Well, the intervention was probably for the best, especially seeing how Nazi-Germany was alread doomed at that point. Without it, most of Europe would have fallen under Communism. As a German, I am very thankful that didn’t happen
One correction. The intervention began in 1939 with diplomatic support of the Allies. The USSR was only able to survive through 1941 thanks to generous lend lease support of the Americans. It isn’t much talked about, but American food kept the Soviets going through that year, where they otherwise would have dealt with mass famine. Their troops had food shortages anyway. American trucks drove Soviet logistics after the Reds destroyed their own rail infrastructure. American intervention doomed Nazi Germany.
Nice song, I’m not really alligned to some of your perspectives but I’m alligned to most, and also, doesn’t matter what the song means or supports if it’s to entertain people
@@unclesam5230 The Europeans run our banks. They have dragged us into almost every war we’ve fought since WW1. They alone are responsible for the economic disaster we’re in.
Hey, did you know if you change some lyrics of the fictional galactic republic s anthem you can have a (sorta) cooler alt anthem for the USA United States, 50 Great states united. Under our flags, All these Stars Burn As One. We will fight to protect. Always will protect. The laws of our democracy. We will not be ruled by thy. Who seek to destroy, Who seek to destroy, Who seek to destroy, Our lordly democracy! Ruled o'er by the people! Voices that will always, that'll always be heard! United States, 50 Great States united. Under our flags, All these Stars Burn As One. For eternity
America's last wars should've been the Civil War and the wars against the Red Indians. We should've left the rest of the world alone, as George Washington said that the United States shall not make any permanent alliance with any part of the foreign world.
Yeah, also gay marriage, world policing, foreign aid, crippling debt, the destruction of the self sufficient single income family, atheism, inflation, I could go on for hours….
@@legionarychoir6588 damn, ice cream man has really spicy debuffs, imagine it’s leader treats in hoi4, he could be the worst leader in a realistic modern hoi4 Mod💀
@@legionarychoir6588 yeah, imagine how many debuffs he would have and have only 1 good treat which is the ice cream industry, politicians are sometimes non Competent
@@littleantukins4415 Europe controls our banks, dragged us into nearly every war since WW2, and are the ones covertly responsible for the destruction of our culture, economy, and honor.
I mean I think one of ur discord members who created the song forgot that the us didn’t want to intervene but was attack by Germany in 1917 and by Japan in 1941 so yes the us did have to go both world wars oh yea can u also do the song “white army black baron next cuz many ppl already asked that and I think that since United front etc were already finished u should have time for this or Kominternlied
Nope. I made it. Germany never attacked the US, you’re making that up out of wholecloth. The US had been supplying the Entente since 1914, and Germany sank a ship that was carrying weapons to England. Germany sent a telegram THREATENING an attack on America, and apparently this counts as an attack. America wasn’t neutral in either World War, we were involved from the start in favor of the English both times. Read a history book.
@@legionarychoir6588 either way even if i still disagree with that point this song is a literal banger 🔥 so what song are you planning to release next?
@Legionary Choir In WW1, that's true, but in WW2 only 7% of the US population would have supported joining the war, and so only after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour (mostly because they wanted the Philippines and the US boycotted sending oil to them) and Germany declared war on them did the US get properly involved. But I would expect you to actually like these conflicts, since they set out the stage for American hegemony over the globe (well, at first only over the capitalist parts) and Pax Amaricana, so as an American nationalist it would be reasonable for you to like the fact that your country has global hegemony (well, its somewhat waining now, thank God, but in the 90's you truly were the undisputed hegemons) as no Empire before has achieved such a thing. It's a shame (for you) that this hegemony was founded upon cringe ideals such as globalism, free trade, anti-colonialism and democracy and thus is probably very short-lived, especially with such great internal tensions and half of your country wanting to commit cultural suicide.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 global hegemony is cringe. There is no reason to have it. America is capable of total self sufficiency. An expansive overseas empire is a waste of blood and treasure. Not to mention the fact that the ideals we enforce are downright evil. End the empire. America for Americans
What's interesting is that your nation was literally founded upon a revolution that overturned a traditional monarchy and pushed her forces away to what once was your ancestors' motherland (Britannia) and from its founding embraced revolutionary ideologies such as democracy and liberalism (I am talking about classical liberalism here from the 18th century), and yet now in this song you call yourselves traditionalists, but that's in line with which school of traditionalism, if I may ask? If you intend to make a christian falangist national dictatorship, well, that's not too traditional, your country has never ever had such a government. If you want to embrace "old fashioned" isolationistic classical 18th century style liberalism instead, well, that might be the traditional form of government for your country, but it was born out of rebelling against the good ol' traditional imperialistic monarchy, that is the British Empire and thus could actually be described as an-anti traditionalist ideology. (And is also democratic, yuck.)
