Canon Cameras Uncovered: Discover the Secrets Behind Their Popularity 📸
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- In this video, we'll discuss whether canon cameras are the best brand for photographers. Let's see if we can come to a consensus!
Canon cameras are some of the most popular cameras on the market, and for good reason. They're known for their quality photography and durability, which makes them a great choice for photographers of all levels of experience. So in this video, let's see if we can come to a consensus about whether canon cameras are the best brand for photographers!
You can find me on;
Instagram / scottchoucino
Facebook Group / 1893064874281393
Tin House Website and WORKSHOPS www.tinhouse-s...
My Commercial Workscottchoucino....
Come and join our friendly group facebook.com/groups/1893064874281393
A RUclipsr that is a true professional. Cares more about the results than the tools. Thank you.
I used to be a total gear nut when I started 10 years back. As I grow further in my career, the less concerned I am about equipment and brand. Gear-wise, I’ve gone into a similar path - started with a Canon 30D back in 2012 because that was what’s available for me at the time when I wanted to learn photography. Upgraded to a 50D when it broke 2 years later, started doing paid jobs. Got a 5D Mark II in 2018 - and yes, it was funny how overblown the AF issues were. If you knew what you were doing, even focusing an 85 1.2 with the outer AF points worked.
I sold my Canon gear in 2021 because I wasn’t using them - I got a full-time job in a studio in 2019 and the equipment was provided. I started using the Nikon system then - first the D800, then took the D850 when most of the people left after the pandemic.
As we rebuilt the business and started hiring junior photographers again, it’s funny how they were complaining about how terrible the D800 is. I’ve shot with my personal 5D Mark II side by side with the D850 for weddings and both are amazing cameras. Just took a little more effort in extreme low-light scenarios with the older camera. Its sad how reliant on gear some photographers are.
I’ve since moved to a different company, and the photo cameras are 5D Mark IIIs. A lot older than what I had been used to, but still gets the job done and with no complaints from the client - that’s all that matters!
Listening to Scott talk about kit and ethos is just like listening to my inner voice speak to the same. Always a joy. Cheers!
Your videos are like talking I’m listening to my father. Not that we had a great relationship but when he talked about what he knew I listened. You are passionate about what you do and you walk the walk. They keep me thinking about how I can improve and that is gold. Thank you.
Won't have to learn it again. Exactly. I told someone the other day that if I were to switch, it would be like going from a PS controller to an Xbox controller.
The audio was off when I played this video and that was distracting. I typically enjoy your rants.
I started with an EOS R mirrorless and was ridiculed (slightly) by the R3 and R5 people constantly reminding me of the things my camera cannot do, and yes only one SD card slot. I shoot 10 to 20 photos on a shoot in a full day, they do 500 - 1500 photos. I create the image and get excellent results, they spray and pray. I love what you say. So refreshing, Invest in what you have and not keep changing. There are not really any bad cameras anymore, just bad photographers who cannot settle.
You are cool Norman...
I had an R but sold it, kind of regret that. It has a lovely sensor
@@paco355 Apart from not having IBIS - It's still an amazing camera. Have paid for itself a 1000 times over. Now waiting for the R5 Mark 2 to arrive on the scene.
Just a note of thanks. I have directed the 'beginners' section of our camera club to listen to your videos and learn from them.
There really is too much hype around cameras today - and you nailed it.
You can go broke chasing technology. Especially if you're not making any money from it.
As I was watching this video, I was wondering to myself why I enjoy your channel so much. Simple answer, you make sense. Common sense is becoming a rate commodity these days and you seem to have a lot of it. Keep up the great work.
I bought into the Fujifilm system a few years back and have invested more than I'd like into it. This is why, for the same reason, I stick with it.
I also have an F1 and Canonette Ql17, which I live using.
I totally agree. I use Fuji cameras, not because I think they are better than other cameras but because I enjoy using them. Most of my gear is old and battered. Most of it was bought secondhand. They do exactly what I need them to do and they pay my bills.
I love the down to earth sense in your videos.
Very well said. That's the truth that many aspiring photographer don't want to hear because it puts the responsibility of their results squarely on their shoulders instead of being able to blame the machine
Thanks for the chuckles! A camera is a tool. As long as you know how to use it and have vision the rest is just gibberish. Have a great week!
