@@kornmaze the military is a prime example of quien es mas macho . we have a bunch of old man politicians who are constantly flexing and threatening war on others . old men can be the worst offenders .
@marleonetti7 Your comment is ignorant in blaming the brave men and women of our military community because of crooked politicians. One is corrupt and lies and cheats the American public they were ELECTED to represent and the other blindly follows orders after having signed a blank check for their life, to protect idiots who post comments like yours, so that the commenter may enjoy the freedoms that allow them to post such idiocy. Instead of hating on the people who put their life on the line for you, you should say thank you, then do an about face and F%$k off.
You must have missed the part of ex military not some pussy axx loser . Now , its amazing she said he drove at him with his wheels turning in the other direction and the camera moving closer in the direction of where the wheels turned
He’s not okay and in fairness many military members need that mental support upon returning home. I think he’s the wrong one and if someone shows aggression towards him, I think it will not end well for them
@@PeopleRTheProblemI hate whenever folks don’t pay attention and lord knows I’ve messed up not paying enough attention but the old man did create by keeping on that’s what I think just give him a California howdy and go on about your business don’t act like he took advantage of your underage daughter the dude probably didn’t even realize his dumbass cut the old geezer off it shouldn’t have went as far as he took it he couldn’t even halfway control his shit in the courtroom
The plantiff talking about "standing up for your rights" is rediculous. You dont have a right to act like a cop when your not. He could have gotten himself killed. People are nuts!
I cannot believe the plaintiff even bothered to bring this case into court. And then, for him to further try to blame his stupid conduct on his military training, all I can say is: *”What part of the training is that sir? Because I certainly must’ve missed it”.*
Sometimes a person that cuts you off doesn't mean to. It's an honest mistake(they misjudged or thought the other car was not going as fast). But to follow someone and confront them by boxing them in and taking photos is really above and beyond uncalled for. Plus, he could have just taken the license plate and called it in. He wanted to punish the Defendant personally for daring to "cut him off". The phrase "You know what you did" without elaborating and assuming the Defendant did everything on purpose is very telling.
even claimed he sped away fast lol so what did the guy really do? .05 seconds of inconvenience so you turn it into and full chase, stop, even a police report (after the fact) plus court? this the type of ignorance I'll never understand.
Plaintiff started out by saying “it was a nice day. I was going to work”. Later when JM asked him what he did for a living, he said he was retired. I’m surprised she didn’t call him out on that inconsistency.
If the plaintiff's behavior in court indicates his behavior daily, I would steer clear of him. He is a haughty, entitled, and angry man. The defendant is totally believable. Good for JM!!!
The plaintiff says to "always stand up for your rights"... Dude, you don't have the right to impede someone's movement because they pissed you off from a traffic incident, nor do you have the right to confront them. And you certainly don't have the right to try and run them over, or even pretend to. This guy clearly has serious anger issues and a severe lack of impulse control, which is a dangerous combination. He's hotheaded, arrogant, and entitled and a slave to his emotions, so much so that he has a blatant disregard for his safety and the safety of others.
This man is a nut. People fuck up in traffic every day. Y’all didn’t collide. Nobody died. Nobody got injured. You don’t follow some strange person to reprimand them for a traffic infraction.
Whoa! The chip on the plaintiff's shoulder is HUGE! Just look at it. (Either side will do.) I wonder what's up with that. Why doesn't he just take the weight off? He'd feel so much better. 🤷🏾♀️ I don't know. Some people just like combat, I guess... they refuse to give up the boots. This guy is definitely combative, the poor guy. Imagine being him. 😬
Ridiculous road rage incites JM court rage. The plaintiff's demeanor and body language towards the defendant said it all. This guy wants to be in charge. I don't think the defendant has any idea he cut the plaintiff off. Just decision in my opinion.
