They were attacked at night to reduce civilian casualties. At least they don't attack in broad daylight when more people are out .Thanks for your uploads.
"So much Russia winning alone while the EU and Nato lose together" Russia has the greatest tapped and untapped resources and land area. China has the greatest manufacturing capacity. US has the greatest national debt. Two of these are great friends. More people in the world would rather a Putin in charge than a Poodle in charge. Lucky Russia, Lucky India, Lucky China, Lucky Hungary.
I would like you to stop using alt account and post from your real one. And if you are afraid of repercussions, well what's the worst that can happen? Here's what has happened to me in a span of 6 months as a direct result of me calling out bs on west MSM and I will split this into two separate comment because I don't know if west and MSM will trigger the censorship bots.
I had my: instagram, facebook, deezer, world of tanks, league of legends, westernunion accounts hacked. I had paypall connected with my WoT account and had 150 euros spent in game on lootboxes but WoT support reacted within 24 hours and refunded me. Here's a kicker - I still had access to all of my accounts (passwords weren't changed) but someone else also had access to them until I figured out I'm targeted by hackers and sorted it out by changing my emails to my alt email. And deezer premium allows account sharing but only one person can choose what music will be played at a time. And surprise, surprise, one day when I opened deezer, Ukrainian rap was playing at the moment.
Oh, and how could I forget... My YT comments are being deleted en masse - without notice. Only one time I got a notification that my comment was removed because of harassment or bullying. And the worst I allow myself when I comment on YT is to call someone breinwashed.
@@GregorachRussia and China together would be unstoppable. E.U.are a paper tiger, weak as hell and barely have armies and ammonition and if the U.S. gets directly involved that will start WW3. Russia is a military manafatering powerhouse outproducing all NATO countries 3 to 1 in weapons and ammunition,it would take years for the U.S to catch up. Russia isn't middle eastern goat hurdlers wearing sandals.
Especially since Zelensky struck first after he threaten Russia he would bomb oil targets in Russia if Russia attack civilian targets. Zelensky broke their gentlemen's agreement, Russia is taking the war to a new low.
@trevorsutherland5263 It was confirmed by the Ukrainians themselves that they're being targeted by aircraft they can't see on radar could be either SU57 or S70 Okhotnik.
@@ailinofaolin8897 True. If either of those can carry FAB-1500 or 3000, then no building or bunker in Kharkiv, Odessa, or Kyiv will be safe for Zelensky or his leadership.
I am pretty sure Russia is humiliating itself their performance has been so poor just because nato gave ukraine some military aid. And i think the Russian navy has performed the worse against Ukrainian sea drones.@@tedstewart114
Shamil Basayev thought Moscow Theater was a good idea, but where is he today? Shamil bragged about American financing and showed stacks of cash on television. His website also have notice about two weeks before the trade towers- everyone knows who operates those groups.
@@louislinsley3128 The dude flies around all the time. They could easily ID and shoot down his plane. But you can find the report in many places of the Israeli prime minister re-assuring the Z-Man after a meeting with Putin that he was not a target. Here is one such link. ruclips.net/video/8aYC9M4_-i0/видео.html But the real question is, if your enemy is run by a drugged up comedian, why kill him and get him replaced by somebody competent?
It has been degraded as units have been destroyed, some batteries moved to the front, as well as a depletion in munition. The report of this last attack seems to point out that cruise missiles do have been taken down while none of the Kinzhals and Iskanders. These latter may have also improved their countermeasures as the time between the alarms sounding and the impacts has been very short in relation to other attacks with a larger time gap that allowed the batteries to get ready as well as to evacuate.
