Como engenheiro elétrico, Nikola Tesla inventou está válvula para usar com fluidos, mas ao lê sua patente podemos perceber que está válvula é um dispositivo elétrico é uma peça para ser usada como parte de outro dispositivo, seu funcionamento asemelha se a um diodo onde a corrente elétrica passa por um lado e não volta, fiz a tradução e leitura desta patente e postei é interessante...
I think so too. Consider the forces acting upon the particle of water at the point where the flows rejoin. In this experiment, gravity acts on that particle in addition to the pressure from the two flows, causing the water to flow through moreso than it otherwise would.
Real question. Can a Tesla valve be used to prevent/slow flooding along a river or a canal during a storm surge? I live along a canal and since Hurricane Matthew when my home was under a storm surge advisory (it fortunately didn’t damage our house), this has been on my mind. If the canal had tear-shaped paths excavated alongside the main waterway, would it help prevent flooding?
Ultimately what floods the region during a storm isn't the river, it's the excess water from the rain following the topography. It only appears that it is the river because the water naturally pools in the lowest point in the region, which will be the riverbed if any rivers are nearby. But you might just as well get flooded on top of a mountain with the nearest rivers several hundred meters away down in the valley, like it happened to my hometown once when I was a child. Unless the valve is built in a way that provides excessive reservoir capabilites far exceeding the volume of the pre-existing waterway, the excess water would just sweep over it and surrounding landscape like it already does. Building this on such a large scale in such an environment would take up an extreme amount of space and impact river flow throughout the entire year, which will likely cause extreme problems with sediment buildup along the entire length and downstream (causing expensive and complicated maintenance, and perhaps other unforeseen issues) and could severely damage the aquatic environment. Those vortices would also pose an extreme health hazard to any individual dropping into the water (i.e. they would kill them) or any ship passing through (if that wouldn't be straight up impossible). I think you're better off with dams, reservoirs and early warning systems. If you feel that you are at elevated risk of property damage, I would look into technology designed to minimise flooding of personal properties (overflow valves for water pipes, pumps, waterproof windows and doors and there's probably more I don't know about), specialised insurance and moving particularly valuable goods upstairs.
🤦♂️ This experiment is an abuse of a term "scientific". How is it even possible to make such a terrible mistake? 🤦♂️ There MUST be NO air bubbles inside the valve. So, fill the valve with water, lift the forward outlet side up to remove bubbles, turn it horizontally, and repeat the experiment again. Ofcourse without bubbles there will be nothing to see 🤷♂️ , but at least the flow (known volume per measured time) will be measured correctly.
Se preferisci vedere i nostri video in italiano iscriviti al nostro canale Jaes italia:
ruclips.net/channel/UC1NLAk7aTBqOgG1D0YnCGIA
Si prefieres ver nuestros videos en español, suscríbete a nuestro canal Jaes Español:
ruclips.net/channel/UCocs1MzsjT_RSJiJ8R-EI4Q
Si vous préférez voir nos vidéos en français, abonnez-vous à notre chaîne Jaes Français:
ruclips.net/channel/UCb7TkWFn3nyb6XhudxGu5twchannels
thanks you all Inside web sr team for the animation
And OceanTree Creative for the voiceover 😉
You're really good in explaining everything! I've learnt so much from your channel! Thanks!
Interesting! This video has been very exhaustive!
Como engenheiro elétrico, Nikola Tesla inventou está válvula para usar com fluidos, mas ao lê sua patente podemos perceber que está válvula é um dispositivo elétrico é uma peça para ser usada como parte de outro dispositivo, seu funcionamento asemelha se a um diodo onde a corrente elétrica passa por um lado e não volta, fiz a tradução e leitura desta patente e postei é interessante...
Loved this so much. Thanks a ton for making this. Subscribed for more such well made videos in the future.
Гениально.
I think if the flow was level or upwards, the reduction in time would be more significant.
I think so too. Consider the forces acting upon the particle of water at the point where the flows rejoin.
In this experiment, gravity acts on that particle in addition to the pressure from the two flows, causing the water to flow through moreso than it otherwise would.
Didn't Tesla design this for use with Gases?
Tesla valve is not a check valve but a relief valve
One direction flow is indicative of a check valve... how would this be a relief valve?
can this device stop huge ocean waves
Real question. Can a Tesla valve be used to prevent/slow flooding along a river or a canal during a storm surge?
I live along a canal and since Hurricane Matthew when my home was under a storm surge advisory (it fortunately didn’t damage our house), this has been on my mind. If the canal had tear-shaped paths excavated alongside the main waterway, would it help prevent flooding?
Ultimately what floods the region during a storm isn't the river, it's the excess water from the rain following the topography. It only appears that it is the river because the water naturally pools in the lowest point in the region, which will be the riverbed if any rivers are nearby. But you might just as well get flooded on top of a mountain with the nearest rivers several hundred meters away down in the valley, like it happened to my hometown once when I was a child.
Unless the valve is built in a way that provides excessive reservoir capabilites far exceeding the volume of the pre-existing waterway, the excess water would just sweep over it and surrounding landscape like it already does. Building this on such a large scale in such an environment would take up an extreme amount of space and impact river flow throughout the entire year, which will likely cause extreme problems with sediment buildup along the entire length and downstream (causing expensive and complicated maintenance, and perhaps other unforeseen issues) and could severely damage the aquatic environment. Those vortices would also pose an extreme health hazard to any individual dropping into the water (i.e. they would kill them) or any ship passing through (if that wouldn't be straight up impossible). I think you're better off with dams, reservoirs and early warning systems.
If you feel that you are at elevated risk of property damage, I would look into technology designed to minimise flooding of personal properties (overflow valves for water pipes, pumps, waterproof windows and doors and there's probably more I don't know about), specialised insurance and moving particularly valuable goods upstairs.
The more restriction the quicker it would just erode something or raise up and out to where it's less restricted.
Is there a one-way tesla valve that completely blocks the flow in one direction?
No
Where can i find the video about swing valves?
playing with energy is child playing game , doing things with unknow energy is different.
1:42 Who's idea was it to use diarrhea as the sample liquid ?
nice, a check valve that doesn’t work…
It works perfectly for any scenario where you might wish to limit flow intensity without cancelling it. With the right job, it's a great tool.
Tesla’s valve looks like bird lungs…
In a complete hydraulic system according to Pascal's law, this valve would do absolutely nothing.
In a system with air in it it would slow the flow.
🤦♂️ This experiment is an abuse of a term "scientific". How is it even possible to make such a terrible mistake? 🤦♂️
There MUST be NO air bubbles inside the valve.
So, fill the valve with water, lift the forward outlet side up to remove bubbles, turn it horizontally, and repeat the experiment again.
Ofcourse without bubbles there will be nothing to see 🤷♂️ , but at least the flow (known volume per measured time) will be measured correctly.