They hope it will just go away as time goes on and most of us will have past on. But we can only hope the younger ones will keep this going even if Martyn Bryant does pass on during the time and the truth is finally told and those involved still surviving face the full extent of the law
It was going to be 30yrs then they changed it. If they had nothing to hide, and MB was so guilty, they would of released them years ago. It doesn't really matter because they will only show, after 70 years, documents they prepared in the mean time that fits there scenario. They will not show the original documents.
I keep on hearing a different story to this was the actual truth and Martin Briant was just a dumb puppet...not sure how believable I never looked into this...
As a reporter, the media is always subjective when psychopaths commit despicable acts like these. It's normally swayed by public opinion. Do we have to be objective to be taken seriously by to some extent justifying the actions of these individuals in the face of grieving relatives? You've really lost me mate.
@@sembatyajoshua6868 You have done what reporters seem to do best; twist my words. My point was clear.. you can present information in a logical, informative manner (which is your job), or tell a story through an emotional-based presentation, manipulating the viewers whilst doing so. It is NOT the medias job to choose how the viewer should feel about a topic.
@@JonnyTGood If this was a news program, I’d agree. But it’s not. It’s a docudrama. Facts mixed with a narrative structure to tell a story. The ‘story’ is complicated. It starts with what happened but that’s not it’s primary objective. It’s primarily about what kind of person did this? Who is Martin Bryant? Why did he do this? What is his story? How has this event shaped the people around the story - his lawyer, his (ex) girlfriend, people he knew growing up, etc. You also have to consider the significance of this event in Australian history. It prompted massive gun legislation. At the centre of all this is Martin Bryant, who is, superficially, the most unlikely looking mass murderer you could imagine. He looked like a surfer. He lived in a tourist town. It was a big shock. And Willessee, who hasn’t been working as a news reporter for some time, was never particularly objective even when he was a tv regular. They’ve brought him in to do this story. And that’s what it is - storytelling.
@@paulbester9516 Exactly. Therefore the viewer isn't responding based upon their own logical and emotional interpretation. This is just one example of the media constantly trying to manipulate opinions on topics instead of doing their REAL job and sharing important information etc.
35 people died is a number, until you see their faces and then that really brings it home. The hurt and devastation he caused is immeasurable. Those poor children, teenagers and adults, may they all rest in peace.
That's why society should stop taking advantage of vulnerable people and take their money because believe you me, they will start to feel hate towards people and no regard for human life. This could have been prevented, similar cases of people getting bullied or taken advantage of ends in similar situations, when someone spends their whole life getting bullied, they don't care anymore and it ends in college shootings or something like this. I feel really sorry for the guy because it could have ended differently if people didn't bully him.
Hopefully they can make the laws more strict without needing anything like this as an excuse. We have to put laws into place first, not after a crime like this.
I recently saw the mother of one of the teenage girl victims, who herself was wounded. She is a wreck of a person suffering PTSD , shaking and anxious . Survivors have a life sentence as well.
For sure people were shot at and that is a horrifying burden to carry through life. My sympathies go out to them. However, it was not Martin Bryant who did the shooting. No matter how many times the lies have been repeated on the television and newspapers, he was just a scapegoat. Too many anomalies, as were exposed by a Perth investigative journalist back in the late 1990's. Unfortunately Joe passed away not too many years later.
@@chantellegattrell7073 because he’s an innocent man who is mentally impaired and has been imprisoned with no trial. This is unlawful but the then PM John Howard passed it to ‘save the families’ the trauma of a trial??? If you read the trial documents, you can see only three people were involved. His lawyer was a sham. The judge went onto be very well positioned. The police interview - on RUclips - shows his frame of mind. The SOLO CAN at the crime scene. The van with picture of the killers leaving the venue. His poor mother isn’t allowed to even see him now. Can you imagine how scared and mentally ill he would be now? Heart bleeds I tell ya BLEEDS for them
@@chantellegattrell7073 it was all orchestrated to change the gun laws. Which they did. Swiftly. Footage of thousands of guns belong destroyed. Now we sit. Unable to defend ourselves. Howard is a sick man, the Lima Agreement. 33rd FREEMASON. Should be tried for National treason or similar.
To avoid the ridiculous amount of adverts on the video, use the slider to fast forward to 5 second away from the end, let it run, and then press replay.
You mean, with an IQ of 66. Yeah, I would say he isn't too bright. Certainly not bright enough to concoct such a plan. John Avery was part of the prosecution initially. Moved to defence to convince him to plead guilty after almost 6 months of maintaining innocence. 6 months of almost complete solitary confinement. That would be absolute torture for most - a lot of people probably wouldn't last 6 months.
The ‘facts’ or otherwise have been sealed for 75 years and cannot be accessed by the public until 2071. Why has this lengthy seal been imposed and who is it to protect ? Does Senate Question on Notice 760 dated 26 March 2018 provide a clue??
His mom went on 60 minutes AUS and said he didnt do it and no one can prove it since there was no trial. Release the docs. Let what is hidden come to light so that the future cant repeat itself.
She only says that now because she sees the conspiracy theories and thinks she can save her son. He told her he did it and she told him to confess to spare families. She doesn’t get to change her story now. Especially after seeing the drawings, killing all those animals and the things he did that lead up to it. It is disturbing that she would want him out in the public. If you listen (which Audio sucks) he claims his weapon and refers to it as his “sweet little gun.”
@@cherylbritt7227 remember the conspiracy theories over the vaccination..how'd that turn out for you..he was 100% not one the shooter's..wait you say there was 2 of them.. FFS stop watching channel 9
@@4bgmtreytrey your IQ is 40. You are literally a bonehead if you believe this guy actually did the shooting! What safe space environment were you raised in. This is a hoax/setup. This is not actual police questioning....please watch real police questioning and compare. Stop eating up the bullshit we are server.
Poor guy got caught steeling $500 000 for his addiction. I've heard Art is harder than heroin to kick the habit, I'm guessing he was paid for the interview, I'm picturing him at his dealers place pleading whilst scratching uncontrollably, please I just need some Art . Just wondering if he can be considered safe to the community with a Art habit that bad,
Indeed. It was an interesting documentary about Martin Bryant, in spite of and not because of Willisee's contributions, and it's a shame he felt the need to inject his own irrelevant opinions. So ironic how he gloats over Bryant's attempts at self-aggrandisement 🤣
@@helmutbargeld728 Willisee simply lead Avery around by the nose and asked nothing of substance and wilfully ignored important elements of the official story and of Avery’s involvement. His commentary and involvement is pitiful as he had displayed on previous occasions and Avery is just an unethical, pathetic person who deserved his years in prison for defrauding his clients.
A forensic psychologist (Ian Joblin) found Bryant to be borderline mentally disabled with an I.Q. of 66, equivalent to an 11-year-old. Looking at the signed confession written in large print and the words and how they were spelt does line up with what you might expect from an 11 year old.
These police failed miserably at recording the interview. I couldn't understand a single word that was said. Pretty much the entire thing was garbage and good for nothing
@@The_Crusty_Old_Hag_Next_Door I put headphones on and turned the volume up and its still garbage. Theyre interviewing a murderer of 35 people and hoping to record admissions of guilt, I would hope for a little better. But cops are fucking dumb.
@@nifflofair6685 why would the state let him keep those? He's spending the rest of his life in prison! I'm sure the state confiscated them and paid his legal fees and kept the rest.
@@simonruszczak5563 Mate i have been around guns all my life in Australia and I still actively hunt with them . Never have used a semi auto for hunting as there is no need . How did the government use a false flag to confiscate my guns ? I hunt with 9 different calibres of rifles and 3 calibres of hand guns . Your post makes no sense to me.
@@fukcg00gle95 In this instance which rights were traded ? purchasing and owning firearms in Australia is an acquired right which are based on safety age and competence similar to driving on the road , flying a plane etc . Owning firearms is not an actual right like you think it is .
@@fukcg00gle95 How many mass shootings in the states so far this year? almost 200, we are not even halfway through 2021, you can keep your rights. Here in Australia owning firearms is a privilege not a right.
Had a school teacher that was in the cafe when he was firing. Her partner was a Vietnam vet who saw a lot of action, they survived because he didn’t freeze up and could think clearly on the best way to get out
@@Hurtasquirter Don’t forget the very mysterious “unidentified Asian man” who supposedly had the firearm pointed at him in the cafe but it did not fire and the shooter walked away and left him unharmed. Strangely he is alleged to have refused to identify himself to the police at the time but even more curious is that the police, without any ID details, were later able to track him down just days before Bryant’s third court appearance in late Nov.1996. For some unknown reason he still remains the “unidentified Asian man". There were other people who feigned death in the cafe and survived.
@@DEJEANWRIGHT - When the vet is armed it’s not a big story. Stuff like that doesn’t help them take away power from the law abiding citizens and make them more dependent upon their government like children.
What people who havent been bullied don't understand is, the victim grows to hate not only the bullies but the people who stood by watched and did nothing to stop it. This spreads to people in general. They didn't care about him ,so he doesn't care about them.And grows to hate them all.And one day he might fight back. Something people standing by watching bullies pick on their victims should remember.
@@notrealatall196Yeah are there any other recorded Australian mass murders based on bullying - because it seems like it is solid proof to all the media watching masses. No question of anything being staged or anything because that's naughty and mean - absolute morons.
He was like this from birth. He was allegedly violent and inappropriate with his peers. He was cruel to his mother. I'm not defending bullying at all but this was not a case of society making him this way. He may have had an undiagnosed disorder or condition but if you dig into Martin Bryant's upbringing and backstory you'll see a mountain of evidence that there was something fundamentally wrong with him. He lacks empathy.
@@jeffoff7795 even more reason not to piss him off by bullying him when guns are readily available, don't you think? Re Martin Bryant - he said he just wanted people to accept him, but noone did except the rich old woman. . He was absolutely incapable of understanding why they didn't , he just knew they didn't. He said his best day ever was when he went overseas and the people he sat next to on the planes talked to him ( because they couldn't move away). The school shooters actually did spare one person who had been nice to one of them.
yep, a complete arsehole who at the behest of the corrupt Howard government convinced Martin Bryant to plead guilty to all charges. NO TRIAL by jury, absolutely unconstitutional.
“At 0821 a male person believed to be the offender emerged from the building appearing to fire indiscriminately from a hand gun and his clothing appeared to be on fire” - Richard McCreadie, Commissioner of Police. “At around 0840 I was advised, without any shots being fired by police, the suspect, Martin Bryant, had left the premises of Seascape. On doing so he had surrendered a firearm and had been taken into custody by an (sic) SOG officer”. - Ian Matterson Coroner. Is this true?? If so, where is that firearm? Why was it not introduced into evidence?
