2024 Ford Mustang GT SHOCKER: Who Says You Need an EV OR Hybrid to Get Great MPG?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
- ( www.alltfl.com/ ) Check out our new spot to find ALL our content, from news to videos and our podcasts! The 2024 Ford Mustang GT still packs a powerful 5.0-liter V8, but in a world where downsizing for better fuel economy is the name of the game, that isn't necessary a good thing for your wallet...or is it? Kase takes our new Mustang on a road trip to find out!
( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
TFLbike ( / tflbike )
TFLnow ( / tflnow )
TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
TFL Podcasts:
TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( redcircle.com/shows/tfltalk-c... )
TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( redcircle.com/shows/tfl-talki... )
#Ford #Mustang #Fordmustang 
Авто/Мото
The 30 MPG is great, but I'm actually most impressed by the fact that it runs perfectly on 87. This things is actually more economical than many sport compacts.
Nothing new is more economical than a base model hybrid compact car
@@wx2999 What does that have to do with anything I said??
@@AkioWasRight he has to make sure sells that 50%+ civic hybrid civic sales goal .
And faster when you want to give it the boot
@@wx2999but a hybrid is lame? I thought we were on TFL because we are men?
I went from Florida to Texas and back driving 72 to 75 MPH and averaged 29 MPG ( all basically flat land ) in my 2019 GT using 87 octane.
I'm glad that Mustang is still carrying the torch for American V8s
So is the F150😎
I had a 2019 Toyota Corolla LE, It gave me 32MPG. If this is giving you 30MPG for a 5L V8 then its freaking awesome. Great Job Ford.
somebody needs to tell Dodge that you can have a V8 with good MPG, and don't need to go all electric with fake engine sounds
And not to mention the forced labor to get those batteries, which the environmentalists always talk about human rights but are ok with forced labor for EV batteries. Something seems off.
@@turnerruma5977the phone your on has lithium batteries. Throw it out if your lithium is so unethical.
Sadly it's not about mpg for manufactures. It's CO2 emissions they have to meet.
😂 yea they didn't know that making the hemi 2 decades... it's about NOX and Govt regulation. That simple. You will drive your miniature over pressurized engine and you will like it.
They will learn when sales plummet
These MPG numbers are the same reason I run a C5 Vette as my daily/long distance commuter. All day driving comfort with good economy at speed is a can't lose situation.
is corvette reliable?
@@tonynguyen9728 Chevrolet ? It is well sorted by now with a great enthusiast and aftermarket support marketplace.
@@tonynguyen9728 if they're unmolested, yeah. Simple routine maintenance and they'll pretty much run forever.
Good highway mileage yes, comfortable drive NO. Those seats were horrible until the C7
My 2016 Mustang GT gets 25 or 26 driving 75 to 80 mph on highway! People think just because you have high hp you are going to get bad mpg. The car is so light and engine is efficient you aren’t lugging the engine!
Love the V8. My Coyote in my F150 averaged 24.5 on a highway 2000mile trip. And that was running 70-80.
And given the f-150 is notably heavier than the mustang, that’s not bad at all for a V8 in a full size pickup
Definitely keep V8s. That was impressive
Ford should bring back the Crown Vic and the Lincoln Towncar, give them a Coyote V8, make them hybrids to make the MPGs even better and to eliminate the issue of high idle hours wearing down the engines and bring them back as cop cars, taxis, limos and comfy cruisers for the common man. And for the love of God keep them body on frame and RWD.
Hybrid doesn't make sense with a giant V8. You'd be adding another 150HP.
@@thedopplereffect00 It could help improve the city MPG in start and stop traffic; but the big advantage would be for cop cars and taxis that spend a lot of time sitting around idling their engines and those idle hours wear down the V8s. If you have an electric engine for the hybrid it can sit there ready to go and the gas engine doesn't have to idle.
