Well, that Bible verse doesn't mean you have to put cross on your clothing and do a crusade. It means in order to become follower of Christ, you must be prepared to face the challenges and trials of being a follower of Christ, that's what the cross mean in that verse.
@@altair-harris9854 wrong , after the fall of acre , king Richard marched to Jerusalem to reclaim it back from aayubids , salauddin sended his 25000 forces mainly under the command of his brother to meet Richard's army , on the other side , king Richard brought an army of 10000 heavy crusader forces ,after long time of marching the crusaders were attacked by Saladins whole army in order to defeat them , salauddins most forces were cavalry , but as they charged into the crusader lines , heavy crusader speramens stopped the aayubid cavalry from charging and breaking their formations , later when Saladin recalls his mens back, king Richard sends his cavalry forces to attack the retreating army of Saladin, and also his crossbowmens to support their cavalry from back. After long time war , salauddins army retreated , the crusaders lost over 1000 mens , while Saladin lost over 7000 mens .
What is the name of that Latin Mass choir that was sung during the part where Urban was in Clermont? It sounds so powerful and would have been terrifying to enemies of Christianity during that time, especially if sung by warriors like Templars.
The First Crusade was truly a match between so uneven numbers and the Crusaders still prevailed. The Fatimid troops numbered over 15,000, along with elite regiments of African tribal warriors from Sudan and Uganda. The Crusaders only had 2,000 knights and men at arms by the time they reached Jerusalem. Utterly inconceivable. What an epic campaign.
@@ahmeda6591The Hindu king Harsvardhan. Famously known as the Turushka Raja ( King of the Turks ) for his merciless plundering and killing of hunnic and turkic garrisons and soilders. Reference : The role of kashmiri sufis in social reform and communal harmony.
The video was amazingly informative but you missed out some highlights like. The Crusaders after capturing the town of *Ma'aara* mercilessly *ATE* the inhabitants 🤢 and after captiring *Jerusalem* they killed so many civillians including men, women, children, old and pregnant women. according to the Muslims and the Crusaders the massacre was so intense that the streets were *filled with blood upto knees of the horses* 😢.
I am proud that my Turks fought against many enemy states at the time in the borderlands, even though they sometimes lost the war, not because of they were weak but they were sometimes not united, and many enemies fought them. I am Central Asian Turk (from Ancient Turan/Turkistan).
which has been used and changed for propaganda for so many reason...The 1st propaganda was spread in europe in 1243 because at that time european monarchis considered crasuders the enemy...So they changed up history many times to make crusaders look bad...Most source of crusaders come from European sources @@scepticsquirrel
When muslims win: Islam.wins When muslims lost:they were secular nice jokes... The history is full of great battles..sometimes u win sometimes u lose..accept it lmao
Normans didn’t stay in scandinavia Franks didn’t stay in belgium Lombards didn’t stay in germany Saxons didn’t stay in germany Arabs didn’t stay in arabian peninsula either, no muslim, no crusades
@@scepticsquirrel Your Fatima or your Muhammad have no business in Jerusalem and should have stayed in Arabian peninsula itself. Did your Muhamad show any mercy to the Jews of Khaybar or Banu Qurayza Jews?? No-he massacred them all.
Crusaders only won when muslims were disunited look what imad ad din zengi kilic arslan sultan mesud bayezid murad did to them sultan baibars even captured the french king😂😂😂😂
o7. Pick up your cross and follow Him. Deus Vult. ✝️☦️⛪️⚔️
puahhasasda
Well, that Bible verse doesn't mean you have to put cross on your clothing and do a crusade. It means in order to become follower of Christ, you must be prepared to face the challenges and trials of being a follower of Christ, that's what the cross mean in that verse.
Kneel down and prostrate to the almighty ☝️🏴🏳️
@yehohanan7738
I think the joke/meme went over your head.
✝️umor
One staggering mistake, Iberia wasn’t under Umayyads at that time. It was under the Berber Almoravids.
