Going Inverted On Takeoff | EE Operations LLC N534FF
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 апр 2024
- Please support this channel by following me on Patreon
/ allecibay
Music: The Only Light Is Gone
Artist: Dalo Vian
Listen to the entire music here:
• The Only Light Is Gone...
Follow me on:
/ allec.ibay
Dad was a career USMC pilot - flew in WWII, Korea and Vietnam. When he retired and bought a Cessna 172, he would never take off without reviewing his preflight checklist. Never. He was distrustful of pilots who do not follow that protocol.
These twin prop planes are very unforgiving when an engine is lost. I wouldn't have flown in this pane if I had heard about the oil consumption issue.
Why did they not ground the plane knowing it had the problem?
@@bradmccullough1437 At a guess, money. Planes that are grounded do not generate revenue.
Oil consumption monitoring is normal in many cases. Unless it is excessive. Maintenance may have needed more data to isolate the problem. The aircraft operating manual and Maintenance manuals would give the guidance on what would ground the aircraft.
Checklists save lives
I'm confused, not facetious -how would a checklist have revealed engine loss on takeoff?
@@mattmcrae1458 could have created awareness before V1, pilot continually ignored checklists. The video never addressed what caused the engine loss on take off which is a major unknown
If it was a friction lock problem, the checklist would have caught it. The throttles creeped back on their own because the locks were not set properly. In other words there was no engine failure, only a roll back of thrust due to the locks. All the pilot would have needed to do was reset the throttles.
Always a treat to see new content from Allec in my RUclips feed 😃
Not sure if ‘treat’ is the right word to use here. Please be more sensitive and respectful. People died in this accident. If your mother had died on this plane you wouldn’t be saying it’s a treat.
@@stacked7476 Don't be... silly. The word "treat" clearly refers to a new upload by an excellent content provider - one who is always sensitive and respectful to his subject matter and any who suffer in regard to aviation accidents. "Treat" has nothing to do with people suffering and dying.
On many fronts that pilot was a total dufus.
Well Said
Also, he was way too old to be a pilot carrying pasengers in a commercial flight.
@@julosx, That is incorrect. Age 65 is for FAR Part 121 Operations only. This flight was operated under Part 135, where the pilot can fly over 65, as long as they have a proper medical certificate.
Yes sounds like it. I wouldn't fly a plane with an engine issue like that.
Complacency, not age, was the issue.
I think there were three conflicting things that were bothersome as to why this terrible accident happened. One is the information received of the left engine with the oil issue. That was forwarded to the flight crew way before departure. Second is the inability to properly configure this airplane before the flight. Third is the lack of experience on the King Air from the first officer and poor communication within the cockpit. Had those necessary steps been taken, the crash would've probably been avoided. I feel sad for all that were lost. RIP ✝️
The oil consumption of the left engine being on monitor is a non-issue. I don't know what you are saying when you state "the inability to properly configure this airplane before the flight." Are you talking about the lack of checklist usage? If so, I agree with you. However, the aircraft was properly configured prior to take-off. The lack of experience by the "first officer" is a non-factor as well. This flight was conducted under Part 135 as a single pilot operation. There are many reasons why he was occupying the right seat, however, he was not a part of the official crew.
King airs usually are certified to be operated single pilot. However, many operators are not allowed solely due to insurance policy, so they bring a second pilot, who may likely not be type rated or experienced in the plane.
I’ve done it once in a king air where I was a glorified radio guy. it wasn’t required to have a second person since it was a personal plane under part 91, but the PIC was 70 and the owner felt more comfortable having a second pilot there in case the PIC had a medical emergency in flight.
Excellent as always, Allec👍
Thank you for accepting my suggestions on Emirates Flight 764, RyanAir Flight 4102, GoAir Flight 811 and Yemenia Flight 626
Also China Airlines Flight 611.
269,000 subscribers. Yea it must all be down to you. Reflected Glory.
@@xr6lad Aimlessly aggressive reply.
Touch grass, bud. 🙄
Sadly that just a start of the long list of accidents happened that way.
He doesn’t take your suggestions into consideration
Sorry to disappoint, Mr Narcissist.
lmao
RIP
To the passengers and the two pilots of N534FF
Love this one remember it vividly and well covered by Blancolirio
The more I watch the less I value total flight hours. As a passenger I'm more interested in total takeoffs and landings.
RIP. Terrible way to go.
Multiple video angles of the crash are shown on the "What you haven't seen" RUclips channel. Absolutely horrific.
thanks for sharing
When you're sitting in a plane and your worst nightmare comes true.
Love your videos!
Enjoy your vids.
Could the oil consumption problem have triggered the left engine failure? Anyway, not doing checklists allows a problem to become a disaster.
Thing is, there was no actual engine failure. The friction lock not being properly adjusted cause the left power lever to move rearward, reducing its power output inducing a yawing tendency.
Rest in Peace Pilots and Passengers.
Another Captain Clown, way to go buddy.
Video of this crash exists as a security camera caught it.