According to the flight pattern of that missile and the time it took to fly from Sevastopol to Kiev its definitely a Zicron that seems to be launched by submarine or from a warship
Two points regarding Russian military production: (1) According to SIPRI, France has nudged Russia out of the #2 spot in the global ranking of arms and military equipment exporters. Short-sighted journalists tried to spin this as a sign of Russian weakness; instead, it’s a sign that Russia’s MIC is diverting its output from exports to the needs of Russia’s own domestic military forces. In addition, it should be pointed out that for the SIPRI ranking nominal sales figures do play a role, since arms exports are purchased with foreign exchange (USD, Euros, etc.), not domestic currency (in Russia’s case, rubles). (2) Where nominally denominated sales figures do not play a role is in domestic production and consumption. Here, purchasing power parity (PPP) is the key factor. So when we measure the level of arms production in Russia we should be looking at it in physical output and not in USD terms. What an increase to e.g. $200 billion actually means has to be looked at more closely: Are we just talking about a multiple of the estimated annual military budget of the Russian Federation in USD in nominal terms prior to the war, or we talking about a PPP equivalent? Since Russia’s military budget measured in PPP terms was already much, much larger than what it appeared to be in nominal terms, we could be talking about an absolutely massive output of the Russian MIC in terms of actual equipment volume. Still below what the U.S., but far less so than what might seem to be the case at first glance. NB PPP comparisons can never be perfect in terms of output quality, "apples to apples", so to speak. I.e. is a T-90M as good as a Leopard 2 or an Abrams? However, the belief - widespread among many in the West - that Russian military equipment is nothing more than worthless junk has been soundly debunked over the last two years of the Ukraine War. Clearly, in many cases Russian equipment does not match Western equipment in quality, performance and lethality. But that does not stop it from wreaking havoc on the forces opposing it on the battlefield.
I don't think that people are concluding that Russia dropping to #6 on SIPRI's list is due to "Russian weakness". Its very well understood that Russia is prioritizing domestic needs over international exports. But what it does point out is that Russia doesn't have any excess capacity because if they did they would fulfil the orders so to keep their ranking, prestige and income source. It is incorrect to say "nominally denominated sales figures do not play a role is in domestic production and consumption". High PPP with low GDP is indicative of low wages. Low wages in turn impacts the capital allocation. In other words, low wages means nobody's going to invest in advanced automation when they can just employ cheap manual labor. Low investment --> low productivity per person --> low wages. So this absolutely affects production and ultimately consumption. And this is where Russia's limitation lie. Cheap labor to achieve your MIB output is fine, except when you need to simultaneously send bodies to the front line. And we see this in Russia's unemployment rate; 2.9% another indicator of "maxed out". Russia's decisiveness has translated into a very good head start in artillery production, for example. However, its low GDP ultimately means low productivity. If Russia's current artillery shell production impresses, you should refer to Canada's WW2 production of 500,000 shells per week. Smaller shells to be sure, but Canada also had about 35% of its current population.
Overall your points hold for a primarily market-oriented mixed economy... but less so for Russia. If you review Russia’s transition from the Soviet socialist command economy to its current state you will see that today’s Russian economy, while no longer purely socialist, is far more command-oriented than, say, the economies of the United States or Canada. Russia achieves this - notoriously - through what might be called neo-feudalist oligarch-controlled monopolistic concentration. Capital allocation in Russia is not driven to the same degree by market forces as would be the case in a more classically capitalist mixed economy. This is how Russia was able to retain the large reserve production capacities in its defense industry that it has been able to mobilize to fight the NATO-Russia War. However, there are limits: If capacity in key MIC-supporting sectors that demand highly skilled labor and heavy capital investment (metallurgy, machine building, chemical and petrochemical, aerospace, etc.) are maxed out and have to be expanded even further Russia will start to hit an “impenetrable ceiling”, at which point MIC expansion will slow down markedly. But Russia will only be forced to do that if the Collective West actually decides to go all-in, to convert large swathes of its economic output to wartime production, and thus - because almost all major Collective West countries, unlike Russia, are all massively indebted - start replacing “butter with guns”. That, of course, would be totally senseless, because the NATO-Ukraine War is, geopolitically speaking, a sideshow, of no real geopolitical importance to the primary driver of the conflict on the Western side: the United States. In any case, convincing voters in the Collective West to accept a move to a wartime footing will take massive bamboozling... always possible with the Collective West MSM, but difficult, because Western publics are slowly beginning to see that a