Love your videos, never stop making these, take us living more stories
Then came Salahuddin Ayyubi 🔥
He lost to Richard the Lionheart.
@@cxarhomell5867 no he didn't , instead they both as respected leaders ended the war and made truce
@@altair-harris9854 wrong , after the fall of acre , king Richard marched to Jerusalem to reclaim it back from aayubids , salauddin sended his 25000 forces mainly under the command of his brother to meet Richard's army , on the other side , king Richard brought an army of 10000 heavy crusader forces ,after long time of marching the crusaders were attacked by Saladins whole army in order to defeat them , salauddins most forces were cavalry , but as they charged into the crusader lines , heavy crusader speramens stopped the aayubid cavalry from charging and breaking their formations , later when Saladin recalls his mens back, king Richard sends his cavalry forces to attack the retreating army of Saladin, and also his crossbowmens to support their cavalry from back. After long time war , salauddins army retreated , the crusaders lost over 1000 mens , while Saladin lost over 7000 mens .
@@kgfff3036 lies
@@Amirali-s3z go and learn first , then say kid
Thank you the downloads
What is the name of that Latin Mass choir that was sung during the part where Urban was in Clermont? It sounds so powerful and would have been terrifying to enemies of Christianity during that time, especially if sung by warriors like Templars.
You didn't showed seljuk and arab Caliphate massacre of Christians? Why crusade were called? You only showed Crusader's in bad light
Christian here also. Yeah, he didn't but it doesn't matter. The crusader were cruel as hell and that is bad enough and unjustifiable
@@nicotavo Wrong. They did some bad, but they stopped the first Muslim advance into Europe and saved the holy land for hundreds of years.
Are U dumb 😊@@Osterriech0707
Because it's the trend of this century to demonize anything Western and glorify islamic terrorism and colonialism.
The Great Seljuks ❤❤❤❤
nah
@@CatholicCrusader__30 fuck YOU as seljuls are best empire tham tje chriatians
GREAT KINGDOM OF JERUSALÉM
Next : Fall of Jerusalem ( Saladdin )
First should be the fall of Edessa by Zengi
Retaking of Jerusalem
Next : fall of Jerusalem (British empire)
No after saladin Jerusalem was under ottoman empire then after 600 years on 1914 it went under Palestinians @@soapbrick9482
@@soapbrick9482there already a video
The First Crusade was truly a match between so uneven numbers and the Crusaders still prevailed. The Fatimid troops numbered over 15,000, along with elite regiments of African tribal warriors from Sudan and Uganda. The Crusaders only had 2,000 knights and men at arms by the time they reached Jerusalem. Utterly inconceivable. What an epic campaign.
Good Lord there's so many things wrong with that
It was around 10,000
@@corpchannel2523
Maybe 11000 but certainly not 2000
Film name?
Pls make a video on siege of Jerusalem 1187
Movie name?
The Seljuk Slayer : Godfrey De Bouilion ☠️
Do not joke lol
Mahmoud of gazni: Hind slayer
@@ahmeda6591 I'm Arabi, not Hindi
@@ahmeda6591The Hindu king Harsvardhan. Famously known as the Turushka Raja ( King of the Turks ) for his merciless plundering and killing of hunnic and turkic garrisons and soilders.
Reference : The role of kashmiri sufis in social reform and communal harmony.
@@OmKaR-if2ekhe also vandalised more hindu temples than Aurangzeb 😂😂
Wonderful 👏 🔥
Deus Vult ✝️ Long Live the Crusades.
Funny how you justify the brutal murder of innocent women and children
@@Amirali-s3z islamist was doing that for 400 years prior to the crusades
@@CatholicCrusader__30islam still defeated crusades
@@GdaewFeswe ?
@@CatholicCrusader__30 the crusades git destroyed by the muslims
This is more entertaining than any movie released recently.