Fifi the flying B-29 is housed at this airport. It was moved from Midland, TX a few years back. I believe the CAF's B-24 is also at Addison.
So the pilot was informed of issues with the left engine and yet was surprised by its failure
I honestly don't know how these lesser known general aviation crashes haven't got their Wikipedia articles yet...
Because no one bothers to make it
What an absolute bummer.
Pilot Debrief covered this case
Can;t find it at Pilot Debrief. Do you know the title of the video?
@@frankblangeard8865 ruclips.net/video/3CrJvlmzFPY/видео.htmlsi=iYXG38sGxCx1gV_F
It was this video
@@frankblangeard8865The Pilot Debrief video is "Pilot's Reckless Mistakes End in Deadly Disaster!". ruclips.net/video/3CrJvlmzFPY/видео.html
You really should look into Decoy 81 a West Virginia ANG C130 that crashed 7 October 1992
Capt age 71..f/o age 28...ohhhh boy
All of those hours in the air and then it comes down to a few critical seconds. For what? No pre take off checks. Wrong rudder inputs... no feathering of the left engine. It all has to be done in the blink of an eye and it wasn't. So damned tragic!
Allec can you upload Aeroflot flight 1492 the plane that got stung by lightning
The MF mechanic knew.
How was the NTSB able to collect all the data without the FDR?
Must have had a voice recorder on board
Can you do BEA 411
A two year old plane with oil issues in one of the engines? Is that normal?
I can’t imagine attempting to fly any aircraft that has any sort of mechanical issue. Insanity…
It is done every day. The MEL (Minimum Equipment List) specifies what can and can't be a deferred maintenance item. All Part 135 and 121 operators have them for each aircraft type and subtype.
Sadly 1 more case of that you can not pull to the side of the road to work on any aircraft in the air. Machine runs 💯 trustworthy as you humanly possibly can or keep it on Mother Earth.
Aircraft are very unforgiving.
Tourists 😮
Definitely did not keep the blue side up.
Less click bait thumbs mate. This is the sort of thing that has made walk away from many channels when they start great and then jump the shark. You don’t need to do that as your videos are good enough as it is.
Are you came from The Flight Channel?
What click bait? The image is pretty much exactly what happened.
@@DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3 5 years old? Really. With all the embellishments? The CGI sprinkles? Th dramatic bursts of flames round the screen?
Lazy pilot that wouldn't do the precheck . How sad for the passengers. 😢
Dang I was 5th!
Are you kidding? Such a tragic story, and that's your priority?
It seems EE Operations could have done a better job of hiring qualified pilots.
The pilot was probably one of the owners at EE Operations. "We don't need no stinkin' checklists."
This video actually shows the crash. ruclips.net/video/Urr-AxPUc3c/видео.htmlsi=CzdXYmR6LtxmnfQm
Because I was Inverted
Stop everything and have that left engine examined. Interesting that the report never resolved the cause of the engine failure. Makes you wonder who's in charge and their expertise.
If I remember correctly. Both engines were mechanically sound. That's why they were trying to decide about throttle position.
@@fltboss Using excess oil did not sound like it should've been taken lightly. Might have been oil leaking out of the crank case.
There is a lot of blaming the pilot here and not enough evidence to back up the criticism, he may have, it might have ect ect.
The initial use of left rudder versus right rudder I'd a huge red flag for me. Either he disregarded his training or was incompetent. I believe Beech now recommends or requires the pilot to keep on hand on the throttles in all models of the King Air. It doesn't need two hands on the control wheel to fly them.
The fact he wanted a silent copilot who would never take any action whatsoever is the sign of an egotistical maniac.
@@DeltaFoxtrotWhiskey3 Suspecting that the 71yo pilot had become an airline captain back when they were demigods?
Was the aircraft repaired and returned to service?
Pilots in multi-pilot commercial air transportation must retire by the age of 65. This pilot was 71.
That is incorrect. Age 65 retirement is for FAR Part 121 Operations only. This flight was operated under FAR Part 135, where pilots can continue to fly as long as they have a proper medical.
Going Inverted On Takeoff | EE Operations LLC N534FF
Going Inverted On Takeoff | EE Operations LLC N534FF
@@anandguruji83 Yes, we KNOW, we KNOW! We can read!!
@@thhseeking It's just bumping-up its own replies, and likes.
@@peggyl2849 A Pakistani bot 🤣
You don't take of with a defectice engine in the first place.
Why do you think the engine was defective? The oil consumption is not a big issue. It was on monitor. And, I would guess that it was checked and serviced if needed prior to this flight. The aircraft was only two years old. For a turbine engine, that is "young".
Too old to be piloting.
Reason 55, why I won't fly.
So you don’t drive either? Or cross the street? Or ride a bike? Or go on a boat?
@@golfswingbodymechanicsinte2854 YAWN 🥱 At 70 & disabled, I don't do much of anything, sonny. But if I can't get there by car, boat or train...I won't go.
@@susiesweet8003 bot