This may be more obvious: control of the Internet and the laws and regulations that concern the Internet must be formulated by all countries and not by one country alone, but this requires awareness of what is happening first. What is currently happening with regard to the Internet is very similar to what happened with the process of establishing the current global financial system and controlling it by one country.
I think the reason why the donkey was waiting for the human to get tired and fall so he could make fun of him was due to a previous conversation about the donkey's specialty (the donkey says he is a doctor). The human did not mean to embarrass the donkey doctor at all, but the donkey's insertion of himself into the conversation at that time was the reason! The human did not mean to embarrass that donkey doctor at all! The donkey's grudge against the human is unjustified!
There is no big difference between watching a theatrical scene and watching it on the Internet. In the end, all scenes are processed by the human brain, whether on stage or on the Internet. The problem lies in the lack of awareness of what is happening, especially the purpose of those scenes and the messages that are being passed on. People differ in their ability to evaluate based on age, mental abilities, experiences, etc. Someone who watches a theatrical show may also be affected by that theatrical show in a way similar to what happens on the Internet. Therefore, classification on the Internet is important, especially with the presence of those who are unable to distinguish and evaluate.
What is happening now on the Internet is normal, but the danger lies in the lack of awareness of what is happening. There are psychological characteristics in humans that make them attracted to social media similar to what used to happen in the past, whether on the stage or in cinemas, and humans usually live the roles of the actors unknowingly, where the level of consciousness type one becomes lower. The lack of public awareness among people and the absence of the role of governments as a result of ignorance and failure to realize the risks is the source of the danger.
When you and your son go to a crowded public place, would you leave him among people you don’t know, with the possibility of exposing him to various risks? you should take him to school or a club that suits his age and needs ? The danger of the Internet lies in underestimating its risks, especially for minors. What moves the body is the mind, so it does not like to underestimate what teenagers are exposed to on social media! This will require local laws and legislation imposed by governments that are aware of the seriousness of what is happening, not the laws and legislation of social media companies that aim to collect money and work within the agenda of those who control them!
What is happening now is not fundamentally different from what was happening hundreds or even thousands of years ago. The Internet and social media are very similar to theaters, including the performers on stage, the audience who watches and interacts with the events of the theater, as well as the presence of those who prepared the stage and the scenario of the theatrical scenes, etc. You can apply this to what is happening on the Internet today, where you find those who own parts of the components of the Internet (previously the theater) and those who assign roles to users, as well as agendas, making money, controlling theatrical events, and working to control and influence the viewers, etc.
The story of the computer is more complicated than it seems! The issue revolves around the logic, size and accuracy on which logic works. At first, the size was large and then the size gradually decreased with the advancement of technology. The important part is the ability to process data and bigger data and faster before making decisions, and this was only available through the human mind. A comparison can be made in terms of the size and speed of data processing between a machine from the nineteenth century and a computer from the twenty-first century. The source of danger is not the computer, but the one behind it, and this applies to the Internet today. Making a trap to catch birds or animals dates back thousands of years ago and relied on human logic, but making a robot that does the same job today will mean putting human logic into the processor of that robot, and that makes a huge difference in terms of speed, performance, accuracy and efficiency (will human logic go deeper than that someday?!).
Yes, current technology is ready to radically change the current computer architecture (an old and not good architecture), especially with the recent development of graphics engine and solid state drives, but that will require SSD manufacturers to take over some of the tasks of database engines first, the current interrelationship between SSD, RAM, CPU and GPU is bad and does not keep up with current technology, I think it will not be long until a new revolutionary computer architecture appears (radical improvements).
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
This may be more obvious: control of the Internet and the laws and regulations that concern the Internet must be formulated by all countries and not by one country alone, but this requires awareness of what is happening first. What is currently happening with regard to the Internet is very similar to what happened with the process of establishing the current global financial system and controlling it by one country.
I think the reason why the donkey was waiting for the human to get tired and fall so he could make fun of him was due to a previous conversation about the donkey's specialty (the donkey says he is a doctor). The human did not mean to embarrass the donkey doctor at all, but the donkey's insertion of himself into the conversation at that time was the reason! The human did not mean to embarrass that donkey doctor at all! The donkey's grudge against the human is unjustified!
There is no big difference between watching a theatrical scene and watching it on the Internet. In the end, all scenes are processed by the human brain, whether on stage or on the Internet. The problem lies in the lack of awareness of what is happening, especially the purpose of those scenes and the messages that are being passed on. People differ in their ability to evaluate based on age, mental abilities, experiences, etc. Someone who watches a theatrical show may also be affected by that theatrical show in a way similar to what happens on the Internet. Therefore, classification on the Internet is important, especially with the presence of those who are unable to distinguish and evaluate.
What is happening now on the Internet is normal, but the danger lies in the lack of awareness of what is happening. There are psychological characteristics in humans that make them attracted to social media similar to what used to happen in the past, whether on the stage or in cinemas, and humans usually live the roles of the actors unknowingly, where the level of consciousness type one becomes lower. The lack of public awareness among people and the absence of the role of governments as a result of ignorance and failure to realize the risks is the source of the danger.
When you and your son go to a crowded public place, would you leave him among people you don’t know, with the possibility of exposing him to various risks? you should take him to school or a club that suits his age and needs ? The danger of the Internet lies in underestimating its risks, especially for minors. What moves the body is the mind, so it does not like to underestimate what teenagers are exposed to on social media! This will require local laws and legislation imposed by governments that are aware of the seriousness of what is happening, not the laws and legislation of social media companies that aim to collect money and work within the agenda of those who control them!
What is happening now is not fundamentally different from what was happening hundreds or even thousands of years ago. The Internet and social media are very similar to theaters, including the performers on stage, the audience who watches and interacts with the events of the theater, as well as the presence of those who prepared the stage and the scenario of the theatrical scenes, etc. You can apply this to what is happening on the Internet today, where you find those who own parts of the components of the Internet (previously the theater) and those who assign roles to users, as well as agendas, making money, controlling theatrical events, and working to control and influence the viewers, etc.
The story of the computer is more complicated than it seems! The issue revolves around the logic, size and accuracy on which logic works. At first, the size was large and then the size gradually decreased with the advancement of technology. The important part is the ability to process data and bigger data and faster before making decisions, and this was only available through the human mind. A comparison can be made in terms of the size and speed of data processing between a machine from the nineteenth century and a computer from the twenty-first century. The source of danger is not the computer, but the one behind it, and this applies to the Internet today. Making a trap to catch birds or animals dates back thousands of years ago and relied on human logic, but making a robot that does the same job today will mean putting human logic into the processor of that robot, and that makes a huge difference in terms of speed, performance, accuracy and efficiency (will human logic go deeper than that someday?!).
Yes, current technology is ready to radically change the current computer architecture (an old and not good architecture), especially with the recent development of graphics engine and solid state drives, but that will require SSD manufacturers to take over some of the tasks of database engines first, the current interrelationship between SSD, RAM, CPU and GPU is bad and does not keep up with current technology, I think it will not be long until a new revolutionary computer architecture appears (radical improvements).
___m_/ o o \_m___
Engagement-Kilroy was here.