There was nothing subsequently to suggest she was affected by an injury after receiving physio treatment. She was on the back foot (no pun intended😀) in the third set at the time & was clearly outplayed on the day by a better player, who could go all the way. No excuses, please. Emma played as well as I've ever seen her play. -The Birdie
Compared to the freedom Emma had previously played with, my impression was that something was no quite right from the outset, and I cannot see why she would have wanted to interrupt the flow of play when she had just broken serve to take the set and with the opportunity to get back into the match. It is a regrettable fact that injuries are not uncommon, such is the intensity of the modern game, but due credit to Lulu, she played exceedingly well.
What in the failed AI translation is this crap. She played her heart out. One of the best Wimbledon matches I've ever seen, second only to Navarro defeating Gauff yesterday.
@@MpanzuSolosI do not get the negative comments on emma radacanu my friend however I guess this is you tube all over🤣 I think she tried her best and sadly it was not enough I find it hard to believe that she would take a medical time out if there was literally nothing wrong with her tho?
@@MpanzuSolos Well, in some quarters, any excuse to criticize her is a good one, and now we hear she had an easy passage to the last 16. I assume that beating the world no 8 in straight sets, and facing the world's best doubles player where she came up to the net and beat her at her own game, doesn't count.
@@simonoliver8576 it seems that there are those who would have you believe that a player would fake an injury and interrupt the flow of their game when on the cusp of regaining the initiative. If the reality of what happens is inconvenient, make something else up!
Listened to the first two games on the radio in the kitchen. Said to my wife, Raducanu is beaten, i wonder how long it will take for her to become injured and use that as as excuse.
You must have been watching another fall because in this one she never looked like she was in pain after the fall, during the medical timeout or when she started to play again. More like play acting and having an excuse in the event of losing, which she did, and what the British media seemed to have missed. Amazing how her infatuated, besotted and ardent fans don't see this.
What a loser comment!!! Probably the best WTA match so far at Wimbledon. Nothing flukey about that performance! They both played stunning tennis, but there can only be one winner. Lulu will probably go all the way. Give credit where it's due, you pathetic wanker. You seem to forget Raducanu was a 'nobody' until she won the US Open.
You're welcome to hope, you obviously have no clue otherwise you'd know post this current WIMBY iteration, EMMA will be firmly ensconced in the WTA 100 thereby negating any need for wildcards. You also have no idea about math, 3 years will be Sept 2024, (meaning 2.10 years), minus the 8 month post surgery hiatus, equates to 2.2 years. Nowhere near the 3 years you people come here and write BS about. As for fluke, according to experts (players past and present) all say "nobody flukes a slam, leats of all a qualifier" but you obviously know more than they do ??
Emma knows she must participate in tennis in order for her modeling money to continue, she has no desire to win a tournament, just participate, once she quits tennis she'll become an unknown person and lose her modeling money
@@toddewing7688 yes, so she didn’t win anything she got knocked out of the tournament by Lulu so she gets the participation award. She just participated. That’s all she did. She’s not good enough to win anything at Wimbledon, but we’ll be nice and tell her she participated.
@@scottbairden175 Your logic is extremely baffling, 128 players begin WIMBY eventuating in only 1 winner, you believe 127 others should all get a participation award, after all according to you they just participated, but you can be nice (if possible) and tell them they participated, what rubbish !!
Спорт
There was nothing subsequently to suggest she was affected by an injury after receiving physio treatment. She was on the back foot (no pun intended😀) in the third set at the time & was clearly outplayed on the day by a better player, who could go all the way. No excuses, please. Emma played as well as I've ever seen her play. -The Birdie
Injured? You mad bro?
Emma trying to her fake injuries and medical timeout trick as usual. Thankfully it didn’t work ✌🏾
Finally someone else can see it as well. Those fake injuries are getting pathetic
Very true..😂😂
She has done it before and will do it again.
Absolutely. Same old same old sicknote.
She’s that one employee who is off sick more days than she actually works
Compared to the freedom Emma had previously played with, my impression was that something was no quite right from the outset, and I cannot see why she would have wanted to interrupt the flow of play when she had just broken serve to take the set and with the opportunity to get back into the match. It is a regrettable fact that injuries are not uncommon, such is the intensity of the modern game, but due credit to Lulu, she played exceedingly well.
