Law fare is not a reason to disqualify a candidate. Oh by the way, not a single person has been charged with sedition and in MY America you need to be charged and CONVICTED of a crime and NOT assumed guilty. What a crock!
The judge is Michigan was discussing the difference between the President Oath to "Perserve, Protect, and Defend" the US Constitution versus and an oath to "Support" the US Constitution. The judge said it was distinction without a difference. The judge appears to be mistaken on this point. "Defend" and "Support" are 2 different duties for the oath taker. We know this to be true because military officers take an oath to "Support" and "Defend" the US Constitution suggesting that "Defend" and "Support" are indeed to 2 different duties within the confines of the oath. It's a fundemental principal that all the words in the US Constitution have meaning. Therefore "perserve" has specific meaning. "Protect" has specific meaning, "Defend" has specific meaning and "Support" has specific meaning. In any event, 14C3 applies to oath takers who took the the oath to "Support" the Constitution. Trump or the POTUS for that matter did not take that oath and it would appear then that 14C3 does not apply to the POTUS.
His argument against Trump is like every liberal argument, To get to the point, you have to make a lot of assumptions. He’s making a lot of assumptions based on very little facts.
Because he's not guilty. If that was really an insurrection, it was the worst attempt at it ever. Look at the real evidence. Like why didn't Nancy Pelosi have adequate security? Why did she DECLINE the National Guard when Trump offer it to her? Maybe because the "enemy was within" like she said. It was the Demo crats who PLANNED the whole thing to try to pin it on Trump. Look at the tapes for yourselves. ANTIFA baby, hired by the Demo crats
Law fare is not a reason to disqualify a candidate. Oh by the way, not a single person has been charged with sedition and in MY America you need to be charged and CONVICTED of a crime and NOT assumed guilty. What a crock!
The judge is Michigan was discussing the difference between the President Oath to "Perserve, Protect, and Defend" the US Constitution versus and an oath to "Support" the US Constitution. The judge said it was distinction without a difference. The judge appears to be mistaken on this point. "Defend" and "Support" are 2 different duties for the oath taker. We know this to be true because military officers take an oath to "Support" and "Defend" the US Constitution suggesting that "Defend" and "Support" are indeed to 2 different duties within the confines of the oath. It's a fundemental principal that all the words in the US Constitution have meaning. Therefore "perserve" has specific meaning. "Protect" has specific meaning, "Defend" has specific meaning and "Support" has specific meaning. In any event, 14C3 applies to oath takers who took the the oath to "Support" the Constitution. Trump or the POTUS for that matter did not take that oath and it would appear then that 14C3 does not apply to the POTUS.
Excellent discussion, thank you🙏💫
He also gives aid and comfort to people who have been convicted of seditious conspiracy.
Trump ❤🇺🇸🙏🇺🇸🎄💕
IF, Trump is elected, America gets what She deserves…..
How has he even been allowed to avoid debates if there are regulations for meeting requirements for debates?
His argument against Trump is like every liberal argument, To get to the point, you have to make a lot of assumptions. He’s making a lot of assumptions based on very little facts.
Why trump haven't been disqualified yet?
Because he's not guilty. If that was really an insurrection, it was the worst attempt at it ever. Look at the real evidence. Like why didn't Nancy Pelosi have adequate security? Why did she DECLINE the National Guard when Trump offer it to her? Maybe because the "enemy was within" like she said. It was the Demo crats who PLANNED the whole thing to try to pin it on Trump. Look at the tapes for yourselves. ANTIFA baby, hired by the Demo crats