When I bought my first "serious" digital camera in 2015, it was based on just two things:-
1. What did it feel like in the hand
2. Did I have any lenses from my extensive film camera collection that were compatible.
I spent ages looking at various brands and models, and most were very nice. I particularly liked the Canon 6D. However, as I had a good number of Pentax and Nikon lenses and no EF ones, it had to be one of those brands that I got into. Well, the Nikon offerings simply did not fit my hands and Pentax did. So that is the camera I bought (a K3 which i still have and love) and the system I stick with.
Sure I have meddled and flirted with other systems just for curiosity as I am now in a financial position to do so, but I still would take my Pentax stuff over all the others if push came to shove, though I really do like my Fujifilm X-T1 and a few primes for just carrying about willy nilly, as I have grown to know the system, the controls and menus. Sure there are some obvious faults with the system (AF ahem), but also some very good advantages (backward compatibility for lenses, excellent handling and build). I am sure though, had I had a couple of EF lenses, I could well be a Canon fanboy now, though I would not trade a FF DSLR for a FF mirrorless system. I find there is something special about a real, proper sized OVF.
Love the closing statement, so true!
I can totally relate to the mechanical operation of a camera you speak of. Manual vs. Automatic in cars (I'm a manual guy). It's tangible, you can feel what you are doing. It's a fantastic thing.
I too just happened to stumble upon Canon when I was in a big box store and I decided to buy a camera to take photos of the music events I was hosting at my coffee shop. I'm pretty sure the Canon kit was like $10 cheaper than the Nikon kit so that was why I went with Canon. Purchased a couple of L lenses and shot on that shitty 400D for 12 years. I got some great shots too I might add. I finished a big project at my day job and the powers that be rewarded me with a very large Amazon gift card. I would have preferred money since that is what I have my day job for. Since I couldn't make a mortgage payment with an Amazon gift card I bought a new camera body. I should have got a 5D Mark but I stupidly went for an R and while it has been years I still struggle with the EVF and the goofy quirks of mirrorless. Not to mention going from a crop sensor camera to a full frame screwed up my brain as far as reach was concerned in my little music venue. I honestly still think I took better photographs with my cheap APSC camera than I do with my mirrorless Canon.
all my youtube related videos try to convince me to buy a Panasonic S5iiX and you sir are the only one that doesn't , I appreciate that :)
This has been my favorite rant of yours bar none! Absolutely vindicating. I’ll send this to anyone asking me “which camera should I buy?”
For me (wildlife/bird) photography is just a hobby to relax. Despite that, your videos are really interesting and I think I can learn a lot. I really got into that hobby around 2 years ago, so there is really much to learn. Interestingly not so much about the gear anymore. What I have, is good enough (Used 5D Mk IV - that one will last for years to come). But more about learning to find good locations with birds/wildlife. Composition of the image. Which month of the year, which time of the day, planning ahead where the sun will be for good light, where will be the proper place to get images. Animal behavior. The newest, best and most expensive gear can't compensate the lack of that knowledge.
I'm also a hobbyist bird photographer. Completely agree with everything you've said. I bought a used 7DmkII and haven't looked back. The only thing that MIGHT improve my photography is upgrading my Sigma 150-600 to the L-series 600mm prime glass. I doubt it will really make a drastic difference though. All of my best photos are of perfectly timed bird behaviour with beautiful light, which has nothing to do with my gear and everything to do with planning and technique.
Having 45 MP (or more) would be cool, but I doubt I'd really use it all that much other than to aggressively crop near-miss shots. That being said, nothing is as blatantly cool as being able to "zoom in" either optically or digitally, so I'll probably upgrade at some point when budget allows just for the fun of it.
@@funknick Of course a 600mm prime lens would be nice 🙂 ... but before I would buy that one, I would really consider to borrow one first - if it really makes a difference for me at my skill level.
That Jagermeister bottle though... congrats Scott, you've seriously upped your game!
When I got my current job. They only use Canon cameras (R6). I was a Nikon D3300. It was a steep learning curve. Now it feels like a second nature. But your words make all the sense to me and I can identify with them. The camera is just the box that holds the image. I make the same type of pictures with either one. Thanks again for the video 😊
couldn't agree More. the amount of milage and money earned from my first Nikon d700 12mp is what made me stick with Nikon, had the lenses, easy upgrade to d850, doesn't feel as good as my rz67 or my sinar, but it is a professional tool, and does the work with minimum wasted time. I don't use 90 percent of the menu's, speed aperture iso and focus. great video and great channel.
