At 4:40 I couldn't understand if frequency of cbet at 5K NL would increase or decrease bc of wider defending range (ie less rake). Assuming vs a wider range the freq would increase?
Excellent coaching couldn't agree more. I think especially on the river, GTO solutions are far from reality in most spots. So many of us over bluff/ underbluff flops and turns and reach the river where we should bluff everything, bluff catch everything or fold everything. It's up to us to decipher what lines require the appropriate action... I think
Quick question as this is creating a huge discussion: if you play against an opponent outside of the expected range/size/aggressiveness is it BETTER to adapt, meaning that if you don't you still get money in the long run or you MUST adapt because the solver is completely range/size/aggressiveness dependent?
It's better to adapt. GTO guarantees a minimum EV in a HU pot - so even if your opponent's range is different in this spot they can only achieve that by making mistakes in other parts of their strategy.
Many Korean players want to study GTO WIZARD, but they are unable to access it because most of the tutorials are provided in English. If possible, more Korean players will definitely choose GTO WIZARD if Korean subtitles are provided.
Excellent video man. One of the best. There is one doubt that I wanted to ask. Did you decrease the checkraise frequency for all checkraising compos proportionately, so that calling ev for ip player doesn't get affected. Also only in that case we can assume that his turn strategy remains the same, right? Thanks
He's not. The turn and river strategies don't change so long as you don't resolve after nodelocking. You can use the "compare actions" function in Pio to view how your expected value changes against the nodelock assuming future strategies don't change. Alternatively you could use the "Set MES" command to force one player to max exploit the other. Hope that helps!
How is anyone supposed to study or learn from this when as you said, these strategies are extremely sensitive to changes in variables such as rake or stack size?
i have a question, if fish gonna call a lot of times Cbet , It s a way Better check more the weak hands like bluffs and low gutshots and Just value bet every value hand of our range either if we have a good advantage ? but i m in difficult with 3rd pairs against these players beacause 3rd pairs if they are passive i prefere Just checking and go to showdown and against aggressive player i prefere to bet marginal value hands and check more medium and strong hands , Just beacause i can call and get 99% of time to showdown with medium hands , with weak value hands on many turn or River can be hard to defend that combos , do you think Is correct?
Your head is in the right place when it comes to marginal hands. With bluffs with very little equity, it depends again on the specific type of player, the only ones you don't want to bluff with 0 equity hands on flop are the over the top stations, which are a minority of the recreational players
@@donkpoker2709 against an aggressive player on turn , do you prefere to bet 3rd pairs on board like K72 where we have a good advatange to bet a lot on flops? i mean a duce is more vulnerable of a 7 if he gonna bet on missed a lot on turn , it s not easy to defend many rivers too, so i just prefere to bet one for protect my vulnerable hand and take the fold equity too , how i can see in this video pio solver is indifferent from check or bet but in real life i mean i would like to bet these hands just beacuse against an aggressive player our checking range is too strong so we don t need to balance 3rd pairs too into the range we re not going to be exploit if we bet always on that board 3rd pair i think.
I wonder why poker sites who depend heavily on the software, but sell some form of coaching based on said software, do not employ statisticians to teach. There is a clear lack of understanding in much of the coaching going on within this site. If you are interested in a class and the examples of what you are interpreting incorrectly, feel free to contact.
I'm purposefully using common knowledge examples to explain the system by which a player could come up with their own new exploits. I'm glad you're already printing at the tables
Mad props! I would appreciate it if you continued to summarize GTO Wizard videos, or at least tell us the key points! Maybe do the above in a positive way 😊
How did you guys like Sergio's exploitative analysis? Let us know what you'd like to see next!
would really like a video on donking rivers - srp/3bp or both.
some river play analysis. Its a topic that no coaches cover in any video but you win / loose the biggest amount of money in that street.
9/10。Sick addition to Qing Yang’s analysis
At 4:40 I couldn't understand if frequency of cbet at 5K NL would increase or decrease bc of wider defending range (ie less rake). Assuming vs a wider range the freq would increase?
@@aa-ron2777 yes the frequency would increase. Imagine you play vs a range that consists purely of KK and AA - you would (hardly) never c bet right?
Excellent coaching couldn't agree more. I think especially on the river, GTO solutions are far from reality in most spots. So many of us over bluff/ underbluff flops and turns and reach the river where we should bluff everything, bluff catch everything or fold everything. It's up to us to decipher what lines require the appropriate action... I think
Yes but does the solver know WHEN to hold them and ALSO WHEN to fold them?
