THAT is one of the very best Sermons I have heard from @davidasscherick- Ever. EVER. Insane On Point. I sobbed thru half of it and laughed and rejoiced the other half.
Interesting perspective of modernistic adaptation of biblical principles. Don't agree that Jesus is not the Son of God, child sacrifice is wrong, God did not commit child sacrifice it was Jesus who willingly offered himself out of love. Jesus is not a child though. It was willing self sacrifice not child sacrifice. Very insightful and enlghtening discussion about sexuality.
I don't know of any nontrinitarian who says that the holy spirit is an effervescent power. I find David's comments nauseating. For someone who claims to know the Bible so well he does not believe the simple truth that God sent his son into the world to die for us. The gospel is the good news that Jesus came to die so that we can live. "GOD SENT HIS SON INTO THE WORLD THAT WE MIGHT LIVE THROUGH HIM. HEREIN IS LOVE----NOT THAT WE LOVED GOD,,, BUT THAT HE LOVED US AND SENT ***HIS SON*** to be the propitiation for our sins." 1 John 4 :7-10. Put aside all preconceived and weird ideas about some three headed God and read the Bible as it reads. The truth is there and it's amazing! Come out of her my people! Come out of confusion and false teachings!
God the Father did indeed allow his only begotten Son to be a sacrifice for mankind. John 3:16 is clear. Pastor Asscherick is under belief that Jesus isn't truly the Son of God in his pre-incarnate existance.
Amen!!! His view of the gospel is incorrect. And he is also wrong about the Trinity, our church has went wrong by adopting the Catholic view and not that of the scriptures, sop, or the founders of the Adventist church.
BDAPink if he were to take into consideration John 3:17 he would see it is written that God sent his Son into the world so it could be saved. You can't send what you do not have, so God had to have a Son to send into the world. Pastor Asscherick is clearly exhibiting the spirit of antichrist.... (sadly)
For what it is worth, the founders of SDA were not united in their understanding of the Godhead, Ellen White's statement of Christ's "life...un-borrowed, un-derived" leans on the side of an endorsement of Christ being fully Divine (in existence throughout eternity), and the Bible clearly references who we affectionately refer to as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. In using terms, that denote distinctly human relationships (Father, Son, Brother, Husband) God has desired to show his Love not his actual person. To the human race "a 'son' is given" to be one with us, born into the human family. I think it may be thought this diminishes the sacrifices God has made for us. I think rightly understood the sacrifices the Father has made are infinite, the Son the same, and the Spirit the same. Would you give your son for another or would you give your self?
James Hill that is incorrect regarding that statement. It is not that Christ had an existence throughout eternity, but FROM eternity. EGW understood perfectly that Christ was begotten of his Father in the days of eternity past.... (read what she says regarding Proverbs 8:22-30). If Christ were divine throughout eternity he could not in fact then be the Son of God. How could God send to earth what he did not have??? God the Father had to have a Son to send. The very divinity of Christ is his divine inheritance, (Hebrews 1:1-4) he inherited everything from his Father including his name. So if his Father is God it would stand to reason that his Son will be God... steal he is the express image of his Father.
If he were righteous, he would have been spared per Genesis 18 but there weren't even 10 righteous so Lot's family of 4 were instructed to leave. Not to mention the fact that Lot offered his daughters to a bunch of men at his door and was still saved so how can that be compared?
it has always been saved by grace thru faith! there was no faith left in sodom and they fell into their flesh so far they were reprobate ! so therefore If DA was alive at that time, God would have made a way that he would not have been there or he had an ear to hear like Lot had! Simple!
He's saying like Jesus should Peter don't say something is common that God has blessed now he con't Judge people so we all sin so by him going to the friends wedding he is saying it's OK because he can't save only God can
![Hunxho - Ball Forever [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nki9ZTF9Uls/mqdefault.jpg)
THAT is one of the very best Sermons I have heard from @davidasscherick- Ever. EVER. Insane On Point. I sobbed thru half of it and laughed and rejoiced the other half.
Amen, Pst David. You answered absolutely 💯 correct GODLY behavior. Thank You. This is why we love you.
Interesting perspective of modernistic adaptation of biblical principles. Don't agree that Jesus is not the Son of God, child sacrifice is wrong, God did not commit child sacrifice it was Jesus who willingly offered himself out of love. Jesus is not a child though. It was willing self sacrifice not child sacrifice.
Very insightful and enlghtening discussion about sexuality.