Driving a 2008 Bullitt with a 4.6 and a 5 speed. I got about 27-31 mpg driving from Lockport, NY, to San Jose, CA. (Gas was $5 a gallon at the time.) Cruise control, consistent speed, and proper maintenance, any car should be able to do better than sticker.
Sounds about right. I had an '08 GT with manual and 3.55 could easily get 28+ mpg highway.
That's true, if I drive smoothly I can get 80mpg in my Prius.
@@Kenman884 🤣
That’s amazing ! If the Prius was as fun to drive as the GT then it would turn the world on its head in a good way ;)
87 octane is our regular here in Chicago. 89 is mid; 93 premium.
Isn't it like that everywhere across the United States except for California?
Same here in Western New York. Maybe 91 sprinkled in here and there
@@JRLL81_ Colorado, Utah, and a few other mountain areas have 85 as well .
Cheap swill. My Challenger needs 93 or it will choke!
@@JRLL81_ No. Here in WA, 91 is premium; it's very rare to see 93 at stations.
Proof that it’s the driver as much if not more than the car!
Power to weight also goes a long way! A powerful motor need not strain as hard to pull the same car, to the same speed, with the same rate of acceleration.
I’d love to see something similar done between the ecoboost and the V8, drive the same route, under the same conditions, with the same rate of acceleration, to see the difference
I've been renting a V6 Charger a few days. It got 24 MPG the first drive on the highway, but since then driving around town the computer says mileage has dropped to 16! I had a 2012 V6 Mustang a few years, with 307 HP vs this Charger's 300 HP. My Mustang got 22 to 24 MPG around town, and when I rarely drove it near the speed limit on the highway it got 32 MPG. With my normal highway driving 85 to 90 MPH it got 28 MPG.
Appears the Charger's extra flab really hits the mileage.
I also had a 2017 Lincoln MKX AWD with the same 3.7L V6, and it got 20 to 22 MPG around town, 24ish highway, so the extra weight and bigger face to the wind really make a mileage difference.
Proof that low end torque is king.
Im all for keeping V8's around, but EV's are king of low end torque 🥴
@@ms3bengay
@@davelospinoso9022 It's 2024, keep up.
@@davelospinoso9022- electric motors can make 100% of there rated torque at 1 RPM. Most internal combustion engines make max torque between 3K & 5.5K rpm. As a ball park. EV’s have a major advantage from a dig. Plus EV’s can more easily modulate torque to prevent or limit wheel spin. Makes them pesky as hell from a dig.
Exactly where did I say anything about EVs? This is a mpg video. Low end torque helped this vehicle get its mpg number.
2018 GT Premium, Performance Pack 1, Active Valve Exhaust, 6 speed manual. 66,000 miles.I’m in North Dallas. Traffic can be bad. Around town, typical milage ranges between 16 and 20. However, on the interstate, with cruise control set to 72, I routinely get 32 +/- MPG. I’ve taken many road trips with this car. I try to avoid interstates. Typicality mountain roads, nation parks, small towns and rural America. Typical road trip milage 28 MPG. I use 93 octane where available, however, in much of the west only 91 octane is available. Secret to good mileage is “no race car driving”. Great car for a two person road trip. Happy motoring 🤠🇺🇸
15 SRT 392 challenger used to get 27mpg highway on cruise at 70mph. Had it for 82K and always got the same mileage.
My 18 Mustang GT, with performance pack 1 and 10R80 trans get 24 mpg around town, and 35 cruising down the highway.
Yeah, that sounds more like an Ecoboost. My '13 Mustang GT manual with the track pack is lucky to get 24 mpg on the highway. I can get 26+ mpg but I have to slow down to 75 mph or slower.
@@302Mustang13 6 speed manual and a 10 speed auto are very different things. My mileage is with me driving nice and not in sport mode.
@@302Mustang13yeah keyword is “manual”. While your cruising RPMS sit between 2000-3000, the 10R80 sits at like 1500RPM at 75mph. BIG difference in fuel economy.
