Take a Tour of Pandora's Cluster
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- This video tours Pandora’s Cluster (Abell 2744), a region where multiple clusters of galaxies are in the process of merging to form a megacluster. Astronomers estimate 50,000 sources of near-infrared light are represented in this image from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope.
The concentration of mass in Pandora’s Cluster is so great that the fabric of spacetime is warped by gravity, creating an effect that makes the region of special interest to astronomers: a natural, super-magnifying glass called a “gravitational lens” that they can use to see very distant sources of light beyond the cluster that would otherwise be undetectable, even to Webb. These lensed sources, which are particularly prominent in the lower right area, appear red in the image, and often as elongated arcs distorted by the gravitational lens.
The video also highlights a mysterious object that appears to be no more than a red dot. One theory is that this source of infrared light is a glowing disk of gas surrounding a supermassive black hole in the early universe.
Read more and download the image: www.nasa.gov/f...
Credits:
VIDEO: STScI, Danielle Kirshenblat
MUSIC: PremiumBeat Music, Klaus Hergersheimer
SCIENCE: Ivo Labbe (Swinburne), Rachel Bezanson (University of Pittsburgh)
IMAGE PROCESSING: STScI, Alyssa Pagan
![Cody Johnson - I'm Gonna Love You (with Carrie Underwood) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yy9PuYMU29g/mqdefault.jpg)
Loving these videos. I'm currently reading Carl Sagan's Cosmos and these pictures help further enhance his amazing book
Hi... who filmed the big bear the pan in the middle of the night at dutch time the nederlands 02.19 on june 7... 2023... ???
JWST discoveries are beyond reality
SubhanAllah 💚 indeed Allah is a best creator ❤ Allah o Akbar
The video mentioned warping of spacetime: Okay:
1. What exactly is 'space' and how exactly does space 'warp'?
2. What exactly is 'time' and how exactly does time 'warp'?
Look up "gravitational lensing"
@@wooddogg8 Okay, what exactly is 'gravity'? And if you say matter warping the fabric of spacetime, then see my opening comment.
@@charlesbrightman4237 My reply was simple, I'm not here to be your physics instructor. Look it up if you want to learn.
@@wooddogg8 I already have my own answer, I was trying to see what other people's answers were. How would I know what those were unless I asked? But maybe if you were a smart instructor you might know how to motivate your students.
And to show I was not lying, see my replies to you after this one.
@@wooddogg8 SPACE and TIME: (copy and paste from my files):
'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Space' is most probably energy itself in the form of gravitational fields, electrical fields and magnetic fields, varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency.
'Time' is the flow of energy.
'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped).
But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow).
* And everything in existence currently appears to be eternally existent energy interacting with itself. There is truly only 1 single 'eternal day', the day of eternally existent ever flowing energy.
AND:
SPACE IS FINITE AND TIME IS INFINITE: (copy and paste from my files):
('Space' being energy itself, 'Time' being the flow of energy):
Consider the following, utilizing modern science and logic and reason:
a. Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong.
First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed."
b. An 'absolute somethingness' cannot come from 'absolute nothingness', 'absolute nothingness' just being a concept from a conscious entity in 'absolute somethingness'. Hence, an 'absolute somethingness' truly eternally existed throughout all of eternity past, exists today, and will most probably exist throughout all of future eternity. That eternally existent 'absolute somethingness' most probably being energy itself.
c. The universe ALWAYS existed in some form, NEVER had a beginning, will most probably ALWAYS exist in some form, and possibly NEVER have an end. Alpha and Omega, beginning and end, have been replaced by actual reality. No Creator needed.
* Some people for some reason (social conditioning/brainwashing/wishful thinking) believe in future eternity without end but do not accept eternity past with no beginning.
d. And for me, 'space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. 'Space' is most probably gravitational energy fields, electrical energy fields and magnetic energy fields, varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. 'Time' is the flow of energy. Hence 'spacetime' being 'energy and it's flow'. 'Spacetime' had no beginning and will possibly have no end.
