@@Neverpullingitout Well when 500 people use the same copy-pasted comments that have literally no grounding in reality, you have to assume that it's a computer spamming comments.
Wouldn't you rather that your warmonger government spent money on your crumbling infrastructure rather than war. I'd rather my fkn government, the UK, didn't waste billions on the US Vs Russia proxy war. Russia is slowly swallowing up Ukraine and the US is thinking 'Maybe we made a mistake here.'
This comment section is hillarious. Russians coping about their wunderwaffe not actually being as good as advertised. Everybody has been shitting their pants for years about these anti-air systems, and now they’re revealed to be: average. Much to the chagrin of the super patriots 😂
@@alexz5336Really? I don’t see that many “Russian shills” I only see Ukrainian shills. You must not have very good eyesight, or you are willfully ignorant.
@@cameronspence4977 Pretty much all I'm seeing in the comments is talk about "Russian bots". It's like some actual bots spam that stuff about "Russian bots". Makes you think...
Most people have little understanding about Air Defence system and thus, easily fall for the hype of S-400 parroted by the bots. They fall for paper performance without realizing its real world implication. The S-400 became operational in 2007 and glorified for its 400 km engagement range - little do many realize that the SAM (40N6) with 380 km range didn’t become operational until very recently. They’re also unaware of the type of target(s) 40N6 is designed to engage. For nearly a decade, Russian outlets claimed 40N6 having Mach 14 speed with ‘anti-satellite’ capability - only when the missile went operational a year ago, the manufacturer’s data pointed a complete different reality - Mach 3.5 speed with smaller engagement altitude than PAC-3 MSE against ballistic missiles. And it’s designed specifically for non-maneuverable targets (AWACS, Bombers, UAVs, etc.) and not ideal for tactical Fighters. Against Fighter aircraft, S-400’s range actually shrink to a maximum of 200-250 km with 48N6E variants. This is not much different than the so-called "inferior" Patriot. For decades, outlets highlighted everytime Patriot failed, while ignoring its successes. In 4 years, Patriot in Saudi Arabia intercepted over 230 ballistic missiles - that’s more than 1 intercept every week. How many ballistic missiles or anything did S-400 intercept in last 15 years of service? Zero. People talk about Patriot’s failure in recent attack on Abqaiq oil refinery in Saudi Arabia, how it failed to intercept Iranian drones while overlooking S-400’s performance in Syria. The S-400 had been deployed in Russia’s Khmeimim air base in Syria since 2015 and that particular air base faced multiple drone attacks over last 3 years. There has been multiple failure to defend the air base against drone attacks, some resulting in Russian aircraft being damaged and personnel killed - yet the S-400 was never used to engage any UAVs despite repeated failure of point defence systems. These also highlighted serious flaws in Pantsir S1 - a system designed specifically to deal with such threats and Russian analysts reporting those flaws were forced to remove their posts. The US fielded PAC-3 with hit-to-kill warhead in 2000 as kinetic warheads are much more effective against hypersonic targets. Russia still relies on conventional fragmentation warhead and there’s no indication of it getting kinetic warhead anytime soon. At the same time people don’t look at Aegis platforms, which is the US equivalent of Strategic Air Defence system. The S-400’s pesa primary Search radar 91N6E is capable of detecting a 0.4 m2 ballistic target from 250 km. The Aegis’s now obsolete and non-AESA SPY-1D(v) reportedly “can track golf ball-sized targets at ranges in excess of 165 km.” Golf ball = 0.0025 m2. For a direct comparison, if you scale SPY-1D’s range to 0.4 m2, then it corresponds to 587 km - that’s more than twice the range of S-400 (91N6E). Unlike S-400’s overhyped 40N6, the SM-6 on Aegis with 260 km+ range can engage almost any endo-atmospheric target from sea-skimming cruise missiles, tactical aircraft to manoeuvrable ballistic missiles in their terminal stage. There’s nothing comparable to SM-3 in Russian service, the most tested exo-atmospheric interceptor with a range of 2,500 km. The Aegis BMD system have demonstrated its ability to engage targets over the horizon using targeting data coming from airborne platforms as part of Cooperative Engagement (NIFC-CA). SM-6 have engaged cruise missiles solely relying on targeting data from F-35 or E-2D. When was the last time you heard S-400 doing something like this?
^^Well said 😉 I also want to point out that Patriot was designed to fully integrate with various tactical defense platforms extending its capability substantially. In 1977 Patriot was integrated with HAWK & it has only improved since then.
A practical look at Air Defense, thanks for doing research and not just spouting off some dumb shit. I’m nowhere near an expert but holy fuck I must seem like a genius when compared with some of these Russian cope(rs) here.
@@rebelliousfewYou have over 100+ comments just on this channel. The max people can see is 100+. You could have over 1,000 comments on this channel and I wouldn’t know. You can’t really call people butt hurt when you’re the one commenting against someone’s side and trying to argue with people on it. They’re not even angry like you’re trying to portray. they’re defending their statements with facts and evidence because you rudely comment towards them. The way you approach things doesn’t help your arguments.
Some titles seem to bring them in masses like a fishing net. I'm sure they have some system that flags videos based of title and descriptions and sends it off to the bot and troll networks to be worked.
Russian bots have infested social media and media in general. On RUclips they post pro-z comments, deprecate or the EU and other bots upvote it. They down vote normal real posters who challenge them and seek to try and get them banned. Several outlets are clearly Russian controlled. RUclips is super inept at stopping this and more concerned with wokeness
@@williamzk9083 There's no Russian bot here. Just because you guys can't take the truth, doesn't make everyone Russian bot. See, your ATACMS are soo effective that for over a month they hit no target and are all shot down by S-400s. There are literally hundreds of S-400 all over the front. ATACMS barely managed to hit 3ish, till S-400 operators tuned their system.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365I have no doubt the S-400 is a modern and effective piece of equipment. Plus, it's fairly inexpensive compared to western equivalents. One of the many reasons Turkey, and I believe India, went with them. According to this video, Russia had 57 S-400 in 2020 and produces several a year. So if those numbers are just in the correct ballpark, then no they don't have 100's all across the front. Besides, not all would be stationed in or near Ukraine. They have a vast border to protect, along with key cities and infrastructure. There's always the possibility of a nation, or non state actor, taking advantage of them being preoccupied with their invasion of Ukraine. As to ATACMS. I'm pretty sure, it's less then a month ago, that Ukraine used ATACMS, to great effect in the newly occupied area of Kharkiv, along with Belgorod. I'm sure there are newer instances, that I'm just not awhere of, or don't remember. You might not be a Russian Bot, or so you say. But your claims are ridiculous, and you act like someone who's getting paid. Here you go. 10 Rubles for you. Thats the last money you'll earn from me responding. You don't have to thank me. Just stay safe buddy.
Are Russian bots people who disagree with you? Why not just debate them with your superior ideas? Seems like the weak route just labeling them bots. What would I know I'm just a common sense bot.
А главную клубнику не покозали как уничтожили болие 25 атакомсов, сжигают насанс и самое главное установки петриот болие 5 видео 2 сразу есть в сети 😂🎉🎉🎉, спасибо налогоплательщика твои деньги сгорели на украине с фейерверком 🎉🎉🎉
Excellent video, this is what I had been thinking as well with regards to how ATACMS was so effective against S-400, glad to see that my hunch matches the reality.
Actually everything is effective against S-400. It is because it is just modernized variant of S-300, what was modernized variant of S-200. Destroyed in bulk in Iraq. It was not even designed to be better, but Russia lost ability to make many parts after fall of USSR. So it is just slightly more compact modernization. It is not even clear if Russia actually based it on fake anti-Stealth warfare concept or just engineers lied, as they tend to do in Russia.
@@leight420 You do realize that "propaganda" is SPECIFICALLY and almost EXCLUSIVELY from the top state/federal level of a country, right? One random person's channel giving his opinion on something does NOT qualify as "propaganda". I can't stand all you people who keep destroying our definition of words everywhere you go, to the point where everything is completely MEANINGLESS.