14:03 “Mary was Bryant’s girlfriend…she asked us to hide her identity” *_immediately cuts to HD shots of Mary’s hands complete with distinguishing marks and ultra closeups of her eyes while an unaltered recording of her voice plays in the background_*
RIP to all the victims. The thought of those kids being murdered by the side of the road is the most troubling for me. Subtitles should also have been used for the old police interview. Its audio was difficult to understand.
Agree. Annoying that they can go to the trouble of adding drone footage for the story but not the actually useful step of adding subtitles. Oh wait because that's actually difficult to do 🙄
The lawyer didn't defend him, that's why he is regretful. I haven't seen any solid evidence, just a very intellectual damaged person that could be easily manipulated.
I simply cannot place words together,after watching the horror of this story. My heart, thoughts and prayers go to each and every person affected by this tragedy
@Travis Maguire I know there's a strong body of evidence to say this guy was framed, but, the survivors tell it differently. You have to admit, the interview and film evidence don't lie
@@laonamullings3627 look, no offence. If there were any reasonable doubt over MB's innocence, I'd take action for justice. I still think we need to consider each and every person whose lives have been forever changed by the events at Port Arthur. After watching this clip,I'd say it's also fair to say that Martin is in serious need of an assessment as to his personal state. It's all really sad
The officer that was handling the AR15 in front of him in the interview is dumb as a stick! He pointed the rifle nearly the entire time at the other officer! He had no business handling the rifle!
And yet the volunteer & retired Police that now run the firearms safety course's for gun licensing have a principal rule/law that even when you're absolutely certain that a gun isn't loaded, the business end of a gun should always be pointed in a safe direction....
Most of the world is like that... and I live in Tasmania. My ancestors were some of the convicts that were forced to come here for very petty crimes in comparisom to this one.
I lived in the same street as Bryant during this time. Something doesn’t sit right, he was actually quite kind and generous to the neighbours across the road. Something is very unusual about the circumstances surrounding this whole investigation, my thoughts are with all the victims and families that suffered tremendous loss.
@@user-my8zo8uh3n A mentally impaired man with an IQ of 66 and a mental understanding of an 11 year old imprisoned and pleading not guilty for five months until 30 Sep.1996, interrogated by police without any lawyer or guardian/advocate being present (agreed by his lawyer and recorded in the police and court transcripts), highly probable, almost certain, that he was interviewed by the psychiatrist Paul Mullens on 4 May 1996 without any representation, and without a skerrick of forensic evidence anywhere in the public domain to prove he was the shooter. Yes, he did eventually take the blame, but was his change of plea freely given? That is the question.
@@darenrigby7009 The total absence of any forensic evidence either presented to the court or in the public domain that identifies Bryant as the shooter or corroborates his change of plea to guilty is highly suspect given the ample opportunity to collect such irrefutable proof.
I wish 7 news hardcoded subtitles, so many parts are muffled. I was 15 when this happened. It was a horrible time, I recall the Monday back at school, the whole class was silent, so many of us in tears, sense of emptiness...it really impacted the whole nation. My heart still goes out to the survivors & families, and of course we still remember all those lives Australia lost on that day.
I was 15 also. I didn't want to watch this at first, knowing that sicko probably revels in the thought. But we have to remember the victims and what they went through, I feel so bad for their families.
Not exactly the first time this has been seen. It's just a re release . No due process was used in this case and Avery is nothing but a liar and untrustworthy.
it happened the day after my birthday....my life that day was very happy ...a wife , a child ...etc.... today its nearly 27 years ago.... The man who lost the babies...my heart breaks .. as a dad .... i dont think i could cope that tragedy.
I was meant to be at Port Arthur that day, but changed my trip schedule at the last minute to go at an earlier date. I couldn't believe what I'd heard on my television news channel here in New Zealand when it was broadcast. The families have always been in my thoughts, and always will be. I still plan on eventually going back to Tasmania, and Port Arthur to pay my respects.
I don't believe anything I hear on the tv either as they lie constantly. The facts about Martin's case and the new Zealand case don't match up with the mainstream narrative.
I don’t believe he drew that sketch. How could he write words on the sketch if he can’t read? How could he write a confession if he can’t read and write??
one psychiatrist who evaluated Martin at the age of 16 ( he had dropped out of school by then ) wrote down on his evaluation that Martin was illiterate and couldn't read or write ( now, I know Martin could have been faking it ) . @@beverleyferguson8942
@@beverleyferguson8942 you mean petra ? Where is she now ? Oh yeah.... his CONTROLLER girlfriend... who has ... dissapeared... and cant be found ? Yeah... her.... the ASIO agent
he refused to confess not matter what they tried, cause he was innocent. THEN that mason crimanal satanist who pretended to be his lawyer , made is MUM go along with the threat that he would NEVER ever see her or speak to her again, UNLESS he agreed. THIS WAS A MENTALLY CHALLENGED GUY < this crime is one of the worst miscarriages of justice in human history, and it is so evil that SATAN blew his load when Martin was sent away. I can only HOPE that Martin incarnated in this life with this destiny in mind as a karmic equalizer?
Wait...what? His lawyer, the main man in this vid, was done for embezzlement? I was watching this thinking it was an expose on Bryant when really it's nothing more than a puff piece "Oh sorry for little old me!" desperate attempt by his crooked lawyer trying to find his own redemption? Utterly pathetic.
This crook lawyer was with prosecution , the original lawyer defending him was sacked after months of isolation and not being allowed to see his mother ..not by Martin..then the crook was appointed to him.
Actually, when the evidence is stacked so high against you, as it was in Martins case, it would be very irresponsible as a defence lawyer to encourage you to plead not guilty.
@@frankwoods4179 The evidence was sealed by the Judge, your statememt is not in the slightest factual but you know that don't you, you're like a broken record mate lol.
I couldn't either. I have the volume cranked but I never made out a single word he said...the other voices blasted out my eardrums, so it's not about deafness or hearing aids.
@@annieo9468 the guy is clearly intelligent and articulate and they obviuosly dont want to project that image cos it doesnt fit their story,martin is clearly on the autism spectrum but he was'nt no violent psycopath or sex offender
Or download RUclips vanced, basically RUclips premium for free, I can see the yellow ad marks but my RUclips ignores them and I can play RUclips over other apps
@@opiumtrail7032 wow! You're one of "those" guys. That's sad man..... go make some friends, quick tip! Try not to correct people. Nobody likes a smart arse
He's like those kids that will do anything for attention, even if the attention is negative. Disapproval is how we're supposed to discourage errant behaviour, but he thrives on disapproval so there is just never going to be any getting through to him.
@@ruok3351 I mean I know that would make a lot of people feel better but you think that will make him a better person or just make him hate humanity more?
If they didn't hold a trial because it would be too traumatic for the families then why do they keep bringing it up and having tv shows about it for the families to see and be traumatized by the events that happened? It's time to have that trial and bring out all this evidence that for some weird reason is locked away for years 🤔
@@MrRecklessryan Martin was actually coerced to plead guilty by a corrupt lawyer that served 4 years in prison for fraud and was also swapped from the prosecution team to be Martin's supposed "defence" lawyer but talked him into pleading guilty with threats of never seeing his mum while in prison if he plead not guilty and went to trial...
@@MrRecklessryan But Avery did admit that his role was to get Bryant to plead guilty. At no time is he seen to intervene on Bryant’s behalf. Avery previously tried to get Terry Hill to admit to selling the firearms to Bryant. Seems a bit of a coincidence in his MO. The video tapes only ever show Bryant with his interrogators, never his lawyer or a guardian particularly given his lifelong mental impairment and IQ66. The court had previously ordered Bryant’s financial affairs be managed by the Perpetual Trustee. Hardly a person to be left to his own defence. The full interrogation and transcripts are not available so we have no idea what transpired.
As well as many other inconsistencies with the whole story, there seem to be a few with regards to his literacy skills. In the map of the cafe he supposedly drew, he had reasonably neat handwriting, and also drew all of his number '1's backward, as well as spelt everything correctly. Yet, in his confession, his writing was messy, he spelt 'John' incorrectly, and the number '1' in 1996, was not consistent with how he wrote his number '1's, on the map. To top it off, he signed off with an almost professional looking signature.
The 2 shooters at Pt. Arthur were Warren & Daniel Overbeeke. Their Father, Hans,was also there as an observer & wrote a letter to the editor of the Mercury newspaper. All were from Sth. Aust.
@@EMLEE2323 there was a police man in the cafe that said Martin was not the shooter the government did it to talk our guns away and the same happened in new Zealand
Bryant missed his forte. Draftsman. Those detailed sketches of the shootings are amazing. And his previous girlfriend was wrong about him not being able to read or write. The sketches have perfect writing. Unless someone else knocked the drawings up. To help Martin. Help. Just helping.
It’s interesting that he drew the sketches so accurately when he was in the cafe for such a short period. Some of the victims feigned death so he had no idea who had died. When were the sketches made? Avery said the sketches were given to him, but by whom? If it was the Police where is the video of Bryant doing the sketches? If it was by Bryant’s previous lawyer Gunson , why not say so? If Bryant had provided the sketches to Gunson why would he have then pleaded not guilty to all 72 charges at his September court appearance?
@@frankwoods4179 The sketches are a smoking gun. Pointing to Bryant’s wrongful conviction or at least a miscarriage of justice. Note I didn’t need to say innocence.
I agree completely. The attorney should have just represented his client. His ulterior motives were a stunning confession of unprofessional conduct and he was obviously caught up in the notoriety.
39:20 the lawyer’s “heroic speech of standing up to a villain” is the most blatantly narcissistic, self-congratulating garbage I’ve ever heard. He read it like he was giving an Oscar speech to a cheering crowd. What a self-absorbed, socially oblivious fool this lawyer is.
From what i know about society today, lawyers drs politicians psychologist etc, anything is possible ,i don't trust any of them unless i know them..i now go by my own instincts or intuition..
well i wouldnt trust this lawyer as even before this interview with him , he was done for embezzling over 500k of his clients money... so yeah.. he is literally and factually a CROOK
@@anthonyfereday9991 The 3 eye witnesses claimed the person accused was not the person who carried out the violent acts? Please refer back to my above query with more information as what you provide as an answer would seem inadequate.
@@loop1479 That's not true at all, all witnesses gave descriptions fitting Martin Bryant. One witness Jim Laycock who knew bryant previously said he didn't recognise the shooter as Martin Bryant but he was so far away he couldn't recognise if the shooter was male or female, you can read his testimony yourself. Jim Laycock is the witness conspiracy theorists latch on to however, None of the witnesses or survivors have ever come forward to claim the shooter was anyone other than Martin Bryant.