* There is really only 1 single truly eternal day that had no beginning and will never ever end. The 'day' of truly eternally existent ever flowing energy.
Interesting. The very first galaxies appear to be very old and mature/large (I suppose the light that reaches the telescope is from when they were new, so the scientists figured what we would see is very young small galaxies). Doesn’t that suggest that right after the “big bang” these galaxies formed instantaneously, and fully matured… as if God created them on the spot with maturity/age already built in? No other explanation would make sense. Gravity (there is no gravity in space, except from large objects, they create gravity from their pull, and thing’s spinning/ spiraling..etc) two objects supposedly crashed into on another and created galaxies. How big would these two objects have been? If every star, every planet, every form of gas, everything and anything had to have been the makeup of these two objects colliding? How could fully mature and fully aged galaxies have been instantly made from this explosion of two rocks? Note = The scientists say there must’ve been a collision of two huge rocks, because everything in existence seems to have a expansion pattern, that if you put the pattern in reverse, everything in existence would follow a path smaller and smaller to end up in one single spot in the universe (I’ve read the spot is so small, it’s like a match head). Now for a scientist who doesn’t believe in God would naturally say it must’ve been two big rocks colliding into each other. But where did these two rocks come from? Also, they would’ve been way too big, imagine every star and planet in the entire universe all added together to make two rocks. What if everything just appeared out of nowhere from this one spot the size of a match head? When God spoke it into being; with age, maturity, order, and an organized path to follow? That’s more believable than what they say. Not only that, but their second problem is “life”. Their reasoning is so unbelievable to themselves, that even they came up with a secondary answer… That aliens seeded earth to grow life. First off, no hypothetical race of aliens could be so advanced that they created two large rocks to hit each other (when nothing other than these two “rocks” existed. Again… God is a better solution. They make fun of Christians, saying we believe in the spaghetti monster… but they believe in aliens…?
Gravity is none from objects spinning.
I wonder what it looks like right now, this is 4 billion years ago...
Prob gone
@@letmeout4 Where did it go?
@@stephenmacisaac5820 ran away
@@stephenmacisaac5820i ate it 😋
damn reality lag
These images always bring me back to earth and makes me glad we are living in a time when we have the technology to see the billions of galaxies that have been hidden from us for the billions of years of evolution. Thank you to all the great people who’ve made the JWST!
We're headed to the sixth great extinction... humanity is failing and we had so much promise once.
Ya, Those images Could Also be Fake???
@@mortalclown3812 humanity is failing because all of these "green" organizations which are not green at all.
@@dr_chicken5911 And you could be a troll bot. You can never prove to me that you aren't. Anything is possible. You can't know anything with certainty. Why bother learning anything if it's all a big fake? Ignorance really is best, isn't it?
Why would they fake these pictures? If they would've faked this picture, why dont they create even bigger fake pictures? This is the max limit of our technology right now... if they wanted to fake this, they could have created a photo of the end of the universe and try to make everyone belive that.. But they dont.
This picture is a combination of thousands of images taken over a long time.
In 20 years, when we have a better telescope in space, NASA will be like “Remember that black pixel in Webb’s image? *zooms in* Yep, there are 5 billion galaxies in here.”
That's a scary thought
Wow
The sheer number of redshifted galaxies is what got me. All those massively formed galaxies possibly 20x larger than our own, existing billions of years before we thought they were capable.
Good job nasa 🇺🇸♥️🇵🇰
This gives me a certain feeling in my heart and in my eyes. So grateful to be here at this moment in eternity to actually witness the deep universe. Think about it. With the human brain and the Earth itself devices have been created that can do the seemingly impossible.
Incredible!
I love how a major amount of jwst targets are what most other instruments see as blank space. Remember the people who said the first Hubble deep field was a waste of telescope time?
Don't watch this unless you are sitting down...
I continue to be gobsmacked by the JWST images and what they’re revealing. 😮
All they Reveal is how Gullible Folk are!!!
Definitely the most impressive photo ever taken! We are just beginning our journey into the depths of space! Let's hope that the human being does not exterminate himself before we know all the secrets of the universe! Preserving the environment here on Earth will be our ticket to the future! Less greed and more science! Cheer´s from south Brazil!