@@JohnDorian-j7xPropaganda has many channels and ways… Not saying this one in particular. I’ve been accused of being Russian when I’m from south America and do not conform to one blindly to one narrative
Why Crimea is not connected to Russia? Because it does not belong to Russia. Too many rich Russians are just loungering around Crimea, because of vacations.
Why Moldova doesn't have access to the Black Sea? Because south of the country was stolen by Ukraine. Why does the Snake island was part of Ukraine?(now under Russian control) Because was stolen from Romania and when Romania won it back at the International Court of Justice in Hague, Ukraine just answered F Off!!!
@@FinnisJaeger so Ukraine took it back so they can give it to the rightful owner Romania? With all the water surrounding the island that are rich of oil and gas?
@@andreiarama8745 This is a matter that was already decided in 2009 by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a manner that Romania's representative described as "advantageous for Romania, fair, and also advantageous for Ukraine”.
The S400 system was approved for service in 2007. The ATACMS missile was first used in combat in 1991. Wasn’t the S400 supposed to shoot down missiles like ATACMS?
@@halliwedge Tell us all how you get the numbers of all the atacms launched and how many get intercepted? You made your view up. ergo. Your reality is fake and a small pile of wood.
I think general the average person does not understand in war you have to expect losses in order to make gains. It is a matter of choosing how and when those losses vs gains will pay off in the long term that matters. Some comments appear as they expect one side or the other to never lose any assets and that is just not reality.
Remember how all leftoids were yelling "PUTIN'S BOT" at the Trump supporters back in 2016? The joke is - you only have standards because you use double standards.
Russia removed 105 systems from airfields that are out of range from ukraien leaving them completly undefended . (proven satelite image see last perun release fr details) apprently rumored that they lost higher number latest 5 month that russia say.
Because it isn’t fair. He never speaks about the failures of Ukraine, and if he does, he either downplays it or just outright denies it, even if there is evidence.
@@rebelliousfew Hilarious, so I suppose you accept his assessment that S-400 fell victim to being overwhelmed by a swarm of ATACMS, yet is shown exploding with secondary missile explosions... makes sense.
@@joetuktyyuktuk8635I never said that, so don’t go off topic like you people typically do. He has not made a single video criticizing or showing the destruction of Ukrainian equipment, let alone talk about it in detail, it’s always been Russian equipment. THAT is why he is an unfair, biased source. Learn to read next time.
@@rebelliousfew"whaaaaa its not fair! Its not fair! Boohoohoohooo I want my mommy and my blanky and my bottle, its not fair😢🥺🥺🥺🥺!" Your desperation and coping is so utterly hilarious, its insane how much fun it is when binkov uploads not bc of the video but bc of babies like you whining and crying in the comments! News flash buddy: the videos about Atacms and S400 so its perfectly fair to put only stuff about s400 and Atacms in it. Thats how basic logic works, I know that might be confusing to you but when you grow up and become an adult youll figure out how the real world works, probably 😂
It appears that Russia has over-stated the efficiencies of the S-300 and S-400 (Gee, who would have guessed). Probably also why Iran is getting unsure about how well they will defend them from Israel air strikes. Note: Russia's 'export version' is ALWAYS degraded over 'homeland' versions.
because russia always focused on shutting down jets and not missles thats their mistake s400 is literally not close to be good shoting down misses but jets each battery only has 4 missles with is another very bad thing vs missles sicne it alwayts gonna be more
@@goldendiamond761 Actually, the S-300 and S-400 were claimed as being able to intercept PGMs like cruise missiles, various guided bombs and even the AGM-88 HARM and other Anti Radiation Missiles.
@@goldendiamond761 The same is true of Patriot batteries. The difference is Patriot batteries have been improved the last 20 years. Russian air defense hasn't
The US only had 700-800 ATACMs because we haven’t been buying them for a while. The weapon that replaced the ATACMs has already arrived and is filling Army inventories as we speak. The PRSM or Precision Strike Missile. It is quite a bit more advanced than ATACMs and has a range of at least 310 miles but probably upwards of 550 miles the exact range is classified. And it can hit moving targets on land or sea. It was test fired against a decommissioned warship traveling at 20 knots and scored a direct hit. The CEP Circle area of probability is 1 meter. So draw a circle on the target 1 meter in diameter and the weapon will hit inside that circle. It’s incredibly accurate. ATACMs is at bad either it’s CEP is 3 meters especially the latest ones. But about the ATACMs we will probably wind up giving Ukraine about 80% of ours we will give them more as the PRSM is delivered or the Prism missile for short. It is a smaller missile too with the same size warhead so one HIMARS launcher can hold 2 Prisms as opposed to 1 ATACMs. But the US is not the only country that has ATACMs and I believe there is still a production line for them gone in the United States as it’s sold to allies. South Korea has a lot of them and they will probably give Ukraine some of them and some European Coumtries have it too I don’t know which ones off the top Of my head.
This is false. The US has 4000 ATACMS in their stockpiles and 500 a year are being manufactured at this very moment to fulfill an order that was placed in 2022. The US can keep giving ATACMS as long as they have funding.
Is there a new PrSM Increments 3 missile developed that increases range beyond 1000km and has a antiship capability as well as land attack. This missile should shake up the Russians.
Thing about the strike vid is the S-400 didnt start firing until juat before impact and only got off three, maybe four missiles, like they disnt realize they were under attack until it was way too late.
Which is weird because a ballistic missile really isn't hard to spot and identify. I think what's happened here is S-400 isn't actually designed to hit tactical ballistic missiles, just air breathing targets. I reckon they _hoped_ it would have a secondary capability against TBMs, and that wing and a prayer got written into the sales pitch. Russia will NEVER say a weapon can't do something if you asked them.
In the full video i saw 6 failed interceptor launches. not just 3 given how fast ATACMS travel the first interceptor missile being launches wasnt right before impact. It just seems that way because the missiles travel fast. When they tried to intercept the atacms was still farther away
I think this video lacks the difference between S-300V and S-300P. S-400 is basically an upgraded S-300P, while S-300V was optimized against ballistic missiles.
Most Western air Defense platforms are turn-key 🔑operational. Meaning that very little user input is required for them to function after they are set up. Russian platforms rely on operators to correlate tracks which introduces errors & requires skilled radar operators which can be difficult to train/find.
Thanks Binkov, hope you are staying well and keeping any seasonal ailments at bay. Appreciate the time and effort you put into this video even though sometimes my bias makes me want to grumble and disagree with your statements. Keep it up.
Isn't the US Army shifting away from ATACM to the newer PrSM, Precision Strike Munition? That was suppose to replace ATACMS with a 500 Km range too? Is that not correct?
@@Predator42IDI don't see that accurate as Austin at the Pentagon said Production has stopped but have a few thousand in stock they might be willing to give them away because they are at the end of service life
What does stealth and missiles have anything to do with each other? There's no proof that either side's technology came out ahead. People like you are basically fanboys who lack any critical thinking abilities. Did you even watch the video? We don't know but assuming it was a saturation attack, even a PAC3 would fail. Not that I doubt S-400 is exaggerated but the bottom line is, no body knows for sure.
@@dailyrant4068 " We don't know but assuming it was a saturation attack" except we do know. ATACMS are big they can only be fired once by a HIMARS truck before reloading. Meaning Ukraine already needed multiple HIMARS trucks to hit the S400 multiple times. If it had been a saturation attack this would have meant they needed their entire stockpile of HIMARS trucks near this exact spot. Which strategically speaking is not sensible. Why keep your entire stock of HIMARS trucks in one spot on the off chance you catch a group of s400 off guard. Also logistically speaking it is nonsense to keep their very limited supply of ATACMS all in one spot as well. At best they keep 3-4 missiles in one region at a time. Which is exactly what was fired. Sad Binkov failed to mention how logically speaking it is impossible for this to have been a saturation attack. No military would keep all of their small supply of weapons in one spot for a saturation attack
@@looinrims That wasnt hit by s400 but a different system. Also you might want to watch the video of the commander who was responsible for shooting down the nighthawk where even he himself was shocked because it was pure luck.
