The question regarding the production Sci-Fi's lacking the same bottom contours, as described and visible in Tomo's video on the board's description page, has come up a lot since it's release. Has anyone found a response as to why the board was "de-tuned" ?
Love the feel of epoxy (stringerless with a carbon stiffener only) and the bugger flies, but even the tiniest hairline crack, barely noticeable, the things rot terribly if you miss one. Mate missed a tiny nose crack and water went around the whole carbon deck stringer and completely destroyed his $999 RRP board.
Really wish the production line of sci-fi's had the same bottom as the sci-fi Daniel explains in his advertisement for the Sci-fi (quad concave inside a single concave). Although the production line design is great I was disappointed to not the have quad concave design. Sort of false advertisement.
the stock off the rack FW SciFi has the Tomo quad inside single concave.... and it rips... I love both my SciFi and SKX and the Cymatic (that I've ridden but don't own) --4est
Good to see an attempt at making complexities comprehensible for non-scientists, but the captioning was terrible, words were mangled and created confusion.
The question regarding the production Sci-Fi's lacking the same bottom contours, as described and visible in Tomo's video on the board's description page, has come up a lot since it's release. Has anyone found a response as to why the board was "de-tuned" ?
Love these boards!! I Bought 3 2.0s’.
I remember their first models...ducked dived one wave knee went through hope they are are stronger now.
Sounds like your a good duckdiving 😂😂😂
epoxy/EPS is treble. I'd love to see your boards in PU/Polyester. Luke. Ding Dr.
Love the feel of epoxy (stringerless with a carbon stiffener only) and the bugger flies, but even the tiniest hairline crack, barely noticeable, the things rot terribly if you miss one. Mate missed a tiny nose crack and water went around the whole carbon deck stringer and completely destroyed his $999 RRP board.
I have this board
I just picked one up, how do you like yours?
would love a scifi
Really wish the production line of sci-fi's had the same bottom as the sci-fi Daniel explains in his advertisement for the Sci-fi (quad concave inside a single concave). Although the production line design is great I was disappointed to not the have quad concave design. Sort of false advertisement.
+1
the stock off the rack FW SciFi has the Tomo quad inside single concave.... and it rips... I love both my SciFi and SKX and the Cymatic (that I've ridden but don't own) --4est
Good to see an attempt at making complexities comprehensible for non-scientists, but the captioning was terrible, words were mangled and created confusion.
Nice fin