lot of what they are being told are simply lies. And, back to Russian capital vs. labor (and potential Russian labor shortages): Yes, tight labor is a concern for the Kremlin. In addition to the unpopularity of expanding conscription and the limits on how much personal military gear (helmets, uniforms, rifles, grenades, etc.) the Russian MIC can generate on short notice tight labor is an important factor behind the Kremlin’s decision not to expand the AF RF to the approximate 2-3 million man level it actually needs to crush the Ukraine quickly and decisively. But note that compared to those in major developing countries like China and India Russian wages are relatively high. So - in addition to the command elements noted above - the lower level of Russian wages as opposed to European or North American wages is not necessarily going to lead to less capital deployment toward things like automation. The opposite is true: Russia is trying to automate lots of things (e.g. street cleaning machines in Moscow!). It’s just that Russia lacks the resources and technology to modernize this way at the breakneck pace its current situation requires... Nobody says the Russian economy is perfect - far from it! - it’s just that most Western analysts, at least those closest to the levers of power, haven’t understood it very well. @@truthseekerodinson5094
The key takeaway was that there is absolutely no warning of the appending attack. Even if the air defenses were compromised, the takeoff of the MiG-31 has always been detected, giving ample time to evacuate to the underground bunkers. Not this time and we don't know why. So it is likely that some personnel were killed, along with very important equipment.
@@4411825 Zircon?! Wow, that explains everything. I was thinking Russia was holding them back because in case of a conflict with NATO, Russia would need every Zircon it could lay its hands.
FYI. Although technologically not the most advanced shall we say, the Russian Army is getting massive experience using and defending against drones of all sorts and sizes. Western countries do not have this experience.
Perun did a video on Russian military exports a few weeks back. They dropped from 2nd place down to 6th. But exports are a lagging indicator. Orders for Russian equipment is WAAAAYYY low (based on best information).
@@dirremoire Um, no. It’s proven that the MBT is vulnerable to certain types of attack which weren’t foreseen. Check the military equipment manufacturers, a lot of them are working on active protection systems for armoured vehicles. The Speed/Armour/Firepower triangle adjusts. We started using armour on warships, we developed better cannon, so we developed better armour, while making ships more maneuverable. The same happened when tanks were introduced. The death of the tank has been announced many times. It hasn’t happened yet.
@@mitchellcouchman6589 Most countries don’t have the capability, and could at best produce something like the Bob Semple tank. India has the capability to replace Russia AND China as a supplier to Africa.
@@mitchellcouchman6589Are you saying that PERUN is disingenuous? Russia is absolutely fielding less modernized tanks and you can see the bloody T54s and T55s up on Oryx. You can further see the Soviet stockpiles dwindling as further ancient hardware is pulled into service. Then there's the Frankenstein constructions which no army would field had they better equipment available. What "old projects" are you referring to? Perun is has been very hesitant to call the war for one side or the other. Yes, Perun will say that the west can wish if it decides to,....but we can all see that it has yet to get serious. For the most part, he lays out the basis of his analysis but he doesn't actually make forecasts. And, its pretty strange for you to be on VOR's zero-fact, zero-analysis, hand-waving, trust-me-bro, "observations" while throwing stones at Perun's relatively rigorous and transparent approach. I'm sensing disingenuous but not from Perun.
I'm surprised to find such a well thought out , and delivered, video. When listening I sense the speaker is possibly an honorable retired US General, as it brings back memories of when I was in the service.
Yeah, Voice of Putin is a 52 year old car salesman in Northern Virginia. In his 20s he was part of a US Army tank crew, that Never saw Combat! "retired general"!? wow!
Survivability is still a thing. Or at least it is if you're not in the Russian turret tossing competitions. Old tanks versus modern drones makes this look worse than it might actually be. Oryx still has "only" 30 lost Leopard2s, 1 Challenger 2 and 3 Abrams on the Ukrainian side. On the Russian side, 72 x T90Ms which beats the heck out of the 1,200 T72 variants.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 it's because Ukraine stopped using the Abrams and Leopards because it was bad press to see them destroyed so easily. As for survivability, it's better for a tank to be completely destroyed so it can't be recovered by the enemy. Thanks to the "survivability" of the Abrams, the Russians now have several Abrams in their collection. By the way, there hasn't been a single reported citing of a Challenger since the summer offensive.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 Put those figures for western tanks in percentage terms (i.e. relative to what is available) and time spent in war or battlefield, and you will get a very different picture. Challenger tank arrived in Ukraine March last year - 14 of them!. Only sight of tank was a burning wreck in August last year. Never seen another near a battlefield since. Can't destroy what isn't there.
