If 3rd Umpire stays focused then they could also give same decision but they may get excited after seeing ultra edge etc....But how he explained second time that there's a gap and spike is cause of bat is appreciable and 3rd Umpire should tell the rules in some controversial decisions or Graphic team should write it while that is shown
@@ankitSharma43825 are you sure ? No one will have Shukla and Singh as their surname together. Also the guy has a clearly Tamil accent when speaking English. North Indians sound very very different
For those who thinks there is no conclusive evidence for not out 1. Spike seen 1st and 2nd frame (2:35 to 2:55)- notice left side view clear gap between ball and bat 2. Third frame 2:56 Now notice right side view - ball already passes bat
As Ashwin mentioned, the spike seen can be before the bat actually hits the ball so it's possible the last frame he shows where ball already passed the bat, it's spike was still showing. He's a professional, has done countless DRS, I'll take his word over yours.
Nobody is denying that the bat did not hit the ground. It's obvious. The argument is that, it might have still nicked the bat, but the small spike got masked by the bigger spike (caused by bat hitting the ground). There is no conclusive evidence that these two events could not happen simultaneously. The gap seen in front-on view is too small. Might be caused by illusion due to camera angles. The umpire should have checked more angles to confirm this before jumping to not out decision. (Especially if he was relying on that gap to conclude that there was no edge).
@@qexx69no ot did not touch the bat because in the frame when there is biggest spike if u check the left frama we can clearly see gap between bat and all and in the very next frame the right frame show gap between bat and ball.
I love to see this kind of umpiring. Where umpire made a technically right decision, the bat hit the ground before ball passes by it, and when the ball passes, there is clear gap between bat and ball. Today's intl. umpires dont have courage to make such decisions, they will say "THERE IS NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO OVERTURN". But there was conclusive evidence of gap between bat and ball. And in the last stood by it ❤❤❤
😂. Hopefully Ashwin was able to admit later that the 3rd umpire made the right assessment. Sometimes it's hard for players to accept something going against them in that enthusiasm and the moment...
I feel sometimes ashwin feels he is bigger than the game He is a great player no doubt Not judging on his skills but sometimes things like this are utter nonsense when you review the drs and the drs will be checked by the same umpire
He recently clarify that drs system is new in tnpl that y he recheck n I don't think he considered himself greater then cricket but I think he stand for what he feel is right
@@jyothibedar1657 I do agree that drs system is new in tnpl Still there is no point in rechecking as it will be checked again by the same umpire, using same set of frames, same amount of technology I mean there is no direct connection between newness of drs technology in tnpl, with the drs taken again against the drs already taken
@@jyothibedar1657 And I feel that I should take my words back regarding he feels he is greater than the game...He would be respecting this game alot He might not feel that but certainly his action suggest that he has answer to everything and he knows everything
Third Umpire was not sure that the bat has hit ground. If the evidence for out is inconclusive, it was inconclusive for not-out also. So in that case the decision given by ground umpires could have been uphold is what I think. This is same as in LBW if the ball is half way hitting stumps, decision given by ground umpire was upheld. No disrespect to anyone here.
When Ashwin took the review, we can clearly see the spike when the ball is not involved, it was from the bat hitting the ground. 2:37 - The spike with no ball involved. 2:45 - Ball next to bat with no contact, spike can be seen. 2:56 - Still a spike with no ball contact. The umpire was sure that the bat hit the ground.
U can take that word from Umpire where he told, the spike is because of bat hitt8ng ground. But there is gap between bat and ball in all frames which indicates no bat involved. Then must revert the decision to not out, spike if not because of ground may be someother noice, not relevant here why the spike is, 100 percent all clear ball not hitting the bat, then should be reverting it, that's it
@@SeeeyogAs Ashwin mentioned, the spike seen can be before the bat actually hits the ball so it's possible the last frame he shows where ball already passed the bat, it's spike was still showing. He's a professional, has done countless DRS, I'll take his word over yours.
Ashwin just trying to make a scene out of nothing. He made the news and got the attention he wanted but costed a review. It was a smart and correct decision by the third umpire.
Ashwin sometimes thinks far too ahead of himself and comes second best most of the time.He feels slighted,and at the wrong end of the stick and carries a big wounded ego,by the way he is treated by the selectors,his Captain and coach,and carries that to every match he plays.