Traditional for whichever country is irrelevant. Traditions can be bad too, a “traditionalist” government in Norway, by your definition, would see state Paganism. Traditionalism, rather, refers to family and Christianity as the twin priorities of government. Whether it’s been done before in a certain part of the world or not is not relevant in the slightest. The ideas are the same
@Legionary Choir , no, traditions are different in each country/ nation or culture and by definition describe the country's own, which might indeed not be something you personally agree with or like. There are also different broader philosophical traditionalist schools of thought (such as the Perennial School, Legalism (or legitimism), Royalism, etc.). And here, I am asking you which one is your ideology connected to and how? Also, you have not answered my question about wanting to uphold your country's traditional form of governance or changing it into a national dictatorship. As a monarchist of sorts, I find both options a bit cringe but still way more based than any of the progressive or Communist nonsense, so you have little to lose from telling me and it could be an interesting intellectual exchange of ideas.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 yes, however traditionalism as an IDEOLOGY in the modern era is defined by a set of key principles, regardless of where the traditionalist lives or rules.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 a national dictatorship would be infinitely better than progressivism, and has advantages over hereditary monarchy, in that oftentimes heirs to the throne become corrupt or lazy, or decadent, which is more easily controlled for by having an appointed successor. I don’t subscribe to any one school of thought- my main concern in all things is the prosperity of the common man and allowing him to achieve Heaven.
@Legionary Choir , that's not really true. For example, an Iranian traditionalist is going to subscribe either to the ideals of Islam or Zoroasterism and support either Theocracy or Shahism as forms of government. A Chinese Traditionalist is probably also going to be either a believer in Chinese Traditional Folk Religions or Confucianism and a Confucian-style monarchy, etc. Now, I do know of a lot of such people who identify their ideology as traditionalism, what you described here is the ideology of traditionalism in the context of the current USA, that's true and since we were talking about this country its a valid argument, however, my original point was not about other countries having different traditions but that the USA itself has different traditions and even many of it's traditions came out of rising up against her motherland (The British Empire) and its traditional order. The real traditionalists were the loyalists, you could say. However there is little to no precedent to what you are proposing being traditional in the US or anywhere within the western world if we are to take the actual classical meaning of traditionalism (and many people, especially in Europe say their ideology is traditionalism and what they refer to by it is basically old-school European Monarchism and Christianity, and Europe is where the American settlers came from and got their original traditions and values from, remember that), so the question still stands, why are you calling this ideology trafitionalism if it has little correlation (other than faith and family values) with mainstream and/or classical traditionalism in the western world? These family values and faith are not inherently good because they are traditional, but because they are God's commandment, as you alluded to earlier, so why do you insist on calling this a form of traditionalism when really, it's based more out of a revived and somewhat modified interpretation of Christianity and not based upon upholding national traditions in its essence? (By the way, my apologies if my comments are found by you to be too long or nitpicky.)
Do you think actually in WW 1 if the German Empire won it might be (sorry) better and a non interventionist aka isolationist, Swiss-like USA might better accept it? World war I, not the second. Free to use codes for that answer.
@@lukejohnston4666 the problem is I don’t care about any of those countries. I could not care less what happens to India, South Korea, and certainly not Indonesia
@@legionarychoir6588 I see. You are entitled to your opinion, But in this day and age, I doubt there is place for Hermit Kingdom style isolation anymore.
@@lukejohnston4666 in most of the world, likely not. America is unique in that she has the ability for total self-sufficiency, as well as two massive oceans that make any invasion difficult to flat-out impossible. America has literally no reason to ever concern herself with the outside, unless she decides to.