@@loop1479 That's not true, all witnesses gave descriptions fitting Martin Bryant. One witness Jim Laycock who knew bryant previously said he didn't recognise the shooter as Martin but he was so far away he couldn't recognise if the shooter was male or female, none the less, he gave a description fitting Martin. None of the witnesses or survivors have ever come forward to claim the shooter was anyone other than Martin.
@@anthonyfereday9991Look nonsense. Btw what overwhelming evidence are u talking about? No fingerprints or DNA evidence at the café, some victims claim it wasn't him etc, the police would have gathered as much evidence as possible just to counter those two mentioned things alone.
Not to mention, there were at least 35 folks that chose to be unarmed sheep. Politicians love to grandstand about guns, while making sure to pass laws making people unarmed victims. It's treasonous.
@@jessiefrye3045 Previously belonged to a Victorian copper, after a few possession changes bought by Bryant. Are you suggesting this as evidence of a conspiracy? I mean you'd reckon Taspol has access to their own weapons...
It’s amazing that people can see beyond the limited vision of a 90s era camcorder. Astounding! It’s not like other people may have a greater field of vision that what’s being recorded right?
Why did Bryant’s lawyer at the time agree to the police interviewing Bryant without representation? The interview dated 4 July 1996 was allegedly the first and the police had been investigating the shooting since 1 May, 1996 when Bryant was charged with the murder of Kate Scott. Did the lawyer advise Bryant beforehand that he would not be represented either by a lawyer or guardian? Bryant has asked for a lawyer during the interview and was informed by the police that his lawyer had given them permission to speak with him. This is clearly identified in the police interview transcript, but not shown in the video.
@Sovereign Soul When you look at all the information that is available (not just from us mad conspiracy theorists) the whole case against Bryant and the events that took place on the 28th April 1996 do have a very distinct foul odour. The number of ‘coincidences’ and timing for the shooting to have occurred at that time, on that day alone should raise suspicion. The lack of direct evidence against Bryant, the initial 30 year seal on the evidence and the media's willing role in vigorously condemning Bryant all point towards a conspiracy.
@@frankwoods4179 i didnt tell anyithing about that. What i have told is tahat police have right to lie to suspect during interigation, in almost all countries.
@@absitinvidia3948 Thank you. Martin Bryant had a mental impairment and an IQ of 66 ( among the lowest 2%). The same Supreme Court had ordered some time previously that he was unfit to manage his own financial affairs and this responsibility had been given to the Tasmanian Perpetual Trustee to manage. His impairment meant that he should have had a guardian and/or a lawyer with him at all times. The police and court records clearly indicate that this was not the case and that his lawyer had agreed with the police that Bryant could be interviewed without representation. Bryant was only made aware of this well into his first interview on 4 July 1996. His lawyer told Bryant on a number of occasions that the police had “overwhelming evidence” or “heaps” of evidence. Neither the police or Bryant’s lawyer should have lied to him.
John Avery was sentenced in the same court for misappropriation and stealing from clients of his firm in 2008.[2]. Dodgy that this man was appointed to Bryant after he was pleading innocent for so long.
Even with the gun hes still a nobody tho, Just a name and face to a horrible act from a weak broken feable, a left over sorry of an excuse for a human being!
Why did you need to take your profile picture with your mask on? Did you take it outside in a public place or is it to protect your kids from covid whilst in your home? I'm sure your husband would like to see your smile whilst at home! Unless your a communist that enforces masks on other people through social media......that would make you a communist!
His no lawyer, he's a self confessed and charged Art addict, Did anyone find it strange he has in his personal Art collection of the crayon drawings and a large testimony that looks like it was made to be displayed in a rich man's black market collection
With all due respect to the victims, directly or indirectly involved, one cannot fathom how Martyn Bryant could pull this off in his capacity of a 2 cell brain and how purchasing the highly powerful assault rifles slipped through the cracks does not get a mention, even in 1996 it was never that easy to purchase high power assault guns legally OR illegally.
@@djrbfmbfm-woa too many unanswered questions for the "seeing" eye my good friend. I vividly remember the going price for an assault rifle in the black market was between $5k - $6k where Bryant says he paid 5 large for it, where as legally they would of been around 1500-1800. He was just the fall guy with perfect IQ for a frame up to take away the peoples guns in my opinion.
@@ArjayMartin Maybe Google who she was first. She didn't own the cafe, she worked on the front desk. Her unsubstantiated claims, which she didn't make at the time, are contradicted by numerous other witnesses and the facts. She's a conspiracy nutter seeking attention.
If the police had Bryant’s passport and Volvo registration at 4.26pm why did it take until after 8.00pm to confirm Bryant was the owner? Who made the call at 6.30pm suggesting that the person at Seascape was Bryant?
i was staying at Seascape Guest house with my girlfriend literally days before the lovely couple were murdered by Bryant.This does bring back painful memories. We could have been victims if we had booked in a few days later. Chilling
@@nobody2661 no I was with the lovely couple staying at their guest house while I visited port Arthur. I was with them 3 or 4 days before they were murdered by Bryant.
Witness descriptions of the shooter varied. The only witness who knew Bryant (the late James Laycock) who saw the shooting of Zoe Hall and the kidnapping of Glenn Pears at the service station said he did not recognise that person as Martin Bryant.
@@caveatemptor3400 The only consistent description of the shooter was of a young man with long blonde hair. In addition the identification process was conducted using photos only. This process was contaminated by the publication of Bryant’s colour photo in the press on 30 April, two days after the shooting and before Bryant had been charged with the murder of Kate Scott later that same day and before most, if not all of the witnesses, had been interviewed by police.
@@frankwoods4179 I see. A lot of questions remain unanswered. I read a comment on RUclips about a year ago which listed 17 points of interest in this case. Very disturbing.
@@caveatemptor3400 Yes, it is a very interesting case with many unexplained issues, numerous (too many) coincidences and no forensic evidence identifying the shooter. If you are from Australia particularly then I would suggest you look at the records of the FederaI Parliament - Senate Question on Notice 760 dated, 26 March 2018. It makes thought provoking reading. I agree it is very disturbing. Regards
The most disturbing info out of this whole tragedy, is that prior to this, a former NSW politician was video recorded whilst speaking in parliament 10 years earlier stating, “it would take a massacre in Tasmania for their to be gun reform in Australia”.
_"“it would take a massacre in Tasmania for their to be gun reform in Australia”."_ That does seem like an oddly prophetic statement but it was the result of an argument with someone from Tasmania about firearms.
@@VanDiemen1969 That was Barrie Unsworth, former NSW premier. But what's the suggestion? That Barrie, he's an old school union ALP guy by the way, was somehow in cahoots with conservative PM John Howard in a decade plus conspiracy involving multiple states and the federal government but nobody in on it has ever blabbed? Is that your angle here?
I hadn't heard of this case before. I would have been 10 years old when it happened. What a horrific crime! I can't imagine the horror for those that witnessed it. My heart goes out to all those affected and those that lost loved ones 💗.
absoulutly gut renching. i cried. im sorry this happened and sorry to all the ppl who had to be their and see that and to the families of the fallen and to the shooters family.
They are showing the police interview but all i see is him being led, he seems like he is trying to please the police men by saying what they want him to say. They show him smiling whilst agreeing with the police but that is called ' incongruence' and when someone has autism, which he has, then his facial expressions may not reflect his inner emotions. He may be feeling under pressure or scared but is smiling because autistic people sometimes have facial expressions that don't match inner feelings. They say horrible things like he is ' dim' I challenge that comment. The guy is vulnerable and it looks like a set up to me.
All The Evidence??? Just give me 4 piece's of that evidence, id love to know...oh by the way so the witnesses who were there that day (and survived) saw just one shooter, no one else...i guess them testifying at the trial was all just make believe yes?
alot of things dont add up with the martin bryant case, i did spend some time a few years ago finding out as much as i could about the situation and when you really dive deep into it the more you do the more things start to not add up, some of the videos and interviews i researched back then dont seem to be available anymore or have been removed from internet searches, in this video it says "this is the first time this footage has been seen" but the full and complete interview tapes were already leaked on the internet years ago as well as the police training video that was made with footage from this incident was also leaked online. the story we were told by mainstream media (including this dramatized cherry picked video) doesn't match up with the facts and reports from witnesses, many witnesses were told not to speak up and were told to keep quiet or police will be coming for them ect... we call it being "hushed". the feeling i got after finding out as much as i did was that yes martin bryant was involved in the situation but it looks to me like he was not the only one involved, i think there was a second shooter most likely an expert marksman hired by someone else to cause as much damage as possible and was then extracted from the scene and martin was left to take the blame for it all. this is just my opinion and im not saying any of what i have said is fact as im only going by witness accounts and reports and footage from years ago, all im saying is there is more to the situation than the main stream media lead us on to believe, when this happened at the time alot of information was blocked and covered up and when that is happening then you have to ask why? i believe the why was because the government had a vested interest in this situation to make it as shocking and horrifying to the public as possible to gain public support for changing the gun laws, it was after this horrible situation that the gun laws were in fact changed. the police spent more time covering things up than actually searching for the truth, if this situation happened today in the 2020's and martin had a decent lawyer then martin would not have gone to jail, instead of what happened back in the 90's when his lawyer was only there to convince martin to take the blame for what happened and confess he was basically black mailed into confessing for crimes he said he was innocent for, was he really innocent? maybe or maybe not but we will never know. find out as much as you can and make your own opinions, im just giving you mine.
Wow how ironic, after that very long text you failed to give one little iota peace of proof, ( what proof do u have, I'm interested?) assumption, conspiracy theory or analysis of what makes you think this? For example, do you even know why he chose Port Arthur in the first place, just ask me i can tell you!
@@shanebriggs1039 go search for it yourself unless you want to pay me per hour to do the work for you then you can go and research this yourself, alot of the articles have been removed from the internet that were there 10 years ago when i did my research, alot of witness interviews have been taken down because they dont fit the governments narrative, but there is still some evidence out there of you look hard enough for it, so go look for it yourself and form your own opinion like i did, once you start looing then you will start to see the same trend that i saw and that is alot of people dont want the truth to get out there about this and alot of things are hidden and silenced, that alone should raise suspicion that this whole situation is very very dodgy and corrupt.
So sad. Some people fall thru the cracks in society and never get the help they need or acceptance that most of us take for granted. Until that changes we’ll continue to have tragedies like this.
Was also a combination of ingredients that all came together to make this happen, fact of him killing rabbits desensatised him to violence, and clearly! he is a psychopath as well, so no! i dont blame just society spicifically!
Especially when he was locked up for so long and his mother and so called defence lawyer told him that if he pleaded guilty he would be taken out of solitary confinement and have some more freedom.
68 I think was his actual IQ, still considered mentally disabled. I grew up in Tasmania, knew a guy that went to Risdon prison. He said that Bryant was that drugged up he didn't know what reailty was, on a daily basis.