Yes to your comments about less greed and more science... science that overlaps continuing consciousness.
I did astronomy degree in 1981 ... James Webb is like HD to my old portable blk n white 9" CRT TV
EXCITING TIMES ..
The structure and even some of the explanations are very similar to the predictions off the Electric universe.
The JWST really is making everyone question a lot of fundamental “knowns”.
🤯🤯🤯 space is literally incomprehensibly big
Space is big realy big, You may think it's a long way down the street to the newsagents but that's Peanuts to space" HHG.
And when you zoom out completely, our whole universe is just a drop of sweat rolling down the buffalo's ass crack
@@dogwalker666 i think there is no word or thought for how space works
@@tunerterror that was a quote from The Hitchhikers Guide to the galaxy.
Beyond mind blowing
MORE!
What we want to know from JST is how the early Universe differs from what Hubble and Theory has said. If at all. Pretty pictures are cool, but Science is cooler. :)
THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: (copy and paste from my files):
Consider the following:
a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics).
b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand.
c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually vary.
d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do.
e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can expand and time can vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could vary in actual reality?
Jwst is a time machine
Amazing
It takes a while maybe..but just think what's happening here. We are familiar with the artificial satellites attracted to the Earth; the Moon attracted to the Earth; the Planets attracted to the Sun...the Solar System attracted to the Galaxy centre...the Milky Way Galaxy attracted to the Andromeda Galaxy...we know about the Local Group of galaxies...
....now we have to get our minds around clusters of galaxies, in their entirety, being attracted to other clusters, their galaxies millions of light years apart....... millions of light years distant!.....and then there's the Super Duper clusters...
The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy was right: ...'Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down to the road to the chemist's, but that's peanuts to Space....'
Nah, This JWST is Not What it Seems!!! These Vidyas can tell you anything and there's NoWay to Prove Otherwise!
This is revolutionary 🫶😘
Even at a distance of 3.5 billion light-years, many galaxies appear close together. Some are adjacent, some are as far from each other as a galaxy, some are a few galaxies. This image does not support the expanding universe theory. It does not support the big bang theory. I think each galaxy was created separately, independently of the others. I think these images show an expanding universe with the creation and addition of new galaxies, not the universe expanding like a balloon.
Compliments for the observation.
A disk of gas surrounding a black hole shortly after the Big Bang, that is one unique find!
Thank you...
hi... who filmed the big bear the pan in the middle of the night at dutch time the nederlands 02.19 on june 7 ...2023
the word is HYPOTHESIS, not theory!
There must be life somewhere in there! If not, then why only earth!?
Question 1: if the universe is so big how could we possibly be the only life out there?
Question 2: if there is life out there cause the universe is so big why would they care about our tiny spec on the lens?
"This small red dot is a distant source of infrared light that has so far defied characterization." Translates into, "We just found a freaking DYSON SPHERE, y'all!!!"
I really think the universe is big
Beautifully done👏
It's been a month. What happened to the jwst...
Does anyone else see all of the circles? The pattern??
My Christmas 🎁 in 2021.
Wonderful
😦😦😦
Informative...
No vídeo about the incredible early galaxies?????
Great CGI!
💯 *PromoSM*
Wow!
Why haven't you posted more videos, and regularly?? Who paid for this telescope, anyway?
You and everyone else paid for this telescope.
All one need do is look online to read re: various studies - past, present and proposed.
On the other hand, the whole kicking toddler shrieking about videos from a highchair bit is adorable.
Random comment for channel interaction.
I highly suggest that everyone take a look at the "Chronological list of James Webb Discoveries," which can be easily found as the first result on Google. It contains a remarkable compilation of findings from the James Webb Telescope, including exoplanets, galaxies located at extreme distances, and quasars
Where is God?
Not there.
👍🏻
I would have loved it if the reverse video of the entire cluster was also broadcasted . Otherwise it is not possible to know where it is and what is being shown.
