Worst one recently; SB v BTN, 3bet, flop T53r, bet 1/2 pot, turn 4, bdfd available, overbet, river J bdfd completes, check, villain jams. We tank fold. No flush blockers.
There's so much different things that happens pretty often in real life, which is not a thing in a solver. Like limping is very common, and higher open sizings with stronger hand (old school) still happens today. super tight 3bet ranges when high 3bet, and not so strong range sometime when 3bet lower. I'm interested in custom AI to learn how to play against assumptions like that, what size is the optimal.. range against limps, range against 3-4x with strong hands when defending big blind. I've folded A9o against these sizings in the bb as I expect their range to be so strong that I'm not able to profit with A9..
I nodelocked some spots where the 3beter is OOP and the opponent calls wider than he should, and raises the flop not enough, on dryer boards the solver always cbets for 67% with his entire range. why if you say small bets are better?
Past a certain point of weakness in the defender range, the solver starts applying pressure by range betting for a bigger and bigger sizing. Everything depends on your exact inputs
You guys are not really gto players. A gto player is playing short stacked not 100bb deep or bigger. Its weird how its not even brought up in the video just playing 100bb deep or bigger. Playing 100bb deep is like this weird pattern that got forced into online poker from the early 2000s. The only time I would play deep is if there is a fish on my direct right I will cover whatever he is playing for and thats it.
Tell us about the most confusing spot you played this month! 🤯 (We might even make a video about it!)
Worst one recently; SB v BTN, 3bet, flop T53r, bet 1/2 pot, turn 4, bdfd available, overbet, river J bdfd completes, check, villain jams. We tank fold. No flush blockers.
HELLO I"M DONK ORLEONE 🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
There's so much different things that happens pretty often in real life, which is not a thing in a solver. Like limping is very common, and higher open sizings with stronger hand (old school) still happens today. super tight 3bet ranges when high 3bet, and not so strong range sometime when 3bet lower. I'm interested in custom AI to learn how to play against assumptions like that, what size is the optimal.. range against limps, range against 3-4x with strong hands when defending big blind. I've folded A9o against these sizings in the bb as I expect their range to be so strong that I'm not able to profit with A9..
I only play tournaments, not cash
It's called node locking
A9o is a fold even in theory bro
Except maybe vs button or co of course
Dominated hands so yeah, i'd 99% fold A9o
@@emilecarette8993 if u fold A9o vs Button you are Capital Nit
I nodelocked some spots where the 3beter is OOP and the opponent calls wider than he should, and raises the flop not enough, on dryer boards the solver always cbets for 67% with his entire range. why if you say small bets are better?
Past a certain point of weakness in the defender range, the solver starts applying pressure by range betting for a bigger and bigger sizing. Everything depends on your exact inputs
Top as usual
when i tell you, i was just thinking about this. It's like you guys read my mind.
Ass symmetric makes me lol. Nice video
brain-solving... wow.
You guys are not really gto players. A gto player is playing short stacked not 100bb deep or bigger. Its weird how its not even brought up in the video just playing 100bb deep or bigger. Playing 100bb deep is like this weird pattern that got forced into online poker from the early 2000s. The only time I would play deep is if there is a fish on my direct right I will cover whatever he is playing for and thats it.
Is this satire
@@agentzero04 it definitley is