Nastia Liukin - Floor Exercise - 2006 Tyson American Cup

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
  • Score: 15.125 - Nastia Liukin (USA)
    March 4, 2006 - The Liacouras Center - Philadelphia, Pa.

Комментарии • 15

  • @kras118
    @kras118 10 лет назад +18

    the triple at the end looked so easy for her!!

  • @janeventrella1366
    @janeventrella1366 9 месяцев назад +2

    Not that I could ever do any of this, but I feel her routines are full of twists and go forward. Doesn’t seem as hard as the other competitors of that era. She is, though the most graceful.

  • @pedromoreno4492
    @pedromoreno4492 5 лет назад +7

    Why she didn't do a double salto here? It wasn't a requirement back then?

    • @lukebeauchampp
      @lukebeauchampp 4 года назад +1

      this was the first meet with the new scoring, so they still had new rules

  • @chessi1820
    @chessi1820 12 лет назад +7

    ok lets go back 6 years and change it lol

  • @courtlandcarr4413
    @courtlandcarr4413 2 месяца назад

    she's soo fierce ...

  • @ajimenez1719ify
    @ajimenez1719ify 8 лет назад +14

    that front 2.5, was no where near complete.

  • @SLPtoMD
    @SLPtoMD 4 года назад +1

    Anyone care to watch Aisher Gerber’s floor routine from this meet and come back to comment? Nastia’s tumbling lines didn’t appear as difficult. Perhaps she had cleaner lines in execution, but Aisha also has clean lines. Any thoughts on the big score difference?

  • @Gazmeizster_Wongatron
    @Gazmeizster_Wongatron 11 месяцев назад +1

    When was the double salto requirement introduced? I thought it was the 06-08 code?

  • @edwardlopez8722
    @edwardlopez8722 Год назад

    Epic

  • @shagya1987
    @shagya1987 12 лет назад +9

    the floorscore is not right...her front 2,5 is not complete..it must downgrade and so her double front cant count!!!!

    • @randomvideosect8431
      @randomvideosect8431 5 лет назад +6

      Kruem3l the judges decide that.

    • @meganhigley8838
      @meganhigley8838 4 года назад +5

      It was obviously a bit underrotated. In those situations, the judges determine if the underrotation was enough to downgrade the skill, or if the gymnast still got it around enough to credit the skill but take execution deductions. Here they determined Nastia completed the 2.5 enough to credit it, but deducted for the execution of it.