@@RAHULYADAV-eb1oc Then why the decision was not in his favor when he reviewed again. He just tried to show off that how much he knew about cricket. The third umpire's decision was a tight slap on his egoistic face.
@@VivekKumar-kf8yc it happens bro chill 👍🏼 they are players even i play football i every time ask for foul from reff just to presserise him if i will not do it then my opponent's will
I request BCCI to make, R Ashwin sir as Indian captain because we are observing the last few ICC matches, something is going wrong , If R Ashwin sir is there we never get to feel hurt because he won't take it easy for Team , it's my personal feeling only
Now see my dear people,how R Ashwin sir did today's Westindies series performance : now onwards even the selection team can think about captaincy, I hope
He literally wasted his review even after checking the replay on the large screen. He couldn't check the gap and assumed that the snickometer showed something from the bat. 😂
In the intensity of the game, Ashwin is missing to see that this was a fairly clear decision and one that was easy to understand. That middle Ultraedge meter in light blue is not the first thing or the only thing you look at in a DRS review. You see the left and right scenes first in each frame, and when the ball and bat does not have a gap in both, only then you look at the ultraedge for confirmation. If there is a gap between bat and ball where you clearly see the ground/pitch behind it, then the spike on ultraedge means nothing. Only when there is no gap in the left and right frame pictures is when ultraedge will be used for confirming
Well ind should also do it aussies way if you're not sure with ultra edge go for hotspot as well to confirm if bat is involved or not or if bat stuck first of pad....
If you zoom before the ball passing the bat and after, you can clearly see a change in the ball trajectory and the seem position after it passes the bat.
Being a international cricketer ego and as a captain simply wasted one review..his attitude will ruin his respect..everyone can see the spike is bcz of bat hitting ground
@@legitguy8881There is no ego bro Jab already 6 wickets down hai to review ka achaar daloge? Use laga ki ho sakta hai out to le liya Condition dekh ke
The decision made by the third umpire was actually bad there was inconclusive evidence to turn the decision to not out. In this case onfield umpire's decision must be uphold
What?! The 3rd umpire will ask for the front shot twice during the initial review. On the left side you can clearly see a gap between the ball and the bat. The next frame has a front view of the ball when it looks like it touches the bat, but in the side view you can clearly see that the ball has crossed the bat by this time. Please check carefully after 0:55.
No, he did not explain the spike first but later explained that it was bat hitting the ground. So, he was correct. Ashwin did not think of the bat hitting ground scenario and hence was unhappy
Too much of an attitude , such a un pleasant behavior. You can be an international gr8 , but doesn't mean that the ground is under your control. I have never seen an arrogant character in any game ever. Ashamed..
Bro it is out because the speed of light travels faster than the speed of sound which means that if there is a spike it should be out as it appears later.Correct decision is out
Umpire give the right decision. I shouldn't say it but Ashwin is the most selfish player U have seen. Whenever he gives interview the number of times he uses the word 'I' is beyond count
@@legitguy8881 ask Sachin Tendulkar's about 3rd umpire decisions,. Some days ago we have seen 3rd umpire giving Shubham gill out on an unclear catch,. The ball was clearly touching the ground,. If you don't know cricket basic rules, then don't preach
Great respect for the third umpire and umpire they were really calm and gentle and gave the conclusive decision and stand by their decision
once he reviewed bowled
Yeah good one
3rd Umpire is Mukesh.P.P.
Gentle, lol.
This isn't football for umpires to just spam red/yellow cards 😂
We need this 3rd umpire for international game and IPLs.
Yes good decision
If 3rd Umpire stays focused then they could also give same decision but they may get excited after seeing ultra edge etc....But how he explained second time that there's a gap and spike is cause of bat is appreciable and 3rd Umpire should tell the rules in some controversial decisions or Graphic team should write it while that is shown
3rd umpire's name is Chandrashekara shukla singh.
@@ankitSharma43825 are you sure ?
No one will have Shukla and Singh as their surname together.
Also the guy has a clearly Tamil accent when speaking English.
North Indians sound very very different
@@RaghunathSIyengar but your real name is "Mr. Vellapalli sudhakara Rao Mutthugau Ahmed" . Am I right ?