Hail Freedom!
Damn you turned an Anti-War song to a patriotic and nationalist song.
Based
It’s still anti-war, in a sense. If you read into it
@@legionarychoir6588 Yeah, now that I look into the lyrics more, It's still kinda Anti-War, especially the World War 2 parts.
“T’en souviens tu?” était pas un chanson contre la guerre
It's not an anti war song lmaooo
La première version est française et nostalgique du premier empire
The spirit of my ancestors is with me. I feel no fear.
Absolutely wonderful song great job as always 🙋🏼
I've downloaded every single song (in 320 kbps) just in case.
Just amazing!
I am belgian and approve this song
Man this was one long awaited
Besides Kominternlied and Vers l'avenir here are 2 other suggestions
Battotai
Deus, Pátria, Rei
Anyone not realizing this is te souviens tu??
Remember the LSSAH song... I had downloaded it before it got removed.
I love your songs comrade! May America rise from her ruins 🙋🏼♂️
First
Edit: that was wholesome asf
Nice to see you're back after youtube tried to take you down
cuz he's a nazi 💀
I recognize this melody, comes from song “t’en souviens tu?”
Well, the intervention was probably for the best, especially seeing how Nazi-Germany was alread doomed at that point. Without it, most of Europe would have fallen under Communism. As a German, I am very thankful that didn’t happen
One correction. The intervention began in 1939 with diplomatic support of the Allies. The USSR was only able to survive through 1941 thanks to generous lend lease support of the Americans. It isn’t much talked about, but American food kept the Soviets going through that year, where they otherwise would have dealt with mass famine. Their troops had food shortages anyway. American trucks drove Soviet logistics after the Reds destroyed their own rail infrastructure. American intervention doomed Nazi Germany.
@@legionarychoir6588I mean a Bolshevik dominated Europe, though still a shit reality, would have been slightly better than a Nazi dominated Europe
Love it! Might I reccomend "Rota Polska" as a next song to do?
You may indeed- the song is a work of art.
Based song comrade! If I may ask, what will be soon.
It depends on my singer. Either the Battle Hymn, or a surprise song I’ve been sitting on (for good reason). We shall see
@@legionarychoir6588 Battle Hymn would be so epic and based.
Te souviens-tu? disait un capitaine...
will you do battle cry for freedom but more nationalistic
Ill work on it.
The lyrics are good, but I feel it needs a different key
I believe when this song was made they forgot about the American Civil War.
Besides that it's a good song.
Magnanimous song. May White America return to it's Traditional Paleoconservative Roots!
Nice song, I’m not really alligned to some of your perspectives but I’m alligned to most, and also, doesn’t matter what the song means or supports if it’s to entertain people
Bro for some reason when i tried to indentify the instrumental at First i tought It was the internationale
True
Great song. Your best, I think.
Let us fight to free our nation from the shackles of European imperialism!
@@unclesam5230
The Europeans run our banks. They have dragged us into almost every war we’ve fought since WW1. They alone are responsible for the economic disaster we’re in.
@@WyattPriceTV Don’t blame Europe for your government’s bad decisions.
@@rtixboi4193
Our governments bad decisions were and are a direct result of manipulation by Europe..
Lol you must be delusional
@@jackwalters5506
Not at all.
Hey, did you know if you change some lyrics of the fictional galactic republic s anthem you can have a (sorta) cooler alt anthem for the USA
United States,
50 Great states united.
Under our flags,
All these Stars Burn As One.
We will fight to protect.
Always will protect.
The laws of our democracy.
We will not be ruled by thy.
Who seek to destroy,
Who seek to destroy,
Who seek to destroy,
Our lordly democracy!
Ruled o'er by the people!
Voices that will always,
that'll always be heard!
United States,
50 Great States united.
Under our flags,
All these Stars Burn As One.
For eternity
51 states?
@@legionarychoir6588 oh sorry lemme change
Well the us isn’t a democracy and we are basically falangists so we don’t support one anyways
Oh know I remember it’s ich bin soldat
America's last wars should've been the Civil War and the wars against the Red Indians. We should've left the rest of the world alone, as George Washington said that the United States shall not make any permanent alliance with any part of the foreign world.