The Fatimids regained Jerusalem 20 years before the First Crusade
We need to recover Jerusalem
Then came sultan salahuddin ayyubi
✝️❤️ Ave Crux Spes Unica
❤ jesus
Deuz volt!!!!!!!
make a video for fall of constantinuple 1453
Next : Siege of Timișoara 1716 ( Eugen of Savoy )
İs there any movie about that campaign?
I am parwana and my Ancestor relation with seljuk turk❤
The video was amazingly informative but you missed out some highlights like. The Crusaders after capturing the town of *Ma'aara* mercilessly *ATE* the inhabitants 🤢 and after captiring *Jerusalem* they killed so many civillians including men, women, children, old and pregnant women. according to the Muslims and the Crusaders the massacre was so intense that the streets were *filled with blood upto knees of the horses* 😢.
Wrong don’t compare us to Muslims
@@soapbrick9482I agree, you were worse...
Punishment of God to the muslims for doing the same to Christians and Jews for 400 years.
Seljuks ❤❤❤❤
DEUS VULT Christian Rome Empire vs Persians. DEUS VULT 2 Crusade vs muslims. DEUS VULT 3 Britisch Empire vs ottomans. ISRAEL YOU HOLY COUNTRY
DEUS VULT 4 JESUS vs allah
@@terranostrum5057How dare you challenge the truthful god
@@terranostrum5057 KAU BODOH
Sejiuk empire war byzantine empire 1:11 ✝️❤
Epic
I am proud that my Turks fought against many enemy states at the time in the borderlands, even though they sometimes lost the war, not because of they were weak but they were sometimes not united, and many enemies fought them. I am Central Asian Turk (from Ancient Turan/Turkistan).
Age of empires 2
Typical of the Islamist channels
Main source for massacres are memoirs of Christian knights.
which has been used and changed for propaganda for so many reason...The 1st propaganda was spread in europe in 1243 because at that time european monarchis considered crasuders the enemy...So they changed up history many times to make crusaders look bad...Most source of crusaders come from European sources @@scepticsquirrel
deus vult deus vult deus vult deus vult
Always islam wins ☪️💪
1967 ?
@@marhaenthemchannelreupload1344 ، they was secular Arabs not müslim
@@marhaenthemchannelreupload1344 don't forget fall the Jerusalem 636 , and ömer binu al-kha-tab
When muslims win: Islam.wins
When muslims lost:they were secular nice jokes...
The history is full of great battles..sometimes u win sometimes u lose..accept it lmao
1917?
If Seljuq Turkish invaders have stayed in Central Asia itself then all could have been prevented.
Romans didn't stay in Rome, so why should others stay where they were..etc. etc...
Normans didn’t stay in scandinavia
Franks didn’t stay in belgium
Lombards didn’t stay in germany
Saxons didn’t stay in germany
Arabs didn’t stay in arabian peninsula either, no muslim, no crusades
Your knights conquered the city from descendants of Fatima binti Muhammad (peace be upon him) who were Arabs not Turks, yet there was no mercy either.
@@C63V8 People wanted Rome not caliphates
@@scepticsquirrel Your Fatima or your Muhammad have no business in Jerusalem and should have stayed in Arabian peninsula itself. Did your Muhamad show any mercy to the Jews of Khaybar or Banu Qurayza Jews?? No-he massacred them all.
A jesus est jesuralem
Je veux voir la guerrrrrrrrrrre
A croire k les hommes ne sont olys des hommes
Un homme défend son honneur
Et celui de Allah
Pembebas al aQsa
Crusaders only won when muslims were disunited look what imad ad din zengi kilic arslan sultan mesud bayezid murad did to them sultan baibars even captured the french king😂😂😂😂
muslims sigma
Deus Vult !
✝️umor
@@julia2k8☪️ancer
@@PeterGriffin-fv8yr ✝️umor
@@julia2k8 cry
Now the christians 😭 in comments , 😂😂😂😂
the only one crying here is you
@@yazovgaming , no no no , poor baby 😂😂😂😂
Aib orang orang kristen 🤬
The Great Seljuks ❤❤❤❤
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
freak christian crying
@@denetim1 lol We remove your kind