Hats off to ashwin to revealing the world a hidden rule
Bhai Ashwin rules ki saari book chaat ke betha he 😂
@@AtulKirad-qy9hdaajkal shakib ko ashwin anna ke ghar se tution padh kar nikalte hue dekha jaa rha hai😂😂😂
@@QuintonDeLauda 🤣
@@QuintonDeLauda Ashwin when Shakib appealing for time out : bol wo rahe he lekin shabd hamare he
Wo Shakib nahi Shanto thaa
Jisne Shakib wo rule bola thaa@@QuintonDeLauda
this 3rd umpire is 1000 times better than WTC 2023 third umpire
Chill brother..yet to start
@@simpeveryonehe wrote WTC read properly
Indian fans been real quiet since the Washington run-out came out not-out
poor Kettleborough lol
1000th like
Legend says,
Ashwin is still reviewing it.
😂
Ashwin is an attention seeker can’t understand how people take him seriously
@@spp2000😂😂 nice joke
@@spp2000 That's why he is the second highest wicket taker for india right?
@@spp2000 he is a genius. Ppl like u won't understand that, that's y u see him as an attention seeker.
Solid umpiring, love how he clarified what he saw the second time over, I didn't even consider the ground the watching it the first time.
For those who thinks there is no conclusive evidence for not out
1. Spike seen 1st and 2nd frame (2:35 to 2:55)- notice left side view clear gap between ball and bat
2. Third frame 2:56 Now notice right side view - ball already passes bat
Bat touched the ground but can't it be possible the bat also touched the ball? So there is no conclusive evidence that bat didn't hit the ball?
As Ashwin mentioned, the spike seen can be before the bat actually hits the ball so it's possible the last frame he shows where ball already passed the bat, it's spike was still showing.
He's a professional, has done countless DRS, I'll take his word over yours.
@@qexx69 ya but the replays show the bat didn't touch the ball, why r u just looking at ultra edge
Nobody is denying that the bat did not hit the ground. It's obvious.
The argument is that, it might have still nicked the bat, but the small spike got masked by the bigger spike (caused by bat hitting the ground).
There is no conclusive evidence that these two events could not happen simultaneously.
The gap seen in front-on view is too small. Might be caused by illusion due to camera angles.
The umpire should have checked more angles to confirm this before jumping to not out decision. (Especially if he was relying on that gap to conclude that there was no edge).
@@qexx69no ot did not touch the bat because in the frame when there is biggest spike if u check the left frama we can clearly see gap between bat and all and in the very next frame the right frame show gap between bat and ball.
Ashwin reviews a review that has been reviewed by opposition
Vere level anna...😂😂😂😂
😂😂
Stupid
😂😂😂
I love to see this kind of umpiring. Where umpire made a technically right decision, the bat hit the ground before ball passes by it, and when the ball passes, there is clear gap between bat and ball.
Today's intl. umpires dont have courage to make such decisions, they will say "THERE IS NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO OVERTURN". But there was conclusive evidence of gap between bat and ball.
And in the last stood by it ❤❤❤
The third umpire is far better than some of the third umpires in international matches.
This is what Anna university students do.. applying for reevaluation hoping to clear the paper although they know they wrote nothing 😂
Best example bro 😂
Bro🤣🤣💥
😂. Hopefully Ashwin was able to admit later that the 3rd umpire made the right assessment. Sometimes it's hard for players to accept something going against them in that enthusiasm and the moment...
Ultraedge should be combined with hotspot...will help in such cases where bat hits the ground.
hotspot very costly teechnology thats why they left using it
@jeevans7656 + it's highly inaccurate to
@jeevans7656 not coz its costly, it was wrong most of the time
hotspot is a military technology. so countries don't use it
This was the standard of umpiring .really good job
Respect to third umpire great decision
2:47 The contempt in the umpire's voice lol. "The spike is due to the BAT HITTING THE GRROUNDDD" 🤣🤣🤣
I feel sometimes ashwin feels he is bigger than the game
He is a great player no doubt
Not judging on his skills but sometimes things like this are utter nonsense when you review the drs and the drs will be checked by the same umpire
He recently clarify that drs system is new in tnpl that y he recheck n I don't think he considered himself greater then cricket but I think he stand for what he feel is right
@@jyothibedar1657 I do agree that drs system is new in tnpl
Still there is no point in rechecking as it will be checked again by the same umpire, using same set of frames, same amount of technology
I mean there is no direct connection between newness of drs technology in tnpl, with the drs taken again against the drs already taken
@@jyothibedar1657 And I feel that I should take my words back regarding he feels he is greater than the game...He would be respecting this game alot
He might not feel that but certainly his action suggest that he has answer to everything and he knows everything
Asking questions is never wrong..