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Why are the court documents to the case still sealed? 70 years is an awfully long time. The families deserve to hear the full truth.
They hope it will just go away as time goes on and most of us will have past on. But we can only hope the younger ones will keep this going even if Martyn Bryant does pass on during the time and the truth is finally told and those involved still surviving face the full extent of the law
It was going to be 30yrs then they changed it.
If they had nothing to hide, and MB was so guilty, they would of released them years ago.
It doesn't really matter because they will only show, after 70 years, documents they prepared in the mean time that fits there scenario.
They will not show the original documents.
some things aint adding up.... sorry ppl.. I feel for everyone involved... but.... sloppy work in the whole investigation I can see
There was no trial. Why do you think that was if they weren’t trying to cover up the truth. It’s the only logical conclusion you can draw.
I keep on hearing a different story to this was the actual truth and Martin Briant was just a dumb puppet...not sure how believable I never looked into this...
It's really sad how the media pretend to take these stories seriously when they're really just presenting it like a dramatic movie.
As a reporter, the media is always subjective when psychopaths commit despicable acts like these. It's normally swayed by public opinion. Do we have to be objective to be taken seriously by to some extent justifying the actions of these individuals in the face of grieving relatives? You've really lost me mate.
@@sembatyajoshua6868 You have done what reporters seem to do best; twist my words. My point was clear.. you can present information in a logical, informative manner (which is your job), or tell a story through an emotional-based presentation, manipulating the viewers whilst doing so. It is NOT the medias job to choose how the viewer should feel about a topic.
@@JonnyTGood If this was a news program, I’d agree. But it’s not. It’s a docudrama. Facts mixed with a narrative structure to tell a story. The ‘story’ is complicated. It starts with what happened but that’s not it’s primary objective. It’s primarily about what kind of person did this? Who is Martin Bryant? Why did he do this? What is his story? How has this event shaped the people around the story - his lawyer, his (ex) girlfriend, people he knew growing up, etc. You also have to consider the significance of this event in Australian history. It prompted massive gun legislation. At the centre of all this is Martin Bryant, who is, superficially, the most unlikely looking mass murderer you could imagine. He looked like a surfer. He lived in a tourist town. It was a big shock. And Willessee, who hasn’t been working as a news reporter for some time, was never particularly objective even when he was a tv regular. They’ve brought him in to do this story. And that’s what it is - storytelling.
@@JonnyTGood This is what the media always does, they feign whatever emotion is necessary so the audience expresses the wanted response.
@@paulbester9516 Exactly. Therefore the viewer isn't responding based upon their own logical and emotional interpretation. This is just one example of the media constantly trying to manipulate opinions on topics instead of doing their REAL job and sharing important information etc.
35 people died is a number, until you see their faces and then that really brings it home. The hurt and devastation he caused is immeasurable. Those poor children, teenagers and adults, may they all rest in peace.
There is no evidence that he was the shooter, just his alleged confession.
You don't say ❗️🙄
That's why society should stop taking advantage of vulnerable people and take their money because believe you me, they will start to feel hate towards people and no regard for human life.
This could have been prevented, similar cases of people getting bullied or taken advantage of ends in similar situations, when someone spends their whole life getting bullied, they don't care anymore and it ends in college shootings or something like this.
I feel really sorry for the guy because it could have ended differently if people didn't bully him.
You really care for people dont you,these people care for you?
Some people badly injured in a crime (or other), can be disabled and in physical, mental and emotional pain for the rest of their lives.
Please release the interviews in full.
Its on youtube
Makes a nice change to have 50 ads instead of the usual 52.
Just Move the red timer bar to the end...then Press the replay icon..and Booom NO ADVERTS...enjoy Uninterupted My Friend...😉👍🏼
I can't watch this. Too many ads.
@@Sforza_ addblocker pro is your friend
@Sean C "Makes a nice change to have 50 ads instead of the usual 52."
I was like thinking, "What ads?" lol
Lololol
& this is how they got the gun laws passed in parliament
yup. j.
Load of power for governments short man Howard💥💥
and a shitty little village in tassie got rid of their idiot for ever
Convenient.
Hopefully they can make the laws more strict without needing anything like this as an excuse. We have to put laws into place first, not after a crime like this.
I recently saw the mother of one of the teenage girl victims, who herself was wounded.
She is a wreck of a person suffering PTSD , shaking and anxious . Survivors have a life sentence as well.
good point i didnt think of this
Was that the mother of Sarah? The 15 year old? Did she confirm it was him? All these conspiracy comments 🙈
@@Sachaair
Yes ,Carol
She confirmed it
That's an unkind and simplistic way to describe someone you don't know well. I'm sure she is a tough person with more to her life than you know about.
For sure people were shot at and that is a horrifying burden to carry through life. My sympathies go out to them. However, it was not Martin Bryant who did the shooting. No matter how many times the lies have been repeated on the television and newspapers, he was just a scapegoat. Too many anomalies, as were exposed by a Perth investigative journalist back in the late 1990's. Unfortunately Joe passed away not too many years later.
You’re totally correct! This about the unseen interview of Martin and it’s still unseen!
Hes not even under guard supervision in risdon.
Its only the psych nursed there to stop him.
That is sus as.
@@nickk5731yeah - his mum isn’t even allowed to see him now. My heart bleeds for them both. And the victims of OzGovmimt
@@clarabella1199why does your heart bleed for the mother and the son? I just saw this case today. I'm from Canada so I've never heard of it before
@@chantellegattrell7073 because he’s an innocent man who is mentally impaired and has been imprisoned with no trial. This is unlawful but the then PM John Howard passed it to ‘save the families’ the trauma of a trial??? If you read the trial documents, you can see only three people were involved. His lawyer was a sham. The judge went onto be very well positioned. The police interview - on RUclips - shows his frame of mind. The SOLO CAN at the crime scene. The van with picture of the killers leaving the venue. His poor mother isn’t allowed to even see him now. Can you imagine how scared and mentally ill he would be now? Heart bleeds I tell ya BLEEDS for them
@@chantellegattrell7073 it was all orchestrated to change the gun laws. Which they did. Swiftly. Footage of thousands of guns belong destroyed. Now we sit. Unable to defend ourselves. Howard is a sick man, the Lima Agreement. 33rd FREEMASON. Should be tried for National treason or similar.
To avoid the ridiculous amount of adverts on the video, use the slider to fast forward to 5 second away from the end, let it run, and then press replay.
use adblock plus.
I’m on an iPhone it won’t work
Thank you
Thank u
LNK how to do that?
There should be subtitles when bryant is talking. Very hard to understand him.
He an idiot!!
You mean, with an IQ of 66. Yeah, I would say he isn't too bright. Certainly not bright enough to concoct such a plan.
John Avery was part of the prosecution initially. Moved to defence to convince him to plead guilty after almost 6 months of maintaining innocence. 6 months of almost complete solitary confinement. That would be absolute torture for most - a lot of people probably wouldn't last 6 months.
Anything he has to say isn't worth listening to......
@@nicolasrose3064 That might be why his comments are mostly muffled in case there was something he said that might contradict the desired narrative.
@@VaughanMcCue Desired narrative?
The facts of this case are sealed for 30 years. The more you look into it the stranger it gets.
The ‘facts’ or otherwise have been sealed for 75 years and cannot be accessed by the public until 2071. Why has this lengthy seal been imposed and who is it to protect ? Does Senate Question on Notice 760 dated 26 March 2018 provide a clue??
Just like 911
70 years.
There is not a hope in hell that Bryant acted alone. He's a patsy
It's not as straight forward as people think.
He was a great shot No forensics Cartridge cases or proper investigation great work!!!!!!!!!!!!!
His mom went on 60 minutes AUS and said he didnt do it and no one can prove it since there was no trial. Release the docs. Let what is hidden come to light so that the future cant repeat itself.
Yeah, I have just watched her mother
Too late. It was repeated in Christchurch.
She only says that now because she sees the conspiracy theories and thinks she can save her son. He told her he did it and she told him to confess to spare families. She doesn’t get to change her story now. Especially after seeing the drawings, killing all those animals and the things he did that lead up to it. It is disturbing that she would want him out in the public. If you listen (which Audio sucks) he claims his weapon and refers to it as his “sweet little gun.”
@@cherylbritt7227None of these conspiracy theorist have anything, they likely don't hold down a job or have families, we should feel sorry for them.
@@cherylbritt7227 remember the conspiracy theories over the vaccination..how'd that turn out for you..he was 100% not one the shooter's..wait you say there was 2 of them.. FFS stop watching channel 9
Rest In Peace all you beautiful souls
This weirdo had the IQ of a glass of milk. RIP everyone affected!
@@dannygray4898 The real weirdos are the people that believe the official story.
@@4bgmtreytrey your IQ is 40.
You are literally a bonehead if you believe this guy actually did the shooting!
What safe space environment were you raised in.
This is a hoax/setup.
This is not actual police questioning....please watch real police questioning and compare.
Stop eating up the bullshit we are server.
Sighs there is no such thing !
@@simonruszczak5563 just like 911 🙃
I'd like to see the full police interogation please. Not just bits and pieces.
I hope you are still here in 2071 when they unseal the evidence, unless of course they don’t extend the embargo again
Your can here shooting in the far background when Bryant calls 000.. There's no way he did this... It's very shocking
Why? So you can play cops and robbers from a computer screen. You aren’t an investigator shut up
u wanna see the aussie police MORE humiliated as they sk this creeps dk?
Yes, sir, Inspector Sherlock. We all await your forensic judgment and crackpot conspiracy theory.
Lol the guy's defense lawyer is basically just an extra prosecution lawyer.
What a dog of a lawyer.
Poor guy got caught steeling $500 000 for his addiction. I've heard Art is harder than heroin to kick the habit, I'm guessing he was paid for the interview, I'm picturing him at his dealers place pleading whilst scratching uncontrollably, please I just need some Art . Just wondering if he can be considered safe to the community with a Art habit that bad,
There was never a trial. Him and his mother still are bound legally against talking about many things. Does that sound right to you?
@@towhomitMayconcern-v2m 'Art'??
@@towhomitMayconcern-v2myou're a that mate
Awful example of Australian journalism.
A true example of awful Australian journalism.
Indeed. It was an interesting documentary about Martin Bryant, in spite of and not because of Willisee's contributions, and it's a shame he felt the need to inject his own irrelevant opinions. So ironic how he gloats over Bryant's attempts at self-aggrandisement 🤣
@@helmutbargeld728 Willisee simply lead Avery around by the nose and asked nothing of substance and wilfully ignored important elements of the official story and of Avery’s involvement. His commentary and involvement is pitiful as he had displayed on previous occasions and Avery is just an unethical, pathetic person who deserved his years in prison for defrauding his clients.
