Celestron Upclose G2 10X50 Vs. Celestron Upclose G2 20X50 - Sharpeness & Zooming Power Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • A Side by side Sharpeness & Zooming Power Comparison of Celestron Upclose G2 10X50 Vs. Celestron Upclose G2 20X50 - Which is Best?
    CELESTRON Binoculars Links (Buy Link)~
    Celestron Upclose 10X50: amzn.to/49msdsS
    Other Versions:
    Celestron Upclose 20X50: amzn.to/3MweRAi
    Celestron Upclose G2 10-30x50 Binocular: amzn.to/3Mx5PDd
    Celestron Upclose 7X35: amzn.to/47mjoxm
    Other equipment used:
    iPhone11: amzn.to/3pT4L0T
    DIGITEK® (DPTR 605 VD) (183 cm) Professional Heavy Duty Tripod: amzn.to/3rPjxdr
    Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid Video Head 60mm Half Ball -Black:amzn.to/45uLntp
    Note: Above are my affiliate links, when you buy from them I get a small commission which will help me run the channel :) Thank you !!
    #celestron20X50
    #celestron10X50
    #celestronbinoculars
    #binoculars
    ---------------------------------------------
    Celestron Upclose G2 10X50:
    Magnification: 10x
    Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm (1.96")
    Angular Field of View: 6.8°
    Linear Field of View (@1000 yds) / @1000 m): 354 ft (118 m)
    Exit Pupil: 5mm (.19")
    Eye Relief: 12mm (.47")
    Close Focus: 23 ft (7 m)
    Interpupillary Distance (max): 72mm (2.83")
    Interpupillary Distance (min): 56mm (2.20")
    Diopter Adjustment Range: -4 to +8
    Twilight Factor: 22.36
    Relative Brightness: 25
    Lens Coatings: Multi-Coated
    Prism Glass (Type): Bk7
    Prism Coatings: N/A
    Weight: 27 oz (765 g)
    Environmental Protection: Water Resistant
    Nitrogen Filled: No
    Tripod Adaptable: Yes
    Carrying Case: Soft Sided Cloth
    Dimensions: 185mm x 81mm x 160mm (7.3" x 3.2" x 6.3")
    Included Items:
    Carrying case
    Objective covers
    Eyepiece covers
    Lens cloth
    Instruction manual
    ---------------------------------------------
    Celestron Upclose G2 20X50:
    Magnification: 20x
    Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm (1.96")
    Angular Field of View: 3.2°
    Linear Field of View (@1000 yds) / @1000 m): 168 ft (56 m)
    Exit Pupil: 2.5mm (0.1")
    Eye Relief: 7mm (0.27")
    Close Focus: 42 ft (13 m)
    Interpupillary Distance (max): 72mm (2.83")
    Interpupillary Distance (min): 56mm (2.20")
    Diopter Adjustment Range: -4 to +8
    Twilight Factor: 31.62
    Relative Brightness: 6.25
    Lens Coatings: Multi-Coated
    Prism Glass (Type): Bk7
    Prism Coatings: N/A
    Weight: 28 oz (794 g)
    Environmental Protection: Water Resistant
    Nitrogen Filled: No
    Tripod Adaptable: Yes
    Carrying Case: Soft Sided Cloth
    Dimensions: 185mm x 81mm x 160mm (7.3" x 3.2" x 6.3")
    Included Items: Carrying case
    Objective covers
    Eyepiece covers
    Lens cloth
    Instruction manual
    ---------------------------------------------
    Music : Center Ring - Freedom Trail Studio
    Source : RUclips Audio Library
    Free to use
    For business enquiry:
    Mail me: krishnadebo1958@gmail.com

Комментарии • 52

  • @mateusdemarco
    @mateusdemarco 22 дня назад

    Good vid! Btw what’s that song? Sneaky catchily 👌🏻😁

  • @Lrxkid
    @Lrxkid 3 месяца назад +1

    Can you tell me best binoculars under 5k for long distance and night sky viewing?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 месяца назад

      Under 5k, celestron will be the best choice 🙏

  • @QuangMinhParsnip
    @QuangMinhParsnip Год назад +3

    Can you come back to making videos about chemistry experiments? I miss it a lot🥺

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  Год назад +1

      Thank you so much for your request 🙏
      I'm currently not in my home town. I will start making my experiment videos as soon as possible.

  • @Kira-iu2js
    @Kira-iu2js 3 месяца назад

    Hey, could you please tell us the negatives if any?

  • @DakaDaki-wd9zc
    @DakaDaki-wd9zc 4 месяца назад +2

    Thank you

  • @moulalikannur1594
    @moulalikannur1594 Год назад +3

    Sar great quality great

  • @Dampyr94
    @Dampyr94 3 месяца назад +1

    Should i go for 10x50 or 20x50 for watching the sky?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 месяца назад +1

      Both are good, each have their own pros and cons. 20x has double magnification but half light gathering ability compared to 10x50 and also the fov is less in 20x50. In my opinion you can try 10x50🙏

    • @Dampyr94
      @Dampyr94 3 месяца назад

      @@Pracitcalscience So, basically image is sharper on 10x50?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 месяца назад

      Absolutely sir 🙏

    • @Dampyr94
      @Dampyr94 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks brother. Cheers from Serbia 🙏

