Nice review. How about the difference in internal volume of these goggles? I feel like both of the newer models has lenses that sit closer to your face, not as close/flush as the Line Miner but closer than the Flight Deck. This gives you better peripheral vision all around.
You are onto something there! The Flight Trackers toric lens is a blend of a spherical and cylindrical lens so it would sit a bit closer to your face than the spherical lens on the Flight Deck and Flight Path XL.
While not technically qualified as OTG goggles, these models may provide enough room to be worn with glasses. However, there is a far better solution... SportRx Prescription Goggle Inserts! Click here to learn more 👉www.sportrx.com/oakley-prescription-snow-goggle-insert.html
Are there any updates to the flight path that would make them a better choice over the flight deck since they are newer? I prefer the design of the flight deck with the black iridium lens but don't want to miss out on any new developements.
Hi there! I would say you should stick with the Flight Deck. If anything the Flight Path XL is ever so slightly larger and there is a rim on the top of the goggle. Both differences are hardly noticeable. I hope this helps!
Sorry to get at this video a little later in the process. But is there any physical size difference on the flight paths?between what used to be L (only size available) and now XL (only size available. I bought some last year and I dont have the box anymore, and there is no size markings so i dont know which ones I have. And i am very interested jn getting additional replacement lenses?
Hi Eric! Oakley recently changed the sizing from XL to L for most of their larger goggle models. Most size differences in the new models will de defined as M or L.
Hi, I have a question about goggle sizes, I am currently wearing an Oakley mod5 Medium size helmet, is it preferable to buy M size goggles also or can I go with L size to have a wider view? Thanks!
@Carl Martin Lind, @Scott, I completely agree as well. This "review" was not helpful at all. It did not offer anything that isn't in a Oakley brochure.
@@sportrxeyewear Well, 1) you could provide a better view of the side by side aspects... like dimensions (typically mysteriously missing on the Oakley website) and showing far out from a dummy face and how high the top rim is for the various goggles. 2) You show a cool color spectrum display, but what about showing a "field of view" display (and for the different sizes) which would be as equally valuable?
100% agree. All of these reviews are useless and mostly just plugs for the RX insert or SMU. I don't live in the US, I can't get an insert, I need OTG, how about doing a real world review for OTG users. Dimensions are required, show the goggle being worn without the lens so we can see the clearance and fit. Put some glasses on and do it again. These are all basically the same frame/chassis with a different lens. If I am wrong, then unless you give us a proper review how are we supposed to see the differences?
Hi! Thanks for checking it out. The Flight Tracker XM is built to fit with most helmets on the market. If it fits your face, there shouldn't be any helmet compatibility issues.
I'm really confused about Flight Deck sizes. Flight Deck Standard, Flight Deck XM, XL and now Flight Deck M and L. Could someone kow what replacement lenses should I choose for Flight Deck L?
It was an Oakley marketing change to reduce the confusion. The old name XM = M. The old XL = L. If you look at the current line up of goggles on Oakley's website, you won't see any with the XM or XL. Bonus though, while the naming scheme has changed the goggles and lenses have not, which means if you are wanting to save some bucks for the exact same goggle (except for the box tag) then shop for the XM or XL version which are being cleared out by many stores.
Hey Andrew, Does Oakley plan on releasing a rimless snow goggles with Toric lens? like an upgrade to the awesome Fall Line XL or a toric version to the fall line XL?
Hi Mike! We do not yet know what is in the plans for next year but if I had to guess I would say a toric rimless option would be a safe bet! If you are looking for a large goggle the Fall Line XL is great!
@@sportrxeyewear I love the fall line XL (I own the Airbrake XL) and was looking to upgrade however I wanted to know if future models will be with toric lenses (benefits of both worlds). I also wait for the Fall line React (which may or may not get released)
Well.. it's clear that nothing is clear.. Saying other words: You want to looks like a pilot take flight deck, if you have already one take flight path ))) If You want something more squarish take flght tracker. Is the other stuff is just stupid marketing means nothing? Is there any serious difference by the fov? Btw the rimles design gives nothing to make bigger fov coz the cloth layers befor the lens is still presenting... Cheap talk..
They are pretty comparable overall. Some prefer the cylindrical design and feel like it offers more peripheral vision. Also, the more rectangular shape give a bit more 'lens real estate', as it were. If the most peripheral is the most important thing, then stick with what you have. If you're interested in getting a spherical lens, that offers the best optical clarity, then go with the Flight Path!
