I don't think Rachmaninoff would have ever played these pieces this way. But I think he would have loved this performance. Chochieva opens new dimensions in this music.
@@amadeusradio9608 with lots of recordings with ridiculously slow tempi or exaggerated rubatos, this recording is certainly a jewel that approximates the drive Rachmaninoff's music has without having necessarily the samd approach he himself had
@@dang5874 I think even we as listeners have some requirements for the music to feel fresh and new, while respecting its conception by the composer. This intuition doesn't require a virtuoso, but rather, a jaded listener. The moment I heard this lady here I knew I would stay for more. I'm tired of the usual performances, I needed this new clarity and fresh ideas. In the end, this is both in the spirit of rachmaninoff, and imbues it with fresh ideas that feel good. This whole recording just feels so good. There's so much for the ear to grasp. It's like rach 3 by that Trifonov guy, just such a brilliant and innovative fresh take
@@amadeusradio9608 A reasonably educated listener can detect differences of performance style among different performers. Rachmaninoff was famously unique in his interpretations. That you may not be able to imagine generalizing his style and recognizing interpretive decisions which conflict with it is no reason to presume that the entire rest of the world is so incapable.
In my humble opinion, she is the best Rachmaninov's interpreter nowadays. Fantastic. One of the most underrated pianist. Wonderful ideas, much better pianist than Wang & Co.
@@jungwirthmartin Sorry but I can't agree. L. is obviously a very good pro with fantastic hands, but predictable (IMO): nothing really new in his ideas, not inventive in comparison with the great pianists of the past (Horowitz, Rachmaninov himself, Richter...) Miss Chochieva has something more than tech perfection: her new ideas. But it's simply my opinion, of course.
@@adrianocastaldini thats the thing, Lugansky is the example of the great Russian traditional pianism, so he plays Rachmaninov in the spirit of this tradition and continues in the tradition of Richter or Ashkenazy, this is what I like on him, on the contrary Chochieva coud be an example of the new approach
Absolutely marvellous! Ms. Chochieva has perfectly polished technique and gorgeous tone that she is able to control in almost inhuman precision. Her clear, superb voicing and the vocal singing quality of all the lines hidden in the textures is second to none. Here we hear transcendental playing so musical and expressive that one is not interested by what means it is technically possible to accomplish all those lush, colorful and pliable sonic effects. One is simply carried away to a musical wonderland, to different dreamlike places and scenes by listening the otherwordly tone she is able to evoke. What a magician she is!
These are masterful performances. I've been listening to these works for over 60 years and Zlata is one of the very few pianists that lets you hear the inner voicings of the D minor etudes 10:44-13:33 and 54:03-57:06.
@@peterbrenton410- I agree 100%. I really liked her approach in that etude. Rachmaninoff often aimed for that kind of 'sound effects' himself, like in the reprise of the Marche funèbre in his famous recording of the 2nd Chopin sonata.
Those may be my absolute two favorites of both sets. I don't know which I love more. I want to orchestrate 33/4. But 39/8 just goes straight to the gut. I grew up on the Ruth Laredo recording which I love. There are some things about this one that are amazing, and I think it's incredibly creative playing.
Opus 39 No 5... My God!! I've heard this etude tableau at least a dozen times by various pianists; Kissin, Horowitz, Wang, Wild. It's not that Chochiev's is better, it's in another class! I was moved to tears. She is just a fabulous pianist! All of these etudes were gorgeous.
THIS MUSIC IS LIKE A FANTASY GONE TO EXTREMES OF EMOTIONAL ECTASY. ANOTHER SIDE OF RACHMANINOFF WHICHI HAD NOT KNOWN AS ZLATA HAS BROUGHT TO SUCH GREAT HEIGHTS. THANKYOU FOR BEING HERE ZLATA.
A superb complete set. I admire the way she can project drama without bombast, also I love her natural unaffected lyricism in such numbers as no2 from op.33 and no2 from op.39. There are many fine young female pianists today, to me Zlata Chochieva is among the very greatest of these.
I purchased the CD a week ago and I am listening to it and the more I listen to it the more I like it. It is such a clear interpretation. Not pretentious and overblown on the fortissimo sections, unlike some of the recordings that Lugansky, Giltburg and others have done. Just listen to the piece @ 24:17- so clear accentuated on this very difficult arpeggios 26:39.
