Thermion 2 LRF | XG50 or XP50 Pro?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
- Have you ever wondered which riflescope is better - the Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro or the Thermion 2 LRF XG50?
Well, our colleague Laurynas Pranckus is here to tell you that the question is flawed!
Both amazing in their own right, these riflescopes were designed for different purposes and excel in different hunting settings.
In short, Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro really shines in poor weather conditions. The XG model, on the other hand, is great for longer-distance shooting at smaller targets.
The reason for this is pixel pitch - the XP model has a 17-micron one, and the XG - a 12-micron.
Now, the latter model also has a higher base magnification with more zooming capabilities, making it, once again, great for longer distances. Meanwhile, the XP has superb thermal sensitivity that cuts through early morning fog, high humidity, rain, or any other conditions which are typically tough for a thermal imager.
Of course, their benefits don’t stop here - if you wish to learn more about the Pulsar Thermion 2 LRF XP50 Pro and Thermion 2 LRF XG50 thermal imaging riflescopes, visit our website now.
See other products from Pulsar: bit.ly/PulsarProducts
Follow us on Facebook: PulsarVision
Get the news on Instagram: pulsar.vision
Find your nearest distributor: bit.ly/Pulsar_WhereToBuy
Get inspired on The Journal: bit.ly/PulsarJournal 
Наука
I bought the XP at a recent demonstration evening as it stood out from the rest in that it was definitely better in the abysmal weather conditions prevailing that evening. However, subsequently in trying it out, I was phased by the low base Mag of 2x in trying to take my customary long shots and regret not getting the XG with 3X which was the model I’d decided to buy prior to looking through them that evening. Some days later, I realised what had fooled me into thinking the XP was better was that we were looking into a wooded area some 235yds distant through driving rain and high winds BUT there was no heat source, otherwise, I’m certain on reflection that the XG higher base Mag would have been chosen. It’s a salutary lesson for any future such evaluation, to ensure that one looks at a heat source when making comparisons
And one more thing for sharp ranging and shooting: please, make the rangefinder usable at ALL zooms!
Hi! Please clarify what issue you have with the LRF on your device.
Why does updating the URF version for xq38 have errors with small white dots on the viewfinder screen?
Hello! Thank you for your question. Could you please contact us directly: support@pulsar-vision.com
We need more info about this issue and about your device.
3X XP sounds like a good idea to me
Better still why not have the XP be able to change base mag depending on circumstance. 2x up close, 3x further shots
I want to buy your scope but this video does explain anything… we can understand the difference between the 2 models …. Would you like me to test them and make a real video on the scope
les tarif svp en Français merci
Bonjour! Merci de votre intérêt pour Pulsar. Veuillez contacter notre distributeur officiel dans votre pays pour l'achat : www.pulsar-nv.com/glo/where-to-buy/36/
Why not just give the xp better magnification, then everyone's happy. Here in nz we are quite often making making long range shots in bad weather. . . . . . . . Also putting the duo function into it would be gold, with these 2 changes it'd be the ultimate anytime anywhere scope
Hello! Thank you for your suggestion. We will definitely work on it.
Laurynas > please give us 75 mm lens and get back to Ulis for XG pro: ATTOs
Hell I be happy to get 60mm lens.... Pulsar will never do a 75mm.
@@Liam-ql7tr they did an Apex XD 75 mm (f1.4🙈) but hey why not? Im not seeing an advantage in 1024 over 640 for long range...
Hello! Thank you for your suggestions. We will forward them to our development department for consideration.
XG50 best resolution at 200 y.
Xp50 blur at 150y
Hello! please write to us for more details: support@pulsar-vision.com