@@bwiren13 Not true. My rpms at 75 mph with 3.73 axle sit at about 2,250 rpm. He said he has a performance package 1 (PP1). That has a 3.55 axle ratio. A 10A PP1 GT with 3.55 would sit about 2,100 rpm at 75 mph I believe off top of my head. My sixth gear is 0.65 while his 10A is 0.64.
Now if he had the 3.15s that would be a different story but it'd be noticeably slower.
@@MongoMotors352 Yeah, you have PP1, which is a 3.55 that has similar cruising rpms as my manual 3.73. I just confirmed calculation that your GT cruises at 75 mph at 2,100 rpm. I'm barely above that at 2,250 rpm cause 10th is about the same as my sixth (0.64 vs 0.65).
I will add I do have a bit of a heavy foot but it is generally normal when I do highway. Only time I've even seen 30 mpg highway was driving 65 mph on a nice day for long distance. It was boring and I usually go 75 or 80. I'm usually 24-26 mpg depending on the day at those speeds and only time a Mustang can do better is with 3.15 for automatics and 3.31 for manuals. Otherwise, I don't believe better than 26-27 mpg at in anything else.
But I notice that the gas used has "Dinocare," which everyone knows is an unfair advantage.
Mustang lives on.
I’ve consistently gotten better mpg than what’s said my vehicle can do. Just by doing the speed limit.
Absolutely keep the big v8s around. I drive a 6.4L Hemi, in Australia, I ran from Melbourne up to Sydney in a day. It is mostly easy level running, no mountains no high altitude, but according to the on board trip computer it was achieving 8.2 ltres per 100 klms. Translated to old money that's better than 34 miles per gallon. That works out at more than 800 klms (500 miles ) on a tank of gas. Yes, I agree, a smaller car with a smaller motor will do much better, but the difference between them is not that much. Add in the fact that I am 1.9 metes tall (6ft1inch) and I don't really fit into a small car. Also add the fact that the big Hemi will carry on doing that for many years into the future, its a worthwhile deal, plus its a real easy effortless car to drive and the whole family fits in easily. What would I gain with a small car? Certainly won't save any significant money over the life of the car. Problem is, Hemi is long gone from the new car landscape. Mustang is the last of its type, hope the keep it going.
Old school V8s got about 10 MPG, making maybe 250 net HP.
A modern V8 getting 30 MPG while making 486 net HP is a mighty leap forward.
Jumping from 30 to 60 MPG sounds like a big difference, but in perspective it's really not so big a deal.
Comparing an old V8 burning $100 of fuel to a modern V8 over the same distance would burn $33 of fuel, vs a 60 MPG car burning $16 of fuel. So the new V8 saves $67 of fuel, while the 60 MPG car only saves $17 vs the modern V8. 67 is lots bigger than 17! Continuing to mandate diminishing returns is more about exercising power and favoring political interests than benefiting the planet.
CAFE standards for light cars is so high that it's easier just to make SUVs. That's why MPG for the common vehicle hasn't really changed in 40 years.
CAFE standards a definite issue...and ironically why most vehicles sold don't do that well on fuel.
And crash regulations and tech regulations require bigger and heavier cars every year. Its a shame too
@@rapom61393That's BS. Manufacturers do claim they need bigger cars for safety, but theyre lying. Mazda can still make the Miata.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 The Miata is the most difficult Mazda to comply with CAFE standards because of its low weight.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872I doubt. That would go back to making cheap little fiberglass death traps if they could get away with it.
My 2004 LS430 which weighs 4000lbs, has a 4.3L V8 and a 6 speed automatic got me 27mpg on my roundtrip from Toronto to Montreal. I was pleasantly surprised by how well it did. With a lot of these V8s when you don't rip them at every corner and use them mainly for highway cruising, there really is no need to get something with a smaller displacement.
Ngl I was surprised by the mpg. 30 is pretty good for thirsty engine.
Pretty good? It's very good!
In my 2022 GT with the 10 speed auto, I drove 110.7 miles from the coast to home and got 31.2 mpg. Just driving normally, at the speed limit.
