Crashing & Dashing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- The plaintiff claims the defendant shot across two lanes to make a left turn and slammed into his car, so the plaintiff is suing for damages. The defendant insists the plaintiff sideswiped him, and he’s the one who was hit. If anyone’s owed money, the defendant believes it’s him. The defendant is countersuing for an insurance deductible.
Case #27009
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
![Eminem - Fuel (Shady Edition) feat. Westside Boogie & GRIP [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/k1OquBida9s/mqdefault.jpg)
Douglas should sue Judge Milian for pain and suffering for spilling his coffee 😂
Installed a dash cam in my car for this exact reason. Better to be safe than sorry in court.
Same here. I’m an American living in Europe I’m not taking any chances.
I got one for everyone on my Christmas list last year.
I did the same thing.
Smart investment. I wonder if a dash cam would have helped in this specific scenario. My guess is: most likely.
@@nicolebart8906Wouldn’t be useless to have one in the US too…
The mentioning of you living in Europe seems completely unnecessary.
If anything: you are way more likely to be sued in the US than in Europe and most insurances in Europe are quite decent, well priced and don’t require a high deductible fee in order to keep it affordable… which can’t be said about the average American insurance policies…
I loved when she "yelled" at Douglas for his coffee being in the way! Lol
*"I've been putting my coffee there for 17 years."*
Not any more, Douglas!
Lol he was saying “thud” 😂
2:12 I think the plaintiff was trying to say "a thud" 😆😆
Makes sense
Oh my goodness lmao
Me n it seems Judge M thought we heard " turd" 😅
😂😂😂 I rewound and laughed outloud..TWICE 🤣🤣🤣…”I heard a turd”…”a what?!”….”a turd”…😂😂😂
After this I used "i heard the turd" as a prank call" 😂😂😂
Judge Milian & Douglas are definitely Work Spouses. I love them😂😂☕️👠👠
I love how she yelled at the bailiff for his coffee being In her way
2:51
She didn't yell at him, she was joking around and they've always gotten along great.
@@Spankmepink I meant in a motherly way
Her "sorry" didn't sound very sincere lol.
@@ohcaptainmycaptain4829it's not that serious
Your insurance companies tend to believe that their client is never at fault.
When The older plantiff with strong accent was explaining his side up at the board with the Judge says i made the turn...lol but it sounded like turd..then Judge M says turd???? With a stunned face, but the plantiff was clueless....🤣🤣🤣
A photo for the defendant of where he stopped that day would have tipped the scale in his favour. In most countries you should be able to safely turn to your ‘immediate’ left or right lane of a multi lane stretch of road. 👍🏼
2:16 (You heard) “A turd?” That part had me busting up.
This is the definition of "an accident". I think BOTH parties made wide turns. Neither one wanted to give a second of time to slow down or stay in their lanes. I think they're both at fault, either one could have given the other the space to procede. Good verdict.
It's rather simple really, not sure why the judge didn't catch it. The defendant had at least 5 times the amount of time to assess the situation because he was making a long turn as opposed to the plaintiff who made the turn in seconds. Assuming the defendant isn't going about traffic hoping someone would hit him, the old guy must have been at fault here.
In any case, these sorts of intersections (without protective traffic lights) shouldn't exist in a country that calls itself the greatest nation in the world.
Back to you, Jim.
@@namnackTherein lies the truth. “those traffic lights should NOT exist”. 👏🏾
A forward facing dash cam in either car would've had this solved in 2 seconds. More proof to purchase one.
This is my second pet peeve driving situation (the first is four way stops and "being polite") Turn into the lane closet to you. Pretty sure that is still in the handbook. Oh and I would like five minutes in a closed room with the guy who originally thought, "Hey, I can pass on the right and not wait for this person to turn."
Pretty boy defendant needs to spend that money on new teeth.
According to the defendant's story, the plaintiff's car should be damaged along the whole side, but according to the photos the only damage was at the rear quarter panel. If they initially stopped on the median as the defendant claims then it shows that the plaintiff is most likely at fault.
if the damage is on the REAR quarter panel then that means the defendant is at fault because he hit the rear of the plaintiff's car meaning the plaintiff was first and the defendant was not paying good enough attention to stop or slow down to avoid the collision .
When I seen that convoluted diagram, I just knew it was going to be a mess.
😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 a turd? Im dead.... ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
Any time I'm turning left at an un-protected intersection (a solid green light), I wait for any vehicles turning right to finish their maneuver. You never know what lane a motorist wants to end up in. Ultimately the driver turning right has the right of way.
Driving 101 is that you should turn into the closest lane.
They should probably want to sue the city for this mess of an intersection. And don't they sell dash cams in NY?
These are cases from back in probably 2016. I don’t know how many people had dash cams back then.
@@maureenostermann291 Dash cams, short for dashboard cameras, began to gain popularity and widespread use in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
@@namnackdisagree. Most drivers started getting them in the past 5 years or so. However they still aren’t extremely common across most motorists.
@@MIkeDye200202holla It's just a fact, not an opinion.
