Her lectures are excellent. I felt like I am in a class room with her. I am more confident now to go into my exams. I hope that she will continue to do this good work up to help us new students of law.
One thing forgotten with Acceptance was Silence or inaction. If it is stipulated in the contract that one of the methods of acceptance is or can be tacit acquiescence =Understood or implied without being stated, silence or Conduct recognizing the existence of a transaction and intended to permit the transaction to be carried into effect; a tacit agreement; consent inferred from silence.
Kind reminder. Do not skip the ads. It's the least we can do for this AMAZING INTELLIGENT Lady Attorney. Keep up the great work. I am a whole different person now thanks to these lectures
Contracts. So what makes a contractor keep breaching terms of the contract, and still been paid cash sums, when the contract has been breached already, by the contractor's employee. How does one terminate a contract on the original breach, when a contract is breached by an employee of the contractor. Does that means, an individual can oped out, of been in contract with the contract breacher, which happens to be the employer of the breacher of the contract. Hence both, the employee and the employer.
Hi Jennifer, as opposed to the offeror offering to sell an item to the ofgoree, if a person makes an offer to buy an item from another person, do they then become the offeror?
If the offerer reads the terms of the contract and then says, "Confirm this information by saying Yes I Agree," and all the offeree says is "Okay," would that considered an unequivocal acceptance?
hi can someone help me. I have an issue i need help with. say a seller makes a counter offer to deliver goods under their standard terms of conditions but does not send the terms of the contract to the buyer. does the buyers payment for the goods create acceptance of the of the offer even though the buyer has not seen the terms of conditions.
Paying for the goods would be an unequivocal acceptance to a counteroffer if both offeror and offeree are both merchants. Additional terms should not be a material alteration of the terms of the contract.
+spyro2007 ok you are saying 2 things here 1. the seller made a counter offer therefore - no contract exist at this point, 2 if the counter offer is not communicated still no contract exist. What i'm getting from your scenarios is buyer makes the initial offer, seller makes a counter offer but doesn't communicate this to the buyer. However buyer went a step further and made a payment. The thing is for any contract to be legit it must have an offer with a matching acceptance of all the terms. In my opinion a contract doesn't exist - since the terms were not laid out. if you want better advice on this you need to provide key facts showing how every thing started from the initial offer
Her lectures are excellent. I felt like I am in a class room with her. I am more confident now to go into my exams. I hope that she will continue to do this good work up to help us new students of law.
Contract Law is one of the most difficult courses in undergraduate Law. Thanks for your help in making this understandable.
I have a final exam in a couple days on contract law and your lectures are being of great help right now. Thank you!
One thing forgotten with Acceptance was Silence or inaction. If it is stipulated in the contract that one of the methods of acceptance is or can be tacit acquiescence =Understood or implied without being stated, silence or Conduct recognizing the existence of a transaction and intended to permit the transaction to be carried into effect; a tacit agreement; consent inferred from silence.
Kind reminder. Do not skip the ads. It's the least we can do for this AMAZING INTELLIGENT Lady Attorney. Keep up the great work. I am a whole different person now thanks to these lectures
You have boosted my moral. I think I am going to be a great Lawyer thanks to you
Great Job, Attorney, May Gold bless you,
She's an amazing lecturer
A lecture so easy to understand and detailed would love her to take Sales of Goods, Higher purchase and equipment leasing.
you make it easy to understanding for my exam. Thank you very much for your great lecture and detail explaination
Many many thanks for these videos. Really been helpful in crucial time. Thanks again. Want other modules as well.
You are good at every element of Law? youare wonderful.
Contracts.
So what makes a contractor keep breaching terms of the contract, and still been paid cash sums, when the contract has been breached already, by the contractor's employee.
How does one terminate a contract on the original breach, when a contract is breached by an employee of the contractor. Does that means, an individual can oped out, of been in contract with the contract breacher, which happens to be the employer of the breacher of the contract. Hence both, the employee and the employer.
Where are the "part 2" of most of your videos? I think I ve already watched all part 1s but where are the others? I can't seem to find them
+estebiitan5 you need to buy them from their official website
she is the best!!!!!
Very interesting points from the law society perspective thanks for posting....
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you soooo much, this video has really helped me a lot.
Glad it helped!
she knows her stuff... i wish i could get the rest of the videos
Good work.It's just wow!!!
Thanks very much , this is a good lecture
Hi Jennifer, as opposed to the offeror offering to sell an item to the ofgoree, if a person makes an offer to buy an item from another person, do they then become the offeror?
she is so professional thats what i like the most
I am not finding Contract Law - Acceptance Part 2. Does anyone have the link to that?
If the offerer reads the terms of the contract and then says, "Confirm this information by saying Yes I Agree," and all the offeree says is "Okay," would that considered an unequivocal acceptance?
Did anyone find Contract Law - Introduction & Offer Part 2 on her page? I searched and could not find it
It is now uploaded. Including parts 2, 3 and 4
aright madam!!!!!God bless u!!???
Great lectures! Are you a Jamaican?
nice lecture
Thank you
hi can someone help me. I have an issue i need help with. say a seller makes a counter offer to deliver goods under their standard terms of conditions but does not send the terms of the contract to the buyer. does the buyers payment for the goods create acceptance of the of the offer even though the buyer has not seen the terms of conditions.
Paying for the goods would be an unequivocal acceptance to a counteroffer if both offeror and offeree are both merchants. Additional terms should not be a material alteration of the terms of the contract.
+spyro2007 ok you are saying 2 things here 1. the seller made a counter offer therefore - no contract exist at this point, 2 if the counter offer is not communicated still no contract exist. What i'm getting from your scenarios is buyer makes the initial offer, seller makes a counter offer but doesn't communicate this to the buyer. However buyer went a step further and made a payment. The thing is for any contract to be legit it must have an offer with a matching acceptance of all the terms. In my opinion a contract doesn't exist - since the terms were not laid out. if you want better advice on this you need to provide key facts showing how every thing started from the initial offer
+nicnax nax in others other words the terms must be certain
is this Alevel standard video or uni ???
wow