Dude, if you're going to talk slowly, then you need to provide more visual content to keep us all awake while you talk. Try including some videos to back up your point rather then keep showing the same still photographs throughout your video. This is downright boring !!!
@@ohydekszalej Its normal for a country to stop exporting some fuel when at war, only sensible thing to do but they are still making hundreds of millions of dollars exporting oil, in case you don't know this unprocessed fuel.
I listen precisely because this is one of the few channels that avoid clickbait headlines and unfounded speculation. Consider the Durant, a once great channel almost ruined by Alexander's constant unfounded pronouncements on the course of the war.
@@dirremoire What's wrong with the Duran? Alexander is very much on the same page with the views of this channel and the likes of Col. Macgregor and Scott Ritter.
@@IAMJEFFREY-cw9ns Alex is cool, but Alexander continually talks about things that are just not true in regards to the war. He's always predicting the end of the war "by spring, by summer, by fall", etc. He just doesn't get that Biden and NATO are not going to give up and that World War 3 is indeed on the horizon.
When moronic folks diss something that is far above their intellectual capacity to understand it tickles my funny bone and I can't stop laughing. Thank you for providing this therapy.
![Luke Combs - Ain’t No Love In Oklahoma (From Twisters: The Album) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J6YlaeACE4E/mqdefault.jpg)
Russia knocked off 2 Patriot missile systems in Kiev, gloves are off after Opera massacre.
Incoming stories of US soldiers dying in motorcycle accidents and helicopter crashes. Just happen to be air defense specialists. Whoopsie
@@TheCrapOnYourStrapOnAll day...
The gloves are still on because NATO drones are still flying.
Maybe the Russians rolled up their sleeves a little.
Ukrain Also knocked out two s400s so?
@@pandibbarmandifference is they didn't have to beg for thise like a bunch of bums 😂😂
They were attacked at night to reduce civilian casualties. At least they don't attack in broad daylight when more people are out .Thanks for your uploads.
"So much Russia winning alone while the EU and Nato lose together"
Russia has the greatest tapped and untapped resources and land area. China has the greatest manufacturing capacity. US has the greatest national debt. Two of these are great friends.
More people in the world would rather a Putin in charge than a Poodle in charge.
Lucky Russia, Lucky India, Lucky China, Lucky Hungary.
🤣🤣🤣😂🤣
I would like you to stop using alt account and post from your real one. And if you are afraid of repercussions, well what's the worst that can happen? Here's what has happened to me in a span of 6 months as a direct result of me calling out bs on west MSM and I will split this into two separate comment because I don't know if west and MSM will trigger the censorship bots.
I had my: instagram, facebook, deezer, world of tanks, league of legends, westernunion accounts hacked. I had paypall connected with my WoT account and had 150 euros spent in game on lootboxes but WoT support reacted within 24 hours and refunded me. Here's a kicker - I still had access to all of my accounts (passwords weren't changed) but someone else also had access to them until I figured out I'm targeted by hackers and sorted it out by changing my emails to my alt email. And deezer premium allows account sharing but only one person can choose what music will be played at a time. And surprise, surprise, one day when I opened deezer, Ukrainian rap was playing at the moment.
Oh, and how could I forget... My YT comments are being deleted en masse - without notice. Only one time I got a notification that my comment was removed because of harassment or bullying. And the worst I allow myself when I comment on YT is to call someone breinwashed.
@@GregorachRussia and China together would be unstoppable.
E.U.are a paper tiger, weak as hell and barely have armies and ammonition and if the U.S. gets directly involved that will start WW3.