I normally avoid commenting on youtube at all cost (I feel like it's an unspoken faux pas for musicians), but I have to say, I'm really impressed. This is interesting. The ones that are dearest to my heart, I'm super picky about: 39/4, 39/8, 33/4, 39/7, etc. I have some interpretations that I like, but I think she does great with them, though this is not in my zone of my curmudgeonly tastes. Here's the thing, as I'm listening, I'm realizing that this pianist _particularly_ elevates the etudes that I never really liked! 33/1 is one that I barely ever listen to all the way through. This recording is incredible! Wow, what a range, what a coherent idea! It's SO good! 33/3 she also commits to with conviction, usually I feel like people phone this one in, just make it "brooding" or what have you. This is next level. 39/9, I also think she is nearly ideal. She even sells 33/8 pretty well, and I just don't appreciate that one. Perhaps her 33/1 is the most remarkable in terms of elevating it for me like I've never heard before.
Very colorful and imaginative playing! Her pedaling and deep, melodic tone are held in balance within an appropriate style. There is much to admire in this recording.
Ms. Chochieva plumbs the soul and intention of Rachmaninoff in her performance of his Etudes-Tableaux. Her approach is exploratory and fresh, highlighting the intricacies and textures, via her fidelity to the score; but evincing with unique interpretations of these masterpieces, unlike any previous ones. I greatly applaud her, in her stunningly successful body of work here; her's is surely an historical landmark recording of Rachmaninoff's Etudes-Tableaux. I know I will return many more times to listen these sublime masterpieces, so beautifully interpreted by Ms. Chochieva. I have tremendous gratitude for Brilliant Classics for this magnificent post. Thank you!
Stupendous playing. Beautiful conceptions, tone, sound and musicality. She goes far beyond the mere notes. Every line has a linear voice to it making it a whole thought rather than a cacophany of sound. Brava
Are you able to articulate one or more of the surprising aspects of this? I quite enjoy this recording but frankly it is not revealing to me anything that I hadn't noticed before in russian pianists' recordings. I believe you, I am asking because I really want to know.
These things are exceedingly subjective, what I can say is that she approaches it from standpoint of lyricism and discovery over just banging out notes. Many of the recordings I have listened to tend to treat these as "etudes" in most technical sense. I think of them as studies in color and shape. She brings color, texture and shape out in her playing as well as giving due to the technical bravura when needed. Watch the video of her giving advice on the Chopin Etudes. I think it really does express her thinking on pianism. I like how she is able to bring out melody and line without overly slowing the tempos and over romanticising them. There is beauty and refinement without being pretentious. She thinks of texture and line on many levels as you would hear in Rachmaninoff's own playing of his own music but it is her own interpretations. The one etude that really demonstrates this for me is the e-flat minor of Op.39. There are many levels of texture, she doesn't rush it, it has space to breath and it has grandeur and breath of emotion without being overly sentimental. It sounded almost orchestral. Not sure that answers your question. I just recently discovered myself so I'm digesting what I'm hearing. So far for me, she is phenomenal.
The pearl in Rachmaninov's two marvellous sets of Etudes-Tableaux is the second half of Op. 33/3 in C minor. Chochieva's interpretation is very tender and smooth, as if it's a lullaby. It's very soothing and gentle. One of the best versions I've heard.
I always love it when I hear a young pianist play op.39 no.8. For some reason, very few pianists dare to play no.8 live. It's a risky etude due to the awkward key in which the doubles have to be played and due to the 'jumpy' left hand, but it's not an impossible etude. Does anyone know if she ever played op.39 no.8 live? Ashkenazy rarely played no.8 live, and I believe Richter even ignored no.8 altogether. Of the pianists of today, only Lugansky and Volodos seem to enjoy playing no.8 live, but I'm sure there are more. If you have a suggestion, please let me know. Thanks!
Wow. Her control of color and voicing is really outstanding. Her appreciation for Rachmaninoff is perhaps reflected in the first-handed quality of her phrasing, the freedom of which I want to reject, but for now I am too mesmerized. Solyom is on the ropes, Richter staggers slightly, what will be the outcome?
@Amadeus Radio That line doesn't work so well with a composer who recorded! But how about the gazillions of comments about composers who died before recording started... "I feel I'm hearing (Chopin) (Beethoven) (Mozart) play!" etc., etc.