Mustang are great road trip cruisers. I´ve gotten about the same MPGs as you in similar trips but going all the way from 9 thousand ft. to sea level and back. I daily drive my Mustang and it is a great everyday car. Fun, comfortable, powerful and yes even fuel economy is not so bad in the city, with that awesome highway fuel economy.
30 mpg is impressive. Avoiding stop and go type driving is key to getting such a good number.
My '13 GT (2d Gen 5.0 Coyote with 6 speed auto) would get mid 20s.
Might even get mid 30s mpg on 91 or 93 octane.
Mine would get 10mpg but I had alot done to it and it had 4:10 gears and around 500hp and I drove like an idiot so... best I could get was maybe 21 on the highway. Those gears were great for drag racing but nothing else. Don't ever get those gears unless ur only drag racing.
A '13 is a gen 1 Coyote. I have a '13 Coyote too. Just because they removed the oil squirters and tuned an extra 8 horsepower doesn't make it a new gen. I'd call it gen 1 revised. Premium doesn't make hardly a difference on mpgs. I've pumped premium always since I bought it slightly used and average 19-20 mpg and 26 on the highway at best unless I drive below 75 mph. Premium maybe makes 0.5 mpg difference.
@@brandonbrodbeck6688I have a manual with 3.73s and even that is too much. I think 3.55 is the sweet spot for best of both performance and efficiency for a street car.
@kennetho5393 yeah your right 3.55 is definitely the sweet spot 👌 and about 650 hp
@@brandonbrodbeck6688 I mean the 3.73s are a blast, but I find it at the edge of traction much of the time and efficiency is just ok. It's kinda bad when V8 trucks are getting similar mpgs.
i got over 30 mpg of pure hwy in a Hellcat Charger. Because of all the torque and the tall gearing the motor doesn't work hard at speed. For a 700hp 4500 lb car to get that kind of mileage was crazy. But over 30 mpg at high altitude with 87 oct is really impressive.
That really is crazy. Currently renting a V6 Charger and only got up to 24 MPG while highway cruising at 75 mph.
Getting 16 around town. :(
I'm not surprised by this at all. I drove a 2016 Mustang GT convertible with the six speed manual transmission. I live down at sea level and on the full on road trips I took with the car, I always averaged 27 to 27.5 mpg, my calculations. The trip computer generally ran 1 to 1.5 mpg optimistic relative to my calculations. The best I ever got out of the car had the computer saying 30.1 mpg with my calculations returning 29.1. My V8 Mustang (435 hp for the 2016 model) routinely came within 1 to 1.5 mpg to the 2013 Toyota Rav4 I owned at the same time. Needless to say, I was thrilled with the car. EPA estimates were 25 highway. My car obviously did well above that.
Good result! I've a 2023 and the best average I've had was about 29.2 MPG on a run from Albuquerque, NM to Dodge City, KS. I don't recall the exact miles and I was not able to go from ABQ to Dodge City on one tank. Generally traveling about 70-75 and going through a number of towns along the route. So, yeah, it's possible based on my experience. The real ironic thing is that it has the gas guzzler tax and the pickups (which can't match fuel economy) don't!
That's really impressive, 30.6 MPG through the mountains, at elevation, with regular 87 octane fuel. And that 5.0L Ford motor is fairly reliable, not so sure about that 10-speed automatic trans. A manual gearbox would be sweet...
The 10R80s have proven to be pretty stout. Midnight performance took a stock factory sealed 5.0 with a stock 10R80(just had a torque converter) and ran 7 second quarter miles with it. That motor was making around 1500 HP. You can find that right here on RUclips.
That V-8 Mustang gets 6 mpg more than my 2014 V-6 convertible Mustang. Pretty amazing.
My '13 GT has 104k miles now. Still gets 29 MPG highway on long trips and 21 MPG in mixed weekly commuting. And, it's not boring like a Camry.
