4 Non-Negotiable Needs Required For a Secure Partnership - 272

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024

Комментарии • 38

  • @michaelking4578
    @michaelking4578 4 года назад +19

    Good stuff. Makes sense.
    1. Feeling safe.
    2. Feeling seen.
    3. Feeling soothed.
    4. Supported and Challenged.

  • @FereshtaMusic
    @FereshtaMusic 4 года назад +3

    The safe harbor & launching pad training you gave at our live event in the fall was SEISMIC! Thank you for bringing it!

  • @shawnette1
    @shawnette1 Год назад +1

    This. This on so many levels… Thank you Jayson G 🙏🏽

  • @WahkeenaSitka
    @WahkeenaSitka 4 года назад +5

    I really appreciate your podcast Jayson. Thank you for all your work.

  • @relaxwithme__
    @relaxwithme__ 3 года назад +1

    This was so helpful. I’m going through your channel now. You are sharp as a tack.

  • @BellClan37
    @BellClan37 4 года назад +1

    Excellent!

  • @bahninjalanguagelearning
    @bahninjalanguagelearning 4 года назад +1

    Thank you

  • @TamaraGrace
    @TamaraGrace 2 года назад +1

    Hi there, I'm watching your content, and so far, it's great. It's not like that bull that others teach about women. That we are just emotional creatures that have no need to be learned or understood... Honestly, my theory on it is, men do think with logic and reason. What you can see, touch, taste, and feel. Women think more on a level that science can't explain, nor has been able to explain because not all results are concrete or measurable... Example, how do you measure one human being who can physically feel the needs of another human being? A woman's boobs feel pressure when her new born baby cries. We are literally programmed from birth, naturally to think on a more spiritual level. And that's something that can not be measured or put into categorical labels... You can't test the science behind it. With that said, some men don't understand that small fact about women and disregard us as being something that should not be understood. In a man's world, there's just not enough science to understand the mind of a woman.
    With the break down of the family, in present society, it makes us women more distant from men unable and unlearned of how to tap into thinking with logic and reasoning. The same way, as men can tap into their emotional side, and learning the unspoken needs of others.... Without a woman present, or without wanting to learn, we become so distant from eachother, and we can see the symptoms of this within our society today. Fathers aren't being fathers, and mothers aren't being mothers...
    Anyhoo, I love your content and agree with most. Please check your description box, you misspelled the word "feeling," in your last time stamp.
    Keep up the good work! Thanks so much!

    • @JaysonGaddis
      @JaysonGaddis  2 года назад +1

      You're welcome

    • @kirstinstrand6292
      @kirstinstrand6292 2 года назад +1

      I understand what you believe and are saying. However, an easier approach to understanding the communication necessary for a good partnership is to focus on the 4 needs. Expressing feelings about the 4 mutually beneficial needs would be a new beginning for those in conflict.
      As an aside, parapsychology addresses some of what you describe. It could be a separate interest for you; who knows, maybe men could understand your "spiritual" side. (Check out Jeffrey Mishlove on RUclips.)

  • @andrewgross1758
    @andrewgross1758 Год назад +1

    I didn't get the part about texting the ex. Why wouldn't that be a more obvious point? That said, I love your content.

    • @JaysonGaddis
      @JaysonGaddis  Год назад

      thanks for watching

    • @alistairhunter5724
      @alistairhunter5724 5 месяцев назад

      Yes .other than the minimum necessary for a co parenting situation they should be deleted from all platforms. I wouldn't even ask .I would be gone .😊

  • @Phoenix44519
    @Phoenix44519 Год назад +1

    V as F was hilarious

  • @avaceleste
    @avaceleste 3 года назад +1

    Boulder, CO hello neighbor 🌻

  • @LaLeoRonroneo
    @LaLeoRonroneo 3 года назад +1

    100%. True

  • @Vykeera
    @Vykeera 4 года назад +2

    What do you do if you openly supply their needs, but they consistently disregard, or even reject it, while refusing to supply your needs in return?

    • @ananeixon
      @ananeixon 4 года назад +5

      Start suppling your own needs so your partner will mirrow you and act accordely. Stop thinking about other's needs first and set yourself also as important and you will see that everything is a balance!

    • @singinglawnchair
      @singinglawnchair 4 года назад +6

      I'll add upon what Ana said and say, do you really want to stay in a relationship where your needs are constantly rejected and dismissed? Meet those needs yourself, whether it's with or without a partner.

    • @Vykeera
      @Vykeera 4 года назад +1

      Thank you for the perspective help. It's one thing to hear and remember that when it's happening to someone else. Totally different when you're in it.

    • @JaysonGaddis
      @JaysonGaddis  4 года назад +8

      a partnership is mutual. both parties do this for each other. while meeting your own needs is important, why be in a partnership if you don't do that for each other also?

    • @Vykeera
      @Vykeera 4 года назад

      @@JaysonGaddis I've been asking myself that same question. I was hoping that all the stuff I've learned would help, but he doesn't value stuff like therapists, coaches, books, or any other "professional" resource out there and insists on only doing things within his comfort zone, which doesn't include colaborating with me either. He says he loves me and is trying, but I still feel invalidated and unseen, and the same issues still have no resolve. How do you know when to walk away?

  • @beatricebliss9379
    @beatricebliss9379 4 года назад

    I thought security was mainly a need women had and that men need a little bit of insecurity to mentain atraction. What do u think?

    • @JaysonGaddis
      @JaysonGaddis  4 года назад +1

      not for a secure-long-term partnership.