@@jibygeorge6407But asking questions at the wrong situation & time is DEAD WRONG......✍🔥✍
TNPL 3rd umpires explains the scenerios better than IPL umpires (boring script)
copying the english script from foreign commentators and making a mess out of it 🙂
@dpak39977 I think that is systematic in international and IPL that's why they use the script.
@@saleemayyyy I mean even with script they make a mess.. Not about English since we are not native speakers.. But no quality
There was spike before the bat. So the decision was correct.
This is exactly the same situation in exams where questions are like : Is he out or not out? Explain why?
We already seen one 3rd umpire blunder one in GILL catch during WTC .
Don't cry Australia will win everytime 😂
@@Deadpool-n7 Womp, Aus couldn't even qualify to the semis now, so how will they win 'everytime'.
Third Umpire was not sure that the bat has hit ground. If the evidence for out is inconclusive, it was inconclusive for not-out also. So in that case the decision given by ground umpires could have been uphold is what I think. This is same as in LBW if the ball is half way hitting stumps, decision given by ground umpire was upheld. No disrespect to anyone here.
When Ashwin took the review, we can clearly see the spike when the ball is not involved, it was from the bat hitting the ground.
2:37 - The spike with no ball involved.
2:45 - Ball next to bat with no contact, spike can be seen.
2:56 - Still a spike with no ball contact.
The umpire was sure that the bat hit the ground.
U can take that word from Umpire where he told, the spike is because of bat hitt8ng ground. But there is gap between bat and ball in all frames which indicates no bat involved. Then must revert the decision to not out, spike if not because of ground may be someother noice, not relevant here why the spike is, 100 percent all clear ball not hitting the bat, then should be reverting it, that's it
It is clearly not out man.
The umpire said he was satisfied that there is no bat involved.
@@SeeeyogAs Ashwin mentioned, the spike seen can be before the bat actually hits the ball so it's possible the last frame he shows where ball already passed the bat, it's spike was still showing.
He's a professional, has done countless DRS, I'll take his word over yours.
Ashwin plays fearlessly and with passion.
Use arrogance kahte hai chutiye
This is not passion, this is just being oversmart 😂
He is cheater and over confident 😂😂 cheater 😂😂😂
@@Avishankaamarasinghe he is not a cheater
Loan lanka cry more@@Avishankaamarasinghe
Thankyou for 2960 Subs Brothers❤️🫂
Keep supporting🙏
2:22 topper tries to prove his answer is correct,than the answer key😅.
Ashwin should be made Advocate of cricket law he knows it well and fights his case 😂
Ashwin's experience would be treat with Msd's excellence ✨️
Hope csk wins again 💛
Good Umpiring
Ashwin just trying to make a scene out of nothing. He made the news and got the attention he wanted but costed a review. It was a smart and correct decision by the third umpire.
Ashwin sometimes thinks far too ahead of himself and comes second best most of the time.He feels slighted,and at the wrong end of the stick and carries a big wounded ego,by the way he is treated by the selectors,his Captain and coach,and carries that to every match he plays.
Excellent analysis
Correct. He thinks that he knows everything about the cricket.
@@VivekKumar-kf8yc he does actually that why he is playing at that age and may players retired ... + If can be in world cup squad also
@@RAHULYADAV-eb1oc Then why the decision was not in his favor when he reviewed again. He just tried to show off that how much he knew about cricket. The third umpire's decision was a tight slap on his egoistic face.
@@VivekKumar-kf8yc it happens bro chill 👍🏼 they are players even i play football i every time ask for foul from reff just to presserise him if i will not do it then my opponent's will
I request BCCI to make,
R Ashwin sir as Indian captain because we are observing the last few ICC matches, something is going wrong ,
If R Ashwin sir is there we never get to feel hurt because he won't take it easy for Team , it's my personal feeling only
He will not bcz he is already 34
Most of the team will quit if they made him captain…
Now see my dear people,how R Ashwin sir did today's Westindies series performance : now onwards even the selection team can think about captaincy, I hope
@@rameshdarla5 no not captain material but a great performer. Let’s not put added pressure on him. I do agree that Rohit isn’t the best captain.