I almost fell out of my chair when I saw the names of the streets.... the exact road I take to work every single day 😂 I sometimes forget People's Court was an east coast thing. (And yes I've seen too many accidents to count. Luckily there's a fire department right over there, so the ambulance is always just a stones throw away)
Okay, so I have a question. In that intersection, the older man said he had a green light to turn. If he had the green light to make that turn, wouldn't the younger guy not have a green light to make his turn? This intersection is a little wonky so I'm not understanding how the traffic light work.
@@jessicabrigman8295 No turning arrow there- both east and west-bound traffic have the green at the same time, and someone making a left has to yield to oncoming traffic. In this case, they both could have made the turn to head south, but the plaintiff instead of turning into the right lane, turned into the left lane.
Right?! I'm originally from there too. Been out of there for 22 years- but used to live mere feet from the exit 61 off-ramp!
@@jessicabrigman8295 Yes indeed it is wonky. Welcome to Long Island! Drive Carefully! 😉
The person turning right has the right away.. Because if you think of it this way.. if the plaintiff was going straight then the defendant would of cut him off..
I'll go over 60 years and the person on the left has the right away
The judge is incorrect. The plaintiff should have won, BECAUSE, and as she stated, "traditionally, persons making a right turn have the right of way" and this remains the case. The defendant should have waited.
Turd or thud? lol. The hidden coffee lol
Another reason for a dash cam!
I had my dogs in the car😂
Doug makes the show worth it. The king of snark. No one is his match.
Did she say “turd”? 😂
This is why you should always take photos as soon as it happens and before you pull to the side of the road to discuss anything, which would have shown exactly where the cars were...
Where they initially stopped wouldn't have proven anything, but may have eluded toward fault. If they first stopped on the median as the defendant claims, it would strongly imply that the plaintiff was probably the one that made the wide turn.
Dash Cam!
Plaintiff has the right of way unless there was a green arrow
For anyone wondering, I'm pretty sure when says "thurd" he means a "thump"
Contributory negligence
RED CAR HAS TO BE CLEAR TO CROSS TRAFFIC!!!
I believe the plaintiff was trying to say a thud
The question is who had the right of way. I think it was the plaintiff
A turd?
Thud
Im gonna use it as a prank call
HMMMMM ALTHOUGH IT'S NOT A CUT & DRY CASE IN THE DEFENDANT CASE HE'S SUPPOSE TO WAIT TIL IT'S CLEAR TO TURN SMH THIS IS WHY IT'S BEST TO HAVE A DASH CAM IN YOUR VEHICLE
Why didn't they use google maps to see the location?
When the plaintiff showed his version of the accident he showed himself making a right into the middle lane which is illegal. This was 100% the plaintiff fault.
i think it was a two-lane road. the lane to the far left looks like a parking lane if i’m mistaken. either way they’re both at fault
Actually, the person turning right has the right away..
@@jenniferlynn2324 but they must turn into the immediate right lane
@@lukerinderknecht2982 You do not have to turn in to the immediate lane. You have choice of lanes. Left turning driver yields to right turn. Each driver can go into any available lane but only after properly yielding. So the left turner can indeed turn into the far right lane but only after yielding to the right turning vehicle. Both cannot turn at the same time. Right turn first, then left turn follows.
@@foxvalleystingraysI think this may depend on the state. I was pulled over for not turning into the lane closest to me at an intersection and had a green light. I also was in an accident similar to this scenario in which the other driver was at fault for not turning into his immediate lane. The states were AZ and TX.
I think the plaintiff is confused in how police reports work. They took his statement, and he’s reading it as if it’s their findings. Wish she would have explained it a bit so he understands the police are not agreeing with him, it’s just a report
Actually the guy making the right was supposed to stop becuz he only has the right of way if there is no traffic light. Since there was, he was supposed to wait for the guy to make a left then go. I find it hard to believe both had green lights 🤔
The plaintiff was nodding during the defendant's testimony. Oops.
Where I’m from, the person turning left (defendant) would be at fault. He didn’t have an arrow, so he should’ve waited until the plaintiff was done with his turn before proceeding.
Not if it happened as the defendant claims because the plaintiff came from behind and was passing him as they collided.
@@DonziGT230 the defendants front end hit the plaintiffs back end. They both acknowledge that. That means that the plaintiff was turning first. When making a left turn, oncoming traffic has the right of way.
@@bbayley3121 You can keep saying and you'll keep being wrong.
@@DonziGT230 whatever you need to tell yourself. 👍
This is why I have a front and rear dash cam, they're very cheap for a half decent one too.
They cut a Check because u have collision…they would have pay it no matter fault as long as u have the coverage…
Yeah, this is why you should always stop and take pictures exactly where the accident happened. Since he's older you would think he is an extremely cautious driver, but a lot of older people do 60 on the highway which may seem cautious but it makes other drivers have to switch lanes to get around pokey drivers which in return is more dangerous. Or him thinking he is making a right turn and can take either lane he wants cause of "right of way". I have people making left with me making a right all the time and i hate it. If im making a left i wait for everyone making their right to go first because i dont trust other drivers! Then the defendant being a younger driver you would think impatient, but im around his age and i am extremely impatient but very aware of others being bad drivers. Judge made the right call. Get dash cams! That would have been a tremendous help.