Same here. My 2013 GT/CS has 142K on it and its overall MPG is 20.9 (last 8,700 miles) which is 1/2 city driving. It does run better if I use 89 octane instead of 87.
Neat! I feel I learned something, and any day that happens is a good day. Thanks! BTW, what is the "wait 30 seconds and top up" trick all about? That's the first time I've heard of this. Cheers!
Doesn’t recommend 87 at all…that’s just the lowest octane it should take
at high elevation, 87 is their midrange (similar to 89/91) down near sea level. The manual does recommend midrange fuel, which again differs based on location.
@@saidtheblueknight watch the video and you would understand what I’m talking about. They said Toyota recommends 87..when it does not. That’s just the minimum requirement
@@bwer2 it wont hurt your car...just wont get as much gas milage on the lower octane...just like oil changes. all the diff types, high and low milage is all selling points... as long as you keep up with your oil changes and change the filters you baby will run good forever
Great vid, well explained - keep V8s around!!!
I'm not surprised at your results. I live in Pennsylvania, and my Triumph Speed Triple that gets 45 mpg here gets 60 mpg in the Rockies. Of course, there's noticeably less power when I get on the throttle as well.
I did a rally in my '21 LC500, Denver to Moab day 1, Moab to Vegas day 2. I returned via I-40 from Vegas to Albuquerque (Vail Pass had snow), at 83 MPH in 10th gear I was doing ~1700 RPMs getting nearly 33 MPG. Nearly 1100 miles in a day on two tanks of gas.
These new 8-10 speed transmissions are game changers for highway cruising.
34.5 mpg in my 370z from Phoenix to Moab…
I get good gas mileage if I stay off the pedal, mostly highway and interstate some city. 6.2 V8 20-25mpg. But if I do all city 12mpg. Depends on driving style and where you live. Flat, hills curves, mountains. Old winters warming your vehicle up.
U must have a c63 amg.? I got a c63 507 , and I can't do better than 19mpg highway
Great review
The extra point of compression over my 2013 5.0 ragtop (6 sp manual and 3:31 gears) and the addition of direct injection makes this one impressive! At a steady 60 mph on I-40 across NM and AZ I could count on 23-24 mpg but that was it. The direct injected Coyotes are definitely more efficient than my first gen version.
This one also has the 10 speed, that helps a lot also
I never got close to 450 miles per tank in my 2020 GT. I could never keep my foot out of the gas pedal. I loved the sound of the coyote V8.
A fairly aerodynamic vehicle with a V8 at low RPM does get pretty good fuel economy. I had a 79 Firebird Formula with the carburated 301 V8 4-speed manual and 3.42 gears. It got about 12MPG on the highway and about 9 around town. Bought a 86 fuel injected 5.0 5-speed with 2.73 gears. The overdrive was .68 for a final drive of 1.85. My Mustang was able to get 27MPG on the highway and about 18 around town. Of course my mileage did vary, particularly once I modified it with 3.55 gears and Nitrous...
I have a'15 GT with PP1 and average around 26mpg on the highway. Keep in mind, you have 3.55 gears versus 3.73, so that will make a difference for sure. I also tuned mine to around the same power with intake, tune, X-pipe, and Borla mufflers and saw an increase from around 22mpg. Still pretty good for a big V8 though. Also, I am relegated to 93 with the race tune on my car and being that I am in Germany and have access to 94 all the time, it is a bit pricier to fill the tank. Overall, informative video.
I owned a 1992 Buick Roadmaster, and I was getting 22mpg city and 30mpg highway.
That’s with the 350 V8 and automatic. 🤨 Using AC and driving normally.
I made some modifications though. Bigger exhaust, performance converter, iridium plugs, performance wires and coil, opened up the air box.
I used it on long trips and the gas mileage was consistently great.
