CFD Analysis for an RC Plane

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 апр 2020
  • To perform the analysis for a design from variant analysis methods like CFD Fluent , CFX , Static structural analysis in that we designed a geometry then meshing it and to perform modal and solutions to generate results.
    Follow us on Instagram to get more updates: pB72-1Ullq...
    Like and Subscribe
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 25

  • @edwin4076
    @edwin4076 4 года назад +1

    Super video bro

  • @gatlarajkiran
    @gatlarajkiran 3 года назад +7

    Can you Explain how we can get Stability and Control Derivatives for Different angle of attack, slide slip angle, and mach number.

  • @serajeemdtoriqularman5955
    @serajeemdtoriqularman5955 3 года назад

    Thanks整挺好👍👍👍

  • @mmasry2001
    @mmasry2001 Год назад

    Hi quick question. I am at the point where I get my drag and pressure graphs and when I am in the contour options it wont let me see the inernal boundary conditions and therfore wont let me select the contour of my plane/wing part. I cant see the interior air either so what can I be doing wrong. I would really like contour of the wing.

  • @thepacifier3267
    @thepacifier3267 2 года назад

    Why is the enclosure so small? What should be the proportion between the virtual wind tunnel (enclosure) and the model be?

  • @goulartmsfs
    @goulartmsfs Год назад

    Machine?

  • @AlexPymnYg07
    @AlexPymnYg07 3 года назад

    Why does the drag coefficient is negative?

  • @yoyomartines18
    @yoyomartines18 3 года назад +5

    what if you analyse half of the geometry? would the coefficients of drag and lift be the same?

    • @littlebitsunshine
      @littlebitsunshine Год назад

      In reality the fluid (the air) is flowing along your airplane depending on the wind direction from different angles. So you can say the half of the plane has not the same coefficients as the full body because you have to rotate the airplane in the flowing fluid. Just a little bit side wind and the second half is necessary to get the correct coefficients of drag.
      For very simpelized cases in CFD you can come to the result of same coefficients. If you want, you can figure it out by creating an easy example with a ball in CFD. You only have to make the correct setup.

  • @shantinepali6205
    @shantinepali6205 2 года назад

    can you leave the link of geometry in description?

  • @bao.nguyenhoang
    @bao.nguyenhoang 3 года назад

    Hello this a good video. But I want to ask that the model imported to geometry is just a shell? Or could i import a model with full solid or structure inside?

  • @mehmetbayezit1883
    @mehmetbayezit1883 3 года назад

    Bro, How ı can "" Cl "" Lift Coeffience

  • @agilarokiyasamy9284
    @agilarokiyasamy9284 2 года назад

    How to find vortex flow brother...

  • @fd5249
    @fd5249 2 года назад

    Thank u for this video. I have a problem. I did as you did but ' cl cd cm ' values ​​were calculated incorrectly. Do you have any idea about this problem?

    • @fd5249
      @fd5249 2 года назад

      I think your calculations are wrong ,too.

    • @brudhelbamokila7682
      @brudhelbamokila7682 2 года назад

      It's wrong perhaps because he didn't specify reference values, and the domain contains contact regions...

  • @haiderf1002
    @haiderf1002 2 года назад

    Greetings, how was the geometry of the plane designed? Is it using the Insight program or another program was used, kindly I need a video of how to design the plane

    • @user-ts3ou3zn9x
      @user-ts3ou3zn9x 7 месяцев назад

      закажите эту работу профессионалам .

  • @muhammadshariqkhan4498
    @muhammadshariqkhan4498 3 года назад

    Geometry???

  • @sasiv4081
    @sasiv4081 2 года назад

    He is not selected Boolean ean

  • @daviddavids2884
    @daviddavids2884 4 года назад +2

    some thoughts. it is not clear whether you have accomplished anything, here. it is not clear whether the velocity has been set too low --- there appears to be, essentially, NO lift or turbulence, predicted. it is not clear whether the program has treated the aircraft as being FIXED in space. it can be understood that a simulation of air flow past an airframe is not IDENTICAL to what happens, When an airframe Moves through air.
    clearly, the asymmetrically shaped nose WILL produce nose-Down moment, in flight. since this design has no real fuselage, you have NO fuselage-related data.
    the design of the stabs is less-than Normal/optimal. cheers googletranslate

    • @cadgadgets7470
      @cadgadgets7470  4 года назад

      It's is our first video regarding CFD analysis so we thought it should not be complicated to the followers to understand . So we have done it with basic design . On our next video on CFD the complete design will be covered and process of simulation will be detaily explained. Thanks for your suggestions.

  • @AviAero123
    @AviAero123 5 месяцев назад

    the enclosure is a joke, particularly that you chose to keep the faces adjacent to the wingtips as wall and not symmetry or an outlet. You only end up getting exaggerated results owing to narrowed enclosure around the model.

  • @user-ts3ou3zn9x
    @user-ts3ou3zn9x 7 месяцев назад

    Вот ответь мне на вопрос , зачем тебе ансис , если ты построил самую плохую модель из всех возможных, с большими потерями на балансировку и большой омываемой поверхностью ? Линии посмотреть ? Или кнопочки понажимать ? Ты абсолютно не умеешь пользоваться этой программой и не обладаешь базовыми знаниями и опытом .