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 месяца назад

      You're welcome sir 🙏

  • @T2EH1N
    @T2EH1N 3 месяца назад

    Hello, I want to know does the 10x50 fit for watching a concert? The concert is set in Tokyo Dome

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 месяца назад +1

      Definitely, but it will be bit heavy to hold for a long time.
      For watching concerts, please try nikon 8x21 binoculars for best results 🙏

    • @T2EH1N
      @T2EH1N 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks for the quick response and suggest🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @hemantodeb5025
    @hemantodeb5025 Месяц назад +1

    Can you explain that a 20×50 needs a tripod?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  Месяц назад

      More than 10x magnification needs tripod for best viewing experience 🙏

  • @anshusharma1523
    @anshusharma1523 5 месяцев назад

    Should I go for a Nikon 10-22×50 or Celestron 20×50 ? What will be the pros and cons of each?
    How much would be the difference in quality and clarity in between a 10-22×50 zoom binoculars from Kson and Nikon?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  5 месяцев назад +2

      Nikon offers best optic quality than celestron.

  • @milroymoses8543
    @milroymoses8543 3 месяца назад +1

    nice comparison

  • @caledonia3390
    @caledonia3390 10 месяцев назад +1

    Nice comparison

  • @ElectromanRM
    @ElectromanRM Год назад +1

    Thank you

  • @tucoramirez5674
    @tucoramirez5674 Год назад +2

    fajne porównanie dzięki

  • @rodrigoanavalon
    @rodrigoanavalon 10 месяцев назад

    Only thing is that binoculars are looking at different buildings. But I get the point of the video, thanks.

    • @shreyasdharashivkar8027
      @shreyasdharashivkar8027 6 месяцев назад

      I am Sorry for your observation skills, they are exactly the same building. Look closely

    • @garywillacey9979
      @garywillacey9979 5 месяцев назад

      It's the same building. Your observation isn't very good.

  • @prashant.ententerprizes5092
    @prashant.ententerprizes5092 Год назад +2

    Which is longest range in binoculars ×

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  Год назад +5

      Celestron 25x100

    • @anshusharma1523
      @anshusharma1523 4 месяца назад

      ​@@Pracitcalscience I came across a binocular from Celestron having a 15-35×70 range. Would the 35× magnification be of any good with 70mm Optical diameter?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  4 месяца назад

      35x is too much for 70mm binoculars. The exit pupil will be too small. It better to avoid in my opinion 🙏

    • @anshusharma1523
      @anshusharma1523 4 месяца назад

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks for the suggestion. One more thing to ask, what if I need to get a magnification more than 20×? I mean, what are the options available in the binoculars segment if i want to go higher in mag?

  • @krishangopalsharma9510
    @krishangopalsharma9510 10 месяцев назад +1

    Shall I go for 20×50

    • @TheClassicWeebNo
      @TheClassicWeebNo 6 месяцев назад +2

      Late reply but, it depends on what you want to view. If it's for bird watching then I suggest using 20x50 if it's for astronomy then 10x50 is good as u can even see the craters on the moon with it (not clearly ofc). Their pretty much the same but 20x50 is a better option

    • @vorox7658
      @vorox7658 5 месяцев назад

      @@TheClassicWeebNodoes the bigger magnification not able to see the skyobject clearly

    • @TheClassicWeebNo
      @TheClassicWeebNo 5 месяцев назад

      @@vorox7658 you can see it more zoomed but u won't get a wider angle. Suppose u wanted to look st the Orion belt, in the smaller magnification lens I can see all the 3 stats together but in the bigger one you might get only 2 stars in vision because it will be more zoomed. Also I suggest u use the celestron binoculars because the company even makes telescopes, I recently bought the 10x50 binoculars of theirs and here's what I can see:
      -the moon
      -more stars as u look into the sky
      -planets (but only the colour it's not strong enough to see the planets itself)
      -Orion nebula (I'm in a light polluted area and yet I can see the Orion nebulas main stars not the gases and stuff but it's very cool)
      I saw the other one in astrobiscuits video on yt, if u go to a clear place u can see the sndromeda galaxy too.
      I suggest 10x50 as u get a wider angle and better understanding, others can only be used for seeing the moon closer, or the nebulas closer.

    • @who-Am-I-Here
      @who-Am-I-Here Месяц назад

      ​@@vorox7658actually its opposite

  • @Ragingcap1212
    @Ragingcap1212 11 месяцев назад

    Is the stand necessary to ise the binoculors..?

    • @hamletcabrerart
      @hamletcabrerart 11 месяцев назад

      If you use stand for 20x you’ll enjoy a steady view and easy to leave fixated rather than to have to find same spot over and over, but neither are as heavy or uncomfortable to hold as the SkyMasters series, so not really necessary, is just better!

    • @Ragingcap1212
      @Ragingcap1212 11 месяцев назад

      @@hamletcabrerart thanks for the information mate..!

  • @osmanioriccioppo3685
    @osmanioriccioppo3685 11 месяцев назад

    Obrigado!

  • @user-qi8bk5qb7r
    @user-qi8bk5qb7r 7 месяцев назад

    Ada no hp nya

  • @Carlos-dq8wo
    @Carlos-dq8wo 4 месяца назад

    Genial!!!!