Great verdict! The plaintiff was looking for trouble! Take a deep breath and leave if no damage was made from the Initial confrontation. No damage was made until the plaintive escalated the issue
The damage was from his poor decision to confront the defendant dangerously in the first place, what did he think would happen?? “Oh I’m sorry!” ??? Make it make sense
@@setteam9337 that’s a lie and a half. If you saw someone pouring gasoline around your house you’d just take your family to Applebees and let the nice arson have a blast?
I agree with the plaintif where it clearly shows the phone video that the defendant walked up to the car , while the plaintif was trying to move forward and make a left turn. The defendant purposly walked towards the car trying to get himself injured because he knew what he did was wrong which is speeding and nearly killing the plaintiff on the road, so that he could have an excuse or reason to go and punch the plaintifs car. The plaintif was in the wrong for taking it further when he could of have got back in his car right after taking the photo of the defendants rego and then going straight to the police station to report it. And the defendant is in the wrong at the start for this whole scenario for speeding which could have killed someone (he admitted he was oblivious to his surroundings when speeding and didnt notice the plaintiffs car) and for walking up to the car while the car was driving forward and making a left turn to create an excuse that the plaintif tried to run over him that is why he punched the car.
I chuckle every time someone who follows a person after a road rage incident is because I just want to talk or have a chat....no, you're pissed and want to continue your rage.
I've watched Judge Milian from almost day 1 - she is my all time favorite judge! It is rare that I see her make a mistake and I certainly agree with her about, "Road rage". If you watch the video/picture closely, you can see the defendant walk to his right and forward to try and purposely get in the way of the car. You can also see the plaintiff sharply turn his wheels to the left in an attempt to go around the picture taking defendant. Avoid road rage - it can kill you!
@@texasmadehoney1523 walking up to the plaintiff car and taking a picture of not just the car the plaintiff who does that. And like huge Milian said what they both did is not safe in this day and age.
@@tamekadavis6641 a lot of people start recording or take pics when they have a dispute with a stranger for their own protection and it's actually good practice. As proven here because it's how he won his case. If someone doesn't want a camera in their face then they should stay out of people face and don't start shit. That man probably would have ran him over if the guy wasn't recording. Sometimes it's the only way to make people stop messing with you. Accountability and proof. I don't think the defendant did anything wrong.
Although I disagree with the plaintiff and his action, I don’t agree with him trying to run over the defendant. The defendant clearly walked into his car, you can see his car wheels facing the direction he’s trying to go before the defendant walked in front of it.
I think the judge blew her interpretation of what happened with the moving car. At 11:48, we see the plaintiff's car back up, then the distance between them closes, but the scratch mark on the pavement between them doesn't go under the car. It just disappears out of the bottom of the frame. I think the defendant did do the moving.
I believe the plaintiff was in the wrong but i also dont think he was lunging the car towards the defendant. the wheels were already turned before moving forward and you cna see the defendant move in front of the car
Either way. He would have been better to back up a lot farther. Let the guy get his photo/video and then go. I wouldn't want to let anyone get so close to my car.
The fact that the plaintiff still thinks he is right is just incredible to me. The idiocy.
SHE is tougher, smarter and being a judge has more clout than him.
And, he was in the military? He didn't learn a damn thing!
@@kornmaze the military is a prime example of quien es mas macho . we have a bunch of old man politicians who are constantly flexing and threatening war on others . old men can be the worst offenders .
@marleonetti7 Your comment is ignorant in blaming the brave men and women of our military community because of crooked politicians. One is corrupt and lies and cheats the American public they were ELECTED to represent and the other blindly follows orders after having signed a blank check for their life, to protect idiots who post comments like yours, so that the commenter may enjoy the freedoms that allow them to post such idiocy. Instead of hating on the people who put their life on the line for you, you should say thank you, then do an about face and F%$k off.
The way she shut him down when he was glaring at the defendant. 😂
That said it all for me. This guy was even trying to be intimidating right in court.
@@r1verman preach. he is a complete psychopath.
You could tell who the bully was
plaintiff even tuned on his bully mode on doug right before leaving .
I can easily see plaintiff being the unhinged aggressor. He has crazy eyes too.