Imagine if the car was designed by GM to be more fuel efficient. 🤷🏻
Nice visiting my favorite ski resort/ small town
I have a 22 gt with a manual. I do a lot of highway driving. I only use the higher octane gas because you could tell the difference in my 2009 Bullitt. Once in the habit, I never got out. I got around 30 mpg in 6th gear in the 22 but I have usually average less. I have a lead foot and until you hit 90 mph 6th pulls too few revs for good passing. 5th gives a good combo of mpg and passing power.
My Lincoln LS V8 gets 24 mpg. My V6 Firebird can go 411 on a full tank. My V10 now does eat Gas but 19 mpg. That is following the laws and speed limits.
I’m jealous of that MPG. I recently bought an older trucklet as a runaround beater to try and keep the miles off of my ‘22 F150 Powerboost. The truck I got is an ‘08 Explorer Sport Trac 4X4 4.6L and I’m only getting about 13MPG. And that’s at sea level.
Remember my fox 302 I had done up heads can and carb tuned right she was thirsty when those secondary’s opened but would get damn near 38mpg cruising at 70 also had a lower end gear since it was a 4 banger car before
Lifelong Chevy guy here, but this is very impressive.
One of the rattles since the ‘15 is in the dash panel center of steering wheel. Better tires would help quiet the ride noise. The 10R80 is a great advantage for mpg as well.
That's a pretty damn solid video guys. I was pretty shocked by the mpg myself
I daily drive a Challenger Scat Pack with the 392 and the auto. I consistently average over 21 mpg in mixed driving. I've seen 28 mph crusing on the hwy.
When you are cruising along on a highway gas vehicles can get impressive gas mileage. My 2.0 VW Jetta GLI is pretty quick and fun to drive but I regularly get in the high 30s on highway trips. I did a 120 mile round trip not long after i first got it and tracked the mpg both manually at the pump and also on the computer. I got 40 MPG on a mix of I95 and normal dual carriageway roads. On a recent 200 mile trip on mostly normal roads I got 36 MPG.
I remember my 2011 V6 Mustang with the 3.7 and the 6 speed would get low 30s MPG on a highway.
I consistently got 28-29 MPG in my 98 GT manual. I was putting 430 miles a week or so on it and not being gentle.
What was your horsepower rating? He got 31 MPG with 448 HP!
My 04 grand marquis can get 29 highway and 19 city I definitely agree many be over blowing on v8s mpg it depends on the driver drives
I just wish it came with a larger gas tank! Then you really don't have to worry about range! And YES on keeping the V8's.
My 1980 Capri with a 400 HP 306 and T5 manual got 26 highway, when premium was $1.15 a gallon.
My 2019 will get 28-30 mpg’s, hand calculated by the way. That was on long trips on mostly highways with 65-70 mph speed limits.
What rear end is in that mustang? I’m guessing it’s got the 3.15 gearing. With 3.55 gears I’m lucky to get 24 mpg at sea level with my 2024 similar configuration.
I got 28.5 MPG with my 2021 mustang GT going to fairplay on 285, then buena vista, then to leadville, and then cruising back down into denver over the weekend using 91 octane fuel. 6-speed manual. It was really windy as well. Pretty good mileage.
Old news
2019 GT with 6spd
Going east on NYS thruway this weekend got 29.4 going east
27.5 going west on the way back
MrBallen podcast… good choice! But I don’t know why you’re comparing it to a hybrid, 31 mpg is abysmal mileage. I get 60 mpg with my hybrid, and I’m always over the speed limit and often floor it in sport mode just for fun, so I’m in no way doing any hyper milling. If I was I’d probably be able to do 70 mpg. My old 2015 Dodge Journey did 30 mpg with 5 passengers and a pop up camping trailer in tow.
Your hybrid has 480 horsepower?
You are comparing apples to oranges. I just sold a 2018 Chevy Spark 5-spd manual that I bought new. It easily got over 50 MPG. Significantly more than that if I babied it. But it had 98 HP. The 2016 Mustang GT 6-spd manual that I just bought has 430 HP. I would never expect it to get the mileage that the Spark got. But, honestly, it does pretty well for a car that spins tires with just a little tap on the gas. And it is about a hundred times more fun to drive.
