I just discovered this series and was immediately drawn in and fascinated - actually, watching several episodes in succession. This is a brilliantly conceived series, which satisfies on so many levels…all exquisitely produced and presented…Bravo! Brava! to all involved.
I was about to write the very same thought--as I am sitting here transfixed with my fourth or fifth episode--but you have said it, and said it better.than I could.
In the opening, Fiona Bruce says: "But for every known masterpiece, there may be another still waiting to be discovered." While true, this series though proves that: For every known masterpiece, there may be a fake waiting to be debunked."
This isn't my "cup of tea", pun intended, because my mind just doesn't work this way. More often than not, I just don't get abstract art, particularly pieces like this. All the same, I am still interested in watching this episode because I love this show and the art mystery of each episode. Perhaps by the end I'll find that I understand this piece more than at the beginning of the episode.
Hello, Mary, I am Lee! I appreciate your perspective very much. I am studying Art History and I am learning that no historical "item" has a single informational source. It's important to keep an open mind.
You don't have to get it, art circles can be a bunch of pretentious waffle and at this level it's all about the money I think. I suggest having a look at Henry Moore's sculptures they are my favourite and with abstract just check in if they make you feel anything rather than 'getting them.
While this piece may not be an original, it is most likely a first copy piece done for the foundry for the making of sand castings for bronze. That process requires a new sand cast for every bronze, so the plaster molded piece would have been under rough conditions and since the original would have been returned to Gacometti, if their plater cast was damaged, they would have needed to repair this for the making of the new sand molds. This would mean that the repaired parts would be of a different plaster than the first casting as they would have pinned together the old and the new parts. A current sculptor that does restoration work and can comment on this is Nick Elfick.
Modern art is very polarising, people either love it or hate it. Personally it leaves me cold. To spend vast amounts of money on it is the same to me as those people who buy extraordinay amounts on bottles of wine that they can never drink (and would probably taste foul anyway).
@@kkkanal Tell me something. If you had seen the statue which is the subject of this programme and you weren't told who made it or what it was called, would you have a clue what it was supposed to be?
@@BoingBB it is not about having a clue about the exact subject of a peace of art. every peace of art is just an artist’s interpretation, version of reality. this makes it so fascinating, and not the speed of recognizing who or what is depicted. in a way, art is like the nature, which is not just about good or bad, beautiful or ugly, but about diversity of life. we are used to being fed by obvious, shallow images with the only criteria- “to feel comfortable”. this is not how the world really works. and this what modern and contemporary art have been to show for more then a century now.
WOW 🤩......astonishing investigative work into Alberto’s extraordinary piece......gosh I love his work .....Giacometti is a brilliant name for a spindley whippet......❤
its interesting to watch this kind of topics.. if i bump onto original gazing head sculpture or its mold i might throw it away.. 😄 i will never think or recognize that it was an art named "the gazing head" this is learning information for me.
Considering some people today don't even like this art, the buyers must have been considered totally wacko 100 years ago. Props to them for being so adventurous!
Art People from the turn of Cent. 1800s to 1900s were very enthusiastically embracing a NEW AESTHETIC, and unlike today "they" were not primarily wealthy business owners looking for investment potential. So selling a work for L20 (today $1000) was not so great an adventure, (gag) as an (exciting!) adventure for someone with a passion for artistic adventure. Might i add that anyone today may go visit an art school and buy something that's interesting by a promising young artist for between $50 and a few hundred or even a few thousand and with a little good taste and luck one may find a massively positive investment after 30 -50 years.
"Are you kidding me?" Who was that very famous painter who said 'why do all the work painting a great piece when these stupid people will buy a colored canvas with your name on it?' That's not a quote but it's basically what he said.
Because Giacometti claimed it was a head. Lol. But I get why it’s valuable-this thing was probably one of the first modernist sculptures ever conceived. In the mid-1920s it would’ve been very revolutionary. Stripping everything that connotes a head except two indentations! My God! (Also never mind that black people in Africa were doing similar abstract work for hundreds of years. They don’t count. Lol.)
In past episodes, restorers made significant repairs to address condition issues. I was hoping Fiona and Philip would take the sculpture through an expert restoration process to remove the surface paint and address the poor plaster repairs.