Big time❤
DEM CRAY CRAY EYEZ.
OH YES HE is crazy. and he a big ol queen. don't twist it.
Oh my gosh, I thought the exact same thing! He looks like a ticking time bomb just waiting to go off
The plaintiff trying to physically intimidate the defendant in front of the judge baffles me
Many entitled rich guys often think they can show off in the Court Room. NOPE! Not even in a real courtroom.
You must have missed the part of ex military not some pussy axx loser . Now , its amazing she said he drove at him with his wheels turning in the other direction and the camera moving closer in the direction of where the wheels turned
Plaintiff could’ve reported without confrontation. What an arrogant fool. He’s going to try the wrong one some day….
He’s not okay and in fairness many military members need that mental support upon returning home. I think he’s the wrong one and if someone shows aggression towards him, I think it will not end well for them
The plaintiff created this whole situation
He cut himself off?
Exactly he created his own problem he should have minded his business that's how people get hurt
@@justinross2230 he was cut off. It is his business
@@PeopleRTheProblemI hate whenever folks don’t pay attention and lord knows I’ve messed up not paying enough attention but the old man did create by keeping on that’s what I think just give him a California howdy and go on about your business don’t act like he took advantage of your underage daughter the dude probably didn’t even realize his dumbass cut the old geezer off it shouldn’t have went as far as he took it he couldn’t even halfway control his shit in the courtroom
He should've let it go. He escalated it
The plantiff talking about "standing up for your rights" is rediculous. You dont have a right to act like a cop when your not. He could have gotten himself killed. People are nuts!
You can get yourself killed by simply getting into your car and driving. Odd are probably higher you’ll die in a car accident
That’s not how you spell RIDICULOUS!! 😂😂 but other than that I agree!
I thought I was going to be the one who said that. You beat me to it.. 😂😂@@TLibra
I cannot believe the plaintiff even bothered to bring this case into court. And then, for him to further try to blame his stupid conduct on his military training, all I can say is: *”What part of the training is that sir? Because I certainly must’ve missed it”.*
Conduct unbecoming an officer!!!
I agree. It's a complete waste of time bringing this to court.
I have witnessed it, the military pampers some people like him.
😂
He probably didn't know about the camera
Everyone invest in a dash cam for your car. Defendant really helped his case with the video.
I have a dash camp for each of my cars and I keep them going at all times
Sometimes a person that cuts you off doesn't mean to. It's an honest mistake(they misjudged or thought the other car was not going as fast). But to follow someone and confront them by boxing them in and taking photos is really above and beyond uncalled for. Plus, he could have just taken the license plate and called it in. He wanted to punish the Defendant personally for daring to "cut him off". The phrase "You know what you did" without elaborating and assuming the Defendant did everything on purpose is very telling.
It is called ROAD RAGE. and you never know what that other driver will do, with a gun or some other weapon.
I'm glad the judge called the plaintiff out on his inability to control himself even in court.
Sometimes people just don't know how to let things go. It's like they look for trouble!!
wants to have a reason even where there is none... funny cause looks like he ran like a biotch after the defendant stood up for himself
That too, besides ROAD RAGE!
When your fragile ego gets hurt by a lane change.
even claimed he sped away fast lol so what did the guy really do? .05 seconds of inconvenience so you turn it into and full chase, stop, even a police report (after the fact) plus court? this the type of ignorance I'll never understand.
and a cute younger guy.
The plaintiff speaks as though his behavior was just ordinary, and how anyone would behave. Wow 😮
the ignorance is real!!
"my military training taught me otherwise" oh really? the military taught you to take chase after an unknown combatant to an unknown area? 👌😂
Excellent comment. 🙂👍🏾
When your stateside behind a desk, yes
This guy is probably in charge of Supply.