I am running a 18 Mustang GT convertible with the 10speed. I am averaging 26.1MPG and right at 400 miles per tank of gas. Even with driving the TAIL OF THE DRAGON last week I still only dropped down to 25.7 MPG.
Thanks for sharing this video! Transmissions make a huge difference for both large and small engines. I have a theory that higher altitude = better MPG (at least for NA engines) because the engine must use less fuel in order to compensate for less oxygen, and because there is less wind resistance -- especially at highway speeds. With all this in mind, I still think that a good modern V8 with an appropriate transmission can achieve excellent highway MPG. I'm looking forward to seeing more videos like this. Keep up the great work! 🙂👍
I got 27.7mpg (hand calculated) staying out of boost the whole way in my 585whp 2011 GT500 performance pack to Lake Tahoe and back.
All this time we needed better transmissions; not complicated flex fuel engines, really complicated hybrid engines or turbos for that matter. What a sad state of affairs! The V8 was vilified when in reality it was old outdated transmissions. 😢
87? I didn't expect that
Ford tuned it to run on 87 minimum, but recommends 91 or higher, as per owner’s manual.
Ford actually rated the engine’s max torque/hp using 93.
My 22 GT Premium can get 24 MPG when driven conservatively on stretches of highway. It also can get 8 MPG when driven enthusiastically up curvy mountain roads. Love that this car can do both.
I don't need an EV, but I definitely WANT and finally have one.
My 3.9 liter Impala barely beats my Camaro LT1 on mpg. The real difference is regular vs premium gas price
I once drove my 19 GT across Colorado, and it felt like my 96 Probe GT. Yes I live at sea level back east😏😆
Wish they came out with an AWD version or 4 wheel to 2 wheel drive so you can go back to 2 when you want. I hate suvs but with some winter weather rear wheel only just sucks in the snow without adding a bunch of extra weight in the trunk giving you worse gas mileage.
Great number! It would be cool if you guys compared this Mustang against smaller displacement engines on the same loop, on the same day. Something farther than Denver 100....
I got the premium performance package. Fill it up and the gauge reads 196 miles to empty. Get out on the road and get it into 6th gear then a few miles later the computer starts calculating and you make gas lol. 312 miles to empty.😅
Brilliant and very objective analysis.
Wow you got over 400 miles of range? That's amazing. Especially in a car like that. How much range does it say on a full tank?
interesting subject guys!
Although it doesn't make nearly as much power, my 05 mustang gt is great on the highway. I've gotten 26.8 mpg driving solely freeway and my wife got 28 mpg when she drove it. In the city though it is pretty bad, I get usually 18 mpg combined but I usually rip it 3 or 4 times each tank.
I regularly roadtrip my 2018 Mustang GT 6-speed manual between Atlanta and Detroit and achieve mid-high 20’s. I’ve moved my daughter to college in it, moved my mother in law into an independent living facility, it is one of my favorite road trip cars and I’m really going to miss the V8 when it goes extinct.
So far in "city" im getting 17.5 with a 24 gt pp with a few half throttle hits to about 70. Got 1k miles on it and haven't exceeded 6k rpm
36.7 UK mpg, pretty good for a big engine though my 2008 Honda Civic can reach 67mpg UK which if I've worked this out right is 55.8 US mpg. The roads where I live however reduces that drastically to around 43 UK mpg and that V8 would not do so well, lots of start stop, steep hills, sharp corners, narrow roads etc. Bloody shame because I love these.
One of the most truthful video on RUclips. Great job guys to display the truth about naturally aspirated engines. Toyotas and Hondas are missing out. Get back in the game with naturally aspirated engines that will be more reliable than the garbage Turbo engines, Hybrids and EV.
If they dared to add the battery from the Maverick, they can eliminate the most gas using function of the car, starting from a dead stop. Maybe the weight distribution can improve too. Could that make up for the battery weight?
