this is 90% culture, people from different cultures act differently. As an example in countries such as China, in recent history social mobility was determined by academic perfromance(university admission). Parents from these backgrounds are obviously going to push their kids harder and be more likely to spend more time and money on education. Its not really anyone's fault, just circumstances.
Some other reasons: if you're new to the country you don't yet know its a scam, not wanting to pay for school is cultural, going to certain schools is cultural
This is such a racist assumption. It's just that Asian kids tend to study harder because their parents recognise the importance of Selective. I myself am a Korean in a selective school. It isn't our fault that Australians tend to be more focused on sport than academics. This is just an excuse for Australian kids who weren't smart enough to get in. Some people even say that coaching colleges are cheating, and to people reading this and believing it I say this to you: if you're going to do a game, getting trained by a coach isn't cheating. It's building up your body. In the same way, going to coaching colleges is building up your mind.
Selective schools are meant to be a public education for gifted students who can’t afford to go to a private school. If your parents can afford to send you to coaching, they have enough money to send you to a good school that is well resourced. I don’t care what cultures are dominating selective schools. What I do care about though is that students who are naturally bright but haven’t the opportunity to be trained because they have no money, don’t even get a chance for these schools because other people with money are spending money to get their kids in. It’s a monoculture in selective schools of kids with financial privilege whether you like to admit that or not.
@@afsutton89Asians are not richer than white people, they spend more percentage of their income on education. Also nobody is "naturally smart" you either study for it or you don't and if white parents would rather have their children do a few hours of sport during the weekend instead of a few hours of tutoring then that's their choice
@@afsutton89Your assertion that a naturally gifted student cannot get into a selective school without coaching is just downright wrong and ridiculous. The kids that get into selective schools aren't there simply because they attended coaching. They are there because they worked hard and devoted a lot of time to their studies. The coaching probably helped, or at least didn't hurt, but to assume that it was just coaching that got them there is ridiculous.
@@Alex-bb1xnthat wasn’t my point. Of course they worked hard. But they needed to have money as well in order to get the coaching to work hard and get in. It’s very unlikely (though not impossible as there are always exceptions), for students to get in without coaching. Even if they work just as hard as those with coaching. But the issue is that students whose parents can afford to give them the coaching aren’t the ones that need these extra opportunities as much as they will do well in any school. Their parents can afford to give them additional opportunities. The students who are bright and work hard but don’t have the right coaching are less likely to get in as a result (as it’s highly competitive), and therefore are stuck in the cycle of receiving less opportunities in their lives. That is what is so unfair about this system. Well one of the many issues with it. But think about it- they’re doing just as well- but they’re not mainstream. They’ve hand picked the students. So technically the actual quality of education isn’t as good. Because again there is less funding
The problem is that international students return to their own country and contribute to their economy instead of the host nation. Hence why the Australian science and engineering related sectors are struggling to compete with those of Asian countries, even though we educate their workers. It may not seem important now, but wait 20 years and you’ll see the effects of this.
Mate where is the information to back it up. It simply doesn't make sense cause countries such as Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, China etc, all have an objectively better education system based on multiple different factors compared to the Australian education system. How can you physically say that an education system teaching at a lower level can create smarter individuals and overall be better than one teaching at a higher level.
@@rayozaki4312 These countries excel in regards to primary and secondary education. However, Australian universities are better. Why do you think we get so many international students at the uni level?
@@KING-bt1tm I understand your argument, but once again you have failed to look at the statistics. Australia's top uni (ANU) ranks 27th in the world. You say Australian universities are better however the National University of Singapore (Rank 11), Nanyang Tech (Rank 12), Tsinghua University (Rank 17), University of Hong Kong (Rank 22) and the University of Tokyo (Rank 23) are all currently achieving higher results, thus I ask you what grounds of information did you achieve to show such a subjective mindset towards the argument without looking at the objectivity of factual evidence.
first of all selective entry schools are not for overseas students, they are for local Australian kids and they tend to be dominated by ethnic local Australian kids. So you don't know what you are talking about. Also even these Asian kids who attended selective entry schools in Australia majority will find it tough to compete against academic elites from Asia. That's how hardcore the system they have compare to us here in Australia.
@@Tizonwar8 You are exactly right. It's not overseas students unless they've bought their PR from one of those programs the government promoted (like my next door neighbour!). My daughter just got into one of the top selective and she is second-generation Asian so she's not moving anywhere. And yes she got tutored but she was smart way before that. Asian parents, especially the economically disadvantaged, know that education is the path to lift yourself out of your current socio-demographic class and have a better life, which is why they push their kids so hard.
This video is racist. These are stereotypes. You are saying that Asian kids are smarter and that is racist. And there is more than one side to things. They could suffer from stress or pressure.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
this is 90% culture, people from different cultures act differently. As an example in countries such as China, in recent history social mobility was determined by academic perfromance(university admission). Parents from these backgrounds are obviously going to push their kids harder and be more likely to spend more time and money on education. Its not really anyone's fault, just circumstances.