Most Australian journalism is awful
Majority of journalism around the world is awful @@Christoph1888
The signed confession is a masterwork from a guy that was illiterate.
🏴☠️
Who told you he was illiterate, he was mentally impaired
Didn't you see it in the video from 35: 37? That wasn't illiteracy.
A forensic psychologist (Ian Joblin) found Bryant to be borderline mentally disabled with an I.Q. of 66, equivalent to an 11-year-old. Looking at the signed confession written in large print and the words and how they were spelt does line up with what you might expect from an 11 year old.
unfit to plead anyway
I don’t think I understood a single word that kid said.
☝️
These police failed miserably at recording the interview. I couldn't understand a single word that was said. Pretty much the entire thing was garbage and good for nothing
Lol
@@mv5713 you better go get your hearing checked or turn the volume up
@@The_Crusty_Old_Hag_Next_Door I put headphones on and turned the volume up and its still garbage. Theyre interviewing a murderer of 35 people and hoping to record admissions of guilt, I would hope for a little better.
But cops are fucking dumb.
@@The_Crusty_Old_Hag_Next_Door They have selective hearing, I had it as a child also 🤣
When you see the names it just breaks your heart... especially the kids a 3 year old and a 6 year old... just awful... 😢😢 RIP to all
Alannah & Madeleine 💜 Never, ever forgotten 😔
He didn't even think .."I've got a sister"
Why are people celebrating this piece of shite? He deserves to be handled in the same way that Chikatilo was handled.
He chased down Alannah what a crap human. He's straight from hell.
Yeah and the 6 year old was running away from him he ran her down and shot her 🥺🥺🥺😭
Seeing the victims at the end really got to me so sad hopefully they are resting in peace 🕊️
Yes may these innocent men, women and children rest in peace 🙏🕊💕
Question to lawyer, ''Why are you speaking now?'' Lawyer: ''Because the money by the network 7 was too good to ignore..''
What happened to the guy's fortune and hoses left to him? His lawyer doesn't seem genuine.
@@nifflofair6685 bingo
Avery is nothing but a crook. Of course, he needed the money paid by Channel 7. This case needs to be solved by a jury and a competent lawyer.
@@nifflofair6685 why would the state let him keep those? He's spending the rest of his life in prison! I'm sure the state confiscated them and paid his legal fees and kept the rest.
@@leondxut Yea all the victims should be wheeled into a pointless court case just for your entertainment.
I remember this like it was yesterday , changed our way of life forever as a nation . RIP you innocent souls .
A government false flag to confiscate guns.
@@simonruszczak5563 Mate i have been around guns all my life in Australia and I still actively hunt with them . Never have used a semi auto for hunting as there is no need . How did the government use a false flag to confiscate my guns ? I hunt with 9 different calibres of rifles and 3 calibres of hand guns . Your post makes no sense to me.
Trading rights for safety is a poor choice in the eyes of many.
@@fukcg00gle95 In this instance which rights were traded ? purchasing and owning firearms in Australia is an acquired right which are based on safety age and competence similar to driving on the road , flying a plane etc . Owning firearms is not an actual right like you think it is .
@@fukcg00gle95 How many mass shootings in the states so far this year? almost 200, we are not even halfway through 2021, you can keep your rights. Here in Australia owning firearms is a privilege not a right.
Had a school teacher that was in the cafe when he was firing. Her partner was a Vietnam vet who saw a lot of action, they survived because he didn’t freeze up and could think clearly on the best way to get out
No one except a neck shot survivor got out of the cafe
@@Hurtasquirter Don’t forget the very mysterious “unidentified Asian man” who supposedly had the firearm pointed at him in the cafe but it did not fire and the shooter walked away and left him unharmed. Strangely he is alleged to have refused to identify himself to the police at the time but even more curious is that the police, without any ID details, were later able to track him down just days before Bryant’s third court appearance in late Nov.1996. For some unknown reason he still remains the “unidentified Asian man". There were other people who feigned death in the cafe and survived.
@@DEJEANWRIGHT - When the vet is armed it’s not a big story. Stuff like that doesn’t help them take away power from the law abiding citizens and make them more dependent upon their government like children.
*Her partner was a Vietnam vet who basically did the same only in other people's country.
Fixed it😀
A vietnam vet in Australia? big story...
What people who havent been bullied don't understand is, the victim grows to hate not only the bullies but the people who stood by watched and did nothing to stop it. This spreads to people in general. They didn't care about him ,so he doesn't care about them.And grows to hate them all.And one day he might fight back. Something people standing by watching bullies pick on their victims should remember.
Too weak then and too weak now? I wouldn't say "that" is the only problem, I think it's that people are just to weak minded now a days
He had a congenital brain issue making him a psychopath. This is not related to bullying.
@@notrealatall196Yeah are there any other recorded Australian mass murders based on bullying - because it seems like it is solid proof to all the media watching masses. No question of anything being staged or anything because that's naughty and mean - absolute morons.
He was like this from birth. He was allegedly violent and inappropriate with his peers. He was cruel to his mother. I'm not defending bullying at all but this was not a case of society making him this way. He may have had an undiagnosed disorder or condition but if you dig into Martin Bryant's upbringing and backstory you'll see a mountain of evidence that there was something fundamentally wrong with him. He lacks empathy.
@@jeffoff7795 even more reason not to piss him off by bullying him when guns are readily available, don't you think? Re Martin Bryant - he said he just wanted people to accept him, but noone did except the rich old woman. . He was absolutely incapable of understanding why they didn't , he just knew they didn't. He said his best day ever was when he went overseas and the people he sat next to on the planes talked to him ( because they couldn't move away). The school shooters actually did spare one person who had been nice to one of them.
Even with headphones I couldn't hear a word he said.
Yeah i had to use closed captions kinda annoying but worth it
I concur!!!😒
Even closed captions didnt work for me . Sigh.
Couldn't even use the closed caption either!
Avery served 4 years in prison for fraud, stealing $500,000 from his clients, real trustworthy guy 🤔
What a shocker 😎
Politicians steal more thsn that off you everyday , whoop de doo.
yep, a complete arsehole who at the behest of the corrupt Howard government convinced Martin Bryant to plead guilty to all charges. NO TRIAL by jury, absolutely unconstitutional.
@@shiraz1736 nah only you
@@slxyerxo Very deep reply, I’m still trying to understand it.
“At 0821 a male person believed to be the offender emerged from the building appearing to fire indiscriminately from a hand gun and his clothing appeared to be on fire” - Richard McCreadie, Commissioner of Police.
“At around 0840 I was advised, without any shots being fired by police, the suspect, Martin Bryant, had left the premises of Seascape. On doing so he had surrendered a firearm and had been taken into custody by an (sic) SOG officer”. - Ian Matterson Coroner.
Is this true?? If so, where is that firearm? Why was it not introduced into evidence?
14:03 “Mary was Bryant’s girlfriend…she asked us to hide her identity” *_immediately cuts to HD shots of Mary’s hands complete with distinguishing marks and ultra closeups of her eyes while an unaltered recording of her voice plays in the background_*
her name is elsewhere online too, not sure the point of that lol
They reveal her actual name in this very video, describing Bryants morning.
29:38
Thank u!
Thank you
thank youuuuuu
Thank you
U the king
RIP to all the victims. The thought of those kids being murdered by the side of the road is the most troubling for me.
Subtitles should also have been used for the old police interview. Its audio was difficult to understand.
My mate from here in Byron Oz her grandad was the man at the first car with the children RIP
Agree. Annoying that they can go to the trouble of adding drone footage for the story but not the actually useful step of adding subtitles. Oh wait because that's actually difficult to do 🙄
It was a government psyop wake up
EXACTLY. Completely Non-understandable.
Agreed. I had to replay everything he said.
Audio is complete trash. Can’t hear anything he says.
I can hear it quite clearly
The lawyer didn't defend him, that's why he is regretful. I haven't seen any solid evidence, just a very intellectual damaged person that could be easily manipulated.
Isn’t it striking that he “started with the Martins” who said they’d never sell their land?
100% well said
What would be the motive to frame him tho?
@@boydj777 Police are under pressure to catch the criminals and can have tunnel vision. He may have done it but this video didn't convince me.
@@SarahVanderputyeah, i got an open mind, if he did do it, this vid makes it look questionable, its either deliberate, or theres something not right.
I simply cannot place words together,after watching the horror of this story. My heart, thoughts and prayers go to each and every person affected by this tragedy
This is all bullshit he didn't do it
@Travis Maguire I know there's a strong body of evidence to say this guy was framed, but, the survivors tell it differently. You have to admit, the interview and film evidence don't lie
The survivor's were paid gag order's - you idiot's.
@@laonamullings3627 look, no offence. If there were any reasonable doubt over MB's innocence, I'd take action for justice. I still think we need to consider each and every person whose lives have been forever changed by the events at Port Arthur. After watching this clip,I'd say it's also fair to say that Martin is in serious need of an assessment as to his personal state. It's all really sad
@@laonamullings3627 You have evidence for that claim? Or just more conspiracist nonsense?
The officer that was handling the AR15 in front of him in the interview is dumb as a stick! He pointed the rifle nearly the entire time at the other officer! He had no business handling the rifle!
And yet the volunteer & retired Police that now run the firearms safety course's for gun licensing have a principal rule/law that even when you're absolutely certain that a gun isn't loaded, the business end of a gun should always be pointed in a safe direction....
Maybe he thought it was a stick.
@Fergus King I do not thnk the poor guy is that manipulative. IQ wise, you are probably correct.
Most law enforcement shouldn't ever handle a gun. Lol For officer safety 🤣
Yeah @ 28:24. basic weapons training. What a numbnut. And he still has a job!
Tasmania is a strange mix of intense beauty and intense sadness.
Yes , long ago white man clleared out every single native aboriginal
@@chateaupig826 wasn’t that long ago.
Most of the world is like that... and I live in Tasmania. My ancestors were some of the convicts that were forced to come here for very petty crimes in comparisom to this one.
I lived in the same street as Bryant during this time. Something doesn’t sit right, he was actually quite kind and generous to the neighbours across the road. Something is very unusual about the circumstances surrounding this whole investigation, my thoughts are with all the victims and families that suffered tremendous loss.
Believe your gut feeling he didnt do it but he did take the blame
@@user-my8zo8uh3n A mentally impaired man with an IQ of 66 and a mental understanding of an 11 year old imprisoned and pleading not guilty for five months until 30 Sep.1996, interrogated by police without any lawyer or guardian/advocate being present (agreed by his lawyer and recorded in the police and court transcripts), highly probable, almost certain, that he was interviewed by the psychiatrist Paul Mullens on 4 May 1996 without any representation, and without a skerrick of forensic evidence anywhere in the public domain to prove he was the shooter. Yes, he did eventually take the blame, but was his change of plea freely given? That is the question.