@@bryanhenderson9637 No, he probably worked at the DFac.😅😅
That's what I was thinking 😂😂😂
The plaintiff is pathetic and a troublemaker. Not to mention saying silly things like, “my military training…” 🙄
Plaintiff started out by saying “it was a nice day. I was going to work”. Later when JM asked him what he did for a living, he said he was retired. I’m surprised she didn’t call him out on that inconsistency.
Could have retired after this incident?
Retired people are retired from their career, they can still have jobs.
@@craZbeauTful That's not what that means😅
If the plaintiff's behavior in court indicates his behavior daily, I would steer clear of him. He is a haughty, entitled, and angry man. The defendant is totally believable. Good for JM!!!
Plaintiff was correct that the defendant walked toward the car while he was backing up. That’s exactly what that live video showed.
Plaintiff definitely tries to use his military service as a “get out of jail card” for everything
The plaintiff says to "always stand up for your rights"...
Dude, you don't have the right to impede someone's movement because they pissed you off from a traffic incident, nor do you have the right to confront them. And you certainly don't have the right to try and run them over, or even pretend to.
This guy clearly has serious anger issues and a severe lack of impulse control, which is a dangerous combination. He's hotheaded, arrogant, and entitled and a slave to his emotions, so much so that he has a blatant disregard for his safety and the safety of others.
He is going to in jail smh he’s crazy
This man is a nut. People fuck up in traffic every day. Y’all didn’t collide. Nobody died. Nobody got injured. You don’t follow some strange person to reprimand them for a traffic infraction.
He was so outta line and caused all of this smh
Whoa! The chip on the plaintiff's shoulder is HUGE! Just look at it. (Either side will do.) I wonder what's up with that. Why doesn't he just take the weight off? He'd feel so much better. 🤷🏾♀️ I don't know. Some people just like combat, I guess... they refuse to give up the boots. This guy is definitely combative, the poor guy. Imagine being him. 😬
I know I'm not the only one that loves to read the comments before watching
Completely HIS FAULT. He's chasing the guy, crashes and wants the other guy to pay for him behaving like a nutcase. What a freak.
Imaging that crazy man as your boss..
Imagine this man carrying a service issued weapon
The plaintiff is a laughing stock. He should have worn a duck costume to court.
"Military Training" made him bold. He act like these dudes in the military that aren't intimidating.
So are we going to ignore how handsome the defendant is 😊
The plaintiff is the hot head. He's retired and has nothing better to do than look for trouble.
The defendant walked right into the car as the plaintiff was attempting to leave. Judge on some bull 💩
You can tell the guy is a confrontational diva. Just him turning around to face him says it all.
Ridiculous road rage incites JM court rage. The plaintiff's demeanor and body language towards the defendant said it all. This guy wants to be in charge. I don't think the defendant has any idea he cut the plaintiff off. Just decision in my opinion.
Wow! He just took victimhood to a whole new level. He's lucky the defendant isn't a violent person.
They’re both lucky neither is violent
@@PeopleRTheProblemThe old guy had no hope. If the Defendant wanted to, he would have pulverized him.
@@stratfordbaby so? That means the defendant gets to continue to be a terrible person?
THAT STOOGE WAS A MILITARY OFFICER?? IN WHAT THE SALVATION ARMY
Best comment ever.
YOU MADE ME LAUGH OUT LOUD😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I was in the military and there are a lot of officers that were idiots.
@@geezee8710 There are idiots in all professions & positions right ?🇺🇸❤️🙏
@@geezee8710 AND thank you for your service! ❤️🇺🇸💪💪💪🇺🇸❤️
"Why you smiling? I'll be with you shortly". ..I love JM!
Maybe he was smiling because he was not the instigator.....
This is why you have a DASH CAMERA. Then you don't need to chase anyone.
How could the plaintiff come to people court and be on tv saying he chased him, hit a curb and got a concussion 😂😂
The same way that you can come in a comment section and be so illiterate 😂😂😂😂😂
as soon as ppl say ''you know what you did''' but won't say, that person is in the wrong. Pretty much always.
one of the greatest episodes
Great verdict! The plaintiff was looking for trouble! Take a deep breath and leave if no damage was made from the Initial confrontation. No damage was made until the plaintive escalated the issue
The plaintiff is insane!! He created this whole situation and COULD have gotten himself hurt or killed if it was anyone else.