Why the Luftwaffe eagle? Anyways beautiful song
Damn it I can’t remember the German name of the song
,, Ich bin Soldat "
Mais la première version est « Te souviens-tu ? »
2:03 "what turned out so badly" sleepy ice cream man crisis, aka sleepy icy joe
Yeah, also gay marriage, world policing, foreign aid, crippling debt, the destruction of the self sufficient single income family, atheism, inflation, I could go on for hours….
@@legionarychoir6588 damn, ice cream man has really spicy debuffs, imagine it’s leader treats in hoi4, he could be the worst leader in a realistic modern hoi4 Mod💀
@@eaturcookiescookie7462 him, and the globalist cabal who give him his marching orders…
@@legionarychoir6588 yeah, imagine how many debuffs he would have and have only 1 good treat which is the ice cream industry, politicians are sometimes non Competent
America was left will all the power after WW2, interventionism is the key of American pride
We were left subordinate to Europe
@@WyattPriceTV No Europe is our subordinates
@@littleantukins4415
Europe controls our banks, dragged us into nearly every war since WW2, and are the ones covertly responsible for the destruction of our culture, economy, and honor.
@@WyattPriceTV europoors ended up being broke and the US a economic powerhouse
@@littleantukins4415
Yeah, and all our wealth is used to serve European interests. The Marshall Plan is a perfect example of this.
Ich bin soldat into a patriotic song is pretty cool.
Souviens-tu...?
Yes
I mean I think one of ur discord members who created the song forgot that the us didn’t want to intervene but was attack by Germany in 1917 and by Japan in 1941 so yes the us did have to go both world wars oh yea can u also do the song “white army black baron next cuz many ppl already asked that and I think that since United front etc were already finished u should have time for this or Kominternlied
Nope. I made it. Germany never attacked the US, you’re making that up out of wholecloth. The US had been supplying the Entente since 1914, and Germany sank a ship that was carrying weapons to England. Germany sent a telegram THREATENING an attack on America, and apparently this counts as an attack. America wasn’t neutral in either World War, we were involved from the start in favor of the English both times. Read a history book.
@@legionarychoir6588 either way even if i still disagree with that point this song is a literal banger 🔥 so what song are you planning to release next?
@@mysterymapping5733 Battle Hymn of the Republic
@Legionary Choir In WW1, that's true, but in WW2 only 7% of the US population would have supported joining the war, and so only after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour (mostly because they wanted the Philippines and the US boycotted sending oil to them) and Germany declared war on them did the US get properly involved. But I would expect you to actually like these conflicts, since they set out the stage for American hegemony over the globe (well, at first only over the capitalist parts) and Pax Amaricana, so as an American nationalist it would be reasonable for you to like the fact that your country has global hegemony (well, its somewhat waining now, thank God, but in the 90's you truly were the undisputed hegemons) as no Empire before has achieved such a thing. It's a shame (for you) that this hegemony was founded upon cringe ideals such as globalism, free trade, anti-colonialism and democracy and thus is probably very short-lived, especially with such great internal tensions and half of your country wanting to commit cultural suicide.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 global hegemony is cringe. There is no reason to have it. America is capable of total self sufficiency. An expansive overseas empire is a waste of blood and treasure. Not to mention the fact that the ideals we enforce are downright evil. End the empire. America for Americans
What's interesting is that your nation was literally founded upon a revolution that overturned a traditional monarchy and pushed her forces away to what once was your ancestors' motherland (Britannia) and from its founding embraced revolutionary ideologies such as democracy and liberalism (I am talking about classical liberalism here from the 18th century), and yet now in this song you call yourselves traditionalists, but that's in line with which school of traditionalism, if I may ask? If you intend to make a christian falangist national dictatorship, well, that's not too traditional, your country has never ever had such a government. If you want to embrace "old fashioned" isolationistic classical 18th century style liberalism instead, well, that might be the traditional form of government for your country, but it was born out of rebelling against the good ol' traditional imperialistic monarchy, that is the British Empire and thus could actually be described as an-anti traditionalist ideology. (And is also democratic, yuck.)
