Just purchased one today. After driving a Mazda CX-30, not sure why anyone would go the Mazda over this. The Mazda was a hard ride with lots of road noise. Yes, it looks nice but it’s style over substance. Anyone who compares Mazda’s to European cars need to book in with their psychologist. For the money this is a winner! Great review.
How is it holding? Test drove a 2023 version. It's much roomier than both T-Roc and Mazda CX-30 and looks better than the T-Roc IMO. Between this and the CX-30, its either the roominess plus the smoother, quieter cabin of Renault, or the eye-candy cabin of CX-30. Driving wise, I didn't push the car, but don't think I could find any difference in 50 and 90 zone that I test drove it in.
@@Subh8081 I ended up selling it after about 8 months. I went back to a Subaru (which still craps on Mazda) it started to show why it a bit cheaper, squeaks in the cabin and was a little crashy over bigger bumps. It looks fantastic though but a bit of style over substance.
Arkana is a compact coupe-SUV and T-Cross is small SUV. Arkana is much bigger both externally and in internal space. Arkana's internal space also felt more roomier than CX-30. I feel it's true competitors in terms of interior size are Nissan Qashqai, Peugeot 3008, Toyota Corolla Cross, Volkswagen Tiguan, etc.
Aussie reviews have often compared Renault SUVs to smaller competitors. The Kadjar was reviewed against the Kia Seltos and Hyundai Kona. Who knows why!
For god sake, comparing the interior to TRoc and it’s hard plastic to this I’d take this any day. The interior of the Mazda is of great quality but it’s heavy, dark and dank in my opinion. This interior is light and airy and for the money is only matched by the Skoda Kamiq.
I really hoped we might get the hybrid version in Australia. I like the Arkana but my next car will have to have some kind of electrification. Hoping for more incentives and infrastructure in Oz to attract the good vehicles from Europe
The 160 is the old engine not very good I have the 130 r/s line. No rear wiper water runs in the boot every time you open door locks fail But the worst is the dealership network. They wanted me to wait six weeks just to look and then order parts keep well away
I like it! In the sea of same styled boxy cross overs/SUVS this stands out. Gotta give it to the French for remaining quirky. Although I'd probably get it in black or grey. White does make it look too busy. However in terms of package, all this just shy over $40k for top spec? I'm in! Sold!
odd, weird, different??? I guess having the cc logo plate in some shots and not in others could also be weird, personally i think the arkana looks decent, i'd drive it....
As a VW T Cross owner with the three cylinder 1.00 litre engine, I wouldn't trade up to this vehicle. Looks good and the 1332cc engine is spot on for efficiecy viz:- 333cc per cylinder. Honest review.
Interesting! I have the new Captur which is basically the same car, but for Captur it only takes 95 and 98 petrol... Maybe I can risk it and go 91🤣🤣 /s
Mate the boot space in this is amazing. There is plenty of room and more for a couple of dogs. Compared to the 2 examples this guy gave ( TRoc and CX30) the rear leg room and boot just can’t complete.
Sat in one yesterday. With the front seat slid all the way back, half the seat is blocked by the side panel. As a person who regularly transport people with disabilities, this makes getting in and out difficult for my passengers. Does that make sen see?
@@chasingcars I’m sorry but now, what assessment is discussing that you don’t like the design? Hard plastics below? Are you telling that it’s standard in the segment or is it just the Renault? Poor journalism
@@chasingcars if it’s ok by you why are you replying to a critical comment then? Am I the only one that doesn’t laude you? Are you that business that picks a fight with all critics online? Not a good light. And yes, There’s plenty of channels out there, so I know which ones to follow
You don’t get unrestrained freedom to leave inaccurate comments unchallenged, sorry - we’re not picking on you, we’re pointing out that your statement was false.
@@chasingcars 7.9 l / 100 km for 1.3 l engine is quite average by any account. Should you wish to consider "this size" - a different engine and, perhaps, transmission would do much better.
regardless of how good it is, outside commercial and full fat Renault Sport product, does a Renault have any resale value in Australia? Most of my friends don’t even realise Renault sells cars here…
Even closing doors feels nicer on European cars :o) but people do not try and then they do not know what they are missing. Also, some people buy cars for driving, not reselling...