@@maka6134 yeah it was a system running on vacuum tubes, and it detected engaged and destroyed the nighthawk He can say its luck all he wants but there’s concrete reasons things happen, if that garbage can lock up a nighthawk then I’m pretty sure S400 can lock up a F35 especially in the same circumstances of opening its weapon bay
Binkov... you try and use the excuse that the S-400's fell victim to saturation attacks... yet the rare footage we do have shows secondary explosions of missiles, this shows tje system wasn't overwhelmed with targets... it just didn't respond to the attack. Isn't it more likely that the S-400 is just like other russian weapons? Over hyped and not capable of doing the job they say it is?
ruclips.net/video/ceskPbDtTzY/видео.htmlsi=fxRxDBUkX8dt8Xxb Ryan Macbeth did a video on this already, the s400 is likely not coded to deal with threats like himars so the s400 operator will have to manually engage the threat themselves and they only have a few seconds to make a decision, he explains it it much better than I can.
Oh, you just gonna ignore the Patriot battery that got destroyed in Odessa without defending itself? Weird- it’s like you fanboys only listen to a one-sided echo chamber.
Most countries now dont loke russia their economy is under heavy sanctions and the war has given nato and other powers vital information on modern warfare. Not to mention that its a stalemate when it was supposed to be quick and clean. Not to mention that the war that was meant to end nato expansionnear russia has increased it with sweden and finland joining. @rebelliousfew
So…let me get this straight: - The fundamental principle of AA is, that incoming ordinance becomes increasingly easier to catch the more directly it is headed for the AA rather than some other object to defend. - outdated patriot systems are on record of easily defending other objects against the absolute cutting edge supersonic Kinzhal. - the absolute cutting edge S-400 is on record of not even being able to manage to intercept an at this point outdated ATACMS that is directly headed for the S-400. Boy oh boy, Russian “cutting edge” technology in a nutshell.
@@rebelliousfew satirical comment in Russian ability to field advanced weapons........not a great track record. Lots of talk but really now advancement.
@@nightelfuserI mean the same official who had the exact date of when it was happening. So they may have a tad bit more info as to why. Plus you do not do the kinds of Pell Nell movements unless you are on a timeline. Luckily for Russia they are addressing their espionage and corruption problems.
@@nightelfuser Russia clearly predicted Ukraine would quickly lose the war within weeks if not days, as proven by Russia state media leaks and the behavior of the Russian military. Of course US officials also thought that, virtually everyone did. You might want to stop that deny of yours.
1) The assumption that any F16's will "30 or 40 year old technology" assumes the planes have not gone through the myriad of upgrade programs the F16 has had available since its inception. 2) Any F16's a S400(or the single in existence S500) ever tracks may be operating in Wild Weasel tactics e.g. draw out out the targeting radar signal to send a HARM straight down the signal back to its hosts. 3) Additionally the range difference of the different bands of radar used by the S400 requires to function also comes into play.
doesn't. if it was so good it wouldn't be replaced. it's an old system. proven in battle. data is open source and widely publicised and verified by independent sources. there's no secret.
Here are some human questions for the channel: -how many atacms fired at S400 -What is the intercept %? -What is the opportunity cost of targeting S400? -What benefit is there for Ukr targeting S400? -What % of atacms are fired at S400 vs all other targets? -How many atacms are Ukr rx each month vs S400 production? These are pertinent questions the channel dodges because of what this channel promotes...
You people are obsessed with "Russ Bots." Are you unaware that the Ukraine project is highly unpopular in America, Asia, Africa & Europe is getting fed up. But you don't have to address that. Why talk to "Russ Bots"😂😂😂😂😂.
It would appear RU has a bottleneck in Active Radar missile production both SAM and AA, as the "AMRAAM-SKI" (R-77) is equally rare being observed in Russian service.
@@neiltitmus9744That was a Buk (SA-11 or 17) medium range missile. There's no way the DPR had an S-400 system while they were just a bunch of rebels supported by Russia, their arms were mostly just kept from the elements of the Ukrainian army who defected to the pro-Russian side, and they had lots of Buk systems.
@@DaFinkingOrk Do you really think S-400 is much different? Also Buk what take out that airliner in Donbas was model present only in Russian military. Because those Rebels were literally from Moscow. Look Girkin.
Binkov himself is one big boring bot narrating like he's chewing paper and nothing changes with years. And I again and again seeing him in the recommendations
@@worldoftancraft And yet, rather than clicking the three dots>"Do not recommend channel," you clicked into the video AND left a comment. Further indicating to the YT algorithm that you'd like to see more of his stuff..
@@IAm18PercentCarbon i didnt say anything pre programmed, if anything its the "slava ukraine" or "slava russia" people, i bet 99% of them didnt even know what слава meant before the war started and are just spamming the same crap everywhere because its popular right now
Ballistic missiles -- from Hitler's V-2 to ATACMS -- are very hard to shoot down. They fly faster (even the V-2 was supersonic), but don't carry as much explosives, as the slower cruise missiles.
That's correct. The Russians still owe 2 batteries to the Indians. They had until December 2023 to deliver the last 2 batteries in an order that was originally... 🤔... originally 7 or 8, I think. They've missed that deadline. I don't know if they're short on any other clients. I don't think they are, but I don't keep up with many other Countries. Not too many parties buy weapons like this, & half of those who can build their own.
i think its hilarious that aemrica has done barly anything milatary wise and russa is doing everything and getting barely no where. (OMG THE BOTS!) america has spend 180 to 240 billion in two years to its 24 trillion a year gdp to help ukraine, and ukraine has be able to do so well becuse of america, america is basically using less then 1% of it gdp and russia cant even compete with that, like using a finger in a arm wrestle xD
The difference is the USA has 34 Trillon of debt.. Russia has Gold and Diamond reserves. That is what this war is about but you need brains to understand
@@shueyk2320 Ok how much money do you believe the US is spending? Also 800 billion is the entire US military budget. We can't go "secret" spending 500 billion with no one noticing.
See the launch at ~@5:21 ? The launcher has a decoy plate on the front of the launcher to help confuse the enemy if it was being observed. Its hiding its capability by looking like it has a set of smaller GMLR missiles, but breaks away at launch like "haha just kidding im launching at something 300km away instead."
If Kamala is elected pres then the American ppl will deserve what they get but Ukrainians do not. Keep in mind Kamala wont run anything. An unelected ghost gov will make the decisions as they have during the past 3.5 years.
They should use Radiation missiles to knock out the jammers then have the ATACMS to hit the missile launchers. They do have the F16 which is capable. The S200 are Soviet era design.
@longshanks7157 we actually have evidence to back up our fan boyism y'all literally have to make shit up. How's the 3 day special military operation going?
Ahhh your info is so wrong, almost like you didn't bother to research this story one bit, the U.S. isn't restarting production of the atacms, atacms is a much older weapon developed decades ago, the U.S. was waiting for the new PrSM missile to go into full scale production, and since the U.S. armed forces got their first batch of PrSM missiles in December 2023, they started to replace the atacms and send them to Ukraine.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
See through media bias in coverage of Ukraine and Russia. Try Ground News today and get 40% off your subscription: ground.news/binkov
ok binkov
really lol no you dont, you seem pro dictator pro commie... Ive watched your channel for a long time and its changed for sure comrade..
@@alanfinch8763 Yeah, I wonder where Comrade Binkov's channel would rate on Ground News 🤔
@@alanfinch8763you sound Demented.
@@alanfinch8763 like how?
Even the bots seem to employ the meat assault tactic here, there are hoards of them.