I have narrowed my next choice down to Oakley or Anon. With every video the peripheral lens is discussed when describing about seeing the sides of the goggles. I have issues with seeing the frame when trying to look down to my feet. What would be the best goggle to NOT see the frame when looking down?
Great question, Mike! Any goggle with a rimless bottom would mean there is no frame to interrupt your views. One goggle that could work is the Oakley Flight Deck: www.sportrx.com/blog/sportrx-flight-deck-xm/ Hope this helps!
@@sportrxeyewear Thank you very much. Thoughts on Flight Deck vs Fall Line in regards to my question? Ive searched and there isn't a video comparing the two...
I had issues with the XM/M size Flight Deck. The lens sits further out than I anticipated and so even though there is no external bottom frame, the inner frame which the goggle uses to attach the lens does obstruct my downward vision. Even though the Flight Deck have a larger inner opening than my older Crowbars, the Flight Deck have poorer downward vision to the point where I sometime feel like I have a touch of vertigo. Swapping out the XM/M to a XL/L resolved the issue and actually fit my face a bit better.
![Tee Grizzley - Robbery 8 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/34_vkNV6wrU/mqdefault.jpg)
Which of these three Oakley goggles is YOUR favorite? Let us know in the comments below!
2 questions among these 3 models :
- how the inside view of these 3 goggles ?
- which one len with ventilation can fit any 3 ?
Nice review. How about the difference in internal volume of these goggles? I feel like both of the newer models has lenses that sit closer to your face, not as close/flush as the Line Miner but closer than the Flight Deck. This gives you better peripheral vision all around.
You are onto something there! The Flight Trackers toric lens is a blend of a spherical and cylindrical lens so it would sit a bit closer to your face than the spherical lens on the Flight Deck and Flight Path XL.
Flight Tracker or Flight Deck? Trying to decide
Hey. Great summary but I am missing the info if you can use theese googles with glasses.
Thank you
While not technically qualified as OTG goggles, these models may provide enough room to be worn with glasses. However, there is a far better solution... SportRx Prescription Goggle Inserts! Click here to learn more 👉www.sportrx.com/oakley-prescription-snow-goggle-insert.html
Hi there, do you mean to say that all 3 Flight Oakley models fit Asians well by default since the nose part is "universal" now?
Are there any updates to the flight path that would make them a better choice over the flight deck since they are newer? I prefer the design of the flight deck with the black iridium lens but don't want to miss out on any new developements.
Hi there! I would say you should stick with the Flight Deck. If anything the Flight Path XL is ever so slightly larger and there is a rim on the top of the goggle. Both differences are hardly noticeable. I hope this helps!
@@sportrxeyewear Appreciate the advice thank you!
@@sportrxeyewear I'm also trying to decide between the Flight Deck and Flight Path. Is there any difference in downward vision between the two?
Sorry to get at this video a little later in the process.
But is there any physical size difference on the flight paths?between what used to be L (only size available) and now XL (only size available. I bought some last year and I dont have the box anymore, and there is no size markings so i dont know which ones I have. And i am very interested jn getting additional replacement lenses?
Hi Eric! Oakley recently changed the sizing from XL to L for most of their larger goggle models. Most size differences in the new models will de defined as M or L.
Hi, I have a question about goggle sizes, I am currently wearing an Oakley mod5 Medium size helmet, is it preferable to buy M size goggles also or can I go with L size to have a wider view? Thanks!
Would be more useful if you discussed anything that actually mattered to users, instead of just gibberish brand speak
Let us know what you would like to know and we will be sure to include it in future videos.
@Carl Martin Lind, @Scott, I completely agree as well.
This "review" was not helpful at all. It did not offer anything that isn't in a Oakley brochure.
@@sportrxeyewear Well,
1) you could provide a better view of the side by side aspects... like dimensions (typically mysteriously missing on the Oakley website) and showing far out from a dummy face and how high the top rim is for the various goggles.
2) You show a cool color spectrum display, but what about showing a "field of view" display (and for the different sizes) which would be as equally valuable?
100% agree. All of these reviews are useless and mostly just plugs for the RX insert or SMU. I don't live in the US, I can't get an insert, I need OTG, how about doing a real world review for OTG users. Dimensions are required, show the goggle being worn without the lens so we can see the clearance and fit. Put some glasses on and do it again. These are all basically the same frame/chassis with a different lens. If I am wrong, then unless you give us a proper review how are we supposed to see the differences?