The plaintiff's story is a study in convolution.
When rage takes over common sense ppl need to chill
The plaintiff is full Karen 🤣
The defendant has a Angel Face
The damage was from his poor decision to confront the defendant dangerously in the first place, what did he think would happen?? “Oh I’m sorry!” ??? Make it make sense
That makes it right?
He thinks that because he's a military officer he intimidates other people and the way he stared down the defendant in court is an example
The judge & the entire watching audience did see the way the tires were turning- towards the defendant!
I knew she was going to say "Quién es más macho" lol. I love her so much
He had every right to take a picture of him an tag the defendant. This plaintiff is crazy
My mother always said “ You play stupid games, you win stupid prizes”. I knew the the outcome of this case before the judge turned to the defendant
I like that I’m going to use that 😂
Pretty sure Taylor swift says that too 😎
Everyone says that lol
Plaintiff confronted someone for changing lanes abruptly 😳 and was unlucky enough to find someone as petty as himself 😆
If the Plaintiff was telling the TRUTH, we would be WATCHING THE VIDEOS and seeing the photos from the actual incident.
Great case 👍
Both parties behaved egregiously and the judge saw right through that.
How in the world could this plaintiff think he was in the right? She didn't see his wheels turning? He's too weird.
Plaintiff wants to start a fight right there in the court! He has issues.
Can we agree that the guy recording the video literally walked into the cars path. He literally moved to the right and walked up.
If someone is in front of your car taking pictures, you should not drive forward to go around them. Wait until they move
If having a lot on your hands were a person would be the plaintiff!!
The plaintiff is something special.
I hate the plaintiff.
Michael has A Big Body and Small Head 😂
people behave like heathens over property, not thinking they can looser their life
You’d let someone set your house on fire? Or sit back and wait for the police?
@@PeopleRTheProblem I would let someone set my house on fire as long as we aren't in it. I'm not hurting no one over an inanimate object.
@@setteam9337 that’s a lie and a half. If you saw someone pouring gasoline around your house you’d just take your family to Applebees and let the nice arson have a blast?
I agree with the plaintif where it clearly shows the phone video that the defendant walked up to the car , while the plaintif was trying to move forward and make a left turn.
The defendant purposly walked towards the car trying to get himself injured because he knew what he did was wrong which is speeding and nearly killing the plaintiff on the road, so that he could have an excuse or reason to go and punch the plaintifs car.
The plaintif was in the wrong for taking it further when he could of have got back in his car right after taking the photo of the defendants rego and then going straight to the police station to report it.
And the defendant is in the wrong at the start for this whole scenario for speeding which could have killed someone (he admitted he was oblivious to his surroundings when speeding and didnt notice the plaintiffs car) and for walking up to the car while the car was driving forward and making a left turn to create an excuse that the plaintif tried to run over him that is why he punched the car.
The plaintiff is unhinged. He's got loose screws on his head.
I chuckle every time someone who follows a person after a road rage incident is because I just want to talk or have a chat....no, you're pissed and want to continue your rage.
That guy that gets upset , anytime a certain race, doesn't win, is gonna be have his undies 😭 in a bunch today!
If I were retired last thing I’d be doing is chasing people. Dude, have fun and enjoy your retirement.
When do they teach "Road Rage 101" in military training? 🤔
😂😂
"I am retired, I AM (not was) a V.P. of a bank AND a military officer" 🙄🥴
The verdict, no surprise there🤣🤭
Judge made the wrong call, he backed up and turned away and the defendant moved towards the car it’s pretty obvious
I've watched Judge Milian from almost day 1 - she is my all time favorite judge! It is rare that I see her make a mistake and I certainly agree with her about, "Road rage". If you watch the video/picture closely, you can see the defendant walk to his right and forward to try and purposely get in the way of the car. You can also see the plaintiff sharply turn his wheels to the left in an attempt to go around the picture taking defendant. Avoid road rage - it can kill you!
