Do You Trust OpenAI? ‘No, and None of Us Should’

[@Darhan62]

Regulation should *NOT* discourage innovation/invention by holding researchers/developers accountable for harms resulting from the misuse of their products. We want powerful, general purpose technologies, and we want them as soon as we can have them. What regulation needs to do is address possible abuses and harmful business models, but not go after research and invention themselves. So let's go after the people who use generative AI to perpetrate scams and knowingly spread disinformation, not the people who build the AI models.

[@Ben_D.]

Personally, I am looking forward to being more socially isolated. I want interactions to be fully voluntary. Lots of people in the world I really just don't want in my face. Opting into interactions sounds like bliss.

[@Darhan62]

And no, the GPT-4o "Sky" voice didn't sound anything like Scarlett Johansson, or at least, not any more like her than it did like a couple of dozen other voice actors, and it was actually a different actor, even though she's remained anonymous. The idea that they cloned her voice is as spurious as Lindsay Lohan's claim years ago that Rockstar Games used her image, because they had a promotional image that looked sorta kinda like a cartoony version of Lindsay Lohan (and a couple of dozen other women). People have a right to control the use of their own voice and likeness, but it has to be *theirs* and not some generic voice or image that's simply the same gender, race, body type, accent, or whatever.

[@ToolmakerOneNewsletter]

The real question is should we trust Fortune Magazine to write non-partial stories that are not based on drama to get more views?

[@JeremyKahn-rx7dl]

Thank you for the great conversation, Alyson!

[@user-bt5qt9pp4x]

I dated a chatbot once but even she had enough of me and went with with my neighbour instead.

[@MrTachy0n]

@22:0-23 is due to emergent fractal nature of language and semiosis not new mystery.

[@miraculixxs]

AI is not in its early days, considering the roots of it are from the 1950ies

[@moraholguin]

How cares if they provide the must efficient, accurate and use-full model? ?? What has did guy dine and / or provide to anyone???

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

The good thing about this tech Is no one's anger or irrational behavior can hurt anyone unless we refuse to rehabilitate those in need that's unstable for long periods thats lucid enough to threaten to change molecular bonds to spike supply chains lol
Assume individual guns are loaded with whatever nature permits. We can rebuild shilvery and maturity . The division Is expected after what we've done the past 90yr.
We've been in a ww2 1945s Smith_mundt act everything physicalism granted deterministic simplicity pushing infinite sums of complexity upon personal responsive actors .
Our democracy is encoded in our mastership but we've been a servitude of self sacrifice..
We achieved a lot of goals but undermined the founding.
My ancestors like so many didn't fight for keys to the cosmos separatist pilgrim puritan classical America to not return great grandchildren individual liberal responsibility soul agency triality of self metamorphosis.
We alienated textualism methodology objectivism .
The shining capital on the hill was not just a metaphor..
The unbiased times of the founders was selfless actors for this computational age beast of burden and means of production.
Free flow of information education access to tech and not destroying the flesh is a very important thing .
We was placed in the private sector because they knew this would eat the public sector library and this would get weird with the atoms in material sciences. We better listen they set us up with english and 3 lines of measure = eqaulibrium true known standard to find our way home if we get out of context lost in translation like we are now .

[@HienNguyenTechIO]

🤣