At 2:48. Oh, Philip. You don’t watch that much “Antiques Roadshow,” do you? A woman found an extremely valuable Tang Dynasty tiger sculpture in her grandma’s backyard. It was used as a fancy doorstop for decades. Lol. She takes it to the show and the Chinese art expert almost cries tears of joy. He’s never found such an exquisite example of a Tang Dynasty tiger. It then sold at auction for $700,000. So, yes, Philip. You can find sculpture treasures in your backyard. 😉
As the proverbial “wet blanket” , like much of modern art, if this is dug up a thousand years from now not a single person will view it as anything more interesting than an odd lump. Whatever works for acolytes.
@@Songbirdstress Well, the Easter Island statues were created by fairly primitive people as far back (or more) as 600 A.D. , an amazing achievement. Therefore, it’s a completely irrelevant comparison to my take on modern art.
@@captainnathan3690 They are stunningly beautiful. There are cave paintings that are as beautiful as any Michelangelo. Artistic talent has nothing to do with sophistication of techniques. Indeed sculptors today haven't changed techniques that much. This sculpture was made of plaster of Paris (gypsum) which has been used for hundreds of years (to the extent that large parts of Paris are honeycomb and your house insurance won't cover you if it falls in a hole). Lastly, the Easter Island works are TOTALLY relevant as they were incredibly influent on artists in Paris at Giacometti's time. In fact, the sculpture in the programme is very close to a flattened negative of the faces. Modern art was incredibly influenced by what are now called "The First Arts". Literally things dug up after thousands of years. Taste is one thing, and what one person likes or dislikes is personal. However, maybe educate yourself before sounding off about things you obviously have no understanding.
@@Songbirdstress Thank you for the unsolicited, condescending lecture on modern art but you’ve totally missed the point, dear. All of the ancient, primitive art is “amazing” (as I said) and of course it influenced the development of the arts which transitioned to the incredible achievements of Greece, Rome, Byzantine empire, Michelangelo, DaVinci, Raphael, Rembrandt, Vermeer (a particular favorite)….well, you should get the drift. The great ones influenced and inspired all of mankind to seek perfection and reach for a higher level of beauty and understanding of history. For that we can thank the artists from the primitive era who were the vanguards.. But the “modern” artist doesn’t come close to their achievements. Yes, they certainly have an important place in the world of art but in MY PERSONAL OPINION, it is work geared more to self-satisfaction and a limited following. Is it interesting? Yes. Is it influential outside of an eclectic group? No. Enjoy your preferences and I’ll enjoy mine.
@@captainnathan3690 Giacometti not widely influential. Lol. OK. But great, you finally got the point, art is often a question of taste, hence why your first posts are rather nasty, and false factually. Maybe you should look up the meaning of "Modern" and "Primitive" in this context. You seem to be using them colloquially but it's not clear. Your beef seems more in tune with "Contemporary" art. And who knows, we might agree. Why don't you learn something and develop that embryo of sensitivity you display?
I think you've all been drinking too much wine my five year old son can make something better than that and kindergarten class he brought me home this awesome looking handprint of his left hand not his right hand his left hand it's amazing
It is quite stunning to see and understand fully: That things of great importance and meaning to some special individuals, are of absolutely no value or significance to naturally raised people. Most people in this world admire and recognizes Truth and Beauty, also the complete lack thereof.
I'm sorry, but just taking an initial look at the sculpture, I didn't get the breakthrough to the radiance, nor did it affirm life. Maybe, it needs a much longer look for me to realize if it is truly art? I'd sure could use the money, though, lol.
I went to the Museum of Modern Art in D.C. I am truly unsophisticated about art but I laughed myself silly when I saw the "art works" on display. I'm sure this piece will impress someone. But I am clueless.
The fact that an original copy of a sculpture made by an artist is great art and worth a fortune, but and identical copy of it, not made by the artist is rubbish, says a lot of the art world itself.
No, that’s art! Lots of guitar players can play Stairway to Heaven, but only Jimmy Page could have written it, and only Led Zeppelin could have created the original!
It makes more sense when you realize these are investments and stores of value for the extremely wealthy. They might also like the art, but that's not why the art is that expensive. When you get rich enough, you have the problem of not having enough places to put your money. So yes, it is snobbishness, but it's also scarcity that's prized.
It's also why people steal art - it's an easily hidden thing with a LOT of value. It's great leverage in a negotiation if you get caught doing something bad.
@@catofthecastle1681 Yep! That's it. It's the "originator" who is lauded. Just like so much of the modern art we see; much of it can easily be copied. But the artist who first created it wins the prize for being the "first" to do it.