NAFO bots ikr
@@baguettedestroyer4145 whatever you say ivan
LET IVAN COOK@@Peter-jo6yu
@@Peter-jo6yusuka blayt
@@Peter-jo6yu kope jerry
The Russian bots are out in force 😂
So funny how butthurt the bots are about a video regarding missiles from the 90's
Makes sense. They're bots from the 90s usually, prob feel a kinship (also known as trolls).
It’s a gaggle of salty Serbs, Indian russophiles, weirdo conspiracy nuts, and yes- thinly veiled bots lol
You know, when you are high on copium, everyone looks like a butthurt bot.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 Why should he be coping about missiles from the 90s doing what they're supposed to do?
Ironically, 90% of the top comments on this video are about how many Russian bots there are. If you smelt it you dealt it.
The more the air defenses are torn up the more effective the F16s will be. It’s preparation time.
Probably
Those f-16s are obsolete block 15,block 25 variants and which Ukrainian pilots aren't familiar with and don't get me started on aircraft mechanics
@@Globalscanningeyespretty much everything in that war is obsolete
@@Globalscanningeyes still better than anything the Russians have got...
@@Globalscanningeyes And what do you call Russian equipment? Lol
Ooof, the Russian bots aren't happy with this one 😂
American bots don't exist...
I've not seen them come out in numbers like this before
Chinese too looks it
@@hayleyxyzKeep coping you lost your Patriot battery to Iskanders in Odessa.
we have a fake china dude using google translate to spout pro russian bollox in the comments lol
There’s no such thing as a budget friendly missile defense system
Making friends
Lasers
@@DoctorMandibleactually this
The bots in here are working overtime.. the coping is hilarious 😂
I mean, it’s not something new, there were bot meat assaults on the comment section of this channel since forever XD
@@shakengandulf RUclips is instantly autodeleting 90% of my comments, but they're letting this spam about "bots" stay...
@hyhhy Gotta be careful what you type.. haven't figured it out out entirely but dont use curse words.. i find that instant deletes 99% of the time 😆
@@shakengandulf I don't use curse words 99% of the time, so it must be other things. I do wish that using the word "bot" was on the list though.
@@hyhhy fair enough.
The russian bots are going crazy on every video that puts russia in a negative light 😂😂😂
Hha yeah dude i noticed it too, all over youtube the last few weeks
I like now you guys reffer the as "bots" 😅
@@Neverpullingitout Well when 500 people use the same copy-pasted comments that have literally no grounding in reality, you have to assume that it's a computer spamming comments.
@@EkstraxWEEKS?!?!? My friend, no. Years.
Wouldn't you rather that your warmonger government spent money on your crumbling infrastructure rather than war. I'd rather my fkn government, the UK, didn't waste billions on the US Vs Russia proxy war. Russia is slowly swallowing up Ukraine and the US is thinking 'Maybe we made a mistake here.'
This comment section is hillarious. Russians coping about their wunderwaffe not actually being as good as advertised. Everybody has been shitting their pants for years about these anti-air systems, and now they’re revealed to be: average. Much to the chagrin of the super patriots 😂
A lot of them are probably bots. Russian information warfare at it's finest
The Russian cope is strong in these comments.
I think you mean Ukrainian cope? Please.. don’t sit here and act as if you yourself don’t cope.
It literally always is lol
@@rebelliousfew The only ones coping right now are Russian shills lmao
@@rebelliousfew you can't be this dumb right?
@@alexz5336Really? I don’t see that many “Russian shills” I only see Ukrainian shills. You must not have very good eyesight, or you are willfully ignorant.
At least the bots are useful for the algorithm 👍
vatniks feeding the algorithm
I don't see any Russian comment. Only comments like yours. Does that mean that you are bot?
The Russian enthusiasts are really taking this topic personally
They are allllll in these comments butthurt, whining over every comment its freaking hilarious 😂
@@cameronspence4977 I guess Russians Air defense is the damage control topic rn. Telegram is going wild with the talking points,
@@cameronspence4977 Pretty much all I'm seeing in the comments is talk about "Russian bots". It's like some actual bots spam that stuff about "Russian bots".
Makes you think...
Most people have little understanding about Air Defence system and thus, easily fall for the hype of S-400 parroted by the bots. They fall for paper performance without realizing its real world implication. The S-400 became operational in 2007 and glorified for its 400 km engagement range - little do many realize that the SAM (40N6) with 380 km range didn’t become operational until very recently.
They’re also unaware of the type of target(s) 40N6 is designed to engage. For nearly a decade, Russian outlets claimed 40N6 having Mach 14 speed with ‘anti-satellite’ capability - only when the missile went operational a year ago, the manufacturer’s data pointed a complete different reality - Mach 3.5 speed with smaller engagement altitude than PAC-3 MSE against ballistic missiles.
And it’s designed specifically for non-maneuverable targets (AWACS, Bombers, UAVs, etc.) and not ideal for tactical Fighters.
Against Fighter aircraft, S-400’s range actually shrink to a maximum of 200-250 km with 48N6E variants. This is not much different than the so-called "inferior" Patriot.
For decades, outlets highlighted everytime Patriot failed, while ignoring its successes. In 4 years, Patriot in Saudi Arabia intercepted over 230 ballistic missiles - that’s more than 1 intercept every week. How many ballistic missiles or anything did S-400 intercept in last 15 years of service? Zero.
People talk about Patriot’s failure in recent attack on Abqaiq oil refinery in Saudi Arabia, how it failed to intercept Iranian drones while overlooking S-400’s performance in Syria. The S-400 had been deployed in Russia’s Khmeimim air base in Syria since 2015 and that particular air base faced multiple drone attacks over last 3 years. There has been multiple failure to defend the air base against drone attacks, some resulting in Russian aircraft being damaged and personnel killed - yet the S-400 was never used to engage any UAVs despite repeated failure of point defence systems.
These also highlighted serious flaws in Pantsir S1 - a system designed specifically to deal with such threats and Russian analysts reporting those flaws were forced to remove their posts.
The US fielded PAC-3 with hit-to-kill warhead in 2000 as kinetic warheads are much more effective against hypersonic targets. Russia still relies on conventional fragmentation warhead and there’s no indication of it getting kinetic warhead anytime soon.
At the same time people don’t look at Aegis platforms, which is the US equivalent of Strategic Air Defence system. The S-400’s pesa primary Search radar 91N6E is capable of detecting a 0.4 m2 ballistic target from 250 km.
The Aegis’s now obsolete and non-AESA SPY-1D(v) reportedly “can track golf ball-sized targets at ranges in excess of 165 km.”
Golf ball = 0.0025 m2. For a direct comparison, if you scale SPY-1D’s range to 0.4 m2, then it corresponds to 587 km - that’s more than twice the range of S-400 (91N6E).
Unlike S-400’s overhyped 40N6, the SM-6 on Aegis with 260 km+ range can engage almost any endo-atmospheric target from sea-skimming cruise missiles, tactical aircraft to manoeuvrable ballistic missiles in their terminal stage. There’s nothing comparable to SM-3 in Russian service, the most tested exo-atmospheric interceptor with a range of 2,500 km.
The Aegis BMD system have demonstrated its ability to engage targets over the horizon using targeting data coming from airborne platforms as part of Cooperative Engagement (NIFC-CA). SM-6 have engaged cruise missiles solely relying on targeting data from F-35 or E-2D.
When was the last time you heard S-400 doing something like this?
^^Well said 😉 I also want to point out that Patriot was designed to fully integrate with various tactical defense platforms extending its capability substantially. In 1977 Patriot was integrated with HAWK & it has only improved since then.
👏 👏 👏
I think you are confusing S400 with S500.
A practical look at Air Defense, thanks for doing research and not just spouting off some dumb shit.
I’m nowhere near an expert but holy fuck I must seem like a genius when compared with some of these Russian cope(rs) here.