@@user-my8zo8uh3n I believe that they drugged him to say he did it they were all to perfect shots
There is evidence he was innocent apparently
@@darenrigby7009 The total absence of any forensic evidence either presented to the court or in the public domain that identifies Bryant as the shooter or corroborates his change of plea to guilty is highly suspect given the ample opportunity to collect such irrefutable proof.
that lawyer has no morals, is a criminal and STILL doing everything to make money of this tragedy.
Yep they are part of the lodge
Grifting slime
I wish 7 news hardcoded subtitles, so many parts are muffled.
I was 15 when this happened. It was a horrible time, I recall the Monday back at school, the whole class was silent, so many of us in tears, sense of emptiness...it really impacted the whole nation. My heart still goes out to the survivors & families, and of course we still remember all those lives Australia lost on that day.
I was 15 also. I didn't want to watch this at first, knowing that sicko probably revels in the thought. But we have to remember the victims and what they went through, I feel so bad for their families.
Late post, but there are closed captions if you're having trouble hearing.
@@mysteriouscapitalist4033 yeah but are very inconsistent during his mumbling interviews.
Oh please, you weren’t even a victim of it.
@@lukasribin4168 i mean i wasn't in japan in 1945 but i still feel kinda bad that it got bombed twice
Not exactly the first time this has been seen. It's just a re release . No due process was used in this case and Avery is nothing but a liar and untrustworthy.
Avery is a criminal ..
Still lying to this day they have to answer for this deception mice willisee as well
@@stephenwillis9988 Mike was a hopeless alcoholic ! 😀😀
Seen all this footage years ago.
Programs like this should be banned!
I no, I DID NOT watch this gutter feeding ‘journalism’.
Disgrace upon them all.
it happened the day after my birthday....my life that day was very happy ...a wife , a child ...etc.... today its nearly 27 years ago.... The man who lost the babies...my heart breaks .. as a dad .... i dont think i could cope that tragedy.
I was meant to be at Port Arthur that day, but changed my trip schedule at the last minute to go at an earlier date. I couldn't believe what I'd heard on my television news channel here in New Zealand when it was broadcast. The families have always been in my thoughts, and always will be. I still plan on eventually going back to Tasmania, and Port Arthur to pay my respects.
what a lot of crap you've just posted tosser
@@hardtokeYou must have the wrong person. Please direct your comment to the right one.
I don't believe anything I hear on the tv either as they lie constantly. The facts about Martin's case and the new Zealand case don't match up with the mainstream narrative.
@@FelineQueen01 Stop making stuff up
@@Adam-im3uz huh
I don’t believe he drew that sketch. How could he write words on the sketch if he can’t read? How could he write a confession if he can’t read and write??
His girlfriend said she “thought “ he couldn’t read.
She clearly says she thought he was pretending, so as to "impress her," as they were in a restaurant. @@beverleyferguson8942
one psychiatrist who evaluated Martin at the age of 16 ( he had dropped out of school by then ) wrote down on his evaluation that Martin was illiterate and couldn't read or write ( now, I know Martin could have been faking it ) . @@beverleyferguson8942
@@beverleyferguson8942 you mean petra ?
Where is she now ?
Oh yeah.... his CONTROLLER girlfriend... who has ... dissapeared...
and cant be found ?
Yeah... her.... the ASIO agent
he refused to confess not matter what they tried, cause he was innocent. THEN that mason crimanal satanist who pretended to be his lawyer , made is MUM go along with the threat that he would NEVER ever see her or speak to her again, UNLESS he agreed. THIS WAS A MENTALLY CHALLENGED GUY < this crime is one of the worst miscarriages of justice in human history, and it is so evil that SATAN blew his load when Martin was sent away.
I can only HOPE that Martin incarnated in this life with this destiny in mind as a karmic equalizer?
Wait...what? His lawyer, the main man in this vid, was done for embezzlement? I was watching this thinking it was an expose on Bryant when really it's nothing more than a puff piece "Oh sorry for little old me!" desperate attempt by his crooked lawyer trying to find his own redemption? Utterly pathetic.
This crook lawyer was with prosecution , the original lawyer defending him was sacked after months of isolation and not being allowed to see his mother ..not by Martin..then the crook was appointed to him.
Wow his lawyer was a good prosecutor. Too bad he forgot to defend his client.
Actually, when the evidence is stacked so high against you, as it was in Martins case, it would be very irresponsible as a defence lawyer to encourage you to plead not guilty.
@Ezyrider64 The evidence was sealed by the judge, that's why so many conspiracists are attracted to this case.
@@MrRecklessryan You have nailed it!
@@MrRecklessryan There is no evidence.
@@frankwoods4179 The evidence was sealed by the Judge, your statememt is not in the slightest factual but you know that don't you, you're like a broken record mate lol.
It's chilling how he's laughing and giggling his way through that interview.
Without the full video in context we cannot be sure why.
It's not what you think. This was a deliberate ploy to disarm Australia
@@leeryan1969 This does appear to be the most likely reason supported by the weight of information and evidence available.
@@leeryan1969 conspiracy theory much?
@@rickb2432 not a rebuttal
what a load of BS. no way that kid got 17 head shots of the hip. best of the SAS cannot do that.
It was a mossad marksman
He acted alone.
Depends how far away
He had being killing animals and hunting his whole life
@@megowopwop8545 Head shots from the hip???? i guess you don't know anything about hunting or rifles..
The girlfriend asks not to be identified. 10% blur should do the trick! 🤣🤣
I thought the same thing and I don’t see very well 😂😂
I'm thinking the blurred eyes were just an actor, only the voice was hers. be more sensible to disguise the voice.
Sincere condolences to the family friends and colleagues of all those who lost thier lives. Rest in peace to all those who lost thier lives. 🙏
Hello hello. It's "their" not the way you've spelt it thier.
@@barbaradyson6951 i sincerely appolagise for making a spelling mistake. 🙄
Barbara had to edit.😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@@BRETTYZCAR lol😂. I didnt notice that. Thanks mate. 😂👍
@@barbaradyson6951 wow. I bet you've never made a spelling mistake
Did y’all even put a mic on this kid?? Can’t hear a word he’s saying!
as if they are going to let him speak LOL
Turn you’re phucking hearing aid up!
Are you deaf?
I couldn't either. I have the volume cranked but I never made out a single word he said...the other voices blasted out my eardrums, so it's not about deafness or hearing aids.
@@annieo9468 the guy is clearly intelligent and articulate and they obviuosly dont want to project that image cos it doesnt fit their story,martin is clearly on the autism spectrum but he was'nt no violent psycopath or sex offender
My mum had a saying that perfectly describes the character of Byant's lawer John Avery,she would say "he's crooked as a dogs hind leg" 🤣
You know what this video needs more of? Ads. It’s ads.
I agree.
Any RUclips video with lots of adds.... just skip to that last few seconds then refresh the vid and all the adds magically disappear !
Or download RUclips vanced, basically RUclips premium for free, I can see the yellow ad marks but my RUclips ignores them and I can play RUclips over other apps
@@benkirby6911 ,ads*
@@opiumtrail7032 wow! You're one of "those" guys. That's sad man..... go make some friends, quick tip! Try not to correct people. Nobody likes a smart arse
He's like those kids that will do anything for attention, even if the attention is negative. Disapproval is how we're supposed to discourage errant behaviour, but he thrives on disapproval so there is just never going to be any getting through to him.
Medieval punishment. Cut his fingers off one by one.
@@ruok3351
I mean I know that would make a lot of people feel better but you think that will make him a better person or just make him hate humanity more?
When fighting monsters, take care, lest ye become a monster
No, he is not like them, he is a killer
He's was mentally insane and depressed.
If they didn't hold a trial because it would be too traumatic for the families then why do they keep bringing it up and having tv shows about it for the families to see and be traumatized by the events that happened?
It's time to have that trial and bring out all this evidence that for some weird reason is locked away for years 🤔
David, because the trauma angle is their only line of defence.
They didn't have a trial because in Tasmania when you plead guilty there is no trial, Martin pled guilty.
@@MrRecklessryan Martin was actually coerced to plead guilty by a corrupt lawyer that served 4 years in prison for fraud and was also swapped from the prosecution team to be Martin's supposed "defence" lawyer but talked him into pleading guilty with threats of never seeing his mum while in prison if he plead not guilty and went to trial...
@@32davkav Everything you just said except for the 4 year conviction is pure speculation. There is no evidence for your claims.
@@MrRecklessryan But Avery did admit that his role was to get Bryant to plead guilty. At no time is he seen to intervene on Bryant’s behalf. Avery previously tried to get Terry Hill to admit to selling the firearms to Bryant. Seems a bit of a coincidence in his MO. The video tapes only ever show Bryant with his interrogators, never his lawyer or a guardian particularly given his lifelong mental impairment and IQ66. The court had previously ordered Bryant’s financial affairs be managed by the Perpetual Trustee. Hardly a person to be left to his own defence. The full interrogation and transcripts are not available so we have no idea what transpired.
As well as many other inconsistencies with the whole story, there seem to be a few with regards to his literacy skills. In the map of the cafe he supposedly drew, he had reasonably neat handwriting, and also drew all of his number '1's backward, as well as spelt everything correctly. Yet, in his confession, his writing was messy, he spelt 'John' incorrectly, and the number '1' in 1996, was not consistent with how he wrote his number '1's, on the map. To top it off, he signed off with an almost professional looking signature.
He was a patsy. He thought he was part of an 'op', he was handled. Read "The Empty Chair", by Oscar Zimmerman.
The 2 shooters at Pt. Arthur were Warren & Daniel Overbeeke.
Their Father, Hans,was also there as an observer & wrote a letter to the editor of the Mercury newspaper.
All were from Sth. Aust.
@Sssthpok they needed a reason to disarm us, I believe they wouldn't have got away with the way they treated us during cov if we were armed
exactly
@@morercthanclassy1543
i believe this case should be opened again and should be scrutinized big time.
for sure
Why?
Gee it's now 2022,the world is now more crazy.
I agree though.
The truth should be told.
More adverts please. Every 2 minutes wasnt quite enough for my fix!
Ad block is your friend. Get it and stop whinging.
@@okidoke4822 Why would I want an ad block? I stated that ads help me get my fix
Exactly! Even when ol' Christopher Skase owned Channel 7, commercialism wasn't this bad.
Don’t be such a tightarse pay for premium membership!
You should change your name to bucket bong! 🤣🤣🤣
The lawyer was basking in it all then and does the same in this video. It’s completely embarrassing.