Too bad it's not even a good sculpture. I kept expecting them to swing it around and show the good sides and it never happened. Shows how the art world works. I am a Giacometti fan by the way but come on.
For those asking: “where’s the head? I see no head.” There’s a head because Giacometti claimed it is a head. Lol. But I get why it’s valuable-this thing was probably one of the first modernist sculptures ever conceived. In the mid-1920s it would’ve been very revolutionary. Stripping everything that connotes a head except two indentations! My God! (Also never mind that black people in Africa were doing similar abstract work for hundreds of years, and it was their work that inspired the cubists like Picasso and Giacometti. They don’t count. Lol.)
For those cheering the "comment" the sculpture was found to be authentic, I'm not buying it. It may be, but I think the comments saying they found a signature and sold it for $600k are lies meant to get everyone excited. You mean to tell me they didn't think of removing the paint on the bottom to see if there was a signature? I saw one sold at Christie's but didn't see it was from this family.
Who are the "they"who sold it at Christies? I would hope it is Henrietta and her family. Of course, everyone takes a cut. . . . Still, this is a great deal of fun. Staples???
If u trow that so called sculpture in the garbage and nobody cares to pick it up… then that is what it is… garbage… lets be honest… with enough marketing any worthless thing can be worth millions
If you find something as wonderful as a Giacometti in a trash can- don’t rely on your taste-just give me a call and I’ll fly to wherever you are in the world to take it off your hands 👍🏼😘
I'd rather have the column it sat on than the sculpture itself - at least it's decorative - Michealangelo would cringe!!. This is where the art world falls apart when it promotes absolute garbage of no skill or talent as art. As an artist this disgusts me... wait to see the crap that got sold for 140 million! People have lost their minds!
No sculpture should be worth 100 million. I like Giacometti, but there are limits as to what his works should fetch, its not being bought for love of its looks but as an investment.
Beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder. There is something wrong with our art world. Mind you, I love the realistic old masters and have visited so many museum in my life. But for the life of me I can't understand those modern art forms at all ! I always felt it was work of untalented people who just gave up since the old masters have perfected their arts? Paying absolute ridicules monies on things you can make yourself and can't take when you die....BUT again that is just my opinion. I am however very lucky living in Bali where my eyes are overwhelmed by absolutely breathtaking art works, sculptures, carvings, paintings everywhere, everyday that surpasses any modern art work, no matter how much history and story attached to it. You'll be hard pressed to find anything over 10 thousand US dollars unless it's made in a very large form. They don't get acclaimed ? paid thousand of dollars or even have them in museum. There is something very wrong with our art world today.
Let this be a lesson to all: don't let your pets near pieces of art.. and get the artist to sign the piece for f sake! doesn't take that much of an effort
OMG it cant actually just be about the artist. It actually has to be good. This is a complete joke. There is NOTHING and I mean absolutely NOTHING interesting about this sculpture. Waste of time.
This is the most disappointing episode of this series. We learn nothing more about the provenance and end up with no resolution. The other episodes have been more engaging. Maybe stick to works on paper or canvas.
UPDATE: After the show aired they did a restoration, removed the paint, and found Giacometti's signature. They sold it at Christie's for US$600k.
That's amazing
that would have been a real stimulus to, uh, "find" his signature...
Thanks for the Update!
BoO§5t’
Oh wow!! Thank you!
I just discovered this series and was immediately drawn in and fascinated - actually, watching several episodes in succession. This is a brilliantly conceived series, which satisfies on so many levels…all exquisitely produced and presented…Bravo! Brava! to all involved.
I was about to write the very same thought--as I am sitting here transfixed with my fourth or fifth episode--but you have said it, and said it better.than I could.
In the opening, Fiona Bruce says: "But for every known masterpiece, there may be another still waiting to be discovered."
While true, this series though proves that: For every known masterpiece, there may be a fake waiting to be debunked."
This series sure illustrates the cut-throat nature of this world.
I've never heard of this sculptor yet loved learning more about this brilliant artist. I love this sculpture. Simply exquisite.
Juicy one! Best wishes to the family, and what a story they’ve already gotten!
This isn't my "cup of tea", pun intended, because my mind just doesn't work this way. More often than not, I just don't get abstract art, particularly pieces like this. All the same, I am still interested in watching this episode because I love this show and the art mystery of each episode. Perhaps by the end I'll find that I understand this piece more than at the beginning of the episode.