Woweeeee, wow wow. I really love this video. At one point I almost fell into the "I have to keep up with the Joneses(RUclipsrs)" mentality. A lot of them was talking about techniques in wedding photography and then switched to gear review like someone else already mentionned. I was following them since they had that going for them, plus they used the same gear as me. Then the whole I'm switching brands and only doing gear reviews started coming in so fast I started thinking the same way... I needed this video then. Good thing something got smacked into me(maybe it was lack of $$$ to be switching systems, and some other videos) but I'm glad I didn't for the same reasons you mentionned in this video. I started thinking more about how I can improve my craft and how to get better doing weddings and my workflow. It was time well spent rather than focusing on gear.
I hope those who are at the same crossroads find your video to get them back on the right track. I will be sticking with Canon because I'm too lazy to learn another system, and I work less on getting to the look I am looking for.
I’ve shooted all systems on the market. Yup mate u totally right! The main thing after skill is your style. Now I’m back to canon. Canon was my first money making system I grown in.
I started on Canon and built my kit around Canon. Rebel xT, 7D, and then the 5D Mk III. I recently learned my 5D Mk III is unrepairable and so, it’s time to upgrade. I know and love DSLR, so the 5D Mk IV seems the next logical step; however, the R6 is the same price, and so I’ve been stuck trying to decide which to go with. Thanks to your video, I now feel the 5D Mk IV is the way in need to go.
omg I LOVE this, the camera journey!!!! So lovely to hear this. To join in: I started w video for 10yrs then moved to photography; my journey; unknown Panasonic CCD DVtape vid recorder; Canon XL1s (rubbish); Sony Z1-U with 35mm RedRock M3 DSLR Lens Adapter (this lasted a long time); Blackmagic Cinema Camera; Blackmagic Production Camera 4k; Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 4.6k G1 (still possess); then lost all interest in being a cinematographer and; Canon5dmkiv; Bronica SQ-A film camera. Powerful feelings of nostalgia on the kit journey 😁😆
You da man! I've had Canon (1DX for low light) and Olympus (for travel portability) since 2011 and because of you I purchased 3 mint 5DSRs, still available from BH at 1/3 the original price, last year. My most used camera is a Ricoh GRIII... but I'm making strides with the 5DSRs and a set of tilt-shifts!
Fit, feel, and fluency are things you can't get ftom a spec sheet. I don't do much studio work. I do a lot of events, indoors, poor lighting and, unpredictable lighting and opportunity. A key feature for me is on-camera flash. Not the pointless pop-up flashes, but a powerful accessory flash, often on a bracket with a TTL cord extension. I have tried a lot of brands and techniques in the last few decades. Nikon has been the one that has been most consistent to the point that I trust it for wedding and baptism photos. Sony, Canon, Minolta, Pentax, Hasselblad, Mamyia, kyocera/yashica/contax, Olympus, and Rollei all had various TTL offerings, and the one that survived for me was Nikon. I still have and use other cameras, more a hobby than a business now, and i use them because i like them, but when i need flash, it has consistently been nikon that delivers for me. A different subject matter, or a different market may have steered choices a different way. I may be a camera snob, but have never been a brand bigot. Use what works for you. While i do tend to agree about no single system gets a blanket "better" label, there are some things that are brand-unique that may be a significant advantage to a particular task.
The haters whining about specs, or autofocus points, or face detection just elude me. What did they do before? How are these features make or break now, but didn't exist just a few years ago? For 180 years we have had practical photography and now some of our community screams "I can't work like this!" over the burden of having to use such primitive hardware that they may have to manually select a focus point.
Depends on the photographer
Awesome video mate!
Great to see you have a much better approach to gear than most of the ppl you found in RUclips!
Really great!
Cheers!
This reminds me of my wife criticising my ironing habit. I chose different temperature, steam level and water spray or no to different clothes! She says I do things complicated, I would say I feel what I do and I call it science!!
Great video again.
You're my antidote to thoughts of pointless "upgrades".
Brilliant video. Makes a tonne of sense. 👍
This was so refreshing to watch. Lots of truth bombs unless your a gear head
I’ve shot for years on a Panasonic Point and shoot from Japan. Them switched on a Trip there to a japan exclusive Pana Bridge. They were awesome for what I needed.
