Visual HGS approach Toronto CYTZ Rwy 26

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Visual no autopilot approach Toronto City Center CYTZ. Crosswind 20G30. Winter 2013 - 2014

Комментарии • 11

  • @preflightGOYR
    @preflightGOYR 10 лет назад +1

    Wow...amazing! Great hands and feet skills on display there.
    Do you ever fly to Thunder Bay?

    • @jackzasiewski
      @jackzasiewski  10 лет назад

      Thanks ! Approach can be bumpy when strong winds move through downtown skyscrapers. No Thunder Bay right now but highly likely in the near future

  • @Aleksandar6ix
    @Aleksandar6ix 9 лет назад +1

    My friend flies the same aircraft, but for Porter. Would love to see him on RUclips one day, but I have yet to find a cockpit video from that airline.

  • @jackzasiewski
    @jackzasiewski  9 лет назад +1

    Hey Varyk!
    Only 26 and 08 works for a Q.
    We do RNAV C but not A
    Q handles great, crosswinds are easy. Cheers!

  • @jaypek43-Phil
    @jaypek43-Phil 9 лет назад +1

    I'd fly with you anytime, Jack!

  • @daleybrathwaite1038
    @daleybrathwaite1038 10 лет назад

    Is the crosswind technique for the Q4 similar to what they teach us in flight school?i.e Crab into the wind and in the flare kick the rudder and aileron into the wind

    • @jackzasiewski
      @jackzasiewski  10 лет назад

      Do whatever works for you. What works best for me is to stay on the centerline until about 5 feet then flare and do aileron / rudder correction. Some people don't feel comfortable flaring very low. Q400 is very responsive, much more so than ATR turboprops. Best landings are achieved by keeping good descent rate till 5 feet then gentle back pressure. This way landing happens fast and landing distance tends to be very short. Flare and corrections at more than 10 feet result in long floaty messy landings on a Q400 and to some degree ATR 42. ATR 72 is not responsive and requires a lot of back pressure in a flare

  • @sol3cito33
    @sol3cito33 8 лет назад

    Hey Jack, what flap setting do you guys use for takeoff out of CYTZ 08/26 please? 10? 15?

  • @michaeldougherty9111
    @michaeldougherty9111 10 лет назад +1

    With a visual approach to RW26, do you follow the PAPI down, or do you just do a normal approach? It seems like you went to the left of that smoke stack and were quite low when you did which makes me think it was a 3 degree approach.

    • @jackzasiewski
      @jackzasiewski  10 лет назад

      Hi ! I use HGS for guidance, set for 3.3 degrees. It works very well after you get used to symbols dancing in front of your face. HGS is like Head Up Display the difference being it uses IRS information for guidance. PAPI is not very good, 4.8 degrees to clear the smoke stack which makes approach appear very high. Exciting when landing with a full load ( 61 700 lbs ). Standard procedure is to line up CN tower and a white dome to clear smoke stack laterally and follow 3.3 degrees slope. It will ensure EGPWS will not go off.

    • @michaeldougherty9111
      @michaeldougherty9111 10 лет назад

      Thanks for the answer!