Crisis Series #5 with Fr. Reuter: What is Liberalism?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 32

  • @therese181
    @therese181 4 года назад +30

    This is a fantastic series. I am learning so much. Thank you to the Fathers involved

  • @horizon-one
    @horizon-one 2 года назад +3

    Amazing insight into the Church. Thank you Father!

  • @liammccann8763
    @liammccann8763 4 года назад +13

    My my, this insight provided by our Church is truly without parallel. Nar laga Dia thu (may God never weaken you) as we say in Ireland ✝️

  • @joannabuk
    @joannabuk 4 года назад +18

    Love the clarity of this lecture! God bless you Father.

  • @dough.6895
    @dough.6895 4 года назад +23

    Thank you all for this series, it’s excellent. Spreading this to my seminarian friends.

  • @user-ht9fr6eh9u
    @user-ht9fr6eh9u 3 года назад +2

    The intellect of these Priests is utterly compelling. Can only be Truth, makes so much sense

  • @elizabethdarley8646
    @elizabethdarley8646 3 года назад +6

    Excellent work. Thank you.
    As an armchair etymologist, God teaches me, through my reading prayers in Latin sometimes, that the word Liberal, to be liberal, means to be freed from.
    In the Movement called Liberal, Father has said what I recently surmised that the Liberals believe in being free from duty and free from adult responsibility, free from the weight of being a man (human).

  • @feaokautai7354
    @feaokautai7354 3 года назад +3

    Brilliant interpretations and integration of our CHRISTIANITY ... DIGNITY, LIBERTY in JESUS CHRIST. SO CLEAR! THANK YOU FR.

  • @cassaundramariac9075
    @cassaundramariac9075 4 года назад +7

    Thank you, Father.

  • @elainehightower
    @elainehightower 3 года назад +13

    Gosh I love this series so much! Thank you!

  • @NoChicanery
    @NoChicanery 4 месяца назад

    This is wonderful thank you. Another excellent priest who has written several books on the crisis back in the early 20th century is Fr Denis Fahey. Found at Loreto Publications

  • @sajinisunil8495
    @sajinisunil8495 3 года назад +4

    Thank you Jesus, Our King and Lord, forever! Amen.

  • @GABRIELLA3254
    @GABRIELLA3254 3 года назад +6

    Amazing series indeed

  • @masonmead27
    @masonmead27 4 года назад +11

    great, thank you Fr.!

  • @jeaniemccombs2200
    @jeaniemccombs2200 2 года назад +2

    I love these videos, they go very fast and name people I’ve never heard of, is there any chance you know of online classes we could take?

  • @feaokautai7354
    @feaokautai7354 3 года назад

    Intellectually and spiritually brilliant and clear for my faith to grow in the TRUTH JESUS CHRIST. Amen Amen Amen!🥰💯💯💯❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @MyRobertallen
    @MyRobertallen 2 года назад +2

    Vatican II, in simple, scriptural terms was Shepherds (like John Dearden in Detroit, where we lived) telling the Flock that it was ok to leave the Fold, even though wolves were prowling outside of It. I was there: parish 'busybodies,' as my saintly father called them, demanding a say in the Liturgy; lay 'teachers' eagerly informing boys, hitherto only concerned with baseball and model airplanes, of adult matters. Read the Little Flower and George Bernanos for exposes of Satan's attack upon Childhood. 'Unless ye be like children ... Matthew 18:3. God bless The SSPX and this series.

  • @jefffinkbonner9551
    @jefffinkbonner9551 2 года назад +2

    31:47 “If the authority would spend more time promoting virtue, it would need to spend less time enforcing laws.”
    There’s the money quote. There’s a direct causation between the breakdown of the family and the chaotic civil unrest happening, especially in cities. The family has broken down because of the breakdown of virtue.

    • @TheGringoSalado
      @TheGringoSalado Год назад +1

      Utter ignorance of virtue. I doesn’t help that the modern church abandoned great writing of Aquinas and Augustine and replaced with…..

  • @moc1334
    @moc1334 3 года назад

    Thank you. Very helpful

  • @laurent-8235
    @laurent-8235 Год назад

  • @mikejaydubs4026
    @mikejaydubs4026 3 года назад

    I don’t understand the resignations by the opponents to Liberalism. On the terms of their position, aren’t resignations effectively concessions?

  • @caminandoconjesus4941
    @caminandoconjesus4941 Год назад

    👍 👍 👍

  • @janetbaker1945
    @janetbaker1945 5 месяцев назад

    Father made a quick comment about angels, something like 'they can't lose it.' I think it meant eternal happiness or the beatific vision. But I don't understand. Didn't Lucifer sin? Did that condition change, the ability to sin?

  • @Toner126
    @Toner126 3 года назад

    06:45 “The church has always been a very staunch defender that man….” What?

  • @prayunceasingly2029
    @prayunceasingly2029 4 года назад +2

    I'm curious about physical liberty and people who were burnt at the stake for heresy due to their different theological views and different interpretations of scripture? If the church believed in true liberty would they want to burn people to death for using that liberty differently than the church wants? True freedom requires freedom to disagree.

    • @CecyGzz
      @CecyGzz 4 года назад +6

      I guess you ignore how did Holy Inquisition happened. The practice you refer to is what protestants and muslims do.

    • @ds9876
      @ds9876 3 года назад +9

      Liberty does not grant one the right to act in a subversive manner in a society or a Church. Both the secular and ecclesiastical authorities have the duty and responsibility to protect the people from subversion.

  • @antoniopioavallone1137
    @antoniopioavallone1137 3 года назад

    I disagree with you saying that liberalism is rooted on naturalism, on the contrary it is rooted on christian thinkers, the founder of liberalism is considered by most historians and philosophers to be John Locke who was a christian philosopher; his political ideas influenced a lot american constitution, in his time he wanted to put an end to the horrible wars between catholics and protestants. Read the epistle of tolerance and the second treatise of government to see that. Also liberalism changed a lot with the passing of time, the liberals of today are not like the first liberals and probably they would be considered today by them as conservatives.