Rushing through many of these. Maybe one person doesn't need to play all of them. That's why we get standout performances of certain Etudes by various pianists. For example, in Chochieva's hands, I don't hear any heartbreak in Op. 33, No. 4 in comparison to Lugansky. In Op. 39, No. 3, all I hear is a brilliant collection of notes. And there is no comparison to Volodos's interpretation of Op. 39, No. 8 where he envelops us in a never ending phrase, with unparalleled legato in the melody, while still bringing out inner voices, except he doesn't have to hit us over the head with them.
I hear plenty of heartbreak in Op. 33 No. 4. I favoured Lugansky at first, but after playing it (for several months now), I was unsatisfied with his interpretation. I don't agree with all of Chochieva's choices-I wouldn't emphasise the unusual voices she finds-but nevertheless, her interpretation is astoundingly coherent to me. The wealth of articulation in the Op. 33 No. 4 demonstrates that it is not as free and fluid as Op. 39 No. 8. I believe it is to be played unsentimentally, in the same way Rachmaninoff played his own works. And Lugansky ignores a lot of the staccato, and you can barely hear some of the counterpoint when he's so intent on voicing the inner and upper lines. His pedal isn't blurry, but it's unnecessarily strong. And neither of those are difficult, by the way. It is much harder to create a working balance-of dynamics and articulation-than to sing the melody alone, as I can attest from personal experience. Lugansky plays the piece as though it is Impressionist, but it is not. I came here only to listen to that Étude after recently rediscovering this recording. The brisk tempo, articulation and careful structure is what sets it apart from any other interpretation. Lugansky is second in my book, with a very fine interpretation. But his is not perfect to me, while this can be.
We don't know who you are, do we? You say you perform all these. You say you went to Rach. Country home. Did you also visit his la home?, So who are you??? Ps. I bought all scores just yesterday not to be totally outdone. Used to have all but lost. I wish Daniil T. would do them. This is excellent pianoforte.
Meravigliosi tocchi...geniali accordi di musica viva.Emozioni tecniche virtuosissime e affascinanti.....ascoltiamo solo ad occhi chiusi.Non si parla......
I don't think Rachmaninoff would have ever played these pieces this way. But I think he would have loved this performance. Chochieva opens new dimensions in this music.
Were you a friend of his? Do you have direct access to Rachmaninoff's mind? Who are you to speak on his behalf !!
@@amadeusradio9608 There are a few recordings by rachmaninoff himself, and its probably true, it sounds nothing like this.
@@amadeusradio9608 with lots of recordings with ridiculously slow tempi or exaggerated rubatos, this recording is certainly a jewel that approximates the drive Rachmaninoff's music has without having necessarily the samd approach he himself had
@@dang5874 I think even we as listeners have some requirements for the music to feel fresh and new, while respecting its conception by the composer. This intuition doesn't require a virtuoso, but rather, a jaded listener. The moment I heard this lady here I knew I would stay for more. I'm tired of the usual performances, I needed this new clarity and fresh ideas. In the end, this is both in the spirit of rachmaninoff, and imbues it with fresh ideas that feel good. This whole recording just feels so good. There's so much for the ear to grasp. It's like rach 3 by that Trifonov guy, just such a brilliant and innovative fresh take
@@amadeusradio9608 A reasonably educated listener can detect differences of performance style among different performers. Rachmaninoff was famously unique in his interpretations. That you may not be able to imagine generalizing his style and recognizing interpretive decisions which conflict with it is no reason to presume that the entire rest of the world is so incapable.
In my humble opinion, she is the best Rachmaninov's interpreter nowadays. Fantastic. One of the most underrated pianist. Wonderful ideas, much better pianist than Wang & Co.
:) 10 thumbs up re: "wang & co" :)
@@MabookaMabooka :)
I don't think so, I believe that Lugansky is the king of Rachmaninov nowadays
@@jungwirthmartin Sorry but I can't agree. L. is obviously a very good pro with fantastic hands, but predictable (IMO): nothing really new in his ideas, not inventive in comparison with the great pianists of the past (Horowitz, Rachmaninov himself, Richter...) Miss Chochieva has something more than tech perfection: her new ideas. But it's simply my opinion, of course.