When my needs grew a bit bigger I changed to sony.
Just because I can get with a a7III a decent hybrid for Video and Foto. And also I can use old Minolta Glass, Old A Mount Glass from Sony and the newer ones. Wich I really like.
But I gotta say: I’m mostly in Love with lenses. So the reason when Sony Clicked was when I used the 90mm Macro with the a7III in the Store. And still love this lens… it’s practically glued to my Camera with the 200-600.
Very solid points! Love it.
This made me truly laugh with joy. So good I watched it twice and probably will again. All the heroes I can think of were all about the image not the gear.
Just found your channel and subscribed, first person I've heard say I don't care about the gear but the image. I too am on Canon started with the d30 then the 7d now on the R5, was going to get the 5dsr but wanted to try the mirrorless and there were no 7D mark III for wildlife. Now everyone wants me to shoot events which is hard to do with a 100-500 and a 15-30 LOL
Yep I hear you, I've had Canon 5DMKII MKIV 1Dx 5DSr Mamiya/phase and a leaf system. But the Canon R5 mirrorless has one huge advantage over al of them. Focus hit rate.Its pretty incredible even unto about Iso 5000 in a dynamic environment. And that's not even mentioning the motion side of the contemporary commercial photographers requirements..
I get what you're saying. I have always had a love for cameras, and once I got to a point in my life, where I could afford to pick up second hand versions of various cameras, I did just that, because I'm interested in how they work and what the differences are between different types and brands of cameras. As a result I have a bit of a collection, and I keep changing my daily carry every or every other week. I thought for sure, I would loose out in getting to really know one camera or camera system.
But, I have come to the conclusion, that today I'm pretty much able to pick up any camera and produce photos, I think look great. It's not, that I remember all the details of different systems, it has just become easy - perhaps because I have been doing it like this for years.
The Konica Big Mini... If my own was still reliable, I'd be carrying it every day. I'm still testing other compact film cameras to find a replacement for mine - perhaps my Nikon AF3 will turn out to be the reliable one for now...
Love this entire rant.
YES. THANK YOU.
I work in a camera store and see the way people get consumed by spec sheets, focus points and mega pickles.
Despite being surrounded by the newest latest and greatest camera gear on the market, I cannot be bothered to even look at any of it; the new tech is not inspiring in the slightest.
The 5D mark ii and the PowerShot G2 are my best friends and do everything I need them to do… Magazine publications and all. ❤
Hard truths and I am here for it
I bought the 5d MK2 and used it until I decided to go mirrorless. I bought an R6 when they first came out and used the eos-rf adapter for my L lenses. Two years later I bit the bullet and bought the r5 for macro and nature work. I can honestly say that I won't be buying a new camera for a good ten years as both these cameras do exactly what I require.
I have been using a Canon EOS60D since 2012. Didn't feel the need to upgrade when the EOS70D, 80D and 90D came along. Now that all new Canon cameras are of the mirrorless type, I reckon I'll be holding onto my 60D indefinitely. Incidentally Canon is the only Japanese camera maker to continue manufacturing their cameras in Japan, when Sony and Nikon make theirs in Thailand, Fujifilm in China and Pentax in the Philippines. For this reason it makes Canon kind of special to me.
"that's a snooze fest in photography" Brought a smile to my face". = brought a smile to my face. Happy shooting. Question, why the bellows on the front pof the tilt-shift lens? I guess it does some type of shading or? Thank you for any replies.
Still love using my Nikon D200, similar philosophy it just feels like an extension of my brain, from the perfect grip to the excellent button layout in my hands, I've gotten more incredible shots from this old cam than any other new camera. I've owned Pentax 645Z, Nikon D810, Canon 1D mark iii etc, and sure the resolution iso etc is better but at the end of the day its a tool and the less that gets in the way of you capturing a moment is far better than any upgrade on paper.
I really enjoy your videos, but on this one, I think the sound is ever so slightly out of sync with the picture.
I think there is something up with YT's cache or processed files. On laptop consistently starts with part of another video, but the lower res m4a and mp4 (mobile app) streams are correct.