You know the Russians are butthurt about something when the bots come out
Funny, I see mostly Ukrainian trolls/fanboys getting butthurt and pissed when someone else challenges their opinion.
About what?
There is barely any truth in pro-ukr. reporting.
There is no need to be butthurt at all
@@rebelliousfew They don't have opinion. They are robots on SSteroids, saying what masters tells them
@@rebelliousfewYou have over 100+ comments just on this channel. The max people can see is 100+. You could have over 1,000 comments on this channel and I wouldn’t know. You can’t really call people butt hurt when you’re the one commenting against someone’s side and trying to argue with people on it. They’re not even angry like you’re trying to portray. they’re defending their statements with facts and evidence because you rudely comment towards them. The way you approach things doesn’t help your arguments.
@@rebelliousfew you’re literally in every thread 😂
So many bots coping harddddd
Holy cope, the vatniks in the comments are going off the chain.
FIngers crossed! Damn! So many Russian bots in the comments! Never seen this many under Binkov's videos.
Some titles seem to bring them in masses like a fishing net. I'm sure they have some system that flags videos based of title and descriptions and sends it off to the bot and troll networks to be worked.
Demn, and we have one US bot here
@@AlexKall thats a really good point. Just scrape social media everyday probably for videos to mass pro-authoritarian comments under
This channel in particular is always filled with them
I just hate modern internet. I just can't know wheather comments are real people anymore
Russian bots have infested social media and media in general. On RUclips they post pro-z comments, deprecate or the EU and other bots upvote it. They down vote normal real posters who challenge them and seek to try and get them banned. Several outlets are clearly Russian controlled. RUclips is super inept at stopping this and more concerned with wokeness
The last stat I saw says atleast 50% are bots.
@@williamzk9083 There's no Russian bot here. Just because you guys can't take the truth, doesn't make everyone Russian bot. See, your ATACMS are soo effective that for over a month they hit no target and are all shot down by S-400s. There are literally hundreds of S-400 all over the front. ATACMS barely managed to hit 3ish, till S-400 operators tuned their system.
Real people know how to spell "whether".
@@aniksamiurrahman6365I have no doubt the S-400 is a modern and effective piece of equipment.
Plus, it's fairly inexpensive compared to western equivalents.
One of the many reasons Turkey, and I believe India, went with them.
According to this video, Russia had 57 S-400 in 2020 and produces several a year.
So if those numbers are just in the correct ballpark, then no they don't have 100's all across the front.
Besides, not all would be stationed in or near Ukraine. They have a vast border to protect, along with key cities and infrastructure. There's always the possibility of a nation, or non state actor, taking advantage of them being preoccupied with their invasion of Ukraine.
As to ATACMS. I'm pretty sure, it's less then a month ago, that Ukraine used ATACMS, to great effect in the newly occupied area of Kharkiv, along with Belgorod.
I'm sure there are newer instances, that I'm just not awhere of, or don't remember.
You might not be a Russian Bot, or so you say. But your claims are ridiculous, and you act like someone who's getting paid.
Here you go. 10 Rubles for you. Thats the last money you'll earn from me responding. You don't have to thank me. Just stay safe buddy.
I’m just here for the bots. 🍿
Me to 😂❤
The comment section is getting more and more salty
The video is just icing, the comments from russian bots are the main cake
Are Russian bots people who disagree with you? Why not just debate them with your superior ideas? Seems like the weak route just labeling them bots. What would I know I'm just a common sense bot.
@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again do you know what a bot is?
@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again There is no point debating them. Its a total waste of energy.
@@Make-Asylums-Great-AgainWhy would we waste time debating with idiots.
А главную клубнику не покозали как уничтожили болие 25 атакомсов, сжигают насанс и самое главное установки петриот болие 5 видео 2 сразу есть в сети 😂🎉🎉🎉, спасибо налогоплательщика твои деньги сгорели на украине с фейерверком 🎉🎉🎉
How does Binkov put up with these comments?
the way to put up with comments is a mix of not interacting with them and not taking them seriously.
He ignores them
Same way he put up with facts... He ignores them
Because he likes activity in comments, even if it's bots. Pushes his video in popularity by algorithm
Excellent video, this is what I had been thinking as well with regards to how ATACMS was so effective against S-400, glad to see that my hunch matches the reality.
Actually everything is effective against S-400. It is because it is just modernized variant of S-300, what was modernized variant of S-200. Destroyed in bulk in Iraq. It was not even designed to be better, but Russia lost ability to make many parts after fall of USSR. So it is just slightly more compact modernization. It is not even clear if Russia actually based it on fake anti-Stealth warfare concept or just engineers lied, as they tend to do in Russia.
@@TheRezro Guess in short, corruption. Nothing works great in Russia.
@@TheRezroHere you are again, spreading absolutely false information.
@@harrypothead4575 Say a "person" who do not elaborate.
The s in s400 stands for scrap
*shite
*smoldering
*swag
Substandard
@@aaaqqwwqqddsw5509 Yepp, that's the one, Substandard-400 is the official name, System-400 is just the propaganda name.
Localized SEAD strategies shows that Ukraine is starting to modernize rapidly in terms of its approach to warfare.
Wow and it only took how many years? 😊
THIS IS PROPAGANDA! Shouted Ivan not being able to hold back his tears.
lil bro really thought that saying this will make it not be propaganda😂😂😂
@@leight420 Cope vatnik
@@ledinity most relevant and and original ukrobot comment😂😂
@@leight420 You do realize that "propaganda" is SPECIFICALLY and almost EXCLUSIVELY from the top state/federal level of a country, right? One random person's channel giving his opinion on something does NOT qualify as "propaganda". I can't stand all you people who keep destroying our definition of words everywhere you go, to the point where everything is completely MEANINGLESS.
@@JohnDorian-j7xPropaganda has many channels and ways…
Not saying this one in particular.
I’ve been accused of being Russian when I’m from south America and do not conform to one blindly to one narrative
The amount of bot comments is insane
This video is bullshit. Go to reality. Reality is, USA can not compete with RUssia. Bye.
@@PavolFilek Reality is that Russia cannot compete with Ukraine. Bye.
@@PavolFilekthank you for the endless amusement
You’re a bot
@@Make-Asylums-Great-Again RUclips is insane at deleting comments since the other day… this thread was loaded ten deep an hour ago
what the hell, theres so many bot comments, dead internet theory fr
vatniks are getting desperate
There are no bot. Rather u r seeing things due to ur copium addiction.
Hey, bots are people too
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 don't think you can see either
@@moscuadelendaestSays the Ukrainian bot.
The bot comments about bot comments are sure making the rounds. #BeepBoop
Leading edge of the Dead Internet here.
Bot on Bot violence is atrocious.
"they started to have visible impact"
Well, you can certainly say that!
Why Crimea is not connected to Russia? Because it does not belong to Russia. Too many rich Russians are just loungering around Crimea, because of vacations.
Why Moldova doesn't have access to the Black Sea? Because south of the country was stolen by Ukraine. Why does the Snake island was part of Ukraine?(now under Russian control) Because was stolen from Romania and when Romania won it back at the International Court of Justice in Hague, Ukraine just answered F Off!!!
@@andreiarama8745 Snake Island was actually taken back by Ukraine
@@FinnisJaeger so Ukraine took it back so they can give it to the rightful owner Romania? With all the water surrounding the island that are rich of oil and gas?
@@andreiarama8745 Nice whataboutism. Snake Island being Romanian or Ukrainian doesnt in any way relate to russian invasion of Ukraine.
@@andreiarama8745 This is a matter that was already decided in 2009 by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a manner that Romania's representative described as "advantageous for Romania, fair, and also advantageous for Ukraine”.
Shaping Operations.
The S400 system was approved for service in 2007. The ATACMS missile was first used in combat in 1991. Wasn’t the S400 supposed to shoot down missiles like ATACMS?
Anyone who takes Russia for technical specifications is crazy. They can't stop lying!
who says it isn't ?