Hi. what model of helmet is it? I see it fits perfectly into the flight tracker. Thanks.
Oakley MOD3!
Thanks 😊
hey there! nice review. Quick question: what helmet goes with the contour of the flight tracker xm?
Hi! Thanks for checking it out. The Flight Tracker XM is built to fit with most helmets on the market. If it fits your face, there shouldn't be any helmet compatibility issues.
I'm really confused about Flight Deck sizes. Flight Deck Standard, Flight Deck XM, XL and now Flight Deck M and L. Could someone kow what replacement lenses should I choose for Flight Deck L?
It was an Oakley marketing change to reduce the confusion. The old name XM = M. The old XL = L. If you look at the current line up of goggles on Oakley's website, you won't see any with the XM or XL. Bonus though, while the naming scheme has changed the goggles and lenses have not, which means if you are wanting to save some bucks for the exact same goggle (except for the box tag) then shop for the XM or XL version which are being cleared out by many stores.
Hey Andrew,
Does Oakley plan on releasing a rimless snow goggles with Toric lens? like an upgrade to the awesome Fall Line XL or a toric version to the fall line XL?
Hi Mike! We do not yet know what is in the plans for next year but if I had to guess I would say a toric rimless option would be a safe bet! If you are looking for a large goggle the Fall Line XL is great!
@@sportrxeyewear I love the fall line XL (I own the Airbrake XL) and was looking to upgrade however I wanted to know if future models will be with toric lenses (benefits of both worlds).
I also wait for the Fall line React (which may or may not get released)
Well.. it's clear that nothing is clear.. Saying other words: You want to looks like a pilot take flight deck, if you have already one take flight path ))) If You want something more squarish take flght tracker. Is the other stuff is just stupid marketing means nothing?
Is there any serious difference by the fov? Btw the rimles design gives nothing to make bigger fov coz the cloth layers befor the lens is still presenting... Cheap talk..
Any idea if Oakley is planning on putting out a Flight Deck XM size? Thanks
Yes, there is a Flight Deck XM available now. You can check it out here: www.sportrx.com/oakley-sportrx-flight-deck-xm-limited-edition.html
Sorry I meant the Flight Path. Any idea if they are coming out with a Flight Path XM?
Any idea if Oakley is going to come out with a Flight Path XM model?
Hmmm no word of anything yet.
What about changing lenses with all these models. What a let down of a video since that is not shown 😥
I have the fall line in xl,do they have equal all round vision compared to the flight path
They are pretty comparable overall. Some prefer the cylindrical design and feel like it offers more peripheral vision. Also, the more rectangular shape give a bit more 'lens real estate', as it were. If the most peripheral is the most important thing, then stick with what you have. If you're interested in getting a spherical lens, that offers the best optical clarity, then go with the Flight Path!
Pena que aqui no Brasil não temos tantas novidades em óculos Oakley
Por favor, use SportRx como sua fonte de informação para everything Oakley! Obrigado por assistir!
I have narrowed my next choice down to Oakley or Anon. With every video the peripheral lens is discussed when describing about seeing the sides of the goggles. I have issues with seeing the frame when trying to look down to my feet. What would be the best goggle to NOT see the frame when looking down?
Great question, Mike! Any goggle with a rimless bottom would mean there is no frame to interrupt your views. One goggle that could work is the Oakley Flight Deck: www.sportrx.com/blog/sportrx-flight-deck-xm/ Hope this helps!
@@sportrxeyewear thank you. I know that Smith has the 4D thing but the size and style just doesn't suit my eye
@@sportrxeyewear Thank you very much. Thoughts on Flight Deck vs Fall Line in regards to my question? Ive searched and there isn't a video comparing the two...
I had issues with the XM/M size Flight Deck. The lens sits further out than I anticipated and so even though there is no external bottom frame, the inner frame which the goggle uses to attach the lens does obstruct my downward vision. Even though the Flight Deck have a larger inner opening than my older Crowbars, the Flight Deck have poorer downward vision to the point where I sometime feel like I have a touch of vertigo. Swapping out the XM/M to a XL/L resolved the issue and actually fit my face a bit better.
4:33 - why the mouth open? 🧐😆
Tyler was just FEELING it!
@@sportrxeyewear 😂👍👍👊
You used like half the video on talking about anything else
blablabla