Eso está tan claro como el agua. Eres básicamente español. Los porcentajes pequeños son el llamado ruido genético y no significan nada. Tu segundo resultado parece correcto.
The previous results were very inaccurate. This was due to not enough reference panels so people will get very varied results not because they are actual ancestry but the algorithm will compensate to match their dna not matching reference panels. It is why populations like Japanese were getting Finnish and Eskimo and Pashtuns were getting Scandinavian and Irish, Scottish and Welsh. Not realistic at all.
@@jackieblue1267 you're wrong, ethnicity has nothing to do with the state you belong to, the new results indicate the possible area of current origin, but they don't indicate your pure and real ethnicity.
@@FlavioTTT I'm not wrong as I have a longterm interest in population genetics and know how these tests work. For example they don't show ancient admixture as they only go back 6 to 8 generations and the reference populations are made up of people now. Old admixture is part of the population now so if you got all those varied populations previously it was due to you not matching reference panels. Why do you think your results change with updates?
@@FlavioTTT Just to add how do you think someone's results would represent an ancient population? If you have long term ancestry in a country you will match the reference population nearly 100% if they have a reference population from where you come from. Ancient admixture would be part of a country's dna today. It all depends on what reference panels they have and if the reference panel is too broad people are going to get varied results of populations they don't have. Previously MyHeritage had a Basque reference or populations closest to Basque which is why Spanish would end up with some Northern population and also North African this was because they didn't match the reference population as most Spanish have a bit higher Steppe and also were more affected by Moors than the Basque populations.
Hola, ¿como pudiste ver tus resultadoa actualizados con el V2? A mi no me deja, me sale la opcion antigua sin actualizar. Muchas gracias
Hay que esperar, ya se actualizará
Eso está tan claro como el agua. Eres básicamente español. Los porcentajes pequeños son el llamado ruido genético y no significan nada. Tu segundo resultado parece correcto.
I think that the new one is really better. it doesn't invent something that doesn't exist.
You are almost all over Europe :D
😮😮😮😮
💕
Your mom having english and north african dna seems wrong
Her results have not been updated yet, we will see
The new update have a fake result
The previous results were very inaccurate. This was due to not enough reference panels so people will get very varied results not because they are actual ancestry but the algorithm will compensate to match their dna not matching reference panels. It is why populations like Japanese were getting Finnish and Eskimo and Pashtuns were getting Scandinavian and Irish, Scottish and Welsh. Not realistic at all.
@@jackieblue1267 you're wrong, ethnicity has nothing to do with the state you belong to, the new results indicate the possible area of current origin, but they don't indicate your pure and real ethnicity.
@@FlavioTTT I'm not wrong as I have a longterm interest in population genetics and know how these tests work. For example they don't show ancient admixture as they only go back 6 to 8 generations and the reference populations are made up of people now. Old admixture is part of the population now so if you got all those varied populations previously it was due to you not matching reference panels. Why do you think your results change with updates?
@@FlavioTTT Just to add how do you think someone's results would represent an ancient population? If you have long term ancestry in a country you will match the reference population nearly 100% if they have a reference population from where you come from. Ancient admixture would be part of a country's dna today. It all depends on what reference panels they have and if the reference panel is too broad people are going to get varied results of populations they don't have. Previously MyHeritage had a Basque reference or populations closest to Basque which is why Spanish would end up with some Northern population and also North African this was because they didn't match the reference population as most Spanish have a bit higher Steppe and also were more affected by Moors than the Basque populations.
Wrong