@@TheBelrick Reality.
@@halliwedge Tell us all how you get the numbers of all the atacms launched and how many get intercepted?
You made your view up.
ergo. Your reality is fake and a small pile of wood.
@@TheBelrick wood reality
The bots have switched from Jew-bashing to Putin-boosting this week.
Yeah the comments here are borderline crazy.
@@Execue notice how it’s literally Five accounts with hundreds of comments?
I think you are confusing the leftist Palestinian bot farms with the Russian ones.
@@rh906 No, I think you're confusing the Israeli bot farms.
Nice to know that you were born in a Israeli bot firm.
I think general the average person does not understand in war you have to expect losses in order to make gains. It is a matter of choosing how and when those losses vs gains will pay off in the long term that matters. Some comments appear as they expect one side or the other to never lose any assets and that is just not reality.
Too young to be on RUclips 😂
This no Red Alert, you caant sacrifice that much to get little wins. Troops and weapons are not bought or respawn in the lobby
while this is true, I don't think anyone would want to be measuring their gains in kilodeaths per meter...
Very well-researched documentary. Especially the details on the Russian S-300 and S-400 missiles used are fascinating.
s400 shit, sorry turkey ❤
Having them instead of stealths ain't a good tradeoff now is it turkey? 🦃 😆
@@chamonix4658 turkey only bought them to reverse engineer them and develop copies.
Wild to see all the Russian bots whinging in the comments 😂 shows that this is working
What kind of bot are U?
It's rhetorical, don't tell me
Remember how all leftoids were yelling "PUTIN'S BOT" at the Trump supporters back in 2016?
The joke is - you only have standards because you use double standards.
Why don't you know what a bot is? It's not someone saying something you don't like. It's an automated program.
That's not what I'm seeing here.
@@kimuko4953the account that’s been around for 18 years surely must be a Bot 😂.
@@kimuko4953 learn what a bot is
Russia removed 105 systems from airfields that are out of range from ukraien leaving them completly undefended . (proven satelite image see last perun release fr details) apprently rumored that they lost higher number latest 5 month that russia say.
Thanks for covering this. As usual, you're coverage seems very fair. It is a shame some of the commenters don't seem to have listened to it.
Because it isn’t fair. He never speaks about the failures of Ukraine, and if he does, he either downplays it or just outright denies it, even if there is evidence.
@@rebelliousfew Hilarious, so I suppose you accept his assessment that S-400 fell victim to being overwhelmed by a swarm of ATACMS, yet is shown exploding with secondary missile explosions... makes sense.
@@joetuktyyuktuk8635I never said that, so don’t go off topic like you people typically do. He has not made a single video criticizing or showing the destruction of Ukrainian equipment, let alone talk about it in detail, it’s always been Russian equipment. THAT is why he is an unfair, biased source. Learn to read next time.
@@rebelliousfew It goes to his obvious pro -russian bias, he makes a claim, that his own video disproves... that is called biased.
@@rebelliousfew"whaaaaa its not fair! Its not fair! Boohoohoohooo I want my mommy and my blanky and my bottle, its not fair😢🥺🥺🥺🥺!" Your desperation and coping is so utterly hilarious, its insane how much fun it is when binkov uploads not bc of the video but bc of babies like you whining and crying in the comments! News flash buddy: the videos about Atacms and S400 so its perfectly fair to put only stuff about s400 and Atacms in it. Thats how basic logic works, I know that might be confusing to you but when you grow up and become an adult youll figure out how the real world works, probably 😂
Very interesting analysis ... especially when you explain why Crimea is more attacked. Keep going !
Always appreciated Binkov's truly neutral and factual approach to video's and info.
NEUTRAL...LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Binkov always reporting non-bias. Love the channel and follow since the beginning.
It appears that Russia has over-stated the efficiencies of the S-300 and S-400 (Gee, who would have guessed). Probably also why Iran is getting unsure about how well they will defend them from Israel air strikes. Note: Russia's 'export version' is ALWAYS degraded over 'homeland' versions.
because russia always focused on shutting down jets and not missles thats their mistake s400 is literally not close to be good shoting down misses but jets each battery only has 4 missles with is another very bad thing vs missles sicne it alwayts gonna be more
@@goldendiamond761 Actually, the S-300 and S-400 were claimed as being able to intercept PGMs like cruise missiles, various guided bombs and even the AGM-88 HARM and other Anti Radiation Missiles.
@@goldendiamond761 The same is true of Patriot batteries. The difference is Patriot batteries have been improved the last 20 years. Russian air defense hasn't
Fabulous info. Well done chap!
Another Ukrainian bot spotted
Fair and neutral analysis. Good work as always Binkov
i really hope thats sarcasm😂
The US only had 700-800 ATACMs because we haven’t been buying them for a while. The weapon that replaced the ATACMs has already arrived and is filling Army inventories as we speak. The PRSM or Precision Strike Missile. It is quite a bit more advanced than ATACMs and has a range of at least 310 miles but probably upwards of 550 miles the exact range is classified. And it can hit moving targets on land or sea. It was test fired against a decommissioned warship traveling at 20 knots and scored a direct hit. The CEP Circle area of probability is 1 meter. So draw a circle on the target 1 meter in diameter and the weapon will hit inside that circle. It’s incredibly accurate. ATACMs is at bad either it’s CEP is 3 meters especially the latest ones. But about the ATACMs we will probably wind up giving Ukraine about 80% of ours we will give them more as the PRSM is delivered or the Prism missile for short. It is a smaller missile too with the same size warhead so one HIMARS launcher can hold 2 Prisms as opposed to 1 ATACMs. But the US is not the only country that has ATACMs and I believe there is still a production line for them gone in the United States as it’s sold to allies. South Korea has a lot of them and they will probably give Ukraine some of them and some European Coumtries have it too I don’t know which ones off the top
Of my head.
This is false.
The US has 4000 ATACMS in their stockpiles and 500 a year are being manufactured at this very moment to fulfill an order that was placed in 2022.
The US can keep giving ATACMS as long as they have funding.
Is there a new PrSM Increments 3 missile developed that increases range beyond 1000km and has a antiship capability as well as land attack.
This missile should shake up the Russians.
@@Leon1Austukraine will not get
Very interesting and informative. These are some seriously nerd details, love it
TLDW: Because the S400 is drunk.
Thing about the strike vid is the S-400 didnt start firing until juat before impact and only got off three, maybe four missiles, like they disnt realize they were under attack until it was way too late.
Which is weird because a ballistic missile really isn't hard to spot and identify.
I think what's happened here is S-400 isn't actually designed to hit tactical ballistic missiles, just air breathing targets.
I reckon they _hoped_ it would have a secondary capability against TBMs, and that wing and a prayer got written into the sales pitch.
Russia will NEVER say a weapon can't do something if you asked them.
@camouflagekumquat3412 Exactly. What part of that trajectory at 10:47 looks ballistic? (Answer: none.)
@@MostlyPennyCat any ruspig tech is designed to build biggest and most expensive yachts in the World.
In the full video i saw 6 failed interceptor launches. not just 3 given how fast ATACMS travel the first interceptor missile being launches wasnt right before impact. It just seems that way because the missiles travel fast. When they tried to intercept the atacms was still farther away
I think this video lacks the difference between S-300V and S-300P. S-400 is basically an upgraded S-300P, while S-300V was optimized against ballistic missiles.
Let's all have a laugh at all the bots and orc lovers making comments.
"orc" tell me you are a bot without telling me😂😂
Most Western air Defense platforms are turn-key 🔑operational. Meaning that very little user input is required for them to function after they are set up. Russian platforms rely on operators to correlate tracks which introduces errors & requires skilled radar operators which can be difficult to train/find.
Less and less each day. And Russia claims it can hold this up for at least a decade
Destroying air defence systems before F16 aircraft arrive in Ukraine
Thanks Binkov, hope you are staying well and keeping any seasonal ailments at bay. Appreciate the time and effort you put into this video even though sometimes my bias makes me want to grumble and disagree with your statements. Keep it up.