Exactly right. The defendant moves toward the car. You can tell by the way the ground moves instead of the car 😅
"Don't make me mad. You wouldn't like me when I'm mad.". Xena: Warrior Princess
“It’s NEVER OVER!”, Rambo
The plaintiff strikes me as someone that pretends they were in the military for all the perks.
Those tires were turned directly toward the defendant you can see them plain as day in the live photo
They both were simply angry... But Plaintiff started it
Tell them Judge! The plaintiff is lucky he’s still here smh he could’ve did that to the wrong person!! Wow
Defendant is a big guy. Biceps and stuff. He could've handled this old guy easily.
They both have road rage smh.
What did the defendant do that you think is road rage 🤔
The Defendant wasn't even involved! Tameka you weren't paying attention.
@@stratfordbaby Did you not hear what the judge said??
@@texasmadehoney1523 walking up to the plaintiff car and taking a picture of not just the car the plaintiff who does that. And like huge Milian said what they both did is not safe in this day and age.
@@tamekadavis6641 a lot of people start recording or take pics when they have a dispute with a stranger for their own protection and it's actually good practice. As proven here because it's how he won his case. If someone doesn't want a camera in their face then they should stay out of people face and don't start shit. That man probably would have ran him over if the guy wasn't recording. Sometimes it's the only way to make people stop messing with you. Accountability and proof. I don't think the defendant did anything wrong.
The one acting like a tough guy in the "courtroom" is more believable as the aggressor.....
I don’t know what it is about being in a car that makes people act a fool. Smh
I love when she says "Quien es mas MACHO!" 😂😂
Although I disagree with the plaintiff and his action, I don’t agree with him trying to run over the defendant. The defendant clearly walked into his car, you can see his car wheels facing the direction he’s trying to go before the defendant walked in front of it.
Now all of a sudden since his car is being recorded, he was trying to go. I bet he was lol
This was such a ridiculous case!
so he cut u off and u act like ur God
This plaintiff really said …. My military training….. NO BOSS NO
GREAT CALL JUDGE
LOL THEM WHEELS WAS AIMED RIGHT AT HIM! HE WASNT GOING AROUND HE COULDVE KEPT STRAIGHT TO GO AROUND HIM
Plaintiff was looking to start problems…and got it. Canis Mas Macho baby! Looove Judge Marilyn…she went OFF…and should have. Karma is a B, Johnny.
Quien es mas macho
@@imissmayberry12I like his spelling better 😅 it makes it funnier
The defendant is so f'ing cute....i can't follow the actual case! 😂
And very nice skin. Nice bod.
The plaintiff is an accident looking to happen! 😂
Road rage; initiated by the plaintiff
Thank god the defendant had Live Photos or it would be he said, she said. The plantiff is crazy !
If he thought he reversed far enough for clearance to drive pass the defendant, then he can’t drive.. Sir you were about to hit him smh
I think the judge blew her interpretation of what happened with the moving car. At 11:48, we see the plaintiff's car back up, then the distance between them closes, but the scratch mark on the pavement between them doesn't go under the car. It just disappears out of the bottom of the frame. I think the defendant did do the moving.
I thought that too. I still think it was the right call overall. I was done when he said he followed the defendant in to the parking lot😂
People with their phones and a sense of self righteousness
I believe the plaintiff was in the wrong but i also dont think he was lunging the car towards the defendant. the wheels were already turned before moving forward and you cna see the defendant move in front of the car
finally, common sense
Either way. He would have been better to back up a lot farther. Let the guy get his photo/video and then go. I wouldn't want to let anyone get so close to my car.
If he is a military officer, then he needs his commission revoked. He is a dangerous leader and a poison to our forces.
The Judge: Were ya?
Me:😅😅😅
Wow....
Thank you for your service ?
Maybe it was PTSD and he felt he was “back in it!”