Fantastic insight and explains much about the modern culture of safetyism and the perception of "harm" related to the increased participation of women in positions of power.
Because of gossip and slander within my AA group I was left without friends there. I never associated with large groups before and was shocked by the hatred aimed at me. It took about 2 years for the gossip to work. I had to leave.
Masculinity studies and now masculinity crisis rhetoric is based on this kind of dynamic but it's accepted as benevolent and promoted almost unanimously as a benign way to conceptualize the general psychology of young men and explain their motivations and outcomes. People have a hard time detecting sometimes very underhanded rhetoric if it's presented in a certain way and involves women or gender relations and dissident types are no exception.
Male hostility is out in the open for the most part (Gillette razor's old ad for example). But the word ''crisis'' is a shield term for ''discrimination''. So you are using a good example where society tries to hide it
Internet says "guise" is a noun, and "Guise" is a place in France. The deep psychological reason why I nitpick grammar, is because I always fuk up grammar, and project my shortcomings/insecurities onto other humans. Incidentally, when I was briefly a psych major, I learned how object relations theories prove that solipsism is true, and other humans are not real anyway. (Some of these are jokes ppl).
Try searching the form "guising," apparently it is used in Scotland. I'm American and I haven't heard it used that way, or the way Ms. Reynolds used it in this vid, but I understood it as meaning the exact same as "disguise" (verb) without any confusion.
Why would I listen to women try to explain something to me that is already obvious and needs no so called scientific research to justify? Emotions and behaviour are not scientifc. Philosophers are much better to read about emotions.
Fantastic insight and explains much about the modern culture of safetyism and the perception of "harm" related to the increased participation of women in positions of power.
yeah i've noticed "are you ok?"
Are you ok is so annoying.
@@CaptainCologne it sure is.
That ladies smile freaks me out. Great convo, smart women.
nice to have Dianna back
Because of gossip and slander within my AA group I was left without friends there. I never associated with large groups before and was shocked by the hatred aimed at me. It took about 2 years for the gossip to work. I had to leave.
Nothing new men have always known: loose lips sink ships. Gossip = spread anxiety (neuroticism).
Masculinity studies and now masculinity crisis rhetoric is based on this kind of dynamic but it's accepted as benevolent and promoted almost unanimously as a benign way to conceptualize the general psychology of young men and explain their motivations and outcomes. People have a hard time detecting sometimes very underhanded rhetoric if it's presented in a certain way and involves women or gender relations and dissident types are no exception.
Male hostility is out in the open for the most part (Gillette razor's old ad for example). But the word ''crisis'' is a shield term for ''discrimination''. So you are using a good example where society tries to hide it
Yes. Read "The Women's Racket" by Steve Moxon.
Internet says "guise" is a noun, and "Guise" is a place in France.
The deep psychological reason why I nitpick grammar, is because I always fuk up grammar, and project my shortcomings/insecurities onto other humans.
Incidentally, when I was briefly a psych major, I learned how object relations theories prove that solipsism is true, and other humans are not real anyway.
(Some of these are jokes ppl).
Try searching the form "guising," apparently it is used in Scotland. I'm American and I haven't heard it used that way, or the way Ms. Reynolds used it in this vid, but I understood it as meaning the exact same as "disguise" (verb) without any confusion.
Why would I listen to women try to explain something to me that is already obvious and needs no so called scientific research to justify? Emotions and behaviour are not scientifc. Philosophers are much better to read about emotions.
I like how almost every comment on this snippet-channel, IS ITSELF AN APORIA.
Because the majority people with influence have an inbuilt bias to not see those things and it's a good thing to get out there.
The thumbnail is kinda creepy, not gonna lie
every single pod with tania has used the same photo of hers… not their fault… perhaps she does not have other pictures