Initially there was a retired police man that got shot in the leg in the cafe and he said that was not my shooter it was not Bryant
WOW 😮
@@EMLEE2323 there was a police man in the cafe that said Martin was not the shooter the government did it to talk our guns away and the same happened in new Zealand
Active police officer, from VIC I believe, possibly NSW, who was on holiday.
But he's obviously not reliable or trustworthy lol
@@mariogallo6891 VICTIMS were all sacrificed for the sake of THE NEW WORLD ORDER!!!!!!!!!!!
He os on video walking around shooting And hundreds of people positively ID'd him it was him end of story
Bryant missed his forte. Draftsman. Those detailed sketches of the shootings are amazing. And his previous girlfriend was wrong about him not being able to read or write. The sketches have perfect writing. Unless someone else knocked the drawings up. To help Martin. Help. Just helping.
It’s interesting that he drew the sketches so accurately when he was in the cafe for such a short period. Some of the victims feigned death so he had no idea who had died. When were the sketches made? Avery said the sketches were given to him, but by whom? If it was the Police where is the video of Bryant doing the sketches? If it was by Bryant’s previous lawyer Gunson , why not say so? If Bryant had provided the sketches to Gunson why would he have then pleaded not guilty to all 72 charges at his September court appearance?
@@frankwoods4179 The sketches are a smoking gun. Pointing to Bryant’s wrongful conviction or at least a miscarriage of justice. Note I didn’t need to say innocence.
@@edithflood631 I agree.
His lawyer probably drew the sketches. And he enticed Bryant to plead guilty with a can of Pepsi.
Really! A criminal lawyer distressed by standing next to a Murderer? This happens every day. That is the Job of the Lawyer!!!
A mass murderer, drastic difference
I agree completely. The attorney should have just represented his client. His ulterior motives were a stunning confession of unprofessional conduct and he was obviously caught up in the notoriety.
He did what he was paid to do.
Not the same in any way.
He seems to be incompetent....and stargazed by the incident
39:20 the lawyer’s “heroic speech of standing up to a villain” is the most blatantly narcissistic, self-congratulating garbage I’ve ever heard. He read it like he was giving an Oscar speech to a cheering crowd. What a self-absorbed, socially oblivious fool this lawyer is.
From what i know about society today, lawyers drs politicians psychologist etc, anything is possible ,i don't trust any of them unless i know them..i now go by my own instincts or intuition..
Well, he is a lawyer. Their pretty much shitty people
well i wouldnt trust this lawyer as even before this interview with him , he was done for embezzling over 500k of his clients money...
so yeah.. he is literally and factually a CROOK
Why were three eye witnesses excluded from the investigation? Why was the investigation halted halfway through?
Investigation by the police often is halted when overwhelming evidence as to innocence or guilt is found.
@@anthonyfereday9991 The 3 eye witnesses claimed the person accused was not the person who carried out the violent acts? Please refer back to my above query with more information as what you provide as an answer would seem inadequate.
@@loop1479 That's not true at all, all witnesses gave descriptions fitting Martin Bryant.
One witness Jim Laycock who knew bryant previously said he didn't recognise the shooter as Martin Bryant but he was so far away he couldn't recognise if the shooter was male or female, you can read his testimony yourself. Jim Laycock is the witness conspiracy theorists latch on to however, None of the witnesses or survivors have ever come forward to claim the shooter was anyone other than Martin Bryant.
@@loop1479 That's not true, all witnesses gave descriptions fitting Martin Bryant.
One witness Jim Laycock who knew bryant previously said he didn't recognise the shooter as Martin but he was so far away he couldn't recognise if the shooter was male or female, none the less, he gave a description fitting Martin. None of the witnesses or survivors have ever come forward to claim the shooter was anyone other than Martin.
@@anthonyfereday9991Look nonsense. Btw what overwhelming evidence are u talking about? No fingerprints or DNA evidence at the café, some victims claim it wasn't him etc, the police would have gathered as much evidence as possible just to counter those two mentioned things alone.
Crazy the little hit piece they did on AR-15s instead of the people who sold one to a literal man-child.
Not to mention, there were at least 35 folks that chose to be unarmed sheep. Politicians love to grandstand about guns, while making sure to pass laws making people unarmed victims. It's treasonous.
Tell me you're an American without telling me you're American!
This dude was apparently at 2 places at the same time? Wow
Wait what do u mean
@@catfish5272 do ur research its open source data
There Was people shot at port Arthur site and seascape at the same time.
So there are 2 Martin Bryant’s then? @@sonsen25
thats weird
Left handed and never shot from the hip
Where did you see never shot from the hip?
Is there a better video on this story?
What was the reason you mentioned left handed?
people can be ambidextrous….
@@heynow01it's in the first few minutes.
And the gun belonged to VICTORIA POLICE!
@@jessiefrye3045 Previously belonged to a Victorian copper, after a few possession changes bought by Bryant. Are you suggesting this as evidence of a conspiracy? I mean you'd reckon Taspol has access to their own weapons...
Imagine that; a lawyer being a crook, what a world we live in. No wonder psychopaths "think" they can get away with anything.
follow the money!
Psychopaths do get away with too much
So someone was filming saying "There he is, there" (but he's not visible in the footage)... GTFO
Lil BrainZ see how the art has been perfected by the way today's "patsy" stories fool off the production line?!!
It’s amazing that people can see beyond the limited vision of a 90s era camcorder. Astounding! It’s not like other people may have a greater field of vision that what’s being recorded right?
I woke up to the media's lies on 911. When they said a plane crashed into the Pentagon but there was no plane wreckage!
The media always lies.
@@peterburton3095 ,the gentleman who called his wife on that plane would disagree with your comment.he was from Danville California.
@@peterburton3095 what about witnesses who lived and identified him?
Why did Bryant’s lawyer at the time agree to the police interviewing Bryant without representation? The interview dated 4 July 1996 was allegedly the first and the police had been investigating the shooting since 1 May, 1996 when Bryant was charged with the murder of Kate Scott. Did the lawyer advise Bryant beforehand that he would not be represented either by a lawyer or guardian? Bryant has asked for a lawyer during the interview and was informed by the police that his lawyer had given them permission to speak with him. This is clearly identified in the police interview transcript, but not shown in the video.
@Sovereign Soul When you look at all the information that is available (not just from us mad conspiracy theorists) the whole case against Bryant and the events that took place on the 28th April 1996 do have a very distinct foul odour. The number of ‘coincidences’ and timing for the shooting to have occurred at that time, on that day alone should raise suspicion. The lack of direct evidence against Bryant, the initial 30 year seal on the evidence and the media's willing role in vigorously condemning Bryant all point towards a conspiracy.
Police is alowed to lie in interigation...
@@absitinvidia3948 Any objective reading of the official documentation highly suggests that many people are not telling the truth.
@@frankwoods4179 i didnt tell anyithing about that. What i have told is tahat police have right to lie to suspect during interigation, in almost all countries.
@@absitinvidia3948 Thank you. Martin Bryant had a mental impairment and an IQ of 66 ( among the lowest 2%). The same Supreme Court had ordered some time previously that he was unfit to manage his own financial affairs and this responsibility had been given to the Tasmanian Perpetual Trustee to manage. His impairment meant that he should have had a guardian and/or a lawyer with him at all times. The police and court records clearly indicate that this was not the case and that his lawyer had agreed with the police that Bryant could be interviewed without representation. Bryant was only made aware of this well into his first interview on 4 July 1996. His lawyer told Bryant on a number of occasions that the police had “overwhelming evidence” or “heaps” of evidence. Neither the police or Bryant’s lawyer should have lied to him.
Thoughts are with the families and survivors
Why are people celebrating this piece of shite? He deserves to be handled in the same way that Chikatilo was handled.
That dude is freaking nuts. His lawyer straight tried to railroad him with a guilty plea. Hes obviously mentally ill. Obviously
John Avery was sentenced in the same court for misappropriation and stealing from clients of his firm in 2008.[2]. Dodgy that this man was appointed to Bryant after he was pleading innocent for so long.
He was illiterate, couldn't read or write....how was he supposed to conjure up a map with clear directives?
Looks like he used some colouring in pencils too me.
That's like telling someone "you can't do that" then they say "watch me". Being illiterate doesn't mean you're unable to fully communicate
This is the dumbest question
@@marilynschmidt6400 yeah but it does restrict your ability to SPELL damn. 🤦
@@ssseeeaaa and you won the DUMBEST comment. Congrats. 👍
R. I. P to the victims 🙏🏾♥️ never no about this story
*knew
@Last Call English might not be his first language, give it a rest.
@@seniorsabali8759 English might not be his first language, give it a rest.
@@leesaunders1930 yeah, man. You never no
@Island Mike dingle 😄 that all you got big Mike?
Where was the trial for the biggest mass murder in Australian history, besides the trial by media that is, its always seemed off.
only time in the history of a court system where someone didn't have a trial...
@@rusco6666untrue.Look it up
He had very low IQ…unfit to stand trial.
Behind closed doors doesn't sell, behind closed doors errors dont leak
Behind closed doors the guilty can't speak!!
Behind Closed doors is where Sinners Sleep!!
@@rusco6666 You are surely kidding. People plead guilty all the time without a trial.
(14:07 and on) Ummmm that’s definitely how you DON’T hide someone’s identity.....🤦♂️
"Without the gun he's a nobody". Accurate description of every mass shooter ever
Even with the gun hes still a nobody tho, Just a name and face to a horrible act from a weak broken feable, a left over sorry of an excuse for a human being!
@@patrickdebellefeuille4196 But is he guilty?
@@frankwoods4179 I cannot honestly say for sure, but if i had to pick one i would say most definately yes!
@@patrickdebellefeuille4196 What makes you so positive?
@@frankwoods4179 The obvious evidence and eye witnesses. He owned those guns ect...
I have zero respect for the lawyer.
Why did you need to take your profile picture with your mask on?
Did you take it outside in a public place or is it to protect your kids from covid whilst in your home?
I'm sure your husband would like to see your smile whilst at home!
Unless your a communist that enforces masks on other people through social media......that would make you a communist!
His no lawyer, he's a self confessed and charged Art addict, Did anyone find it strange he has in his personal Art collection of the crayon drawings and a large testimony that looks like it was made to be displayed in a rich man's black market collection
the "girlfriend" was a total joke LOL,what a reliable source
no clear pic of her. j.
@@djrbfmbfm-woa and now apparently claiming there were 2 girlfrinds and the one interviewed wasnt the one he was with in 1996 when it allhappened
@@andrewsmart2949 the entire thing is fabricated.
@@djrbfmbfm-woa yep
@@djrbfmbfm-woa and the earth is flat.