Some other reasons: if you're new to the country you don't yet know its a scam,
not wanting to pay for school is cultural, going to certain schools is cultural
This is true though, however a lot of asians excluding south asians don’t get racist comments in my experience it’s the Indians now
This is such a racist assumption. It's just that Asian kids tend to study harder because their parents recognise the importance of Selective. I myself am a Korean in a selective school. It isn't our fault that Australians tend to be more focused on sport than academics. This is just an excuse for Australian kids who weren't smart enough to get in. Some people even say that coaching colleges are cheating, and to people reading this and believing it I say this to you: if you're going to do a game, getting trained by a coach isn't cheating. It's building up your body. In the same way, going to coaching colleges is building up your mind.
Selective schools are meant to be a public education for gifted students who can’t afford to go to a private school. If your parents can afford to send you to coaching, they have enough money to send you to a good school that is well resourced.
I don’t care what cultures are dominating selective schools. What I do care about though is that students who are naturally bright but haven’t the opportunity to be trained because they have no money, don’t even get a chance for these schools because other people with money are spending money to get their kids in. It’s a monoculture in selective schools of kids with financial privilege whether you like to admit that or not.
Oh shut up, you can't even take a joke that was made 6 years ago, when people took jokes as jokes.
@@afsutton89Asians are not richer than white people, they spend more percentage of their income on education.
Also nobody is "naturally smart" you either study for it or you don't and if white parents would rather have their children do a few hours of sport during the weekend instead of a few hours of tutoring then that's their choice
@@afsutton89Your assertion that a naturally gifted student cannot get into a selective school without coaching is just downright wrong and ridiculous. The kids that get into selective schools aren't there simply because they attended coaching. They are there because they worked hard and devoted a lot of time to their studies. The coaching probably helped, or at least didn't hurt, but to assume that it was just coaching that got them there is ridiculous.
@@Alex-bb1xnthat wasn’t my point. Of course they worked hard. But they needed to have money as well in order to get the coaching to work hard and get in. It’s very unlikely (though not impossible as there are always exceptions), for students to get in without coaching. Even if they work just as hard as those with coaching. But the issue is that students whose parents can afford to give them the coaching aren’t the ones that need these extra opportunities as much as they will do well in any school. Their parents can afford to give them additional opportunities. The students who are bright and work hard but don’t have the right coaching are less likely to get in as a result (as it’s highly competitive), and therefore are stuck in the cycle of receiving less opportunities in their lives. That is what is so unfair about this system. Well one of the many issues with it.
But think about it- they’re doing just as well- but they’re not mainstream. They’ve hand picked the students. So technically the actual quality of education isn’t as good. Because again there is less funding
as an RSAK, I can confirm this
1:20 "these treacherous orientals" 🤣 🤣 🤣
The problem is that international students return to their own country and contribute to their economy instead of the host nation. Hence why the Australian science and engineering related sectors are struggling to compete with those of Asian countries, even though we educate their workers. It may not seem important now, but wait 20 years and you’ll see the effects of this.
Mate where is the information to back it up. It simply doesn't make sense cause countries such as Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, China etc, all have an objectively better education system based on multiple different factors compared to the Australian education system. How can you physically say that an education system teaching at a lower level can create smarter individuals and overall be better than one teaching at a higher level.
@@rayozaki4312 These countries excel in regards to primary and secondary education. However, Australian universities are better. Why do you think we get so many international students at the uni level?
@@KING-bt1tm I understand your argument, but once again you have failed to look at the statistics. Australia's top uni (ANU) ranks 27th in the world. You say Australian universities are better however the National University of Singapore (Rank 11), Nanyang Tech (Rank 12), Tsinghua University (Rank 17), University of Hong Kong (Rank 22) and the University of Tokyo (Rank 23) are all currently achieving higher results, thus I ask you what grounds of information did you achieve to show such a subjective mindset towards the argument without looking at the objectivity of factual evidence.
first of all selective entry schools are not for overseas students, they are for local Australian kids and they tend to be dominated by ethnic local Australian kids. So you don't know what you are talking about. Also even these Asian kids who attended selective entry schools in Australia majority will find it tough to compete against academic elites from Asia. That's how hardcore the system they have compare to us here in Australia.
@@Tizonwar8 You are exactly right. It's not overseas students unless they've bought their PR from one of those programs the government promoted (like my next door neighbour!). My daughter just got into one of the top selective and she is second-generation Asian so she's not moving anywhere. And yes she got tutored but she was smart way before that. Asian parents, especially the economically disadvantaged, know that education is the path to lift yourself out of your current socio-demographic class and have a better life, which is why they push their kids so hard.
Its me!!!
i have to disagree on the smart bit 😻anyway extremely yas
This video is racist. These are stereotypes. You are saying that Asian kids are smarter and that is racist. And there is more than one side to things. They could suffer from stress or pressure.
Lmao it was satirical
but RSAK exist
Not smarter, just work harder
Learn how to take a joke