Russia is a military manafatering powerhouse outproducing all NATO countries 3 to 1 in weapons and ammunition,it would take years for the U.S to catch up.
Russia isn't middle eastern goat hurdlers wearing sandals.
It only gets worse from here for Kiev
The VOR. It is always very pleasant, very informative listening to you. Very precise and accurate analysis. Thank you.
Thank you kindly!
This projection of manufacturing limitations would contribute to why NATO high command was praying that the Russians had run out of everything...
an eye for an eye
You have to be a fool to be hanging out in Kiev
Especially since Zelensky struck first after he threaten Russia he would bomb oil targets in Russia if Russia attack civilian targets. Zelensky broke their gentlemen's agreement, Russia is taking the war to a new low.
Or have a White Stick !
It’s a dangerous place to raise your right hand to bandera these days
I think that Zelensky’s days are numbered.😂😂
wakka wakka
Mrs Z will be pleased
worst case scenario he joins karzai resort.
He’s already in overtime…
Hello VOR! Thank you for your honest reporting. Keep safe
Your analysis is truly remarkable thank you ❤
Morning. Thanks M and F. J.
I totally forgot about the S-70 Okhotnik! I knew it was rumored to be operational a few months ago, but no one has suggested it is in use until now.
@trevorsutherland5263 It was confirmed by the Ukrainians themselves that they're being targeted by aircraft they can't see on radar could be either SU57 or S70 Okhotnik.
@@ailinofaolin8897 True. If either of those can carry FAB-1500 or 3000, then no building or bunker in Kharkiv, Odessa, or Kyiv will be safe for Zelensky or his leadership.
@@trevorsutherland5263no way they could fit a 3000 inside the bomb bay though I would guess. The missiles they carry have penetrative warheads though.
New to the channel. Great stuff.
Much appreciated
Russia is not a federation. On the other side is not Ukraine but Ukraine the USA, UK. And the Nato members.
Thats right, and isnt Russia humiliating this group of countries ?
I am pretty sure Russia is humiliating itself their performance has been so poor just because nato gave ukraine some military aid. And i think the Russian navy has performed the worse against Ukrainian sea drones.@@tedstewart114
God save us all after what has happened in Moscow! EU is done and Ukraine is done:(
Shamil Basayev thought Moscow Theater was a good idea, but where is he today?
Shamil bragged about American financing and showed stacks of cash on television.
His website also have notice about two weeks before the trade towers- everyone knows who operates those groups.
Word is when the ZMans term expires (Today I believe) Russia will no longer consider him president of Ukraine and will consider him fair game.
Зеленский делает много ошибок,не разбираясь в военном деле. Как раз он выгоден для России
For two years Putin has sent hit squads for President Zelenskyy.
Now, Zelenskyy is "fair game"? Huh?
@@louislinsley3128 The dude flies around all the time. They could easily ID and shoot down his plane. But you can find the report in many places of the Israeli prime minister re-assuring the Z-Man after a meeting with Putin that he was not a target. Here is one such link.
ruclips.net/video/8aYC9M4_-i0/видео.html
But the real question is, if your enemy is run by a drugged up comedian, why kill him and get him replaced by somebody competent?
Thank you
2 comments but none showing wonder wot they said democracy usa style
Can't believe this war is still going, so easy to forget unfortunately
It has been degraded as units have been destroyed, some batteries moved to the front, as well as a depletion in munition. The report of this last attack seems to point out that cruise missiles do have been taken down while none of the Kinzhals and Iskanders. These latter may have also improved their countermeasures as the time between the alarms sounding and the impacts has been very short in relation to other attacks with a larger time gap that allowed the batteries to get ready as well as to evacuate.
According to the flight pattern of that missile and the time it took to fly from Sevastopol to Kiev its definitely a Zicron that seems to be launched by submarine or from a warship
ZIRCON was used
Two points regarding Russian military production:
(1) According to SIPRI, France has nudged Russia out of the #2 spot in the global ranking of arms and military equipment exporters. Short-sighted journalists tried to spin this as a sign of Russian weakness; instead, it’s a sign that Russia’s MIC is diverting its output from exports to the needs of Russia’s own domestic military forces. In addition, it should be pointed out that for the SIPRI ranking nominal sales figures do play a role, since arms exports are purchased with foreign exchange (USD, Euros, etc.), not domestic currency (in Russia’s case, rubles).