God has a big plan for my life!
amen... I like the part about free choice
Anybody can please tell me the book and the quotation Pastor had taken from E.G white wrtiting
Kaycee Hruaia desire of ages
The great controversy. Not sure
Hey- when I take John 3:16 out of my Bible, do I move the rest up or just leave an empty space?
Asking for a friend...
could you please share the quote that pastor is sharing when he explains that he will go to a gay couples wedding.
Love requires freedom- freedom envolves risk-risk entails responsibility- responsibility enables growth 🙌 ✨ 👏 ❤
Best Sermon Eva
i am so confused with all the comments
my understanding is God, Jesus and the holy spirit are one. Jesus was god in human form
You are not confused. David is.
He talks too fast !!
Best advice! Don't read the comments. Search for yourself. :)
AMEN
I don't know of any nontrinitarian who says that the holy spirit is an effervescent power. I find David's comments nauseating. For someone who claims to know the Bible so well he does not believe the simple truth that God sent his son into the world to die for us. The gospel is the good news that Jesus came to die so that we can live. "GOD SENT HIS SON INTO THE WORLD THAT WE MIGHT LIVE THROUGH HIM. HEREIN IS LOVE----NOT THAT WE LOVED GOD,,, BUT THAT HE LOVED US AND SENT ***HIS SON*** to be the propitiation for our sins." 1 John 4 :7-10.
Put aside all preconceived and weird ideas about some three headed God and read the Bible as it reads. The truth is there and it's amazing! Come out of her my people! Come out of confusion and false teachings!
God the Father did indeed allow his only begotten Son to be a sacrifice for mankind. John 3:16 is clear. Pastor Asscherick is under belief that Jesus isn't truly the Son of God in his pre-incarnate existance.
Amen!!! His view of the gospel is incorrect. And he is also wrong about the Trinity, our church has went wrong by adopting the Catholic view and not that of the scriptures, sop, or the founders of the Adventist church.
BDAPink if he were to take into consideration John 3:17 he would see it is written that God sent his Son into the world so it could be saved. You can't send what you do not have, so God had to have a Son to send into the world. Pastor Asscherick is clearly exhibiting the spirit of antichrist.... (sadly)
For what it is worth, the founders of SDA were not united in their understanding of the Godhead, Ellen White's statement of Christ's "life...un-borrowed, un-derived" leans on the side of an endorsement of Christ being fully Divine (in existence throughout eternity), and the Bible clearly references who we affectionately refer to as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. In using terms, that denote distinctly human relationships (Father, Son, Brother, Husband) God has desired to show his Love not his actual person. To the human race "a 'son' is given" to be one with us, born into the human family. I think it may be thought this diminishes the sacrifices God has made for us. I think rightly understood the sacrifices the Father has made are infinite, the Son the same, and the Spirit the same. Would you give your son for another or would you give your self?
James Hill that is incorrect regarding that statement. It is not that Christ had an existence throughout eternity, but FROM eternity. EGW understood perfectly that Christ was begotten of his Father in the days of eternity past.... (read what she says regarding Proverbs 8:22-30). If Christ were divine throughout eternity he could not in fact then be the Son of God. How could God send to earth what he did not have??? God the Father had to have a Son to send. The very divinity of Christ is his divine inheritance, (Hebrews 1:1-4) he inherited everything from his Father including his name. So if his Father is God it would stand to reason that his Son will be God... steal he is the express image of his Father.
This is so not true!!! SDA which he is believes in Trinity. You are not following what he is saying.
A clever man who has become more knowledgeable that God Himself.
So he must think. :-(
How do you figure?
I wonder what would have happened if he were attending a gay wedding in Sodom the day when the angels came to destroy it!
If he were righteous, he would have been spared per Genesis 18 but there weren't even 10 righteous so Lot's family of 4 were instructed to leave. Not to mention the fact that Lot offered his daughters to a bunch of men at his door and was still saved so how can that be compared?
it has always been saved by grace thru faith! there was no faith left in sodom and they fell into their flesh so far they were reprobate ! so therefore If DA was alive at that time, God would have made a way that he would not have been there or he had an ear to hear like Lot had! Simple!
+kellimatic Jesus, the Righteous, would not have gone to such a wicked event.
+kalo That's just it, Lot should not have been there in the first place.
He's saying like Jesus should Peter don't say something is common that God has blessed now he con't Judge people so we all sin so by him going to the friends wedding he is saying it's OK because he can't save only God can
could you please share the quote that pastor is sharing when he explains that he will go to a gay couples wedding.
could you please share the quote that pastor is sharing when he explains that he will go to a gay couples wedding.