⚠️ Audio sync issue when I watch on my Tv , i can hear your sound check talking about going to the kings head have some beer and visit cafe Roma for some pasta, espresso, cocktails 0:00-0:14 !!!! 😂 seems ok viewed on my phone!
All seems A OK now
Always enjoy your candour.
My favourite thing about you is you are NOT about the gear.
So many RUclipsrs who started off talking about the craft and then got subscribers and went full time gear review. And I get it, money is money and its fun to try new lenses but truthfully as someone who used to collect gear, I want like maybe 6 AF lenses and 1 camera and nothing more. It is so much better to master a few lenses then have so many lenses that everytime you use them its like you're testing them out again for the first time.
I got into the Canon world in much the same way. However, I am slowly moving to mirrorless for one reason...the size. It is important to me to keep my traveling kit as small as possible and Canon mirrorless and RF lenses are smaller than their DSLR counterparts.
good video wondering if anyone else notice the voice over on this video, not the normal, kinda made it hard to following the out of sync footage and voice over. don't know if this was quick turn out from scott but he usually has a good audio and video sync. enjoyed the information all the same just something for scott to consider about in post production next time
I use a 6D mark 2. When I get enough money to buy another camera I’ll either buy a 5D mark 4 or maybe another 6D mark 2. Choosing camera brands is like choosing auto brands. They’ll all get you results and they’re all basically the same. Its all personal preference
You are a breath of fresh air
I was moving from a point and shoot and walked in to Costco and starting looking at cameras. I picked up a Nikon first and didn't like that the power button was next to the shutter, so I went with Canon. Bought my first used 24-105 from a guy moving to Nikon. Thats my story.
The harsh reality and i love it. Thank you this should be said more often. I use Sony because that's where i started and if i switched you would not see a difference in my photo's anyway. I just like the look of Sony cameras.
Focusing on outcomes is the mark of a true pro
Is there some audio bleed between your last video and this one, Scott? It sounds like the audio from the last few moments of that video (the one about Saturdays) begin this one. Maybe there's.a glitch in the Matrix or it's a very deep reference to Pink Floyd's The Wall. Hopefully it's the latter because otherwise I may need to see a psychiatrist. Great video as always.
Yes just trying tout fix it in the back end. I like that only two people noticed though 😂
@@TinHouseStudioUK I noticed as well but just like camera brands syncing the audio with the video of you waving your hands around wasn't important it was what you were saying that was important! 😁
I noticed that too and it was a bit confusing at the start but I soon realised, and as Joe said, what was being said was more important than the video.
@@TinHouseStudioUK Only the most desperate fanatics among us spotted it. 😀
So inspiring… Thank you!
Another excellent episode. Thank you so so much for your effort. May be in this way people will stop watching all the chanelles which are paid go sell sell sell
Well said. You’re a breath of fresh air
“I’m just lazy” music to my creative ears, the easier and lazier I can do something the better.
wonderful and hilarious thank you!
I think that if you use a tethered camera, then you are using a digital, rather than optical, viewfinder.
Not necessarily so.
You can still use the optical viewfinder and use the tether to transfer the image.
@@olafzijnbuis If you are not going to use a computer monitor to monitor your Images, what is the point of tethering?
@@jimgsewell usually at the tether station there's the digital/retoucher/assistant, or at least someone who can check your exposure and the focus, things that are not 100% safe when seen from the camera display by the shooter. Then, depends on your work: if I'm taking portraits/headshots/editorial, surely I'm on camera using the viewfinder, and someone else is at tether station and checking stuff for me, while if you're doing products/food/jewels/etc, especially if the set is complicate and crowded, then is more common for the photographer to be at the station, even using the monitor has a viewfinder, but it's not the rule. You may tether on a corporate headshot session with multiple people just to show pics on a bigger screen, so they can review them immediately and choose the one they prefer. There are so many motivation to tether without the obligation of using the screen as the viewfinder 🙂
after useing the r6 i am not goin back to dlsr. I still have my 7d2 but the user experience is way better and the colors are different
I’ve changed systems once and I’ll never do it again. I’ve now got 2 Nikon F mount (film) bodies and 5 lenses. I jumped into digital with a Fujifilm X-T2 with an F mount adapter but I’m really considering buying a used Nikon DSLR to replace it to keep everything together.
I follow the idea that the camera should not be an obstacle between the photographer and the image he is taking, but I am very technical about my photography.