These alleged coupe style vehicles don't do it for me. A coupe has always been a two door vehicle. This style is an aberration; neither a sedan, a wagon nor a coupe. Ans being French, you can shove it. I remember the Rainbow Warrior and will never forgive an act of war. Okay you haters start replying and it makes not an iota of difference to me!
Having owned a new and a second hand Renault in my life, you couldn't even give me one for free. Biggest lumps of breakdowny expensive garbage I have ever seen.
Just purchased one today. After driving a Mazda CX-30, not sure why anyone would go the Mazda over this. The Mazda was a hard ride with lots of road noise. Yes, it looks nice but it’s style over substance. Anyone who compares Mazda’s to European cars need to book in with their psychologist. For the money this is a winner! Great review.
How is it holding? Test drove a 2023 version. It's much roomier than both T-Roc and Mazda CX-30 and looks better than the T-Roc IMO. Between this and the CX-30, its either the roominess plus the smoother, quieter cabin of Renault, or the eye-candy cabin of CX-30. Driving wise, I didn't push the car, but don't think I could find any difference in 50 and 90 zone that I test drove it in.
@@Subh8081 I ended up selling it after about 8 months. I went back to a Subaru (which still craps on Mazda) it started to show why it a bit cheaper, squeaks in the cabin and was a little crashy over bigger bumps. It looks fantastic though but a bit of style over substance.
@@Maggieismydog Ok. Thanks.
Arkana is a compact coupe-SUV and T-Cross is small SUV. Arkana is much bigger both externally and in internal space. Arkana's internal space also felt more roomier than CX-30. I feel it's true competitors in terms of interior size are Nissan Qashqai, Peugeot 3008, Toyota Corolla Cross, Volkswagen Tiguan, etc.
Aussie reviews have often compared Renault SUVs to smaller competitors. The Kadjar was reviewed against the Kia Seltos and Hyundai Kona. Who knows why!
I tried it today and both the interiors and exteriors are much better than the T-Roc. Also for the same price you get so much more for your money.
For god sake, comparing the interior to TRoc and it’s hard plastic to this I’d take this any day. The interior of the Mazda is of great quality but it’s heavy, dark and dank in my opinion.
This interior is light and airy and for the money is only matched by the Skoda Kamiq.
I really hoped we might get the hybrid version in Australia. I like the Arkana but my next car will have to have some kind of electrification. Hoping for more incentives and infrastructure in Oz to attract the good vehicles from Europe
Same. In addition, I do love the SUV-Coupe design, but don't relish the idea of forking out insane amounts of cash for it like the other brands.
Looks pretty good to me but would like to see an RS model with larger engine.
Whiter than most Americans teeth - love it 👍
OK, I found out a 160 Hybrid is sold in Europe. We absolutely need this model to be sold here asap
The 160 is the old engine not very good I have the 130 r/s line. No rear wiper water runs in the boot every time you open door locks fail But the worst is the dealership network. They wanted me to wait six weeks just to look and then order parts keep well away
Sharkana or Tarkana- needs more oomph imho - need a Megane RS line as that is a car that I’d buy - great review as always
Sharkana RS
This car is far better than T-Cross. Not comparable. Cx30 is definitely relevant.
Earliest I've ever been on to a review! Love your work fellas!!
Much appreciated!
I like it! In the sea of same styled boxy cross overs/SUVS this stands out. Gotta give it to the French for remaining quirky. Although I'd probably get it in black or grey. White does make it look too busy. However in terms of package, all this just shy over $40k for top spec? I'm in! Sold!
Fair point.
What Price does the arkana start from Nathan?!
odd, weird, different??? I guess having the cc logo plate in some shots and not in others could also be weird, personally i think the arkana looks decent, i'd drive it....
Lol, fair enough…
As a VW T Cross owner with the three cylinder 1.00 litre engine, I wouldn't trade up to this vehicle. Looks good and the 1332cc engine is spot on for efficiecy viz:- 333cc per cylinder. Honest review.
Can someone explain if black roof is coming along with the normal edition or costs extra?
Interesting! I have the new Captur which is basically the same car, but for Captur it only takes 95 and 98 petrol... Maybe I can risk it and go 91🤣🤣 /s
nah dont. need the detergents and additives if not the octane rating itself.
Who’s asking for a coupe suv
No mention of a spare tyre?
It's a space saver spare
Technically speaking you could also consider the Toyota CH-R a coupe SUV, it’s even in the name, and is similarly priced but smaller…
Quite true.