What in the failed AI translation is this crap. She played her heart out. One of the best Wimbledon matches I've ever seen, second only to Navarro defeating Gauff yesterday.
Ridiculanu has discovered her kryptonite and it's called tennis.
She made the r16 pal, that’s pretty impressive after the injuries
@@MpanzuSolosI do not get the negative comments on emma radacanu my friend however I guess this is you tube all over🤣 I think she tried her best and sadly it was not enough I find it hard to believe that she would take a medical time out if there was literally nothing wrong with her tho?
@@MpanzuSoloslol with weak draw make it to round 4 😂 and at every time she lost had an medical treatment on the court
@@MpanzuSolos Well, in some quarters, any excuse to criticize her is a good one, and now we hear she had an easy passage to the last 16. I assume that beating the world no 8 in straight sets, and facing the world's best doubles player where she came up to the net and beat her at her own game, doesn't count.
@@simonoliver8576 it seems that there are those who would have you believe that a player would fake an injury and interrupt the flow of their game when on the cusp of regaining the initiative. If the reality of what happens is inconvenient, make something else up!
Are you deluded or knowingly talking crap
Hahaha, i wished i'd read you comment before i posted on his nonsensical logic,
(i would have saved some time) !!
Listened to the first two games on the radio in the kitchen. Said to my wife, Raducanu is beaten, i wonder how long it will take for her to become injured and use that as as excuse.
Did your wife tell you EMMA never used an excuse !!
Why did she bark after every point she won?
You must have been watching another fall because in this one she never looked like she was in pain after the fall, during the medical timeout or when she started to play again. More like play acting and having an excuse in the event of losing, which she did, and what the British media seemed to have missed. Amazing how her infatuated, besotted and ardent fans don't see this.
Color me 'besotted' then mate. She's the bees' knees imo.
edit: have you never heard of the Oxford comma?
EMMA never used any injury as an excuse, on the contrary she confirmed Lulu was the better player on the day !!
Feel very sorry Emma
Blah blah blah
She got a beat down, that's all.
保重身體 Emma
Awful video. Raducanu overatted. She should retire.
Let's hope the wildcards stop for the biggest fluke major winner who has had no results for 3 yrs.
What a loser comment!!! Probably the best WTA match so far at Wimbledon. Nothing flukey about that performance! They both played stunning tennis, but there can only be one winner. Lulu will probably go all the way. Give credit where it's due, you pathetic wanker. You seem to forget Raducanu was a 'nobody' until she won the US Open.
You're welcome to hope, you obviously have no clue otherwise you'd know post this current WIMBY iteration, EMMA will be firmly ensconced in the WTA 100 thereby negating any need for wildcards.
You also have no idea about math, 3 years will be Sept 2024, (meaning 2.10 years), minus the 8 month post surgery hiatus, equates to 2.2 years.
Nowhere near the 3 years you people come here and write BS about.
As for fluke, according to experts (players past and present) all say "nobody flukes a slam, leats of all a qualifier" but you obviously know more than they do ??
What a load of tosh!
Same old rubbish - starts to lose, so injury appears. Weak pandered mentality
Same old rubbish, when did EMMA start to lose ??
It was 1-1 sets and 15=15 in 3rd.deciding set when the obvious slip (to most) occurred !!
Emma knows she must participate in tennis in order for her modeling money to continue, she has no desire to win a tournament, just participate, once she quits tennis she'll become an unknown person and lose her modeling money
'Participate'??
She went three sets, in the round of 16, on centre court, @ Wimbledon ffs.
@@toddewing7688 yes, so she didn’t win anything she got knocked out of the tournament by Lulu so she gets the participation award. She just participated. That’s all she did. She’s not good enough to win anything at Wimbledon, but we’ll be nice and tell her she participated.
@@scottbairden175 Your logic is extremely baffling, 128 players begin WIMBY eventuating in only 1 winner, you believe 127 others should all get a participation award, after all according to you they just participated, but you can be nice (if possible) and tell them they participated, what rubbish !!