Google it and it's position becomes apparent.
Quite a large investment for one video every 3 months or so...
Put up humanity’s most advanced telescope for scientific research and international studies?
Nah, that’s a RUclips view investment…
@@bigpurplepops What I meant was we should be getting many more images than what we are. Where are the vids or images?
Is the telescope even working?
Quite a bit of money was spent on this. Why aren't we getting more uploads?
@@CaptTeamwork if you wanna know who gets to look at the other thousands of hours of watch time; I suggest reading the associated thousands of research papers completed based of the imaging. These are basically public 1-minute highlights reels.
Also $9B over the course of 3 decades; it sounds like a lot until you realize nasa also adds billions per year to the economy.
hi! Here you go! webbtelescope.org/images. This is the official archive of publicly-released images, many/most associated with peer-reviewed scientific papers. Scientific data takes time to be released, as the teams that proposed the observations process their data, write papers, and get them submitted, viewed, and published.
You can also find them on our Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/nasawebbtelescope/albums
Enjoy!
Maravilloso
There are billions of galaxies. Even if there is one intelligent civilization in one galaxy, then even in this scenario there are billions of them!
correction There are TRILLIONS of Galaxies
@@melissasullenger8839 that is still not enough compared to reality.
Will we ever be able to see our own galaxy with the best and compare how large or small it is comparably?
It's already been computed.
The image I want to see is the Milky Way from the outside. An actual image of home from a distance.
Why are we not able to see planets and stars up close
😂
Its not a big enough telescope just like you can see a plane up close with a 600mm camera but not an ant on a tree at the same range.
ما شاء الله ،سبحان الله وبحمده، بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الَّذِي لَا يَضُرُّ مَعَ اسْمِهِ شَيْءٌ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَلَا فِي السَّمَاءِ ، وَالسَّمَاءِ ذَاتِ الْحُبُكِ، وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ، لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله، جميل
Mashaa Allah! Allah is the Greatest!
ALLAH ho Akber
Oh fgs it's all the same.
"Shrimp" GALACTICA, red stem and all the details , is confirmation of the theory. My personal theory. "Sponge Y" is the element.
We know Earth Flat. Space fake. =)
I know that your existence is fake. I don't believe in you.
😂
spent billions on this stupid thing and they can only produce 1 video a month lol
Producing videos is not the primary purpose.
Everything these kind of telescopes show is flat and one dimension. So we can never the whole picture of these objects. People that are not into astronomy just see these photos as spots of light that could have been made by anything. I believe the colours we see are all made by guess work. Yeah! James Webb was exiting when we were expecting the 1st pictures but to be honest the photos have become meaningless.
They definitely hyped up the JWST. The images we get are so boring and they're looking at stuff Hubble has already seen.
They are more detailed and see fainter objects they are for scientists not gamers and ravers.
Can we please just go to Mars already? We've been waiting for the Space Race sequel for decades.
Sahara Desert turns green dude
No need to spend the money or the time.
🚮🗑️🗑️🗑️
😱
Nice graphics. It inspired me to learn Photoshop
Still blows my mind, that Hubble couldn't detect some of these distant galaxies. Considering space is moving faster than speed of light, and yet JWSP detected the unobservable galaxies that Hubble couldn't see.
"Considering space is moving faster than speed of light..." What exactly is 'space' that it can move at all?
Always putting same image that's webb first captured..waste of time..further James Webb can zoom into planets and put that images..it's worth of viewing
grumblegrumble 😂
😱
I like Hubble better. It was more real.
Lol grumpy old men.
Do you prefer Film Cameras too?
🤓Well technically 🤓
It's because older Photoshop versions cost less to purchase with all the add-ons.
@@H-var that’s crazy 😱
Gravitas
When is next post??
suitable for my screensaver,thanks!
And we used to live in caves!!!! Now we’re building A.I. out of macaroni
Biggest waste of money ever, for what? Pictures,
A computer could generate the same things
“Why would you send a team to research the titanic? If you wanna know the people who died in it, just watch the movie. Waste of money. ”
this is about human discovery