Hi everyone! I was watching this video myself and thought I could've worded 2 things better: Improved wording for Case 10 @ 12:30 "If the blood vessels in the central lung look like they’re converging towards the ENLARGED HILUM , we think it’s more likely the ENLARGED HILUM is just a big pulmonary artery. If the blood vessels are converting on something OTHERN THAN THE ENLARGED HILUM, like the heart, then we’re thinking of something more ominous, like a hilar mass instead of an enlarged pulmonary artery." Improved wording for Case 11 @ 13:33 "The differential diagnosis for crazing paving represents the INTERSECTION of the differential diagnosis of septal interstitial pattern and ground-glass opacities." If you notice something else that doesn't sound quite right or is worded in a confusing way, please let me know. Thanks!!
Someone should send this to all the provincial radiologists….doing so will save lives; equally, GP’s and others should be attempting to have a look at this because in the modern world it’s just not acceptable any more for them to have no frame of reference with radiology - we all need a good level of the basics. Just as competition lawyers need to learn economics (wasn’t always like this) so too should non radiologists learn some radiology - the world has moved on and people need to get with the program….alternatively they should make way for others to come through. Peoples lives are at stake here…..
Hi everyone! I was watching this video myself and thought I could've worded 2 things better:
Improved wording for Case 10 @ 12:30
"If the blood vessels in the central lung look like they’re converging towards the ENLARGED HILUM , we think it’s more likely the ENLARGED HILUM is just a big pulmonary artery. If the blood vessels are converting on something OTHERN THAN THE ENLARGED HILUM, like the heart, then we’re thinking of something more ominous, like a hilar mass instead of an enlarged pulmonary artery."
Improved wording for Case 11 @ 13:33
"The differential diagnosis for crazing paving represents the INTERSECTION of the differential diagnosis of septal interstitial pattern and ground-glass opacities."
If you notice something else that doesn't sound quite right or is worded in a confusing way, please let me know. Thanks!!
Great presentation. Thank you for your time and effort in making this available
Thank you, sir! Great work! Waiting for more videos like “board review” and “classic signs”🙏.
Thanks! Lots more case reviews coming your way!
Thank you very much 🙏🏻
Great collection, the title is a bit misleading - not only chest images included
Chromotography
Left lowerbar
Pericardial
Superior label
Clusters
Clumps
Non intrusive
Increased attentuation
Enhancing
reversed halo
easonophillic
Basil
Air crescent
Prognosis positive
Ground glass opacity
Symmetric
Diffuse alvear
Bone mar suppressed
Drug toxicity
differential diagnosis
costophrenic angle
OPD
763002
youtube.com/@RadiologyinfoDailycases-ze?si=XZWmF_P4tl7kLjuH
Really great work! Thanks
Someone should send this to all the provincial radiologists….doing so will save lives; equally, GP’s and others should be attempting to have a look at this because in the modern world it’s just not acceptable any more for them to have no frame of reference with radiology - we all need a good level of the basics. Just as competition lawyers need to learn economics (wasn’t always like this) so too should non radiologists learn some radiology - the world has moved on and people need to get with the program….alternatively they should make way for others to come through. Peoples lives are at stake here…..
good mornning sir , please most of abreviation we dont know , excuse me to be mentioned and explained
Excellent video. More of these
Amazing work.
2:45 Should c be epicardial fat and a pericardial fat?
You are completely correct! Somehow, I got the labels backwards on that slide. Thanks for catching this!!