The comments are spicy as always. People treat this like a football match. Shame on them.
I'm Dutch. Small country. Yet we could maintain an empire on various continents for centuries. Russia under putin cant take a capital city miles away.
oorlogsvoering tegen prinsdommen in Nederlands-indië zonder moderne legers is niet echt te vergelijken met moderne oorlogsvoering
@@The_FatGeneralnotice how he said “maintain an empire on various continents for centuries”
@@The_FatGeneraland not “our armies won wars in the East Indies 🤓”
the dutch had a navy! more than russia has in the black sea these days! ;o)
@@rahjah6958 so what ur comparing apples to oranges
Thanks!
Why waste moneybom fake propganda video which made by ukranie AI media
Why did an Attacms hit an s-400, dumb question better question how come s-400's can't defend themselves from missiles?
If you read the actual video title, he does in fact ask that exact question...
Because its trash.
@@3komma141592653like abrahms patriot f16 styker bradley all are game changer😂😂
Isn't the US Army shifting away from ATACM to the newer PrSM, Precision Strike Munition? That was suppose to replace ATACMS with a 500 Km range too? Is that not correct?
You are correct but the ATACMs are still in production as there are a lot of buyers.
@@Predator42IDI don't see that accurate as Austin at the Pentagon said Production has stopped but have a few thousand in stock they might be willing to give them away because they are at the end of service life
@@sshumkaerUnless the US government has told the manufacturer that they're not allowed to sell them, then you're talking about two different things?
The new PrSM has anti-ship variants
@@Atheos-1 NO not talking about 2 different things. ATACMS
and russia still claims that s-400 can hit stealth jets lmao
What does stealth and missiles have anything to do with each other? There's no proof that either side's technology came out ahead. People like you are basically fanboys who lack any critical thinking abilities. Did you even watch the video? We don't know but assuming it was a saturation attack, even a PAC3 would fail. Not that I doubt S-400 is exaggerated but the bottom line is, no body knows for sure.
It definitely can, just ask the Nighthawk in Yugoslavia
Don’t mix up ‘support’ with ‘stupidity’
@@dailyrant4068 " We don't know but assuming it was a saturation attack" except we do know. ATACMS are big they can only be fired once by a HIMARS truck before reloading. Meaning Ukraine already needed multiple HIMARS trucks to hit the S400 multiple times. If it had been a saturation attack this would have meant they needed their entire stockpile of HIMARS trucks near this exact spot. Which strategically speaking is not sensible. Why keep your entire stock of HIMARS trucks in one spot on the off chance you catch a group of s400 off guard. Also logistically speaking it is nonsense to keep their very limited supply of ATACMS all in one spot as well. At best they keep 3-4 missiles in one region at a time. Which is exactly what was fired. Sad Binkov failed to mention how logically speaking it is impossible for this to have been a saturation attack. No military would keep all of their small supply of weapons in one spot for a saturation attack
@@looinrims That wasnt hit by s400 but a different system. Also you might want to watch the video of the commander who was responsible for shooting down the nighthawk where even he himself was shocked because it was pure luck.
@@maka6134 yeah it was a system running on vacuum tubes, and it detected engaged and destroyed the nighthawk
He can say its luck all he wants but there’s concrete reasons things happen, if that garbage can lock up a nighthawk then I’m pretty sure S400 can lock up a F35 especially in the same circumstances of opening its weapon bay
Binkov... you try and use the excuse that the S-400's fell victim to saturation attacks... yet the rare footage we do have shows secondary explosions of missiles, this shows tje system wasn't overwhelmed with targets... it just didn't respond to the attack. Isn't it more likely that the S-400 is just like other russian weapons? Over hyped and not capable of doing the job they say it is?
Well stated
Facts
ruclips.net/video/ceskPbDtTzY/видео.htmlsi=fxRxDBUkX8dt8Xxb
Ryan Macbeth did a video on this already, the s400 is likely not coded to deal with threats like himars so the s400 operator will have to manually engage the threat themselves and they only have a few seconds to make a decision, he explains it it much better than I can.
Oh, you just gonna ignore the Patriot battery that got destroyed in Odessa without defending itself? Weird- it’s like you fanboys only listen to a one-sided echo chamber.
@@rebelliousfew you must be referring to the “Kinzhal Killer”
No matter what happens, Russia has lost. Demographics and the increased strength of NATO is not what they expected.
How so? Care to explain?
Most countries now dont loke russia their economy is under heavy sanctions and the war has given nato and other powers vital information on modern warfare. Not to mention that its a stalemate when it was supposed to be quick and clean. Not to mention that the war that was meant to end nato expansionnear russia has increased it with sweden and finland joining. @rebelliousfew
@@randomperson774 😂😂😂😂😂😂😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😂😂😂😂😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
@@randomperson774And you think Russia hasn’t learned anything from modern warfare? They are the ones conducting it after all.
@@rebelliousfew no they are the ones losing it after all lol
So…let me get this straight:
- The fundamental principle of AA is, that incoming ordinance becomes increasingly easier to catch the more directly it is headed for the AA rather than some other object to defend.
- outdated patriot systems are on record of easily defending other objects against the absolute cutting edge supersonic Kinzhal.
- the absolute cutting edge S-400 is on record of not even being able to manage to intercept an at this point outdated ATACMS that is directly headed for the S-400.
Boy oh boy, Russian “cutting edge” technology in a nutshell.
Patriots have never intercepted Kinzhals, only islanders. And the S-400 was destroyed because it was overwhelmed and ran out of missiles.
If you really want to know why ruspig tech is failing--buy ruspig-made car. You'll get all the answers you need.
I only come here to read all the salty vatnik bot posts.
same
then it must be disappointing only seeing ukrobots
Title says why is Ukraine attacking SAM sites. Surely that is obvious
Up till now all the hype about Russian weapons is all that it's been hype.
What about the Western tanks? What good have they done? Are y’all people this blind?
@@rebelliousfew Well Russia showed us with the T-14.........chucke
@@davidlanders2853The T-14 hasn’t been used in Ukraine. Stop going off-topic, child. Answer the original question.
@@rebelliousfew satirical comment in Russian ability to field advanced weapons........not a great track record. Lots of talk but really now advancement.
@@rebelliousfew3000 russian tanks lost in ukraine and you want to talk about the 20 western ones. Lol you cant make this stuff up people
What is undeniable is, clients of Russian weapons went from 60+ in the 1990s to 13 now……nuff said
Good video. 👍 Russias 3 day special operation still going on? Problem?
It was an American official who said that. You might want to check on that bias of yours.
@@nightelfuserI mean the same official who had the exact date of when it was happening. So they may have a tad bit more info as to why. Plus you do not do the kinds of Pell Nell movements unless you are on a timeline.
Luckily for Russia they are addressing their espionage and corruption problems.
You misunderstood they never meant Earth days it was Venus days.
When did Russia say that?
@@nightelfuser Russia clearly predicted Ukraine would quickly lose the war within weeks if not days, as proven by Russia state media leaks and the behavior of the Russian military. Of course US officials also thought that, virtually everyone did. You might want to stop that deny of yours.
Great video. Very informative.
Once these are gone..F16 will rule the skies..
1) The assumption that any F16's will "30 or 40 year old technology" assumes the planes have not gone through the myriad of upgrade programs the F16 has had available since its inception. 2) Any F16's a S400(or the single in existence S500) ever tracks may be operating in Wild Weasel tactics e.g. draw out out the targeting radar signal to send a HARM straight down the signal back to its hosts. 3) Additionally the range difference of the different bands of radar used by the S400 requires to function also comes into play.
An F-16 with 30 years old tech will still be more than a match for today’s Russian jets.