(2) Where nominally denominated sales figures do not play a role is in domestic production and consumption. Here, purchasing power parity (PPP) is the key factor. So when we measure the level of arms production in Russia we should be looking at it in physical output and not in USD terms. What an increase to e.g. $200 billion actually means has to be looked at more closely: Are we just talking about a multiple of the estimated annual military budget of the Russian Federation in USD in nominal terms prior to the war, or we talking about a PPP equivalent? Since Russia’s military budget measured in PPP terms was already much, much larger than what it appeared to be in nominal terms, we could be talking about an absolutely massive output of the Russian MIC in terms of actual equipment volume. Still below what the U.S., but far less so than what might seem to be the case at first glance. NB PPP comparisons can never be perfect in terms of output quality, "apples to apples", so to speak. I.e. is a T-90M as good as a Leopard 2 or an Abrams? However, the belief - widespread among many in the West - that Russian military equipment is nothing more than worthless junk has been soundly debunked over the last two years of the Ukraine War. Clearly, in many cases Russian equipment does not match Western equipment in quality, performance and lethality. But that does not stop it from wreaking havoc on the forces opposing it on the battlefield.
I don't think that people are concluding that Russia dropping to #6 on SIPRI's list is due to "Russian weakness". Its very well understood that Russia is prioritizing domestic needs over international exports. But what it does point out is that Russia doesn't have any excess capacity because if they did they would fulfil the orders so to keep their ranking, prestige and income source.
It is incorrect to say "nominally denominated sales figures do not play a role is in domestic production and consumption". High PPP with low GDP is indicative of low wages. Low wages in turn impacts the capital allocation. In other words, low wages means nobody's going to invest in advanced automation when they can just employ cheap manual labor. Low investment --> low productivity per person --> low wages. So this absolutely affects production and ultimately consumption.
And this is where Russia's limitation lie. Cheap labor to achieve your MIB output is fine, except when you need to simultaneously send bodies to the front line. And we see this in Russia's unemployment rate; 2.9% another indicator of "maxed out". Russia's decisiveness has translated into a very good head start in artillery production, for example. However, its low GDP ultimately means low productivity. If Russia's current artillery shell production impresses, you should refer to Canada's WW2 production of 500,000 shells per week. Smaller shells to be sure, but Canada also had about 35% of its current population.
Overall your points hold for a primarily market-oriented mixed economy... but less so for Russia. If you review Russia’s transition from the Soviet socialist command economy to its current state you will see that today’s Russian economy, while no longer purely socialist, is far more command-oriented than, say, the economies of the United States or Canada. Russia achieves this - notoriously - through what might be called neo-feudalist oligarch-controlled monopolistic concentration. Capital allocation in Russia is not driven to the same degree by market forces as would be the case in a more classically capitalist mixed economy. This is how Russia was able to retain the large reserve production capacities in its defense industry that it has been able to mobilize to fight the NATO-Russia War. However, there are limits: If capacity in key MIC-supporting sectors that demand highly skilled labor and heavy capital investment (metallurgy, machine building, chemical and petrochemical, aerospace, etc.) are maxed out and have to be expanded even further Russia will start to hit an “impenetrable ceiling”, at which point MIC expansion will slow down markedly. But Russia will only be forced to do that if the Collective West actually decides to go all-in, to convert large swathes of its economic output to wartime production, and thus - because almost all major Collective West countries, unlike Russia, are all massively indebted - start replacing “butter with guns”. That, of course, would be totally senseless, because the NATO-Ukraine War is, geopolitically speaking, a sideshow, of no real geopolitical importance to the primary driver of the conflict on the Western side: the United States. In any case, convincing voters in the Collective West to accept a move to a wartime footing will take massive bamboozling... always possible with the Collective West MSM, but difficult, because Western publics are slowly beginning to see that a lot of what they are being told are simply lies. And, back to Russian capital vs. labor (and potential Russian labor shortages): Yes, tight labor is a concern for the Kremlin. In addition to the unpopularity of expanding conscription and the limits on how much personal military gear (helmets, uniforms, rifles, grenades, etc.) the Russian MIC can generate on short notice tight labor is an important factor behind the Kremlin’s decision not to expand the AF RF to the approximate 2-3 million man level it actually needs to crush the Ukraine quickly and decisively. But note that compared to those in major developing countries like China and India Russian wages are relatively high. So - in addition to the command elements noted above - the lower level of Russian wages as opposed to European or North American wages is not necessarily going to lead to less capital deployment toward things like automation. The opposite is true: Russia is trying to automate lots of things (e.g. street cleaning machines in Moscow!). It’s just that Russia lacks the resources and technology to modernize this way at the breakneck pace its current situation requires... Nobody says the Russian economy is perfect - far from it! - it’s just that most Western analysts, at least those closest to the levers of power, haven’t understood it very well.