Traditional for whichever country is irrelevant. Traditions can be bad too, a “traditionalist” government in Norway, by your definition, would see state Paganism. Traditionalism, rather, refers to family and Christianity as the twin priorities of government. Whether it’s been done before in a certain part of the world or not is not relevant in the slightest. The ideas are the same
@Legionary Choir , no, traditions are different in each country/ nation or culture and by definition describe the country's own, which might indeed not be something you personally agree with or like. There are also different broader philosophical traditionalist schools of thought (such as the Perennial School, Legalism (or legitimism), Royalism, etc.). And here, I am asking you which one is your ideology connected to and how? Also, you have not answered my question about wanting to uphold your country's traditional form of governance or changing it into a national dictatorship. As a monarchist of sorts, I find both options a bit cringe but still way more based than any of the progressive or Communist nonsense, so you have little to lose from telling me and it could be an interesting intellectual exchange of ideas.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 yes, however traditionalism as an IDEOLOGY in the modern era is defined by a set of key principles, regardless of where the traditionalist lives or rules.
@@gaborholotajr.4427 a national dictatorship would be infinitely better than progressivism, and has advantages over hereditary monarchy, in that oftentimes heirs to the throne become corrupt or lazy, or decadent, which is more easily controlled for by having an appointed successor. I don’t subscribe to any one school of thought- my main concern in all things is the prosperity of the common man and allowing him to achieve Heaven.
@Legionary Choir , that's not really true. For example, an Iranian traditionalist is going to subscribe either to the ideals of Islam or Zoroasterism and support either Theocracy or Shahism as forms of government. A Chinese Traditionalist is probably also going to be either a believer in Chinese Traditional Folk Religions or Confucianism and a Confucian-style monarchy, etc. Now, I do know of a lot of such people who identify their ideology as traditionalism, what you described here is the ideology of traditionalism in the context of the current USA, that's true and since we were talking about this country its a valid argument, however, my original point was not about other countries having different traditions but that the USA itself has different traditions and even many of it's traditions came out of rising up against her motherland (The British Empire) and its traditional order. The real traditionalists were the loyalists, you could say. However there is little to no precedent to what you are proposing being traditional in the US or anywhere within the western world if we are to take the actual classical meaning of traditionalism (and many people, especially in Europe say their ideology is traditionalism and what they refer to by it is basically old-school European Monarchism and Christianity, and Europe is where the American settlers came from and got their original traditions and values from, remember that), so the question still stands, why are you calling this ideology trafitionalism if it has little correlation (other than faith and family values) with mainstream and/or classical traditionalism in the western world? These family values and faith are not inherently good because they are traditional, but because they are God's commandment, as you alluded to earlier, so why do you insist on calling this a form of traditionalism when really, it's based more out of a revived and somewhat modified interpretation of Christianity and not based upon upholding national traditions in its essence? (By the way, my apologies if my comments are found by you to be too long or nitpicky.)
Do more German ones
Do you think actually in WW 1 if the German Empire won it might be (sorry) better and a non interventionist aka isolationist, Swiss-like USA might better accept it?
World war I, not the second.
Free to use codes for that answer.
Noninterventionist USA would be better. I can’t tell you what the world would look like but the US would be better. Frankly that is my only concern.
@@legionarychoir6588 tbh there might not be Indonesia or maybe South Korea or even an independent India but its your opinion.
@@lukejohnston4666 the problem is I don’t care about any of those countries. I could not care less what happens to India, South Korea, and certainly not Indonesia
@@legionarychoir6588 I see. You are entitled to your opinion,
But in this day and age, I doubt there is place for Hermit Kingdom style isolation anymore.
@@lukejohnston4666 in most of the world, likely not. America is unique in that she has the ability for total self-sufficiency, as well as two massive oceans that make any invasion difficult to flat-out impossible. America has literally no reason to ever concern herself with the outside, unless she decides to.
What song is this from? Or is it original?
Te Souviens Tu, or Ich Bin Soldat
noice
LARP lol
I like it but please chill out with the auto tune
Ashamed that the theme of Ich bin Soldat is being used in this context
Why I think the Germans who died in WW1 would have a similar sentiment if they saw their nation.
Cope
Wasn't Ich Bin Soldat's Melody From Te Souvein Tu?
Ich bin Soldat come from a Pro Napoleon song lol
Hail Eazekeyia
Second