Ep. #63: What Factors Can Help to Justify a Vehicle Frisk for Weapons?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- Join us for another interesting video where Anthony teaches law enforcement officers best-practices and clarifies legal issues officers face everyday. Please hit subscribe and share this video with co-workers!
Have another question? Click here: www.bluetogold...
____________
More about Blue to Gold:
NEWSLETTER: www.bluetogold...
IN-PERSON TRAINING: www.bluetogold...
FREE WEBINARS: www.bluetogold...
ON-DEMAND TRAINING: bluetogold.tea...
BOOKS AND TRAINING MATERIALS: www.bluetogold...
____________
Let’s Connect:
FACEBOOK: www.bluetogold...
TWITTER: / bluetogold
____________
#LawEnforcementTraining #PoliceTraining #legaleducation #firearms #reasonablesuspicion
#friskingvehicle
@04:23 😂 It's the police whom believe they are sovereign citizens as if they were an authority upon themselves.
Excellent video Anthony
I love these videos! Thanks again Anthony!
Thanks Caleb.
Great info. The idea of frisking a car because someone might retrieve a weapon after they're released from a detention is something I'd never considered. Excellent angle given the right circumstances. Thanks for sharing!
You're welcome. It's all about being reasonable and safe.
Yeah who would have thought you could violate someone's rights because of what might have happened. You know imaginary or delusions.
Great job please keep it going Anthony
Thank you. -Anthony
If I have a CCDW Permit issued from my state of Kentucky, can my vehicle and I just be stopped and searched? I know my driver’s license and vehicle registration’s are flagged in the NCIC database because I have a firearm permit. Does that fact alone allow me to be stopped and searched? Of course any Officer can find a reason for a vehicle stop. I’m not worried specificity my home state, it’s when I travel on vacation or work through other states. Also, the way I read Illinois Statutes, CCDW Permits from other states are valid while in my motor vehicle. Meaning, while I’m in POV, I can carry concealed?
Hello. I cannot give you a specific answer because that may be construed as giving legal advise, but I can say that if an officer stopped a vehicle solely because the person had a concealed weapons permit, it would likely run afoul of the Fourth Amendment. In order to make a "seizure" it must be a proper administrative seizure (think DUI checkpoints), reasonable suspicion, or probable cause. That would not exist under your scenario. Hope this helps.
Good stuff. Great explanation.
You're welcome.
Excellent.
Thanks Russ.
So let me get this straight, a citizen who knows their rights and "doesn't like you," is likely a sovereign citizen and armed and dangerous? So Houston v Hill doesn't matter then? What are you teaching here? That sort of arrogance is dangerous for the public and will get a cop sued. "Furtive movements"? Do you mean like a driver sees lights go off behind them, and get their license, registration, and insurance information out of the glove box, arm rest, and pants pocket? And this whole being in a "high crime area" is problematic at best. It doesn’t make you likely to be armed and dangerous if you live in, work in, or happen to be driving through a "high crime area." But training cops this way can predispose them to play hunches, reinforce negative stereotypes, and ultimately violate the rights of the people they are supposed to be serving.
This co shows exactly what's wrong with America. He is a trained jackboot thug training other jackboot thugs that everyone is a criminal and you ha e to do whatever you can to violate their rights and arrest them because it's a cop's job to do that, and "officer safety" is all that matters.
There is a reason why YOU dont qualify for the profession and its NOT because you are intelligent 😅
Don't worry, if you don't make those movements they will shine a bright light in your face to make you make movements. Yeah, what this guy teaches is partially questionable to me.
If you've released them from detention, they are free to go. Why would they attack you afterward?
Why would anyone want to attack an officer?
@@josephe.8505 exactly. Especially if they are already released and free to go.
Ashton you would have to ask the officers who have been killed in the line of duty. Or I guess their families. People do irrational things. I call them criminals. It's not unreasonable to secure the weapon even if they are leaving. That's my viewpoint.
@@BluetoGold but you gotta give it back to them. After which they would have possession. No offense, but it seems like the kind of paranoia that cops preach against to civilians. "Do you have a problem with cops?"
ruclips.net/video/9Y_l3sa-iJQ/видео.html
lack of respect for LEO has been earned unfortunately. Police are listening to you looking for a way to skirt the law, they should uphold the law, not be the thugs they are now adays.
If a person committed no crimes police have no authority over people . Removing some ones firearm for officers safety is not a law . I see nothing that allows police to remove a lawful carrying persons firearm that committed no crimes . Nevada no longer has speeding as a criminal offense . Old video here . Its 2021 now and things have changed .
good citizen I don't believe you are correct. you can be disarmed on a Terry stop. Ras to stop you is a detention.
If your state law says otherwise that is great please post the law.
In Texas 411.207 states an officers authority to disarm.
The key point is was the stop legal, if so you will not win the "no crime committed" argument unless your state has a specific limitation.
Example 411.207 b and c require officers who disarm you while in a police lobby to immediately rearm you as soon as you are no longer in a non public or secured area.
You can walk into the lobby armed, that is not RAS of a crime, no reason to disarm you. There is that fine line though about when a reasonable person would feel threatened. Unfortunately there are a lot of unreasonable police officers.
@@blueliesmatter2 No crime no taking a firearm . Officers safety is not a law . The laws says someone can carry or having a license to carry is a law .
@goodcitizen3300 Lol it's called case law. Learn it. Temporary seizure of a firearm during lawful detention.
@@christophercampbell2929 Lol, it's not a law and cops usually get sued for it. It's so much not a law insurance companies try to settle as soon as possible hoping to get a lower settlement than a default judgment of guilty.
@mikhaelis This has been settled in the Supreme Court. Show me otherwise or just stop with your nonsense. Terry v. Ohio, Arizona v. Johnson, Michigan v. Long. All judgements that affirmed under various circumstances the rights of law enforcement during a lawful detention. Try bringing facts instead of feelings next time.