@@LyricalMurderer1and i do agree that kohli isn't a good captain
Here the problem is Ashwin thinks he knows everything and he reviewed only to satisfy his ego that's it.
What a stupid move by Ashwin. If 3rd umpire says NOT OUT, how he can get another decision from third umpire for the same incident.
Ashwin is clasic guys, i don't know abt other how they think, but I enjoyed it ...
Anna bhai rocks, umpire shocks 😂
(Massive respect for the third umpire though. He was calm and reasonable throughout)
He literally wasted his review even after checking the replay on the large screen. He couldn't check the gap and assumed that the snickometer showed something from the bat. 😂
In the intensity of the game, Ashwin is missing to see that this was a fairly clear decision and one that was easy to understand. That middle Ultraedge meter in light blue is not the first thing or the only thing you look at in a DRS review. You see the left and right scenes first in each frame, and when the ball and bat does not have a gap in both, only then you look at the ultraedge for confirmation. If there is a gap between bat and ball where you clearly see the ground/pitch behind it, then the spike on ultraedge means nothing. Only when there is no gap in the left and right frame pictures is when ultraedge will be used for confirming
RUclips reccomended this to me the day Ash Anna retired. Happy retirement legend!
Umpires should also have review system when their decision gets overturned , then everyone on the field will be doing this --> 💁♂️
Excellent decision by umpire.
This is just Ashwin releasing his frustration for not playing WTC finals on the umpires in TNPL. Classic Ashwin 😅😅😅
Ashwin a legend in cricket constitution
cricket constitution? konsa sasta nasha kartay ho?
@@wonderwalls3565 sarcasm ka ..jo tu nhi krparha 😂
issi waja sae likha nahan ja raha. kahan suna sarcasm ka lafz?@@SiddhantSrivastava.
Here after Ash retired. Watching all his videos again
❤❤❤
We should confident like Ashwin
Excellent 3rd umpire! Very professional!
Well ind should also do it aussies way if you're not sure with ultra edge go for hotspot as well to confirm if bat is involved or not or if bat stuck first of pad....
If you zoom before the ball passing the bat and after, you can clearly see a change in the ball trajectory and the seem position after it passes the bat.
Aswin being oversmart as always
Fabulous work
Much appreciated❤❤
Ashwin showing for once how being oversmart and over-intelligent is not exactly smart, rather foolish.
Absolutely Kudos to the 3rd Umpire. Also nothing Wrong in taking Review over Reviewed Decision
2.53 left frame says it all, Talk out or not out, benefit of the doubt is always on the favor of the batsman, well done third umpire. 💯👌🏻
Excellent decision 👏
all Ashwin fans begging and crying for justice in comment off
That’s not out
U can see a spike on the ultra edge because the bat had hit ground and created a sound…
Who remembers when kholi took goes to third umpire twice against Zimbabwe in Harare
Being a international cricketer ego and as a captain simply wasted one review..his attitude will ruin his respect..everyone can see the spike is bcz of bat hitting ground
Yas bro ashwin has a lot of arrogance
Actually he is poineer of mankad . Mankading shows ashwin attitude and prove that he has no sportsmanship
@@legitguy8881There is no ego bro
Jab already 6 wickets down hai to review ka achaar daloge?
Use laga ki ho sakta hai out to le liya
Condition dekh ke
@@legitguy8881Mankading par naa hi bolo to accha hai
Agar indian player mankad hoga to bhi mai kuch nahi bolunga
It is legal
Why don't we simply use hot spot?
3rd umpire after 2nd review- "Dafuq bro, i just did it, why wud it b any different"
Yes ,the umpire much much better than WTC 2023 FINAL
i think the batsman farted causing the spike & saving his wicket
The decision made by the third umpire was actually bad there was inconclusive evidence to turn the decision to not out. In this case onfield umpire's decision must be uphold
There's a clear gap between bat and ball. Nightlight lol. You must have no eyes to not see it.
You can see that the bat hit the pitch ground that made the noise, not the ball
What?! The 3rd umpire will ask for the front shot twice during the initial review. On the left side you can clearly see a gap between the ball and the bat. The next frame has a front view of the ball when it looks like it touches the bat, but in the side view you can clearly see that the ball has crossed the bat by this time. Please check carefully after 0:55.