I think the solver usually overplays its strength according to 'Max Value' Wesley
Kenny Rogers knows!
@@Trevor-nb6cn the gambler knows
When to walk away
One of the best presentations yet. Been following donk corleone for a while.
I’d like to see defending the BB post flop.
Thank you for the videos!
Sergio is fantastic!
Great video. Thanks!!
Good analysis. Probably applies to most cash games that aren’t against crushers
Amazing vídeo!
Thanks!
Another great video. Thanks!!
Thank you!!
Quick question as this is creating a huge discussion: if you play against an opponent outside of the expected range/size/aggressiveness is it BETTER to adapt, meaning that if you don't you still get money in the long run or you MUST adapt because the solver is completely range/size/aggressiveness dependent?
It's better to adapt. GTO guarantees a minimum EV in a HU pot - so even if your opponent's range is different in this spot they can only achieve that by making mistakes in other parts of their strategy.
Many Korean players want to study GTO WIZARD, but they are unable to access it because most of the tutorials are provided in English. If possible, more Korean players will definitely choose GTO WIZARD if Korean subtitles are provided.
Thank you for the suggestion
Excellent video man. One of the best.
There is one doubt that I wanted to ask. Did you decrease the checkraise frequency for all checkraising compos proportionately, so that calling ev for ip player doesn't get affected. Also only in that case we can assume that his turn strategy remains the same, right? Thanks
I just started the video but is this my guy from Donk Poker?!
Yes it is!
How are you locking the rest of the tree past the flop? From my understanding you’d have to go to every turn and river card manually?
He's not. The turn and river strategies don't change so long as you don't resolve after nodelocking. You can use the "compare actions" function in Pio to view how your expected value changes against the nodelock assuming future strategies don't change. Alternatively you could use the "Set MES" command to force one player to max exploit the other. Hope that helps!
Where does this guy coach for apart form gto wizard?
We need another solver actually
How is anyone supposed to study or learn from this when as you said, these strategies are extremely sensitive to changes in variables such as rake or stack size?
One step at a time. Perfection is impossible in a game as complex as poker, but with dedication and practice you can crush the competition.
i have a question, if fish gonna call a lot of times Cbet , It s a way Better check more the weak hands like bluffs and low gutshots and Just value bet every value hand of our range either if we have a good advantage ? but i m in difficult with 3rd pairs against these players beacause 3rd pairs if they are passive i prefere Just checking and go to showdown and against aggressive player i prefere to bet marginal value hands and check more medium and strong hands , Just beacause i can call and get 99% of time to showdown with medium hands , with weak value hands on many turn or River can be hard to defend that combos , do you think Is correct?
Your head is in the right place when it comes to marginal hands. With bluffs with very little equity, it depends again on the specific type of player, the only ones you don't want to bluff with 0 equity hands on flop are the over the top stations, which are a minority of the recreational players
@@donkpoker2709 against an aggressive player on turn , do you prefere to bet 3rd pairs on board like K72 where we have a good advatange to bet a lot on flops? i mean a duce is more vulnerable of a 7 if he gonna bet on missed a lot on turn , it s not easy to defend many rivers too, so i just prefere to bet one for protect my vulnerable hand and take the fold equity too , how i can see in this video pio solver is indifferent from check or bet but in real life i mean i would like to bet these hands just beacuse against an aggressive player our checking range is too strong so we don t need to balance 3rd pairs too into the range we re not going to be exploit if we bet always on that board 3rd pair i think.
I wonder why poker sites who depend heavily on the software, but sell some form of coaching based on said software, do not employ statisticians to teach. There is a clear lack of understanding in much of the coaching going on within this site. If you are interested in a class and the examples of what you are interpreting incorrectly, feel free to contact.
Feel free to point out statistical mistakes. Also join our discord to discuss further! (link in vid description)
Exactly. Gto/pio is ussed wrong by 99% players
A very long winded way of saying that the population doesn’t xr enough so bet more in general and larger with value 🤷♂️
I'm purposefully using common knowledge examples to explain the system by which a player could come up with their own new exploits. I'm glad you're already printing at the tables
@ACRBlitzCash This video is free.
@ACRBlitzCash Pretty sure he gets a flat rate per video. Either way, YOU aren't paying by the hour, so why are YOU complaining?
Mad props! I would appreciate it if you continued to summarize GTO Wizard videos, or at least tell us the key points!
Maybe do the above in a positive way 😊
This content is insanely valuable, if you know how to maximally incorporate it into your game and study...