@@adrianocastaldini thats the thing, Lugansky is the example of the great Russian traditional pianism, so he plays Rachmaninov in the spirit of this tradition and continues in the tradition of Richter or Ashkenazy, this is what I like on him, on the contrary Chochieva coud be an example of the new approach
Absolutely marvellous! Ms. Chochieva has perfectly polished technique and gorgeous tone that she is able to control in almost inhuman precision. Her clear, superb voicing and the vocal singing quality of all the lines hidden in the textures is second to none. Here we hear transcendental playing so musical and expressive that one is not interested by what means it is technically possible to accomplish all those lush, colorful and pliable sonic effects. One is simply carried away to a musical wonderland, to different dreamlike places and scenes by listening the otherwordly tone she is able to evoke. What a magician she is!
You said it!! Exactly!!!
Fully agree - magical playing of such magical music - especially 33 no 3!!!
She has uncovered the poetry in these pieces.
These are masterful performances. I've been listening to these works for over 60 years and Zlata is one of the very few pianists that lets you hear the inner voicings of the D minor etudes 10:44-13:33 and 54:03-57:06.
spotted
Agree .she also gives a very good description of bells at the start of the d major - just as Rachmaninoff would like I'm sure.
@@peterbrenton410- I agree 100%. I really liked her approach in that etude. Rachmaninoff often aimed for that kind of 'sound effects' himself, like in the reprise of the Marche funèbre in his famous recording of the 2nd Chopin sonata.
Those may be my absolute two favorites of both sets. I don't know which I love more. I want to orchestrate 33/4. But 39/8 just goes straight to the gut. I grew up on the Ruth Laredo recording which I love. There are some things about this one that are amazing, and I think it's incredibly creative playing.
@@dskim24 I would love to hear her play the 2nd movement "intermezzo" from the 3rd Concerto.
She plays this like Chopin would. But it is amazing and very unique. Not very often can you listen to this peaceful set of Rachmaninov etudes.
Opus 39 No 5...
My God!!
I've heard this etude tableau at least a dozen times by various pianists; Kissin, Horowitz, Wang, Wild. It's not that Chochiev's is better, it's in another class! I was moved to tears. She is just a fabulous pianist! All of these etudes were gorgeous.
Wonderful
My children will grow up with your interpretation of Rachmaninoff
Put your children Volodos' and Pletnev's records if you want them to know what Rachmaninoff really is . And of course Horowitz.
ah , at last someone who doesn't drag on the tempo of op 39 no 2. ! lovely tone .. well she's a first class artist.
⁰
THIS MUSIC IS LIKE A FANTASY GONE TO EXTREMES OF EMOTIONAL ECTASY.
ANOTHER SIDE OF RACHMANINOFF WHICHI HAD NOT KNOWN AS ZLATA HAS BROUGHT TO SUCH GREAT HEIGHTS. THANKYOU FOR BEING HERE ZLATA.
A superb complete set. I admire the way she can project drama without bombast, also I love her natural unaffected lyricism in such numbers as no2 from op.33 and no2 from op.39. There are many fine young female pianists today, to me Zlata Chochieva is among the very greatest of these.
"Drama without bombast"...
A perfect description!
I purchased the CD a week ago and I am listening to it and the more I listen to it the more I like it. It is such a clear interpretation. Not pretentious and overblown on the fortissimo sections, unlike some of the recordings that Lugansky, Giltburg and others have done. Just listen to the piece @ 24:17- so clear accentuated on this very difficult arpeggios 26:39.
I normally avoid commenting on youtube at all cost (I feel like it's an unspoken faux pas for musicians), but I have to say, I'm really impressed. This is interesting. The ones that are dearest to my heart, I'm super picky about: 39/4, 39/8, 33/4, 39/7, etc. I have some interpretations that I like, but I think she does great with them, though this is not in my zone of my curmudgeonly tastes. Here's the thing, as I'm listening, I'm realizing that this pianist _particularly_ elevates the etudes that I never really liked! 33/1 is one that I barely ever listen to all the way through. This recording is incredible! Wow, what a range, what a coherent idea! It's SO good! 33/3 she also commits to with conviction, usually I feel like people phone this one in, just make it "brooding" or what have you. This is next level. 39/9, I also think she is nearly ideal. She even sells 33/8 pretty well, and I just don't appreciate that one.
Perhaps her 33/1 is the most remarkable in terms of elevating it for me like I've never heard before.