Hello, Mary, I am Lee! I appreciate your perspective very much. I am studying Art History and I am learning that no historical "item" has a single informational source. It's important to keep an open mind.
I just don't understand those indentation either
You don't have to get it, art circles can be a bunch of pretentious waffle and at this level it's all about the money I think. I suggest having a look at Henry Moore's sculptures they are my favourite and with abstract just check in if they make you feel anything rather than 'getting them.
@@christinagiannaros9817 Thanks for the suggestion. I'll have to check them out.
I love it. So simple, and yet so eloquent. Glad it sold for $600,000US. 😉
mass psychosis!
While this piece may not be an original, it is most likely a first copy piece done for the foundry for the making of sand castings for bronze. That process requires a new sand cast for every bronze, so the plaster molded piece would have been under rough conditions and since the original would have been returned to Gacometti, if their plater cast was damaged, they would have needed to repair this for the making of the new sand molds. This would mean that the repaired parts would be of a different plaster than the first casting as they would have pinned together the old and the new parts. A current sculptor that does restoration work and can comment on this is Nick Elfick.
I do hope that there's an update on this. Love the history lessons.
It seems that after the restoration,they found his signature on it.
It just sold for 600 thousand US dollars.
Giacometti is not "taking the medium of clay and stretching it to the absolute limit." 😂Those figures are built over a wire armature.
Modern art is very polarising, people either love it or hate it. Personally it leaves me cold. To spend vast amounts of money on it is the same to me as those people who buy extraordinay amounts on bottles of wine that they can never drink (and would probably taste foul anyway).
modern art is not polarising. many people just believe that their never challenged and undeveloped taste is something to be proud of.
@@kkkanal Tell me something. If you had seen the statue which is the subject of this programme and you weren't told who made it or what it was called, would you have a clue what it was supposed to be?
@@BoingBB it is not about having a clue about the exact subject of a peace of art. every peace of art is just an artist’s interpretation, version of reality. this makes it so fascinating, and not the speed of recognizing who or what is depicted. in a way, art is like the nature, which is not just about good or bad, beautiful or ugly, but about diversity of life. we are used to being fed by obvious, shallow images with the only criteria- “to feel comfortable”. this is not how the world really works. and this what modern and contemporary art have been to show for more then a century now.
@@erichl1167 well, the first part of it was borrowed from David Hockney. By no means, it was a definition of anything, dear Erich.
WOW 🤩......astonishing investigative work into Alberto’s extraordinary piece......gosh I love his work .....Giacometti is a brilliant name for a spindley whippet......❤
its interesting to watch this kind of topics.. if i bump onto original gazing head sculpture or its mold i might throw it away.. 😄 i will never think or recognize that it was an art named "the gazing head" this is learning information for me.
His Art is an acquired taste but one worth developing 👍🏼
@@anthonylemkendorf3114 true
Interesting stuff. Good Luck to the family. 🎨
Its like he opened up his third eye and saw things from an enlightened pov
Considering some people today don't even like this art, the buyers must have been considered totally wacko 100 years ago. Props to them for being so adventurous!
Art People from the turn of Cent. 1800s to 1900s were very enthusiastically embracing a NEW AESTHETIC, and unlike today "they" were not primarily wealthy business owners looking for investment potential. So selling a work for L20 (today $1000) was not so great an adventure, (gag) as an (exciting!) adventure for someone with a passion for artistic adventure. Might i add that anyone today may go visit an art school and buy something that's interesting by a promising young artist for between $50 and a few hundred or even a few thousand and with a little good taste and luck one may find a massively positive investment after 30 -50 years.
That's so beautiful.
"Are you kidding me?" Who was that very famous painter who said 'why do all the work painting a great piece when these stupid people will buy a colored canvas with your name on it?' That's not a quote but it's basically what he said.
Just fabulous!!!!!!!❤🎉
How do the y know its a head? I see a square with 2 indentations.
Because Giacometti claimed it was a head. Lol. But I get why it’s valuable-this thing was probably one of the first modernist sculptures ever conceived. In the mid-1920s it would’ve been very revolutionary. Stripping everything that connotes a head except two indentations! My God! (Also never mind that black people in Africa were doing similar abstract work for hundreds of years. They don’t count. Lol.)
