CHAINLINK: This Mindblowing Theory Predicts That Link Will Hit $100+ in 2025!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @user-mers7777
    @user-mers7777 3 месяца назад +14

    Chainlink $500 2025 ✅

    • @XForceGlobal
      @XForceGlobal  3 месяца назад +1

      $500 is pretty ambitious! But hey, anything is possible!

  • @I3lazedOne
    @I3lazedOne 3 месяца назад +6

    Nice count GFX! Im bullish on Link so thanks for the added confidence 😅

    • @XForceGlobal
      @XForceGlobal  3 месяца назад

      Hi!!! Thank you and hopefully that was helpful!!

  • @BroughtonCF
    @BroughtonCF 3 месяца назад

    Thanks for a great video. Top range! Can you please cover the fib levels for this run at macro level. I.618 is $200 plus although I would say we will see $100 this run. Thank you.

  • @InstruccionesPC
    @InstruccionesPC 3 месяца назад

    Master does you use Fibonacci Extensions in logarithmic scale or in algorithmic? Also thanks for the video!!

    • @XForceGlobal
      @XForceGlobal  3 месяца назад

      Hi! Both are completely fine depending on what your goal is for each chart. Log chart will have the tendency to be the most accurate in terms of price reaction since that is what most refer to (more referred to = more used)

  • @CaceresHoracio
    @CaceresHoracio 3 месяца назад

    good!!!

  • @united1206
    @united1206 3 месяца назад

    Thanks, can you do analysis on arbitrum?

    • @XForceGlobal
      @XForceGlobal  3 месяца назад +2

      Sure! I'll add it to the list ^^

  • @jenerwinquebral7683
    @jenerwinquebral7683 3 месяца назад

    thank you , do you have update on Sol

    • @XForceGlobal
      @XForceGlobal  3 месяца назад +1

      I did an update on sol earlier this week!

  • @SanDiegoOfficial
    @SanDiegoOfficial 3 месяца назад +2

    Meh. Seen this type of analysis years ago. Still low price.

  • @neocitadel
    @neocitadel 2 месяца назад

    Elliot Wave is nonsense. People pick and choose the points that suit. Ignoring all the other points.