You can tell it’s synthetic by the way it sounds. Think about it. Think about people that you know are great speakers and don’t stutter or anything. They don’t sound like this. They sound human. This synthetic voice is extremely clean and “perfect”. You can also tell by the way that successive sentences of different topics are sometimes strung together fluently as if they are of the same topic. The inflections in this voice sound very natural, but it’s the abruptly fast transitions between some sentences that further give it away.
I was thinking it sounded like a chat algorithm...it will be very interesting if humans can detect chat algorithms maybe that will be a new job for some people I'm sure there will be a need for this in the future.
@@johndzwon1966 I already avoid videos which have "insane", "shocking", "game over", or similar labels in their title. There should be some anti-clickbait law, thumbs-down is insufficient. In the case of this video, the click-bait was totally unnecessary, the idea of a standardized robotic language seems quite good for generating views.
@@laszlokorosi9012 I agree with you. However, there is a conflict of interest at play here. The reason that click-bait is on the rise, is because Google/RUclips decided to monetarily incentivise videos based on how many times they are watched. Since greed is considered good in the capitalist/corporate system, I think we're stuck with this problem for now.
There is something profoundly ugly about discrete tokens in an analog world. No wonder so much data is needed, because the discretization in the multimodal input space will have a lot of non-interpolatable blind spots.
They need to find a way to get the data they need, rather than throwing massive vast quantities of data, at it where most is unuseable. Am I right? It should be easy, too!
More precisely, 99.999% if you mean “smarter” as in more knowledgeable. Who is able to intuitively explain quantum mechanics, theoretical physics, astrophysics, abstract algebra, and topology? A list of such people would not have that many names. But yes, the actual problem solving and critical thinking skills (which isn’t that good so far) of AI is likely better than 90% of humans, unfortunately.
um, not to put too fine a point on it, but is it really that hard to make humans look stupid? are you watching the US election? you need to find a better comparison metric, your bar's way too low
Right? They try to off the best president they've had in decades, twice, and yet the other side which has fielded a vegetable and a cackling lawyer with zero policies or people skills are still in the running!
Yes, humans created a machine that is intelligent enough to create its own machines that are even superior to itself, thereby rendering humanity useless and obsolete to the capitalist machine... Does that make humans smart, or stupid is the real question?
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
hey, did you know you sound similar to NotebookLM AI voice? I am not really sure if you are human😂
Voice prosthetic. I doubt anyone want to hear the true awkward incel voice of the author.
You can tell it’s synthetic by the way it sounds. Think about it. Think about people that you know are great speakers and don’t stutter or anything. They don’t sound like this. They sound human. This synthetic voice is extremely clean and “perfect”. You can also tell by the way that successive sentences of different topics are sometimes strung together fluently as if they are of the same topic. The inflections in this voice sound very natural, but it’s the abruptly fast transitions between some sentences that further give it away.
I was thinking it sounded like a chat algorithm...it will be very interesting if humans can detect chat algorithms maybe that will be a new job for some people I'm sure there will be a need for this in the future.
I don't see anything here making humans look stupid.
Sure you do. It's our inability to stop viewing click-bait. 🙂
yep disliking this video also helps out on weeding these garbage contents
😂😂@@johndzwon1966
@@johndzwon1966 I already avoid videos which have "insane", "shocking", "game over", or similar labels in their title. There should be some anti-clickbait law, thumbs-down is insufficient. In the case of this video, the click-bait was totally unnecessary, the idea of a standardized robotic language seems quite good for generating views.
@@laszlokorosi9012 I agree with you.
However, there is a conflict of interest at play here. The reason that click-bait is on the rise, is because Google/RUclips decided to monetarily incentivise videos based on how many times they are watched. Since greed is considered good in the capitalist/corporate system, I think we're stuck with this problem for now.
Not open-source apparently
There is something profoundly ugly about discrete tokens in an analog world. No wonder so much data is needed, because the discretization in the multimodal input space will have a lot of non-interpolatable blind spots.
The kind of comment that I didn't expect but appreciated
@@djpaddyofficial it comes from the work floor
I give it 2 years
I give it 2 days
I give it 2 hours
I give it 2 minutes
I give it 2 seconds
@wizardlyrhino2824 no where near there yet
Now we require data production as an industry that pays people.
They need to find a way to get the data they need, rather than throwing massive vast quantities of data, at it where most is unuseable. Am I right? It should be easy, too!
Humans make this smart robot and the AI itself
They can do many things, but they cant draw something as simple as a casr with 4 tires :D
Click bait. So annoying
ai is already smarter than 90% of humans.
More precisely, 99.999% if you mean “smarter” as in more knowledgeable. Who is able to intuitively explain quantum mechanics, theoretical physics, astrophysics, abstract algebra, and topology? A list of such people would not have that many names.
But yes, the actual problem solving and critical thinking skills (which isn’t that good so far) of AI is likely better than 90% of humans, unfortunately.
Good robot 🤖 with good people 😅 butttt BAD robot with bad people dangerous 😮😮😮
Imagine a holographic AI robot.
For what?
I mean, it could be cool, but a hologram wouldn’t be able to do anything in the physical world.
those human attempts to cling to own relevance are so cute
The universe is so perfect for the perishable things.
um, not to put too fine a point on it, but is it really that hard to make humans look stupid? are you watching the US election?
you need to find a better comparison metric, your bar's way too low
Right? They try to off the best president they've had in decades, twice, and yet the other side which has fielded a vegetable and a cackling lawyer with zero policies or people skills are still in the running!
nothing in video
cartoons look after my pets?? what?
Eat turtle .. calculate love .. drink up .. and turtle ur ai
Which AI you use for thumbnail?
I believe more data is need even human need more data to perform multiple task.😅
aw shi here we go. :)
Rosey!
AI voice
Love from India🇮🇳 brother your voice is mind-blowing
🤣🤣🤣😋😋😛😛
who speaks on this video?
ai voice
when will this terminator come out killing humans?
Ask this super-brain if he knows what is indescribable and if so if he will ever be able to feel it.
Sounds like a disease
Neat!
That hurts, we feel stupid on our own enough, but thanks for trying to help, think to save the future amen, I like the Jetsons amen
Humans still created them so….they got that on em
Yes, humans created a machine that is intelligent enough to create its own machines that are even superior to itself, thereby rendering humanity useless and obsolete to the capitalist machine... Does that make humans smart, or stupid is the real question?
“Stupid” l be stupid, 🤖🤪🤖
as most West Aging now next between young & west
So stupid humans made an intelligent machine? Weird claim to have. It’s super hard to think you put any effort into anything .