Any comments regarding the Torsion Bar rear suspension it has V Multilink?
Is anyone getting, the cheap looking Alfa wheels?
pls renew Koleos.
my choice of french cars would be: 1)Peugeot, 2)Citroen, then 3)Renault.Actually I love design of Pugs
T cross better quality then arkana? 😮
So basically a jacked up Megane
Basically.
No, it's actually a longer Captur.
Can you make a Koleos review？
Tell as the price for service?
You said "the only affordable coupe suv" but isn't the new Citroën C4 also an affordable coupe suv?
Yes - but when this video was filmed the Citroen C4 wasn’t available in Australia.
I am just scared that the sloping fastback roof/hatch might not be great for 2 large dogs? Also, seems very high from ground to boot lip?
Mate the boot space in this is amazing. There is plenty of room and more for a couple of dogs. Compared to the 2 examples this guy gave ( TRoc and CX30) the rear leg room and boot just can’t complete.
Sat in one yesterday. With the front seat slid all the way back, half the seat is blocked by the side panel. As a person who regularly transport people with disabilities, this makes getting in and out difficult for my passengers. Does that make sen see?
Buy a Van it maybe Grand Scenic or Espace it doesnt get better than this
Very critical for the sake of critiquing
No, for the sake of providing an accurate assessment of the car.
@@chasingcars I’m sorry but now, what assessment is discussing that you don’t like the design? Hard plastics below? Are you telling that it’s standard in the segment or is it just the Renault? Poor journalism
Sounds like you just don’t like the findings, which is OK by us. We stand by the review.
@@chasingcars if it’s ok by you why are you replying to a critical comment then? Am I the only one that doesn’t laude you? Are you that business that picks a fight with all critics online? Not a good light. And yes, There’s plenty of channels out there, so I know which ones to follow
You don’t get unrestrained freedom to leave inaccurate comments unchallenged, sorry - we’re not picking on you, we’re pointing out that your statement was false.
There’s no wiper on the back 😂 FML 🤦♂️
Name one SUV Coupe with wiper ? BMW,Mercedes or Porsche ? Nope so what is the Point it is a SUV Coupe 😅
"7.9 l/100 km - this is pretty good...." Really? For CVT and 1.3 l engine?
Moving something this size, yeah, in the real world that’s okay. And it’s a DCT.
@@chasingcars 7.9 l / 100 km for 1.3 l engine is quite average by any account. Should you wish to consider "this size" - a different engine and, perhaps, transmission would do much better.
Great review
Thanks Alf
“… looks whiter than most American’s teeth” LMFAO.
Love it
Ponch give Tom his jacket back
regardless of how good it is, outside commercial and full fat Renault Sport product, does a Renault have any resale value in Australia? Most of my friends don’t even realise Renault sells cars here…
There is a dedicated following in parts of Sydney. John Law is one of that pack!
Even closing doors feels nicer on European cars :o) but people do not try and then they do not know what they are missing. Also, some people buy cars for driving, not reselling...
whomst asked for a sedan suv
Somebody. Apparently.
Suv Car Arkana
Mazda easy win always, japan reliabilty > european design
These alleged coupe style vehicles don't do it for me. A coupe has always been a two door vehicle. This style is an aberration; neither a sedan, a wagon nor a coupe. Ans being French, you can shove it. I remember the Rainbow Warrior and will never forgive an act of war. Okay you haters start replying and it makes not an iota of difference to me!
The Navy is purchasing the electric model ...
Lol sir you seem so pressed😂.
Rainbow warrior what a joke, as for the rest of the world we will never forget Jacinta the donkey Adern
Nice car. But the front light design is just fugly….. look like fishing hooks 😂
Lemme be bold and make a guess, this is gonna flop so hard, I'm sorry. I'd be surprised if I'm able to see one of these more than once per month
Look cheap to me... like other cars from the old Renault/Samsung partnership.
First!
Having owned a new and a second hand Renault in my life, you couldn't even give me one for free. Biggest lumps of breakdowny expensive garbage I have ever seen.
Yikes. What did you have?
@@chasingcars I had a Clio and a Megane. Just horrible
My Megane RS265 100% reliable and a 2014 with 92k - must be lucky?
@@malcolmscott4150 Im glad yours has been trouble free
@Jason Lewis : my version of your story is with Peugeot. I wonder what the two brands have in common…