I agree with your impressions of the F minor! WANTED to keep listening. That's rare.
a truly great musician ,this wonderful lady
Very colorful and imaginative playing!
Her pedaling and deep, melodic tone are held in balance within an appropriate style.
There is much to admire in this recording.
Simply wonderful Rachmaninov and Zlata Chochieva.
Ms. Chochieva plumbs the soul and intention of Rachmaninoff in her performance of his Etudes-Tableaux. Her approach is exploratory and fresh, highlighting the intricacies and textures, via her fidelity to the score; but evincing with unique interpretations of these masterpieces, unlike any previous ones. I greatly applaud her, in her stunningly successful body of work here; her's is surely an historical landmark recording of Rachmaninoff's Etudes-Tableaux. I know I will return many more times to listen these sublime masterpieces, so beautifully interpreted by Ms. Chochieva. I have tremendous gratitude for Brilliant Classics for this magnificent post. Thank you!
She is a fabulous pianist. Number 3 gave me chills!
Stupendous playing. Beautiful conceptions, tone, sound and musicality. She goes far beyond the mere notes. Every line has a linear voice to it making it a whole thought rather than a cacophany of sound. Brava
I bought this CD today
Wonderful recording! ❤️
Probably the first Lady to get so close to Rachmaninoff's soul. Bravo! 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
She is unbelievable
I have listened to a great many recordings of these pieces and this is one that was a revelation to me...amazing...
Are you able to articulate one or more of the surprising aspects of this? I quite enjoy this recording but frankly it is not revealing to me anything that I hadn't noticed before in russian pianists' recordings. I believe you, I am asking because I really want to know.
These things are exceedingly subjective, what I can say is that she approaches it from standpoint of lyricism and discovery over just banging out notes. Many of the recordings I have listened to tend to treat these as "etudes" in most technical sense. I think of them as studies in color and shape. She brings color, texture and shape out in her playing as well as giving due to the technical bravura when needed. Watch the video of her giving advice on the Chopin Etudes. I think it really does express her thinking on pianism. I like how she is able to bring out melody and line without overly slowing the tempos and over romanticising them. There is beauty and refinement without being pretentious. She thinks of texture and line on many levels as you would hear in Rachmaninoff's own playing of his own music but it is her own interpretations. The one etude that really demonstrates this for me is the e-flat minor of Op.39. There are many levels of texture, she doesn't rush it, it has space to breath and it has grandeur and breath of emotion without being overly sentimental. It sounded almost orchestral. Not sure that answers your question. I just recently discovered myself so I'm digesting what I'm hearing. So far for me, she is phenomenal.
Thank you.
Let's hope such moving music is , & ever will be being , so faithfully composed (& played) , still now , & for all our descendants to come \
adore this amazing young lady... her playing is sooo first class... and ... in a category all by itself...
Fabulous and convincing....
The pearl in Rachmaninov's two marvellous sets of Etudes-Tableaux is the second half of Op. 33/3 in C minor. Chochieva's interpretation is very tender and smooth, as if it's a lullaby. It's very soothing and gentle. One of the best versions I've heard.
Замечательное исполнение,одно из лучших!
Gorgeous pianist, just enchanting sound and I marvel in her technique.
Wonderful !
I listen to her wonderful playing almost every day. Franz Liszt would have fallen in love with her.
Шедевр
Люблю
Спасибо
I always love it when I hear a young pianist play op.39 no.8. For some reason, very few pianists dare to play no.8 live. It's a risky etude due to the awkward key in which the doubles have to be played and due to the 'jumpy' left hand, but it's not an impossible etude. Does anyone know if she ever played op.39 no.8 live?
Ashkenazy rarely played no.8 live, and I believe Richter even ignored no.8 altogether. Of the pianists of today, only Lugansky and Volodos seem to enjoy playing no.8 live, but I'm sure there are more. If you have a suggestion, please let me know. Thanks!
ruclips.net/video/FkOAqgJPpSA/видео.html
Замечательное исполнение! Браво Злата🎉
Beautifull... What was Glenn for Bach , Zlata is for Rachmaninoff...
Brava....Brava..Pensare che nemmeno ti conoscevo!!
Superb audio quality...and the playin aint bad either.
Good sound quality! And good interpretation!
Excellent performance.