I wanted to know at which aperture is each of my lenses the sharpest, at which exposure time is the readout noise the lowest and of course at which ISO is the dynamic range the best.
Since Canon EOS 5d MarkII i shared the sentiment that there is little to nothing to be done for a better photography, and I do believe that its still great camera for pro work. Much later I understood that way to go is miniaturization. Smaller and lighter bodies, smaller and lighter lenses.
Somehow for me it was Olympus from 2015 up until 2019. The newer OM-1 became bestseller in whole M43 segment, but I own M1x and M5.MkIII. Both have same image quality, first one is class of its own in terms of build, the second follows the ethos of light and compact pro-grade camera. What is interesting that when people compare images from this Olympus generation cameras, they use word "organic", and I have to agree. I used to be film purist before sensors got better, but it was Olympus which allowed me to make and edit photos which really have look like a photography prior to digitalization.
Therefore I believe that the tools are important to a certain extent.
Problem is I don't like making it more compact, I have big hands and using a full frame DSLR without a portrait grip feels like a small camera to me, especially when I need to use it fluently. Lighter might mean more brittle.. I think the big mag alloy cameras will always have a place in the lineup, especially now that we get to see the R3 and Z7 and such doing just that into mirrorless where you don't need any of the bulk.
I am that gear guy. 😁 I don't make money with photographing, but I love gear. 🤣
Not a fan boy, only has Canon camera's Lol.. Just kidding. I have many of the FL/FD lenses and they are great! The camera bodies from the era are a little different. The F1 being the exception. However, 60th on flash is a little slow. Canon EOS was a major switch in design and function leaping ahead of the competition until the mirror-less era. Great videos! You have a great setup and work philosophy and that is everything.
The 5D outer focus points are OK for some subjects.
Great video!! Do you think there is a difference in the say Fuji 100s vs say any Sony, canon or Nikon 35mm? Love your work!!
Is the audio out at the start ?????
Shouldn’t be. They still straight baked into the file
Nope. It’s got audio from the last video hha, will be fixed in two hours apparently
Audio seems out of sync- by several seconds. I assume it is the cameras to the left of the screen that give you naughty thoughts, if not the manual film cameras that have disappeared from sight by the time you say this, by which point you are already gesturing to your 5D rig. Great content, though!
NIKON!!!!!
God bless you for every video you make .
2 card slots are just more space nothing more...IMO, Thank you!
I am an utter amateur but it is true that I have taken photos with the 5D Classic that have made me wonder... how? Where do these colors come from? Its sensor is really different.
Something weird has happened with the audio/video sync. It was fine when I started watching this earlier but now it's out of sync. Tried everything, but it's the same everywhere. It seems like a RUclips problem?
Instead of you getting 2 Canon 5D Mark II's you should just have the one - and the next upgrade path should always aiming to improve the prime camera - example Single Canon 5D Mark II & upgrade to single Canon 5D Mark IV using Canon 5D Mark II as backup , then next upgrade to Mirrorless R5 Mark II to have the Canon 5D Mark IV, as backup. You can't deny the new object and eye focus is game changer. In 10 photos you get 7/10 keepers with the old tech, with mirrorless you will get 10/10
Personally I think you have to have a good eye, good timing, good subject (or VERY GOOD eye), then give it some thought, and have a willingness to work it. I once knew a woman who looked exactly like Miss Piggy from the Muppet Show. She had basically the same face shape, same long hair, she used to flip her head and hair just like Miss Piggy, and same body. I could not imagine any good photo of her. She got married, temporarily, to my cousin, she later left him, but there were some wedding photos. The shot in the local paper was unreal, not the same woman at all. She was shot in profile, and she looked great, really great. So, talent, skill, patience can get you some really unreal results. Miss Piggy went on to abandon my cousin after he had done everything for her, including rehabbing and entire house, moving after that to some other place she wanted, and then having her move again a third time. He even bought her a Corvette, not new but very classic. He could do no more. She even had this shit little dog he had to deal with.
We all drank too much at his bachelor party, since we all knew it would go bad. He was doomed. Yes, he had escaped her clutches several times in the years before they got married, even moved 1200 miles away, but she pursued him for years. She moved to follow him! Once she had him, and he gave her everything, she wanted to move on. She was a nut-job. Poor guy was worn out I guess.