With all due respect to the victims, directly or indirectly involved, one cannot fathom how Martyn Bryant could pull this off in his capacity of a 2 cell brain and how purchasing the highly powerful assault rifles slipped through the cracks does not get a mention, even in 1996 it was never that easy to purchase high power assault guns legally OR illegally.
thank you. u r correct. j
@@djrbfmbfm-woa too many unanswered questions for the "seeing" eye my good friend. I vividly remember the going price for an assault rifle in the black market was between $5k - $6k where Bryant says he paid 5 large for it, where as legally they would of been around 1500-1800. He was just the fall guy with perfect IQ for a frame up to take away the peoples guns in my opinion.
@@beklerken1 exactly.
He had an air rifle is dad gave him I'm childhood. He's practice shooting animals that were pets. He had plenty of practice shooting a gun.
and they want it to remain unanswered. @@beklerken1
bottom 2% IQ but wrote a confession?
He also mispelled a couple of words
He didn't write a confession he signed his own statement he didn't write anything but His own name
Google what Wendy Scurr and the owner of the cafe who knew Martin Bryant personally had to say...
@@ArjayMartin Maybe Google who she was first. She didn't own the cafe, she worked on the front desk. Her unsubstantiated claims, which she didn't make at the time, are contradicted by numerous other witnesses and the facts. She's a conspiracy nutter seeking attention.
If the police had Bryant’s passport and Volvo registration at 4.26pm why did it take until after 8.00pm to confirm Bryant was the owner? Who made the call at 6.30pm suggesting that the person at Seascape was Bryant?
@@frankwoods4179 Who says this? What do you mean by "confirm"? And what are you suggesting?
i was staying at Seascape Guest house with my girlfriend literally days before the lovely couple were murdered by Bryant.This does bring back painful memories. We could have been victims if we had booked in a few days later. Chilling
if my grandparents had moved to australia at young age, this could have been me too. crazy to think about smd
By Bryant ? did you witness this ?
@@nobody2661 no I was with the lovely couple staying at their guest house while I visited port Arthur. I was with them 3 or 4 days before they were murdered by Bryant.
@@scott2724 Did you see it happen ?
@@nobody2661 No. I had just left and arrived back in Sydney, turned on the news and was confronted with what had happened. Could not believe it
Meanwhile this happens so often in America that it doesn't even make the news anymore.
They tried but nobody hands guns over like we did.
But eye witnesses in the cafe said the shooter did not resemble Bryant at all.
Witness descriptions of the shooter varied. The only witness who knew Bryant (the late James Laycock) who saw the shooting of Zoe Hall and the kidnapping of Glenn Pears at the service station said he did not recognise that person as Martin Bryant.
@@frankwoods4179 thank you for that Frank.
@@caveatemptor3400 The only consistent description of the shooter was of a young man with long blonde hair. In addition the identification process was conducted using photos only. This process was contaminated by the publication of Bryant’s colour photo in the press on 30 April, two days after the shooting and before Bryant had been charged with the murder of Kate Scott later that same day and before most, if not all of the witnesses, had been interviewed by police.
@@frankwoods4179 I see. A lot of questions remain unanswered. I read a comment on RUclips about a year ago which listed 17 points of interest in this case. Very disturbing.
@@caveatemptor3400 Yes, it is a very interesting case with many unexplained issues, numerous (too many) coincidences and no forensic evidence identifying the shooter. If you are from Australia particularly then I would suggest you look at the records of the FederaI Parliament - Senate Question on Notice 760 dated, 26 March 2018. It makes thought provoking reading. I agree it is very disturbing. Regards
I was 18 when this happened here. I'm in Melbourne but it definitely shocked and upset the whole country.
Did you meet the killer?
I was 7 my mum and the schools never told us about it. I'm in Sydney
I was 23 when this happened and was working at the hospital. Traumatic memories.
I’m in Scotland and remember this. It shocked and upset us over here too.
Naive
So his lawyer said he has no mental problems who is his lawyer a doctor
An airport worker snap the photo of 4 men exiting a very large helicopter one so large and so unusual to be at that airport people wake up
??
Lay off the drugs Bill. You’re talking bollocks.
Big story no evidence with a lot of questions to answer wake up people
The most disturbing info out of this whole tragedy, is that prior to this, a former NSW politician was video recorded whilst speaking in parliament 10 years earlier stating, “it would take a massacre in Tasmania for their to be gun reform in Australia”.
There are many disturbing issues with this event.
_"“it would take a massacre in Tasmania for their to be gun reform in Australia”."_
That does seem like an oddly prophetic statement but it was the result of an argument with someone from Tasmania about firearms.
Please provide the Hansard reference.
@@VanDiemen1969 That was Barrie Unsworth, former NSW premier. But what's the suggestion? That Barrie, he's an old school union ALP guy by the way, was somehow in cahoots with conservative PM John Howard in a decade plus conspiracy involving multiple states and the federal government but nobody in on it has ever blabbed? Is that your angle here?
I hadn't heard of this case before. I would have been 10 years old when it happened. What a horrific crime! I can't imagine the horror for those that witnessed it. My heart goes out to all those affected and those that lost loved ones 💗.
@ Clairey, Ditto! I was 35yr at time of tragedy. Good Documentary👍🏽
I turned 9 that day
he didn't didit^^
@@corettejones it was an inside job FYI
They call it history, ever heard of it?
absoulutly gut renching. i cried. im sorry this happened and sorry to all the ppl who had to be their and see that and to the families of the fallen and to the shooters family.
The only person you should be saying sorry to is martyn briant! Hes innocent. And ofcouse rhe people who died
Me too!
They are showing the police interview but all i see is him being led, he seems like he is trying to please the police men by saying what they want him to say. They show him smiling whilst agreeing with the police but that is called ' incongruence' and when someone has autism, which he has, then his facial expressions may not reflect his inner emotions. He may be feeling under pressure or scared but is smiling because autistic people sometimes have facial expressions that don't match inner feelings. They say horrible things like he is ' dim' I challenge that comment. The guy is vulnerable and it looks like a set up to me.
Comfort and love to the family and friends of all who were maimed that day xx
How could his iq be so low when the spelling in the letter he wrote was perfect.
Because he copy the transcript word for word
One of the many inconsistencies in this case.
Ones IQ isn’t based on hand writing
Because IQ tests are based on math wich is total utter bullshit. Doubt he was honest on the tests anyways.
@@Star-ze6yl The tests had been carried out since he was a child.
All the evidence suggests he didn't do this alone, if at all.
Isn’t it striking that it says he shot the Martins first, who refused to ever sell their land?
I don’t think he was the one so interested in it.
He seems like a quietly spoken person. No evidence of the vicious psychopath the press have made him out to be. Still, appearances can be deceiving.
So witness testimony counts for nothing then?
All The Evidence??? Just give me 4 piece's of that evidence, id love to know...oh by the way so the witnesses who were there that day (and survived) saw just one shooter, no one else...i guess them testifying at the trial was all just make believe yes?
Being that he isn't of capacity, how could he have done this alone? All set up by Howard to disarm Australian's.
alot of things dont add up with the martin bryant case, i did spend some time a few years ago finding out as much as i could about the situation and when you really dive deep into it the more you do the more things start to not add up, some of the videos and interviews i researched back then dont seem to be available anymore or have been removed from internet searches, in this video it says "this is the first time this footage has been seen" but the full and complete interview tapes were already leaked on the internet years ago as well as the police training video that was made with footage from this incident was also leaked online. the story we were told by mainstream media (including this dramatized cherry picked video) doesn't match up with the facts and reports from witnesses, many witnesses were told not to speak up and were told to keep quiet or police will be coming for them ect... we call it being "hushed". the feeling i got after finding out as much as i did was that yes martin bryant was involved in the situation but it looks to me like he was not the only one involved, i think there was a second shooter most likely an expert marksman hired by someone else to cause as much damage as possible and was then extracted from the scene and martin was left to take the blame for it all. this is just my opinion and im not saying any of what i have said is fact as im only going by witness accounts and reports and footage from years ago, all im saying is there is more to the situation than the main stream media lead us on to believe, when this happened at the time alot of information was blocked and covered up and when that is happening then you have to ask why? i believe the why was because the government had a vested interest in this situation to make it as shocking and horrifying to the public as possible to gain public support for changing the gun laws, it was after this horrible situation that the gun laws were in fact changed. the police spent more time covering things up than actually searching for the truth, if this situation happened today in the 2020's and martin had a decent lawyer then martin would not have gone to jail, instead of what happened back in the 90's when his lawyer was only there to convince martin to take the blame for what happened and confess he was basically black mailed into confessing for crimes he said he was innocent for, was he really innocent? maybe or maybe not but we will never know. find out as much as you can and make your own opinions, im just giving you mine.
Wow how ironic, after that very long text you failed to give one little iota peace of proof, ( what proof do u have, I'm interested?) assumption, conspiracy theory or analysis of what makes you think this? For example, do you even know why he chose Port Arthur in the first place, just ask me i can tell you!
@@shanebriggs1039 go search for it yourself unless you want to pay me per hour to do the work for you then you can go and research this yourself, alot of the articles have been removed from the internet that were there 10 years ago when i did my research, alot of witness interviews have been taken down because they dont fit the governments narrative, but there is still some evidence out there of you look hard enough for it, so go look for it yourself and form your own opinion like i did, once you start looing then you will start to see the same trend that i saw and that is alot of people dont want the truth to get out there about this and alot of things are hidden and silenced, that alone should raise suspicion that this whole situation is very very dodgy and corrupt.
@@shanebriggs1039I bet you are fully vaccinated.
@@paulz234 and i bet you think Lee Harvey Oswald was the only gunman in Dallas Texas on that day....am I right?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA 100%@@paulz234
So sad. Some people fall thru the cracks in society and never get the help they need or acceptance that most of us take for granted. Until that changes we’ll continue to have tragedies like this.
Well he was a millionaire so I am sure life was really tough for him
@@glenchapman3899 I think you completely missed the point being made.
@@glenchapman3899 Rich or poor, People fall through the cracks. What part of that do you not register?
Some people are just crazy and no amount of help would stop em
Was also a combination of ingredients that all came together to make this happen, fact of him killing rabbits desensatised him to violence, and clearly! he is a psychopath as well, so no! i dont blame just society spicifically!
With a lawyer like that, who needs enemies?
indeed
How hard would it be to coerce an 60 iq man into a false confession ?
Especially when he was locked up for so long and his mother and so called defence lawyer told him that if he pleaded guilty he would be taken out of solitary confinement and have some more freedom.
False confession? You have to be kidding.
68 I think was his actual IQ, still considered mentally disabled. I grew up in Tasmania, knew a guy that went to Risdon prison. He said that Bryant was that drugged up he didn't know what reailty was, on a daily basis.
Also doesn't fit in with Asperger's diagnosis either. Asperger's have normal to above average IQ's. Not intellectually impaired.
How did the measure his iq ?