This is a great Show 👍🇬🇧
I believe this sculpture of gazing head is genius . It has captured the FEELING of his intention. 🎉
Sure.
Well said 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Are you joking or serious? I can't tell.
For MY next masterpiece, I'm going to mix up some concrete and sit on it. It will be called; My Arse.
😂
@@Roses-lilac Or you could duct tape a banana to a wall and call it art
Search "Cycladic figurine" made thousands of years ago in the Greek islands. That's most likely where he drew inspiration from. ❤
Why didn't they try to compare the ingredients of the plaster to known genuine works of plaster Gazing Head?
For me, personally, a work of art must display incredible talent, skill and beauty, but above all else, evoke profound emotion...
In past episodes, restorers made significant repairs to address condition issues. I was hoping Fiona and Philip would take the sculpture through an expert restoration process to remove the surface paint and address the poor plaster repairs.
Yes. Very inspiring. I'm going to change my name and start making art such as this.
Nothing wrong with your name , just remember to turn out junk , and put a high price tag on it.
Granddaughter and grandma looking so similar
I'm not seeking it.
We need the smoking gun. The "Oh, Giacometti, you are a wonderful lover & thank you for the plaster sculpture" letter!
At 2:48. Oh, Philip. You don’t watch that much “Antiques Roadshow,” do you? A woman found an extremely valuable Tang Dynasty tiger sculpture in her grandma’s backyard. It was used as a fancy doorstop for decades. Lol. She takes it to the show and the Chinese art expert almost cries tears of joy. He’s never found such an exquisite example of a Tang Dynasty tiger. It then sold at auction for $700,000. So, yes, Philip. You can find sculpture treasures in your backyard. 😉
I Look Forward to an Update; Meanwhile I'm Buying Some Plaster!
sold after restoration for 600k US! and...plaster is cheap....
@@chloeuntrau4588 Plaster is cheap...but talent is priceless!
Excellent!!!!
Great! A success!
Beautiful , sturdier bases mounted on wood would help ,such a shame to be broken ,the evidence is looking very strong tho , hmmm another good one
I very much enjoyed the program, but with 12 or more commercials, it was nearly unwatchable.
Just call that art and then you'll be happy!
My son did a clay sculpture in art class. It looks a whole lot better than that chunk of plaster. Where do we pick up the $100 million check?
600K US....
Ask Christie's
As the proverbial “wet blanket” , like much of modern art, if this is dug up a thousand years from now not a single person will view it as anything more interesting than an odd lump. Whatever works for acolytes.
You don't like the Easter Island statues then?
@@Songbirdstress Well, the Easter Island statues were created by fairly primitive people as far back (or more) as 600 A.D. , an amazing achievement. Therefore, it’s a completely irrelevant comparison to my take on modern art.
@@captainnathan3690 They are stunningly beautiful. There are cave paintings that are as beautiful as any Michelangelo. Artistic talent has nothing to do with sophistication of techniques.
Indeed sculptors today haven't changed techniques that much. This sculpture was made of plaster of Paris (gypsum) which has been used for hundreds of years (to the extent that large parts of Paris are honeycomb and your house insurance won't cover you if it falls in a hole).
Lastly, the Easter Island works are TOTALLY relevant as they were incredibly influent on artists in Paris at Giacometti's time. In fact, the sculpture in the programme is very close to a flattened negative of the faces. Modern art was incredibly influenced by what are now called "The First Arts". Literally things dug up after thousands of years.
Taste is one thing, and what one person likes or dislikes is personal. However, maybe educate yourself before sounding off about things you obviously have no understanding.
@@Songbirdstress Thank you for the unsolicited, condescending lecture on modern art but you’ve totally missed the point, dear.
All of the ancient, primitive art is “amazing” (as I said) and of course it influenced the development of the arts which transitioned to the incredible achievements of Greece, Rome, Byzantine empire, Michelangelo, DaVinci, Raphael, Rembrandt, Vermeer (a particular favorite)….well, you should get the drift.
The great ones influenced and inspired all of mankind to seek perfection and reach for a higher level of beauty and understanding of history. For that we can thank the artists from the primitive era who were the vanguards.. But the “modern” artist doesn’t come close to their achievements. Yes, they certainly have an important place in the world of art but in MY PERSONAL OPINION, it is work geared more to self-satisfaction and a limited following. Is it interesting? Yes. Is it influential outside of an eclectic group? No.
