Slavoj Zizek on levels of stupidity (extract)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Continental philosopher Slavoj Žižek and Paul A. Taylor (author of Žižek and The Media) explore the difficulty of conveying philosophical ideas within today's media.
    2011
    Watch the full video here: tinyurl.com/2n...

Комментарии • 45

  • @lanodramallama
    @lanodramallama Год назад +118

    This makes absolutely zero sense as an excerpt. It's like joining a Christopher Nolan film halfway through.

    • @farrider3339
      @farrider3339 Год назад +4

      Hell, the sense is what you want ? A meaning ? A background where to build upon idiotic interpretation's ?
      Meaning is for weenies, I claim.

    • @yayo0
      @yayo0 Год назад +8

      if you are not well read on philosophy you obviously will not understand his references.

    • @lucasfabisiak9586
      @lucasfabisiak9586 Год назад +9

      @@yayo0 Please enlighten us, professor.

    • @ramdas363
      @ramdas363 Год назад

      @@lucasfabisiak9586 To Be Fair, You Have To Have a Very High IQ to Understand Zizek...

    • @welearntoday
      @welearntoday 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@lucasfabisiak9586 for once he already explains this and builds more on it in the very beginning of his book "Less Than Nothing." Now, this is particularly is more of a classic zizek being zizek, just humour, although it does tie down and give nuance to following ideas in the introduction and later in the book as well so that's that. Also comparing Zizek to Christopher Nolan is like comparing Lacan to Michael Bay, very wrong, totally different types of incoherence are at play

  • @NeoRoman1453
    @NeoRoman1453 Год назад +27

    "Idiocracy" was never meant to be a documentary, but here we are!

    • @zestyfg
      @zestyfg 11 месяцев назад +2

      Then we have the parrots who never muster up the courage to speak themselves, but simply repeat what others have said before them with the assuring certainty that their (but actually someone else’s) statement has been pre-approved by the masses.

    • @NeoRoman1453
      @NeoRoman1453 11 месяцев назад

      @@zestyfg I wholeheartedly agree 👍
      😊

    • @noa7399
      @noa7399 Месяц назад

      ​@@zestyfg didn't you listen? These are morons

  • @MrSchmouz
    @MrSchmouz Год назад +25

    the grasp-the-snot frequency is staggering...
    might this be the connection to the many mysterious stains he's got on his t-shirt usually?

  • @nejzk2026
    @nejzk2026 5 месяцев назад +2

    from all the people Slavok Zizek is expert in stupidity

  • @richmason5152
    @richmason5152 Год назад +9

    @1:17 "Wittgenstein"

  • @farrider3339
    @farrider3339 Год назад +8

    Three level's of hysterical babbling menace's - good, I claim !
    Important to have these definitions. Now, where shall we put these ?
    Btw idiocracy has taken over anyway, so let the rudder go and drift along without hurting the water 😊

  • @omarlerouge5420
    @omarlerouge5420 Год назад +11

    don't forget the "stooopid" level these days

  • @AnyaSheven
    @AnyaSheven Год назад +5

    what was this Kafka and Judaism comparison, I honestly didn't get it, and it was a mess of an explanation.... anyone? 😹

    • @lucasfabisiak9586
      @lucasfabisiak9586 Год назад +3

      If I understand him correctly, Zizek is saying that although Kafka was certainly aware of his Jewishness, he did not explicitly incorporate it into his work.

    • @mariettestabel275
      @mariettestabel275 Год назад

      🤣 we are all stupid

    • @collaborativedataaccounts3249
      @collaborativedataaccounts3249 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@lucasfabisiak9586 He did though, unconsciously. You cannot separate Kafka from his Jewishness or his Jew-as-outsider outlook on the world.

    • @lucasfabisiak9586
      @lucasfabisiak9586 10 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@collaborativedataaccounts3249Thank you for clarifying what "explicitly" means.

    • @CeramicShot
      @CeramicShot 10 месяцев назад

      @@collaborativedataaccounts3249 I think he incorporated his Jewishness both unconsciously and consciously (read "Jackals and Arabs" for a conscious example), but never explicitly in his fiction. Inexplicit and unconscious aren't mutually exclusive.

  • @sumitrashankarchamoli8547
    @sumitrashankarchamoli8547 5 месяцев назад

    As usual , he is provocative, but may not be as profound as he seems to be by his hegelian speaking style .

  • @H.C.J.
    @H.C.J. Год назад +10

    Remember that Hegel is the reason why the structure of german literature is so overly intellectual to the point where we generate people that talk a whole lot who say a whole lot of nothing like Zizek 😊

    • @hss12661
      @hss12661 11 месяцев назад +5

      What does Zizek have to do with German literature?

    • @Vifnis
      @Vifnis 5 месяцев назад

      "we generate people that talk a whole lot who say a whole lot of nothing"
      Sorry, sir! I'll remember to speak in pure logic like a true Englishmen who follows Russel & Whitehead would!

    • @etfreak
      @etfreak 5 месяцев назад

      i understand what he's saying he just usually goes on tangents and talks a lot