Just had my SUV totalled 2 days ago. I had a green light, a 76 yr old made a turn at the last second (on his red). You'd be surprised how much damage & pain is caused by 45mph hitting a near-stationary car. Dash cam is still sitting in its box in my living room. So dumb of me... Install dash cams, friends.
I think the defendant is colorblind
Honestly, I kinda believe the defendant. He tells the story with more clarity and specificity.
And he's very handsome 🥰
Judge Judy figures out who hit whom by the danages. Easy peasy
The right of way is Right the left turning person should've waited until it was clear and not be in such a hurry to make his turn he's an old man give him time to make his Right turn.
When the plaintiff showed the accident on the diagram, they immediately moved themself into the middle lane, which would be an illegal turn. My guess is that he was shooting across the lanes and was honest when showing himself on the diagram. This makes me think he was the one who caused the crash. But that's a pretty minor detail and may have just been a mistake.
We don’t know if the right lane is a parking lane. If that’s the case, his lane to legally turn into would’ve been the middle lane. But considering he also showed the defendant flying over the median, I’m not sure we can trust his testimony that accurately.
Both these idiots could have killed someone. Sometimes its best to just slow down and swallow your pride.
keep up hard work uploads some more videos today is my birthday
this makes no sense, both of these idiots had a clear view during the turn
Who had the green light an was it a arrow if I have the light to turn it on the other side has to stop I have the right away an I do head for the outer lane pull out take your chance
He heard a what
Defendant, please go see a dentist
Where I’m from the defendant should have turned left and stayed the left lane, and the plaintiff should have turned right and stayed in the right lane. That’s not what happened obviously because there was an accident. Who was at fault? 🤷🏼♂️
WTH??!! The plaintiff, when he was demonstrating on the board what happened, admitted that he turned into the left lane- thus it is his fault- but dingbat psycho Milan says she doesn't know who turned into the inappropriate lane??!! People, this is why you NEVER want to come under the jurisdiction of a court, because judges are idiots, psychos, or just don't give enough of a damn about you or justice to even pay attention or care. (Once sold a vehicle online to a husband and wife judge couple [no, not Marilyn & John]...between the two of them, they couldn't figure out how to use PayPal and had to send a check for the deposit. Real judges, who have jurisdiction over the lives, liberty and property of others every single day. How would you like you life being in their hands?)
To be fair, the plaintif also had the defendant flying all over the meridian, so perhaps we shouldn't trust toooo hard on his white-board-spacial abilities 😅
@@faile66 True about the plaintiff...but that really has nothing to do with the defendant's admission.
1:06
The defendant is cute but why the bad teeth ? He's too young to have teeth like that. Brush, floss at least 2x daily and get regular check-up.
Shouldn't the plantif have turned into the most right lane? I know in Canada that's the proper turn, right lane to right lane, so he would have been at fault
The old man said he went into the middle lane when he described his incident.
The defendant is cute 😏
THE DEFENDANT IS GOOD LOOKING GUY BUT WHEN HE OPENS HIS MOUTH. HE NEED A DENTIST TO FIX THEM.
He's very handsome. 😍All the girls in his city will be after that stud as soon as he gets those teeth fixed.
@@reginaphalange6775 I bet!
Defendant’s teeth are yikes @_@
are there any traffic lights there? whoever has the green light has the right of way. if there isn't a light, whoever has the yield is at fault
Idians are never wrong! pompus
One making the left is wrong he said he seen the one making the right so he have to wait to it’s safe to turn
I think that the car that was turning was at fault and should be responsible for paying the damages.
Both were turning
The defendant was kind of cute but I felt bad for him. His front teeth are…something. Extra small? Hard to tell. But he tried not to smile to hide them.
Lol...my husband intentionally hit my car...35 years later the car is in the barn with the damage still in tact as a reminder of our strong marriage. I forgave him.❤
Defendant’s teeth are yikes @_@!!
Pee wee herman died today at the age of 70. It's why I always tell men to take care of themselves and forget about these women that generally outlive us anyway. Put yourself first and foremost before all else accept God and you'll be fine.
Okay incel. What does Mr. Ruben's death have to do with this case?
How old are u ?
Wow. Imagine using the newly and dearly departed to garner attention for something that has nothing to do with this case. Nothing. You're off your bean, Adrian. Seriously. Totally misogynistic.
As for Mr Paul Reubens, God rest his beautiful, merry soul. 💐🙏🏽❤️
PS If you accepted God as you purport you do, then you wouldn't hate half the population of the entire world, Adrian.
Adrian really is an overgrown black supremacist that’s all over the place. Not sure if it’s his drug use or a mental handicap. Today it’s pee wee Herman. Tomorrow it’ll be him running his filthy mouth about how JM hates black people. Day after that it’ll be about women who dare to talk back to men. He really is bigoted ghetto trash.
Plaintiff smacked into the defendant no doubt...that old man shouldnt be driving anymore!!!!
Nah. That young guy is at fault. They don’t know how to drive
Get off my lawn. 😂