#Dow

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 май 2024
  • The DJIA has just hit 40,000 - but didn’t it just reach 30,000 three years ago? The Dow’s milestones keep coming faster and faster - WSJ’s Gunjan Banerji explains why.
    #Dow #DowJones #Shorts

Комментарии • 31

  • @thomascowart3
    @thomascowart3 21 день назад +39

    So basically they just explained how exponential functions work for people that don’t know what exponential function are?

    • @dgusev
      @dgusev 16 дней назад +1

      :D

  • @CHMichael
    @CHMichael 22 дня назад +5

    Its called exponential growth.

  • @pedroribeirocanoas6600
    @pedroribeirocanoas6600 22 дня назад +4

    How does this graph behave on a logarithm scale?

  • @RDRLegend23
    @RDRLegend23 22 дня назад +33

    And the money printers continue to go brrrrrrrr

    • @madhavyu
      @madhavyu 22 дня назад +11

      And the conspiracy theorists go cuckoo cuckoo

    • @SharkMastaFlash
      @SharkMastaFlash 22 дня назад +1

      And the 1% goes "Take, keep, hoard!!!"

    • @LyricsQuest
      @LyricsQuest 19 дней назад

      And the ostriches go "I looked around, don't see anything down here".

  • @5k-fcr121
    @5k-fcr121 22 дня назад +9

    easy explanation: exponential money printing results in proportional asset valuation growth

  • @jc4418
    @jc4418 22 дня назад +2

    Dayum I didn’t expect gunjan to look like that!

  • @bobthemagicmoose
    @bobthemagicmoose 22 дня назад +7

    Serious question: why does WSJ keep reporting on DOW milestones? Because of inflation it’s value declines in real dollars and, as shown in this video, it grows exponentially so a linear scale isn’t useful.

  • @AndreaDoesYoga
    @AndreaDoesYoga 22 дня назад +1

    Amazing progress! Keep it up, Dow 🚀

  • @pandreis1452
    @pandreis1452 22 дня назад +1

    Very nice reporter. Now what was she saying?

  • @JustaKubrickFan
    @JustaKubrickFan 22 дня назад +7

    Neat. Isn't it interesting how statitistic can be a great deception tool.

  • @user-fj3it6qp1l
    @user-fj3it6qp1l 22 дня назад +1

    compounding effect

  • @Katherine-qs8ws
    @Katherine-qs8ws 22 дня назад +1

    Did…did you just explain what basic exponents are

  • @apprehensivetoe9811
    @apprehensivetoe9811 22 дня назад +6

    Easy they printed money to buy a bigger printer to print more money.

  • @Peculate
    @Peculate 10 дней назад

    The Federal Reserve added trillions of dollars to its balance sheet through quantitative easing, and much of that liquidity went into inflating asset prices, enriching the rich.

  • @brandonedlin2052
    @brandonedlin2052 22 дня назад +1

    Guess you can make a lot of money when you over charge, underpay, and take away everyone’s health benefits. At least until they get smart enough to do something about it.

  • @carultch
    @carultch 17 дней назад +1

    Exponential growth cannot continue forever on a finite planet.

    • @dangiamb6750
      @dangiamb6750 15 дней назад

      Yes, everything that goes up has to go down, but when?

  • @crooger3594
    @crooger3594 14 дней назад

    It was mostly the same talk in the start in 1928-1929... the rest is history which seems to be forgotten for most people sadly .... should keep you awake at night in my opinion.

  • @LyricsQuest
    @LyricsQuest 19 дней назад

    Would be neat to chart this against population size, real gdp, and monetary supply. Think there's a good chance there'll be something quite noticeable around 2009.

  • @chessopenings
    @chessopenings 22 дня назад +1

    money printing

  • @jonr6680
    @jonr6680 8 дней назад +1

    Comments are mostly wrong.
    It's not exponential. That's mathematically incorrect.
    It's not just compounding. That only applies to monetary value.
    (And the explanation woman is right - but utterly pointless...)
    Early days, literal growth in value WAS from real world innovation, discoveries, exploitation across finance, globalisation, industrial processes, research...& Population growth.
    NOW we have an insane desire aka need to believe that growth in value can be 'forever'. The corporations, the investors, the economists... Everyone is pulling in the same direction. The real world growth has been hijacked by a crazy Ponzi-like mutual delusion.
    Until one day something happens to burst that bubble.
    TLDR? A crash is coming. It's inevitable. The only question is when & how big.
    The biggest problem in this century is how so many goods & services are simply not necessary for survival, effectively mostly luxury toys.
    And the globalisation which fuelled capitalist greed is running out of steam as the cheap countries now have their own aspirations.
    Essentially the old industrial countries gave away their production capacity and now can't compete on cost - or even quality now.
    The future will be grim, no matter how you try to wish it away with fancy graphs & attention-deficit video explainers.

  • @jonrupp6822
    @jonrupp6822 22 дня назад +2

    Absolutely genius analysis here

  • @bobchannell3553
    @bobchannell3553 22 дня назад +3

    I'm looking at a graph of the Dow in Google. It doesn't look like the one they're showing in this little video.