That’s awesome, my 2020 Volvo has a 4 turbo, with half the horsepower and I’m getting 31-32mpg at best.
Dang when did you film? From CO and I saw all that snow on side of road, main reason I left for warmer weather, plus all the people from Cali moving to Broncos Country. No thanks. .
*That's what I'm sayin'.* Just put a torquey V8 in a small-ish, relatively "light" car and you're golden. My '20 Camaro consistently hovered around 38 MPG on the interstate at around 80 MPH. Love the new Mustangs though, may have to snag one. Test drove a 6-speed the other day and it was excellent.
I have 800+ miles on my 2024 Mustang GT (manual) AVE. Around town, I'm getting 15.3mpg. I haven't been able to get it to sixth gear and keep it there for more than a minute or two. No long trips.
My s550 gen 3 does great fuel mileage as well. Ford has the recipe for success it you wanna daily your v8, which I do
would love to see a 2.3l eco-boost mpg comparasion/shootout ... and a 2015 v6 manual to boot
Holy Smokes. That's amazing.
I'm surprised you used 87 octane. I was told to use premium of 93 but you can only find 91. Next time try using the cruise control and I guarantee you'll get a lot more gas mileage why I don't know. I have a 20/20 GT performance pack 2 and getting about 25 with the cruise control. Try using the cruise control on your 10-speed automatic you'll be impressed nice video by the way
Pretty cool how far muscle cars have come. I lived in Crested Butte in the mid ‘90’s and daily’d a Porsche 944 year round (really fun). On drives to Boulder or Denver and back I could only muster around 28mpg, with what is relatively a small, light, 4 cylinder sports car with a really tall 5th gear. I really wish they would move forward and lose the ‘60’s retro look of this car (same with the Camaro, completely over the ‘67 Camaro look).
Great mileage on that trip! Mustang GT is full of surprises, I guess..
Ford better never stop making this car. I don't have the room in my budget or my current life situation to get one again (had a 2001 when I was younger), but I will at some point so I better be able to still get my hands on one!
Super efficient for a V8 with almost 500 ponies on 87 octane. My 2002 Lexus ES300 gets 30 mpg average on straight highway driving on 93 octane Mobil gas. It calls for premium 91 or higher. Has 183k miles with about 2 years old DENSO plugs & ignition coil packs.
Always love mustangs, but not a fan of those 2 screens on the dash. They should go back to a driver oriented dash with conventional round gauges
Wow....thats better than I thought! Whats the insurance?😁
Overall I dig the car it sounds great and I will be honest im impressed.
We have a rx 350h 2023 and it has that ratty sounding 4 cylinder the vehicle is really nice overall but i miss the v6 it just sounds smoother pulls easier. then there is this mustang v8 that sounds so good. I realize this is entirely two different types of vehicles our rx gets 35 fits more people extremely comfortable but slow feeling 0-60 this mustang fits 2 powerful v8 gets 30 31mpg has an awesome 0-60 sounds great and probably real fun to drive. Pretty cool times we live in.
My insurance on it is 1600 a year and I'm only 19 so its pretty great
I have a 2020 Gls580 Mercedes Benz and live in NYC .
Big suv and I can fill up in New Jersey and make it to Suffolk Virginia to the final destination with a quarter tank of gas stil remaining.
With conservative driving any V8 can easily get great mileage.
26.2 gallon tank
This is good stuff but the reality is that if you actually use the horsepower the MPG starts dropping very fast. My coyote mustang would get as low as 12.7 MPG (although I would get closer to 15.x being a little more reasonable) during my spirited commutes with a mix of the suburbs, country roads, and highway. My 2023 BRZ would do 21.7 MPG on the same exact commute.
I actually have a Honda Fit daily currently and it get about 27-28 MPG on the same commute on regular gas but it's slow as hell. Granted, I was working with about of a 1/4th of the income I am now the mustang was surprisingly punishing to own financially. I guess my point is don't buy performance cars expecting decent gas mileage unless you live in the Midwest.