@@truthseekerodinson5094
Tx VOR
Thanks
Thank you! Your support to the channel is tremendously appreciated
Looks like Putin took the gloves off. Get the popcorn
those buildings were empty, you know they were not stupid enough to go to work there after the terrorist attack
The key takeaway was that there is absolutely no warning of the appending attack. Even if the air defenses were compromised, the takeoff of the MiG-31 has always been detected, giving ample time to evacuate to the underground bunkers. Not this time and we don't know why. So it is likely that some personnel were killed, along with very important equipment.
@@dirremoire, Ohotnik ( Hunter) maybe? 🤔🤔
@@dirremoireBecause the Zircon hypersonic missile is a ground launched platform!
@@4411825 Zircon?! Wow, that explains everything. I was thinking Russia was holding them back because in case of a conflict with NATO, Russia would need every Zircon it could lay its hands.
Good new to this pro-Russian individual.
Putin seems a bit angry. He wants to rain down the hurt I'll bet
👍👍👍✊️✊️✊️👏👏👏👍👍
FYI. Although technologically not the most advanced shall we say, the Russian Army is getting massive experience using and defending against drones of all sorts and sizes. Western countries do not have this experience.
Hmm. You know India is developing their own MBT? Something to ponder when considering future military procurement worldwide.
This war has proven that the MBT is a huge waste of money.
Perun did a video on Russian military exports a few weeks back. They dropped from 2nd place down to 6th. But exports are a lagging indicator. Orders for Russian equipment is WAAAAYYY low (based on best information).
@@dirremoire
Um, no. It’s proven that the MBT is vulnerable to certain types of attack which weren’t foreseen. Check the military equipment manufacturers, a lot of them are working on active protection systems for armoured vehicles.
The Speed/Armour/Firepower triangle adjusts. We started using armour on warships, we developed better cannon, so we developed better armour, while making ships more maneuverable.
The same happened when tanks were introduced. The death of the tank has been announced many times. It hasn’t happened yet.
@@mitchellcouchman6589
Most countries don’t have the capability, and could at best produce something like the Bob Semple tank.
India has the capability to replace Russia AND China as a supplier to Africa.
@@mitchellcouchman6589Are you saying that PERUN is disingenuous? Russia is absolutely fielding less modernized tanks and you can see the bloody T54s and T55s up on Oryx. You can further see the Soviet stockpiles dwindling as further ancient hardware is pulled into service. Then there's the Frankenstein constructions which no army would field had they better equipment available.
What "old projects" are you referring to? Perun is has been very hesitant to call the war for one side or the other. Yes, Perun will say that the west can wish if it decides to,....but we can all see that it has yet to get serious. For the most part, he lays out the basis of his analysis but he doesn't actually make forecasts.
And, its pretty strange for you to be on VOR's zero-fact, zero-analysis, hand-waving, trust-me-bro, "observations" while throwing stones at Perun's relatively rigorous and transparent approach. I'm sensing disingenuous but not from Perun.
