Nope. The A320 & A319 have the same issues. The NEOs too, but since on the real aircraft their engines are larger anyways, it looks better and less off in its proportions.
I have a good number of 200 scale models as well. My major issue is that they take up a lot of space so 400 scale works better for me. However, I love the detail on 200 scale models.
Ok. So I’ve seen it all. The American A321s that have the retro schemes are instead powered by IAE engines. Gemini made the IAE engines correct. But very incorrect are the size of the CFM engines. They always make them the size of the PW 1,000 series engines the A320neo family uses. Other than that those retro schemes look Better on A321s now that the A319s that had them retired. Gemini still has yet to release the America West heritage scheme. And hopefully a US Airways heritage scheme. Aeroclassics made all those schemes.
Well, other manufacturers such as Panda Models & NG Models have got these items scaled correctly so I see no reason why Gemini Jets can’t do it correctly too.
Great looking models!
They are!
@@CitrusAviation Yeah !
I like these retro schemes on an A321 better than on the A319s.
Yeah they look very nice on the A321.
Is the a321 in 1:200 trash to?
That model is decent:
Great vid!! Is panda A321 better? Which ones I have to choose between Panda A321neo and GJ A321Neo?
Panda Models & NG Models both make superior A321 to the Gemini Jets / JC Wings variants.
Nice vid :) (it’s my birthday btw)
Happy bday
@@Mo_Aviation thx
Happy birthday, bro!!!!
Happy birthday to you!
@@olaerola Thx
My local model store makes a321s in their own brand and they are amazing
Are the other members of the Gemini Jet A320 family any better
Nope. The A320 & A319 have the same issues. The NEOs too, but since on the real aircraft their engines are larger anyways, it looks better and less off in its proportions.
Thank you
Nice duo GJ AA retro A321 review, btw is this also applied on their A319 and A320 as well besides the A321 of being a "trash" model?? 😂👀
Yes it does. The mould is very similar for the A319, A320, A321, A320Neo, & A321Neo.
@@CitrusAviation Ahh I see 👀👍
I think the a321 is OK not bad I mean only some have bad details but over all its good
As shown in the video an 80/100 is a decent rating so yeah the model is alright.
You may want to switch to 1:200 models. The detail is much better then 1:400.
I have a good number of 200 scale models as well. My major issue is that they take up a lot of space so 400 scale works better for me. However, I love the detail on 200 scale models.
Ok. So I’ve seen it all. The American A321s that have the retro schemes are instead powered by IAE engines. Gemini made the IAE engines correct. But very incorrect are the size of the CFM engines. They always make them the size of the PW 1,000 series engines the A320neo family uses. Other than that those retro schemes look Better on A321s now that the A319s that had them retired. Gemini still has yet to release the America West heritage scheme. And hopefully a US Airways heritage scheme. Aeroclassics made all those schemes.
Thats why that american air a320 cost 25dollars
Yep, that one model was a disaster.
Bro it’s tiny what better can u do? It’s sMaLl
Well, other manufacturers such as Panda Models & NG Models have got these items scaled correctly so I see no reason why Gemini Jets can’t do it correctly too.
But its really tiny and I usually by skymarks models and there bigger and more detailed but the tiny=less realistic