Enjoy your preferences and I’ll enjoy mine.
@@captainnathan3690 Giacometti not widely influential. Lol. OK.
But great, you finally got the point, art is often a question of taste, hence why your first posts are rather nasty, and false factually.
Maybe you should look up the meaning of "Modern" and "Primitive" in this context. You seem to be using them colloquially but it's not clear. Your beef seems more in tune with "Contemporary" art. And who knows, we might agree.
Why don't you learn something and develop that embryo of sensitivity you display?
I think you've all been drinking too much wine my five year old son can make something better than that and kindergarten class he brought me home this awesome looking handprint of his left hand not his right hand his left hand it's amazing
Bring it to Christie's...
I have one very similar in my bathroom,, ❤️
you should definitely relocate it to your living room
It is quite stunning to see and understand fully: That things of great importance and meaning to some special individuals, are of absolutely no value or significance to naturally raised people. Most people in this world admire and recognizes Truth and Beauty, also the complete lack thereof.
I’m unspeakably natural and special in only my mother’s heart ,however-I’m a fanatic for absolutely everything this Swiss Genius created! 😘
I'm sorry, but just taking an initial look at the sculpture, I didn't get the breakthrough to the radiance, nor did it affirm life. Maybe, it needs a much longer look for me to realize if it is truly art? I'd sure could use the money, though, lol.
Given how the art market works, yes it could.
restaured and sold later for 600K US....
I went to the Museum of Modern Art in D.C. I am truly unsophisticated about art but I laughed myself silly when I saw the "art works" on display. I'm sure this piece will impress someone. But I am clueless.
I would not pay $5.00 for that! Not something I would understand, Give me A body or something!
What happened to Dr. Barndoor? He would find out....
I think you mean Benedor.
Does anyone know the artist of the piece 9 seconds in?
There is art and there is business - sometimes these two align and sometimes (as here) we just get the Emperor's New Clothes.
The Emperor’s New Clothes was exactly my thought as well!
Hello from British Columbia Canada
🇨🇦🖐👍♥️🌲🤴🐻🤠😂🤣🐖🕶🚐🦝🌳
Did they ever got a positive and in-time answer from a French comity?
signature was found and it was sold ...
The fact that an original copy of a sculpture made by an artist is great art and worth a fortune, but and identical copy of it, not made by the artist is rubbish, says a lot of the art world itself.
No, that’s art! Lots of guitar players can play Stairway to Heaven, but only Jimmy Page could have written it, and only Led Zeppelin could have created the original!
It makes more sense when you realize these are investments and stores of value for the extremely wealthy. They might also like the art, but that's not why the art is that expensive. When you get rich enough, you have the problem of not having enough places to put your money.
So yes, it is snobbishness, but it's also scarcity that's prized.
It's also why people steal art - it's an easily hidden thing with a LOT of value. It's great leverage in a negotiation if you get caught doing something bad.
@@catofthecastle1681 fantastic analogy 👍🏼
@@catofthecastle1681 Yep! That's it. It's the "originator" who is lauded. Just like so much of the modern art we see; much of it can easily be copied. But the artist who first created it wins the prize for being the "first" to do it.
i can’t believe they are handling a white plaster piece of art with their bare hands…no matter who made it.
Too bad it's not even a good sculpture. I kept expecting them to swing it around and show the good sides and it never happened. Shows how the art world works. I am a Giacometti fan by the way but come on.
For those asking: “where’s the head? I see no head.” There’s a head because Giacometti claimed it is a head. Lol. But I get why it’s valuable-this thing was probably one of the first modernist sculptures ever conceived. In the mid-1920s it would’ve been very revolutionary. Stripping everything that connotes a head except two indentations! My God! (Also never mind that black people in Africa were doing similar abstract work for hundreds of years, and it was their work that inspired the cubists like Picasso and Giacometti. They don’t count. Lol.)
''Valtah? Valtah? I heah zat floot!'' - Eva Gabor... will someone please dress the Emperor?🤷
I agree with the cat. Doesn't do a thing for me.
For those cheering the "comment" the sculpture was found to be authentic, I'm not buying it. It may be, but I think the comments saying they found a signature and sold it for $600k are lies meant to get everyone excited. You mean to tell me they didn't think of removing the paint on the bottom to see if there was a signature? I saw one sold at Christie's but didn't see it was from this family.
I say yes... Where the alter use to be is the perfect space
I like Fiona. But her "sidekick" Philip. He just drones on and on.
