PETRONAS Malaysia Open 2025 | Shi Yu Qi (CHN) [1] vs. Chou Tien Chen (TPE) | QF

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 янв 2025

Комментарии • 41

  • @jj1024
    @jj1024 3 часа назад +22

    Good game. The last one is in anyway.

  • @luxin8167
    @luxin8167 3 часа назад +15

    Why was CTC that adamant about the fault at the end? SYQs last shot was in anyways, wouldnt have made a difference right?

    • @HokKan
      @HokKan 3 часа назад +8

      He didn't see it I guess

    • @BrianWang-t6c
      @BrianWang-t6c 3 часа назад +4

      Chou wants to challenge the shot but he cant due to the umpire called fault(touching shuttle),I mean it is in anyway and he’s got an obvious fault in the previous point about the net block

    • @first8956
      @first8956 2 часа назад +4

      Chou has always been a mama boy. If you understand mandarin, you’d be quite “entertained”by what Victoria Kao spoke to him every time she’s with him…

    • @lab997
      @lab997 2 часа назад

      Give examples of the conversation​@@first8956

    • @sufulama
      @sufulama 2 часа назад

      ​@@first8956U have totally no idea about the relationship between them

  • @Jayessayy
    @Jayessayy 2 часа назад +5

    Well played Chou Tien Chen! Incredible tenacity as always. While the last shot was certainly in, it is also clear the shuttle didn’t touch CTC. The umpire calling fault preventing him from challenging does add contentiousness to an otherwise clean and hard fought match. Congratulations to Shi Yu Qi on the incredible finish 💪

  • @hang1964
    @hang1964 3 часа назад +6

    Bit of a drama at the end, but these 2 are still my top 2 favorite single players in 2025.

  • @ChrisLoVeTaiwan
    @ChrisLoVeTaiwan Час назад +1

    Always like to see these two plays, much more fun to watch!

  • @我想静静-k5m
    @我想静静-k5m 3 часа назад +5

    沒有看出來最後一球周天成為什麼要和裁判辯論?石頭的扣殺是在界內的,不論球是否打在周的腳上😂!

    • @racingandy
      @racingandy 3 часа назад +5

      他那個角度沒看到所以想確認吧,球員確實是有挑戰權的,雖然這邊結果上來說不會變

    • @first8956
      @first8956 2 часа назад

      ⁠@@racingandy如果裁判已经判了碰到身体,就没有所谓“球员确实有挑战权”…… 裁判判断是否有无,也不单是这一场比赛,那是另一件事。他应该是想挑战出界,但是裁判判了球已经碰到了身体,所以否决了他的要求,他认为没有触身、有权挑战。至少,但这场比赛来讲,回放画面是界内的,他也无实际损失。

  • @胡欣然-l1o
    @胡欣然-l1o 3 часа назад +2

    It’s really an incredible game I ever seen. But it is obvious that the last shot is definitely in, hence, I don’t understand why the Chen wanna argue with that.

  • @mansfield1971
    @mansfield1971 2 часа назад +1

    At 1:17:43 the umpire is saying fault. Therefore the umpire judged (rightly or wrongly) it touched Chou.

  • @connieshinhwa5982
    @connieshinhwa5982 2 часа назад +1

    The last point was very much IN (at 1:18:46). The empire should have let Chou to challenge the call, so that he can be convinced that he has lost the match indeed. Did he even shake hands with Shi?🤔

    • @losuk8
      @losuk8 Час назад

      In or out is not the point, the major problem is WBF ref is crap, his eyes dropped somewhere and never admitted errors

  • @kabzizindabaad1872
    @kabzizindabaad1872 3 часа назад +4

    What a match

  • @linbeijianbaoxia
    @linbeijianbaoxia 2 часа назад

    精彩,都加油😊

  • @waynezw
    @waynezw 2 часа назад +1

    The last one is in. You can see it clearly if you slow down the play speed. Poor sportsmanship from CTC.

    • @xd_ryuu3041
      @xd_ryuu3041 Час назад +1

      well all players have the right to challenge, he was denied so because the umpire called fault which was wrong. So not exactly bad sportsmanship

  • @Frankw551
    @Frankw551 3 часа назад +1

    Wait , check this 1:17:09 it’s clearly in 100% , what is Chou arguing about ? Yea I guess maybe this empire dude , he kept saying touch or fault , confused Chou 😂

  • @Cyu2000
    @Cyu2000 Час назад +2

    He lost it in all aspects

  • @Mulknwan
    @Mulknwan 2 часа назад

    26:20, I thought Victoria was gonna kiss CTC. 😅

  • @Mulknwan
    @Mulknwan 2 часа назад

    CTC’s conditioning is immense, lean as a butchers dog and legs like tree trunks. 😎

  • @j.w7550
    @j.w7550 2 часа назад +2

    I didn’t like this commenter, he spent so much time talking about CTC’s past performance, and clearly favored one side when there was a clear net fault at 20-16 while the judge missed it.

  • @bt1163
    @bt1163 2 часа назад +1

    He had the right to challenge the shot !!!! Empire is Wrong to call End !!🙄🤔🙄

    • @mansfield1971
      @mansfield1971 2 часа назад +1

      I was also confused but at 1:17:43 the umpire is calling fault, so I assume he judged (correct or not) that the shuttle hit Chou.

  • @hanakien
    @hanakien 2 часа назад

    Itu jelas didalam, dia hanya tidak menerima kekalahan

  • @SpeedGoea99
    @SpeedGoea99 2 часа назад

    中中中中中

  • @fun_gun
    @fun_gun 3 часа назад

    It doesnt touch him. Poor judgement

    • @wiseone7S
      @wiseone7S 2 часа назад +1

      reduce playback speed,,it was clearly in

    • @j.w7550
      @j.w7550 2 часа назад +3

      Was clearly in. Poor sportsmanship from CTC today

    • @robeldam
      @robeldam Час назад

      Are you guys morons? Cant you use logic and realize that from the position of ctc and the speed of the shuttle that he could not clearly see where it landed? So he challenged because he didnt know if it was in or not. WE know its in but he doesnt. Jesus some people lack logical reasoning