Bravissima 🔝🔝🔝👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Wonderful. She has a touch like Marcelle Meyer.
Marvellous, Frederic Meinders
This is GREAT playing !❤🎉
El 39 2.... magnífico, limpio, perfecto
She does not have to bang the hell out of the piano to effectively make Rachmaninoff's point.
You obviously have no clue.
She doesn't bang ,only big and beautiful .She knows no other way.
@@misschocoholic82 Jesus Christ, I am not accusing her of 'banging" I meant that she makes the point without banging.
@@peterbrenton410 That's about what I meant.
@@lunchmind well you must admit your comment can be understood both ways. Infact that's the first thing everyone will assume reading your comment. ☺️
Fantastic..!
Wow. Her control of color and voicing is really outstanding. Her appreciation for Rachmaninoff is perhaps reflected in the first-handed quality of her phrasing, the freedom of which I want to reject, but for now I am too mesmerized. Solyom is on the ropes, Richter staggers slightly, what will be the outcome?
Es buenisima, la mejor
Gracias!
my fav ever 00:33:31
FEMME A LA POWER !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!
Спасибо за 27:24 в особенности. И за все остальное. Прекрасное исполнение.
It is perfect
13:38 My Etude 🤗
この人の引き方好き。
Amazonで探そう
@Amadeus Radio That line doesn't work so well with a composer who recorded! But how about the gazillions of comments about composers who died before recording started...
"I feel I'm hearing (Chopin) (Beethoven) (Mozart) play!" etc., etc.
Zlata, come to Beograd 🙏🇷🇺🇷🇸🍀❤️🙂😚
and fav ever too 00:10:37
At 45:22 the "Little Red Riding Hood" is very clear and fiery
?
00:33:31
It seems to me in the opus 33 were somewhen 9 etudes.. Who could throw out one else ?
Finally I found that!
Beautiful Russian Music
53:57 SOTTO VOCE 😌
🙄💙🌾🌱
when introverts play Rachmaninoff 🤓
Rushing through many of these. Maybe one person doesn't need to play all of them. That's why we get standout performances of certain Etudes by various pianists. For example, in Chochieva's hands, I don't hear any heartbreak in Op. 33, No. 4 in comparison to Lugansky. In Op. 39, No. 3, all I hear is a brilliant collection of notes. And there is no comparison to Volodos's interpretation of Op. 39, No. 8 where he envelops us in a never ending phrase, with unparalleled legato in the melody, while still bringing out inner voices, except he doesn't have to hit us over the head with them.
I hear plenty of heartbreak in Op. 33 No. 4. I favoured Lugansky at first, but after playing it (for several months now), I was unsatisfied with his interpretation. I don't agree with all of Chochieva's choices-I wouldn't emphasise the unusual voices she finds-but nevertheless, her interpretation is astoundingly coherent to me.
The wealth of articulation in the Op. 33 No. 4 demonstrates that it is not as free and fluid as Op. 39 No. 8. I believe it is to be played unsentimentally, in the same way Rachmaninoff played his own works. And Lugansky ignores a lot of the staccato, and you can barely hear some of the counterpoint when he's so intent on voicing the inner and upper lines. His pedal isn't blurry, but it's unnecessarily strong.
And neither of those are difficult, by the way. It is much harder to create a working balance-of dynamics and articulation-than to sing the melody alone, as I can attest from personal experience. Lugansky plays the piece as though it is Impressionist, but it is not.
I came here only to listen to that Étude after recently rediscovering this recording. The brisk tempo, articulation and careful structure is what sets it apart from any other interpretation. Lugansky is second in my book, with a very fine interpretation. But his is not perfect to me, while this can be.
Volodos doesn't have the same build up of emotion like Zlata does in op.39 no.8 Sorry but I don't agree. Hers is full of poetry, it's just brilliant.
Whimsical tempo distortions. But great sound and musicianship.
16 people are totally deaf
We don't know who you are, do we?
You say you perform all these. You say you went to Rach. Country home.
Did you also visit his la home?,
So who are you???
Ps. I bought all scores just yesterday not to be totally outdone. Used to have all but lost. I wish Daniil T. would do them. This is excellent pianoforte.
Нет
Meravigliosi tocchi...geniali accordi di musica viva.Emozioni tecniche virtuosissime e affascinanti.....ascoltiamo solo ad occhi chiusi.Non si parla......