2009 Daftmill "Summer Batch Release" Lowland Single Malt Scotch Whisky

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 янв 2025

Комментарии • 17

  • @mikebennett3741
    @mikebennett3741 Год назад +4

    I admire them for not releasing early. I shared a bottle of Summer 2006 with a friend. Liked it so much I bought another bottle, which I’m saving for future enjoyment. Pricey, yes. But I found that it has a malty effervescence that I haven’t encountered elsewhere. So, on paper, not worth it. But it resonated with my soul, so yes. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it. 😊

  • @carlossandiego7925
    @carlossandiego7925 Год назад +3

    Thanks for the honest review. I always appreciate your take on a whiskey because I know you won’t let hype interfere with your experience. This case of FOMO is cured. Thanks for the $200 saved.

  • @archietyler6759
    @archietyler6759 Год назад +2

    Awesome and honest review as usual!!! Glad to see you back!!! Cheers!!!

  • @thewhiskyenthusiast
    @thewhiskyenthusiast Год назад +2

    I like Daftmill's style of waiting for proper 10 years to release but yeah I agree that it is too much money for a 10 year old, no matter how craft it is. Anyway, there are plenty of great whiskies out there. Cheers for an honest review!

  • @MrPsiman
    @MrPsiman Год назад +1

    I agree. I find it to be a $80-ish whisky at best

  • @rnatodna
    @rnatodna Год назад +1

    Hi Erik, did you ever try the first two U.S releases? I have both the 2007 winter release and 2006 summer release, both are great and very similar but I prefer the winter release. For me the 2009 release you just reviewed was a pass.

    • @WhiskyMystery
      @WhiskyMystery Год назад +1

      Love those two. And really disliked the 2009. Bitter Sherry ruined it.

    • @steveno7058
      @steveno7058 Год назад +1

      Letting this poor release make the market is enough for me to avoid this company selling $200 young Scotch.

    • @steveno7058
      @steveno7058 Год назад +1

      @@WhiskyMystery Daftmill ruined it by actually using that cask in the blend.

    • @WhiskyMystery
      @WhiskyMystery Год назад +1

      @@steveno7058 Agreed

  • @steveno7058
    @steveno7058 Год назад +3

    I won’t pay $200 for a 10 year non cask strength. Simple reason is it will give other producers an excuse and reason to jack up prices.

  • @kevinmrn
    @kevinmrn Год назад +1

    Yes, educational purposes is why I drink whisky as well. 😂

  • @WhiskyMystery
    @WhiskyMystery Год назад +2

    The Sherry barrel ruined this whisky compared to the ex bourbon only.

    • @steveno7058
      @steveno7058 Год назад +1

      Just another reason to pass on Daftmill. Allowing such a poor cask in a $200 bottle is terrible quality control

    • @WhiskyMystery
      @WhiskyMystery Год назад +1

      @@steveno7058 But the Bourbon barrels are a delight