No, he did not explain the spike first but later explained that it was bat hitting the ground. So, he was correct. Ashwin did not think of the bat hitting ground scenario and hence was unhappy
Overturn which decision? There's absolutely no evidence to overturn the decision to take a review :D
Umpire forget 15 seconds DRS time was over😅😅😅
ITS NOT OUT...WELL DONE THIRD UMPIRE AND WELL DONE ASHWIN FOR PRACTICING HIS RIGHTS..
What a piece of third umpiring....this is awesome!!❤
Why not using slow motion or ultra motion then frame by frame
I would love to see him coaching india in future
Hell no
Ashwin is a ruthless bowler😂😂
CORRECT DECISION by the 3rd Umpire
It was a review out of frustration..... it was clearly not out 😂😂😂....
Calm down Ash!!
The video framerate should be higher to see bat involvement as the gap between the two frames is too long.
Many people miss this view
there's clearly a gap and bat hitting the ground.. it's clearly not out
When theres so much slow mo available in the cricket matches, i just dont get how the frames are so apart.
Notable
because its only 60 fps
I have a doubt, the second ball in video. That was no ball for sure right?
I mean I hope umpire didn't mess up that one as well.
Its clearly a not out
I want ash to review his retirement decision😢
Too much of an attitude , such a un pleasant behavior. You can be an international gr8 , but doesn't mean that the ground is under your control. I have never seen an arrogant character in any game ever. Ashamed..
Don’t we have a time limit to take a review? 15 seconds? How the 2nd review was allowed?
Bat is clearly touching ground this is stupidity from Ashwin asking for review again after review
2 reviews used for same decision? Am I getting this right?
It is really obvious that the bat didn’t hit the ball. Ashwin thinks of himself as above the game. Lost respect.
Guys, the countdown is on for May 10! JOIN the lottery madness with 4ra, prizes are out of this world this year! 🌍💫
Bro it is out because the speed of light travels faster than the speed of sound which means that if there is a spike it should be out as it appears later.Correct decision is out
You cannot overturn the on feild decision without conclusive evidence
Not sure what Ashwin was trying to achieve there. There was a clear gap between bat and ball and it was pretty conclusive.
Exactly lol
He likes to create controversies
His teammates mindvoice: enna Ivan loosu maadhiri review pannitrukkaan
Ashwin’s overthinking wasted the review. Well done umpires!
NYC decision by umpire, Good Job 👍
What's a New York City decision?
Umpire give the right decision.
I shouldn't say it but Ashwin is the most selfish player U have seen.
Whenever he gives interview the number of times he uses the word 'I' is beyond count
Is there a tamil nadu premier league as well?
It's Tamil Nadu Premier League
thats actually bat hitting ground...right decision
They didn't consider the fact that bat hit the ground and the ball hit the bat too.
🏆👕 Scored a merch set from May 3rd draw. Going for the iPhone this May 10 with 4 RA’s points! The game is on! 📱👚
Ashwin always hogs all the reviews no matter the team. One of the selfish players in the game. That's why csk and India prefers jaddu.
Ashwin needs to respect umpires though he is a legend
DRS itself disrespectful for umpire
@@shanmugavelsubramanian4609no? If the umpire decision can be wrong what's wrong in being able to correct it
@@shreyassinha1207many times we have seen 3rd umpire giving wrong decision, what about that??
@@KattarSanatani_Kumaruttamno bro , always 3rd umpire give right decision .
Problem is That ashwin has a lot of arrogance
@@legitguy8881 ask Sachin Tendulkar's about 3rd umpire decisions,. Some days ago we have seen 3rd umpire giving Shubham gill out on an unclear catch,. The ball was clearly touching the ground,. If you don't know cricket basic rules, then don't preach
This is why we need hotspot not ultra edge
It will not work properly in Indian conditions because temperatures here are generally high.
No bat involve - Great Decision by third umpire
we need 4th umpire to review 3rd umpire decision
Hot spot way more better than spike😅
Bcci doesn't use it because it's not affordable technology. Bcci is a conjooz board, they just want easy money
You pay for it then
@@freedylo8124 BCCI earning thousand of crores so please don't waste ur time here go and tel to them 🤣🤣
its clearly not out. not sure why some times players on field overreact
Dont teach Ashwin anna cricket rule because he is whole encyclopaedia of cricket 😂❤