It should not be worth five pounds. Its absolutely rubbish. Greatest sculptor? And you people insult millenials?
Born 1901... He was a sort of millennial of his times.
@Lorenzo Pinto the fin de sicle were more a lost generation than we were.
@@gabrialcanada6764 Man: the Web. Your generation has experimented an unthinkable revolution.
It is not art, it is a quip. "Originality" no matter the cost. "Fools gold".
You have been conned!
Its not about the art, its about the artist, making art a con.
Who are the "they"who sold it at Christies? I would hope it is Henrietta and her family. Of course, everyone takes a cut. . . . Still, this is a great deal of fun. Staples???
You know it looks like a soap dish
If u trow that so called sculpture in the garbage and nobody cares to pick it up… then that is what it is… garbage… lets be honest… with enough marketing any worthless thing can be worth millions
If you find something as wonderful as a Giacometti in a trash can- don’t rely on your taste-just give me a call and I’ll fly to wherever you are in the world to take it off your hands 👍🏼😘
Humans… and their obsession to collect things … aint that fascinating?
I'd rather have the column it sat on than the sculpture itself - at least it's decorative - Michealangelo would cringe!!. This is where the art world falls apart when it promotes absolute garbage of no skill or talent as art. As an artist this disgusts me... wait to see the crap that got sold for 140 million! People have lost their minds!
"I dont know much about art, but I know a piece of shit when I see it.
No sculpture should be worth 100 million. I like Giacometti, but there are limits as to what his works should fetch, its not being bought for love of its looks but as an investment.
To me this little thing is useless.
Today we have the best artist 🎨 make them proud 👏 but don't make him proud when he dies.
"What is it..." Says it all. Abstract has become another word for rubbish. It is the ultimate art-dealer scam to sell nonsense.
Love the program. However....viewing this "masterpiece convinces me that many in the art world smoke funny cgarettes. "Important" indeed!
It looks like the tepe of turkie
In my opinion, this sculpture is absurd!
SOLD FOR 500,000 pounds, Stop the lies.
Money laundry perhaps?????
@@JoyceHariyono No, sold at Christie's.
🇻🇳 hello
Beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder. There is something wrong with our art world. Mind you, I love the realistic old masters and have visited so many museum in my life. But for the life of me I can't understand those modern art forms at all ! I always felt it was work of untalented people who just gave up since the old masters have perfected their arts? Paying absolute ridicules monies on things you can make yourself and can't take when you die....BUT again that is just my opinion.
I am however very lucky living in Bali where my eyes are overwhelmed by absolutely breathtaking art works, sculptures, carvings, paintings everywhere, everyday that surpasses any modern art work, no matter how much history and story attached to it. You'll be hard pressed to find anything over 10 thousand US dollars unless it's made in a very large form. They don't get acclaimed ? paid thousand of dollars or even have them in museum. There is something very wrong with our art world today.
That dumb-ass cat cost them a fortune.
Picasso is not a person anyone should brag about running with!!!
Cats 🙄
I don’t get it. I mean it’s ugly 🤷♀️
A shame that Perspective picked out such a pisspoor clickbait title
👍
💙
its a fake!
Fiona is now becoming over-facelifted. Too much?
Let this be a lesson to all: don't let your pets near pieces of art.. and get the artist to sign the piece for f sake! doesn't take that much of an effort
It was signed....Paint covered it...
I could do that i dont understand why these are so prais3d
No. I don't care who made it. It cannot be worth over 100 million. Can anyone name a female artist whose work is worth over 100 million?
Beyoncé?
ANYONE THAT CONNECTS GIACO TO MORE THAN A 100 BUCKS IS NUTS !!!!!!!
OMG it cant actually just be about the artist. It actually has to be good. This is a complete joke. There is NOTHING and I mean absolutely NOTHING interesting about this sculpture. Waste of time.
Whomever this "sculpture " is by , it remains , a piece of crap....
That is one HIDIOUS sculpture! 😂
The pretentious way everybody speaks in this show is irritating.
Lol (what is it). Art…..
This is the most disappointing episode of this series. We learn nothing more about the provenance and end up with no resolution. The other episodes have been more engaging. Maybe stick to works on paper or canvas.
Hideous. IMHO not worthy to be in a museum, garage maybe.
Cry me a river, but Giaco was and is so overrated as a sculptor..