GRE Quant Ep 8: Data Interpretation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024

Комментарии • 12

  • @moondog279
    @moondog279 2 месяца назад +2

    Omitting the 6 zero values from both sides make the calculations a lot easier

  • @garvjuneja7097
    @garvjuneja7097 10 месяцев назад +1

    Great videos sir, Can you please make a video which gives an overview of all the different strategies that are required to deal with different patterns of quant questions in the GRE.

  • @muhammadtufail3376
    @muhammadtufail3376 8 месяцев назад +1

    Love from Pakistan ✨💕 GRE is all about tricks ✨ Thank you for sharing

  • @martynadydyk9714
    @martynadydyk9714 13 дней назад

    The only section on GRE I'm sure I will pass haha

  • @yessbenne5924
    @yessbenne5924 3 месяца назад +1

    In mean problems, allways
    think the mean in relation with what

    • @yessbenne5924
      @yessbenne5924 3 месяца назад

      PERCENTAGE CHANGE: (p2-p1)/p
      x down 20% percent in periode1 and up 20 percent in period2 (that come afeter p1) so x*(0.8)*(1.2)

  • @EBOIGBEEFOSAABEL
    @EBOIGBEEFOSAABEL 2 месяца назад +1

    I think the answer to the last question is SUB SAHARAN AFRICA even though it is not among the options because going by your explanation the ratio is approx 0.1 for that region. Or was there a reason for the ommission?

    • @GRENinjaTutoring
      @GRENinjaTutoring  2 месяца назад +1

      This is one of those situations in which you need to be very careful with the wording of the question. We're asked "For which of the following regions is the ratio...smallest." This means we're limited to looking at the regions mentioned in the answer choices and only those regions. We can (and should) ignore any other region mentioned in the table.
      There's no reason why Sub-Saharan Africa was left out. However, the fact that it is not one of the options means it cannot be the answer to this question, even though you're absolutely right that Sub-Saharan Africa has the lowest value for the ratio of all the regions in the table.
      I hope that helps!

  • @kamaicfraser858
    @kamaicfraser858 6 месяцев назад +1

    question 4 wasn't the most efficient. we didnt need to calculate the percentage change. I know if i double 233M i get 466 thats a 100% change. If i add another 233M i get 699M. thats 200%. My answer is 220%. im enjoying this. thanks

    • @GRENinjaTutoring
      @GRENinjaTutoring  6 месяцев назад +1

      You're correct that there are quicker ways of answering this question. I wanted to include the percentage change formula as it comes up a lot in GRE Data Interpretation questions. While the numbers in this question worked out and we could have used the formula you suggested to quickly reach the correct answer, the numbers won't alweys be so nice in other questions. If you're comfortable using the formula and using the estimation method you laid out, you're in a great position to take on these problems!
      Thank you for posting!

  • @omgujarathi1286
    @omgujarathi1286 4 месяца назад

    In Question 9, I feel the answer should be (B) 2/3 because they have asked how many times greater? It is 863 thousand greater which is (2/3)rds. of 1340.

    • @GRENinjaTutoring
      @GRENinjaTutoring  4 месяца назад

      This all comes down to the wording of the question. You're absolutely right that 863 is approximately 2/3 of 1340, but that's not what we're asked to find in this question.
      We have to put find the number we would multiply 1340 by to get 2203. It turns out that 1340 * (5/3) = 2233, so the number of secondary teachers in South-eastern Asia is approximately 1 2/3 times greater than the number of secondary teachers in Western Asia. This is why the answer to this question is (D).
      I hope that helps!