Responding to Joe Rogan, Wes Huff, and his critics on the Dead Sea scrolls

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
  • Kevin weighs in on the Dead Sea scrolls conversation surrounding Wes Huff's appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience.
    Resources:
    Does your Bible mistranslate Isaiah 7:14? ( • Does your Bible mistra... )
    The Dead Sea Scrolls with Esther Chazon ( • The Dead Sea Scrolls w... )
    __________________________________
    Learn the biblical languages in 15 minutes a day with Biblingo: the only language learning app that provides everything you need to go from zero knowledge of Greek and Hebrew to reading the Bible in its original languages.
    Start your 10-day free trial at
    biblingo.org.
    FOLLOW US:
    Twitter/X:
    x.com/biblingoapp
    Facebook:
    / biblingoapp
    Instagram:
    / biblingoapp
    TikTok:
    / biblingoapp
    LinkedIn:
    / biblingoapp

Комментарии • 15

  • @BzudemE
    @BzudemE 13 дней назад +2

    Thank you so much Kevin for covering a whole new aspect of this conversation with the English versions being different from one another as well! I think this whole Wes Huf on Joe Rogan podcast made more people get interested in the Bible than it got people away from it so all Glory to the one who is, who was and who is to come!! ☺️🙏🏼

  • @danemiljoshua
    @danemiljoshua 20 дней назад +1

    Informative!!!

  • @samueljhood
    @samueljhood 19 дней назад

    Excellent. Loved this!

  • @SDsc0rch
    @SDsc0rch 20 дней назад +1

    I find this topic fascinating

  • @frankhartmann3824
    @frankhartmann3824 20 дней назад +2

    Well done! Well done! Well done! Not sure if I can praise this video and its explanation of textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible in a higher manner. It certainly gets scary when someone like Wes Huff gets a platform like Rogan to share his views. But having a view from a reliable scholar like you Kevin certainly helps separate the wheat from the chaff. Thank you.

    • @Biblingoapp
      @Biblingoapp  18 дней назад +1

      Thanks, Frank! Appreciate the encouragement. Overall, Wes did a fine job, I think. It is a very tough thing to do, and I think it was a win for Christianity.

  • @craiglittle7367
    @craiglittle7367 17 дней назад

    “Nearly identical” and “word for word identical” are completely different.
    Wes was wrong.
    Period.

  • @christineclements9321
    @christineclements9321 20 дней назад

    Hi-first time viewer-great content-but your delivery is TOO MUCH.
    I have to apologize for my complaining about you, the messenger-but you are talking to me as if I am stupid.

    • @Biblingoapp
      @Biblingoapp  18 дней назад

      Thanks for the advice.

    • @fixpontt
      @fixpontt 17 дней назад +3

      quite the opposite, as a non-native english speaker i absolutely like how slowly he speaks and pronounces words clearly so that i can understand without any issue, this is how scholars should speak so the entire spectrum of the audience can follow it

  • @wendybaker8801
    @wendybaker8801 19 дней назад

    Loved the content, however, your delivery sounds like you are reading prompts and do not truly understand your subject

  • @rossjpurdy
    @rossjpurdy 19 дней назад

    "Earliest and best: codex Vaticanus"... Vaticanus is one of the most incoherent and error filled manuscripts discovered! That does not qualify as best!

    • @Biblingoapp
      @Biblingoapp  18 дней назад

      Thanks for your comment. “One of the earliest and best”
      Best being best preserved. So it is one of the best-preserved, earliest manuscripts we have.

    • @rossjpurdy
      @rossjpurdy 18 дней назад

      @@Biblingoapp That is acceptable but that is not what they mean when they say that. They are saying it is the best text because it is old and therefore closest to the original. But the text is not that good.