@@Dave5843-d9mThe F16 Denmark and Netherlands are supplying are fully upgraded, it does not have the same radar as F35
Atacms has probably a much higher range. Don’t forget accurate information is censored.
doesn't. if it was so good it wouldn't be replaced. it's an old system. proven in battle. data is open source and widely publicised and verified by independent sources. there's no secret.
@@riskinhos That’s what they want you to believe. We don’t know what upgrades the ATACMS received before being sent to Ukraine.
@@riskinhos There were upgrades that are unknown to us after the restarted production
The replacement for ATACAMS is much longer range but these are old missile systems that are pretty well known.
God the Russ bots are swarming this vid with misinformation
This channel is paid misinformation. Why don't you know this? And talk about projection....
Here are some human questions for the channel:
-how many atacms fired at S400
-What is the intercept %?
-What is the opportunity cost of targeting S400?
-What benefit is there for Ukr targeting S400?
-What % of atacms are fired at S400 vs all other targets?
-How many atacms are Ukr rx each month vs S400 production?
These are pertinent questions the channel dodges because of what this channel promotes...
You people are obsessed with "Russ Bots." Are you unaware that the Ukraine project is highly unpopular in America, Asia, Africa & Europe is getting fed up. But you don't have to address that. Why talk to "Russ Bots"😂😂😂😂😂.
@@vdotme They do what's called "Mirror popaganda".
Whatever they do, they instantly point it out at other side.
Not bots, it's people that are not gullible like you lol
It would appear RU has a bottleneck in Active Radar missile production both SAM and AA, as the "AMRAAM-SKI" (R-77) is equally rare being observed in Russian service.
Isn´t there like 1 radar for one battery of 4 for S300 and S400?
Excellent info
To answer your question: why can't they defend against Atacms? Because they are Russian S400.
Yes s400 they can only defend against airliners
@@neiltitmus9744That was a Buk (SA-11 or 17) medium range missile. There's no way the DPR had an S-400 system while they were just a bunch of rebels supported by Russia, their arms were mostly just kept from the elements of the Ukrainian army who defected to the pro-Russian side, and they had lots of Buk systems.
@@DaFinkingOrk Do you really think S-400 is much different? Also Buk what take out that airliner in Donbas was model present only in Russian military. Because those Rebels were literally from Moscow. Look Girkin.
Bots, typing c300/c400 is a like a neon sign pointing towards your botness 😂
Binkov himself is one big boring bot narrating like he's chewing paper and nothing changes with years. And I again and again seeing him in the recommendations
@@worldoftancraft And yet, rather than clicking the three dots>"Do not recommend channel," you clicked into the video AND left a comment. Further indicating to the YT algorithm that you'd like to see more of his stuff..
@@EhEhEhEINSTEIN RUclips algorithm has its own ways, and it's not always listening to me
@@worldoftancraftlol Cope and Seethe Russki, cope and seethe.
@@PeterMuskrat6968 cope about what? Did you see my ID?
Countries that bought these rubbish anti-aircraft systems
😂😂😂
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ♥️ ❤️ 💖
🤖
@@Fred_the_1996 hello russian bot how you doing?
@@toninhosoldierhelmet4033 does my account scream bot to you
@@Fred_the_1996 yes because you say things that only a pre-programmed automaton would say
if you're human that's just sad
@@IAm18PercentCarbon i didnt say anything pre programmed, if anything its the "slava ukraine" or "slava russia" people, i bet 99% of them didnt even know what слава meant before the war started and are just spamming the same crap everywhere because its popular right now
Ballistic missiles -- from Hitler's V-2 to ATACMS -- are very hard to shoot down. They fly faster (even the V-2 was supersonic), but don't carry as much explosives, as the slower cruise missiles.
im starting to respect you, both sides hating on you
People are incredibly fact-resistant and push their own agenda.
Russian disinfo bravery trying to hold back reality, but laughing emojis can do so much.
Right? I'm unable to take anyone seriously using laughing emojis.
Be they russian agent/bot or young & emotionally/communicatively inept.
@@thespeedracer5772Unless it’s used in response to a humorous post I interpret it as the crying soyjack with a pretend smile.
This was your absolute best video and anime
The decoy missiles were used as well I think
To all the Russian bots, it's S400
TO ALL THE NATO BOTS ITS PROPGANDA OF AI GENRTAED VIDEO
@MICLakVER Russians vs Nato bring it on Russian bot
@@Banker88 nato bot nato using ukrain as proxy what a shame why they cant directly ask youself bot
It had been reported thatt S-400 batteries scheduled for overrseas delivery... have been delayed, sine die.
That's correct. The Russians still owe 2 batteries to the Indians.
They had until December 2023 to deliver the last 2 batteries in an order that was originally... 🤔... originally 7 or 8, I think. They've missed that deadline.
I don't know if they're short on any other clients. I don't think they are, but I don't keep up with many other Countries. Not too many parties buy weapons like this, & half of those who can build their own.
i think its hilarious that aemrica has done barly anything milatary wise and russa is doing everything and getting barely no where. (OMG THE BOTS!)
america has spend 180 to 240 billion in two years to its 24 trillion a year gdp to help ukraine, and ukraine has be able to do so well becuse of america, america is basically using less then 1% of it gdp and russia cant even compete with that, like using a finger in a arm wrestle xD
Tell me how stupid you are again?
Imagine believing zog figures. Lmao
Bot alert 🤖🤖
Ignore this fake lemmon guy, he is an ukropropaganda beliver
The difference is the USA has 34 Trillon of debt.. Russia has Gold and Diamond reserves. That is what this war is about but you need brains to understand
@@shueyk2320
Ok how much money do you believe the US is spending?
Also 800 billion is the entire US military budget. We can't go "secret" spending 500 billion with no one noticing.
Informative ❤
Russian equipment is garbage. The Ukrainian war has shown the quality of Russian equipment,troops, and intel. Garbage
a whole lot of garbage
See the launch at ~@5:21 ? The launcher has a decoy plate on the front of the launcher to help confuse the enemy if it was being observed. Its hiding its capability by looking like it has a set of smaller GMLR missiles, but breaks away at launch like "haha just kidding im launching at something 300km away instead."
Whoa I didn't pick up on that, that's kinda genius lol, and very simple for the effectiveness it gives
@@sage5296 US also do the same with HIMARS packs. Nothing new.
Why are they attacking SAMs?... Obviously so they can gain Air Superiority...
This isn't going to do it.
It'll HELP with that mission but Ukraine only gains air superiority by putting wings in the air.
If Kamala is elected pres then the American ppl will deserve what they get but Ukrainians do not.
Keep in mind Kamala wont run anything. An unelected ghost gov will make the decisions as they have during the past 3.5 years.
Its called Supression of Enemy Air defense what Ukraine do
@@angelo_giachetti -- something makes me doubt that you know jack-shit about the subject.
@papadeenw6 Yes but he was saying this about the Biden Admin.
Oh good now Russia will know what America was making in 1980!😏
They should use Radiation missiles to knock out the jammers then have the ATACMS to hit the missile launchers. They do have the F16 which is capable. The S200 are Soviet era design.
Great reporting!
Turkey made a bad choice 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
S400 fan boys: 😳😰😭
Copium addict NAFO bot.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 haha, fan boy alert!
To be fair you're a NATO fan boy so just as bad 😂🤣@@Ilove3SGTE
@@longshanks7157you can say Russian equipment is shit with out being a NATO fanboy, he didn’t even mention NATO
@longshanks7157 we actually have evidence to back up our fan boyism y'all literally have to make shit up. How's the 3 day special military operation going?
Ahhh your info is so wrong, almost like you didn't bother to research this story one bit, the U.S. isn't restarting production of the atacms, atacms is a much older weapon developed decades ago, the U.S. was waiting for the new PrSM missile to go into full scale production, and since the U.S. armed forces got their first batch of PrSM missiles in December 2023, they started to replace the atacms and send them to Ukraine.
The West is not giving their best . They are New Old stock.
got my plushie 😁😁😁😁