It was a nice photo though. Really nice job. High price in pain and suffering for some though. He learned a hard lesson.
As for me, I would not have given that broad a second look, and sure as hell would not have touched her even for money. She was not attractive, BUT her personality was repulsive, and man, if that is not there, there is nothing for you to even consider. In the end, the stuff on the inside is the most important. Lots of great looking women are really kind of shit. Not all, but quite a few.
My biggest problem at the moment is the dynamic range....I shoot both video and stills. After shooting the video I have to change the lighting to get my stills. Alexa, Komodo, c300MKIII all cameras have more usable DR. I dont know why they can not match the dynamic range on stills camera to video cameras. No complains after the r5 on canon autofocus :) I am glad those horror days missing focus are over - specially getting older, it is easier on the eyes after a long day shooting.
True that, on some of their models they sure COULD put clog2 on some of their dslrs but don't for market segmentation.
Scott, it's just me, or the video is just (not so) slightly out of synch with the audio? Also the subtitles are totally off. I refreshed the page couple of times, but still see it pretty flawed.
Not sure, works on mobile but not other devices. Really strange. Hope it fixes itself haha
As a former dubbing mixer (many years ago now, sadly), I'd say it's wildly out, and drifting around - so much so that I can't guess how much - at least several seconds in places.
Sorry to be bearer of bad news, but that said, I really enjoy your content and approach to the craft. Please continue sharing with us!
All your said is what matters to you or your type of photography. It won't be the same for everyone.
Canon R5, R6 and RF lenses bring one to a totally new world and they won't waste time as a new commer will learn from that level of technical sophistication. So, I didn't find this video anyway convincing.
It is true that the equipment today is all very similar, but there are still differences and some are substantial. If you haven't already done so you should edit a file from your 5DSR and any GFX (even the older GFX50s) and you'll see that they are very different. The editing flexibility without degradation is superior in Fujifilm's GFX line. Cheers.
He has talked about this. He said if he were to get anything else it would be a Fuji gfx
@@CoveringFish Thanks for the notice. But I'm glad he has that opinion .-) I too used every Canon between the 5DII and EOS R in a decade and a half and when I switched to the GFX... what a welcome difference.
I also love my 5Dii + good glass, no plans to upgrade and waste 1000s of £ £ £
I use canon for weddings. They are machines that do the job to perfection and I am so lazy, couldn’t care less about it’s appearance only image quality and workflow.
I like your long curly hair.
This is all common sense but it describes ideas and practices which are Revolutionary to some.
When I got back into photography about ten years ago, after a 20-30 year gap, I ended up buying a Canon mainly because I bought a Canon fTb in the 1970’s. I guess I was programmed to be a fanboy.
Am I the only person for whom the audio is completely out of sync with the video!?!? Tried it on three devices now and the laptop and TV are out of sync but the mobile version works fine!? Laptop and TV start off with talking about pints in The Kings Head but mobile starts at "I'm going to show you the cameras I've got here"? Confused now 🤔
Not sure, works on mobile but not other devices. Really strange. Hope it fixes itself haha
Yes - audio sync is WAY off
the audio is not synced
A professional camera is one that has a pro's finger on it's shutter button. Easy.
The end result is not the point , most cameras will get u there. Its the advancements in technology that help u get better image results , u cannot ignore IBIS , and the dramatic improvement in focus technology, the advantages are huge and obvious for many genres of photography.
Beautiful pastel colors on Canon cameras, not so much on the newer models. Sony, Fuji, and Leica all jerk each other off by dropping LUT colors on your images. Let me decide what my colors will be pushed to.
I don't see anything wrong with being a fanboy. That means passion, and passion leads to good images. I have Canon (5Ds) and Nikon (D800e) that I use the most. I like them about the same. I agree that you can do good work with any camera. Steve O'Nions and Ari Jaaksi make breathtaking images with Holgas and pinhole cameras. If zillion dollar equipment was needed to make good images, then that would not be possible. A ten thousand dollar camera will not turn a bad photographer into a good one and a good photographer can make nice images with almost any camera. Which is not to say that a bad photographer cannot become a good one. Just that the path to better photography is not paved with expensive equipment.
You said you're about the image and not about the camera and then you describe why you use a camera and lens combination that's not as good because of the feel of the knobs and switches. I think most of us are both or some of each.
Pink Floyd - TIme