I'm surprised to find such a well thought out , and delivered, video. When listening I sense the speaker is possibly an honorable retired US General, as it brings back memories of when I was in the service.
Yeah, Voice of Putin is a 52 year old car salesman in Northern Virginia. In his 20s he was part of a US Army tank crew, that Never saw Combat! "retired general"!? wow!
close to first
Spam bots pushing spicy content
UUURRRAA 🇷🇺 🎖️ 🇷🇺
Thanks!
Thank you good sir
if you yell at zelensky(slava kokaine), and he cant hear you.. that means you are probably at the safe distance
🇷🇺Salva Russia🇷🇺
Point of interest, tanks have been rendered obsolete due to modern weapons ! These death traps have been replaced by missiles and drones !!
Definitely not obsolete 🤦 redesigns and countermeasures won't take that long to appear!
His cappa was detated!!
Why the hell is anyone buying tanks anymore?
Survivability is still a thing. Or at least it is if you're not in the Russian turret tossing competitions. Old tanks versus modern drones makes this look worse than it might actually be.
Oryx still has "only" 30 lost Leopard2s, 1 Challenger 2 and 3 Abrams on the Ukrainian side.
On the Russian side, 72 x T90Ms which beats the heck out of the 1,200 T72 variants.
well, you cant go back to strait infantry only
@@truthseekerodinson5094 it's because Ukraine stopped using the Abrams and Leopards because it was bad press to see them destroyed so easily. As for survivability, it's better for a tank to be completely destroyed so it can't be recovered by the enemy. Thanks to the "survivability" of the Abrams, the Russians now have several Abrams in their collection. By the way, there hasn't been a single reported citing of a Challenger since the summer offensive.
@@truthseekerodinson5094, russian tank dont have crew in turret 😂😂😂. Next time learn first .
@@truthseekerodinson5094 Put those figures for western tanks in percentage terms (i.e. relative to what is available) and time spent in war or battlefield, and you will get a very different picture. Challenger tank arrived in Ukraine March last year - 14 of them!. Only sight of tank was a burning wreck in August last year. Never seen another near a battlefield since. Can't destroy what isn't there.
Dude, if you're going to talk slowly, then you need to provide more visual content to keep us all awake while you talk. Try including some videos to back up your point rather then keep showing the same still photographs throughout your video. This is downright boring !!!
How are Russian refineries doing? Still burning?
Actually no, read an article earlier, there was a bit of damage but they are still operating normally
@@tedstewart114 Normally as in - Russia stopped exporting diesel and gasoline?
@@ohydekszalej Its normal for a country to stop exporting some fuel when at war, only sensible thing to do but they are still making hundreds of millions of dollars exporting oil, in case you don't know this unprocessed fuel.
Speaking so slowly to spin it out is horrible to listen to, even at 1.5x.
I'll admit this isn't the best channel for people with ADHD.
Just go away then....
Poor channel, too little specifics, old news.
I listen precisely because this is one of the few channels that avoid clickbait headlines and unfounded speculation. Consider the Durant, a once great channel almost ruined by Alexander's constant unfounded pronouncements on the course of the war.
If all this happened in the last 24 hours, how can it be old news?
Let's see you do better armchair warrior.
@@dirremoire What's wrong with the Duran? Alexander is very much on the same page with the views of this channel and the likes of Col. Macgregor and Scott Ritter.
@@IAMJEFFREY-cw9ns Alex is cool, but Alexander continually talks about things that are just not true in regards to the war. He's always predicting the end of the war "by spring, by summer, by fall", etc. He just doesn't get that Biden and NATO are not going to give up and that World War 3 is indeed on the horizon.
You talk too slow
This shit is straight comedy, love it hahahahahaa.
What a wonderful sense of humour you have, Morgan.
When moronic folks diss something that is far above their intellectual capacity to understand it tickles my funny bone and I can't stop laughing. Thank you for providing this therapy.
@@2vintage68 Yes thanks for getting triggered, that also makes my day. 😁
@@2vintage68 Morgan is such a happy little camper, bless.
Orc botZ ahoy
What does that mean
donate to kremli-bricspal for the fab on zelli