Debating on getting the 14-24 vs the 16-35. I would be using it for both stills and video. If it was just photo, I would be 100% okay with the 14-24. But the fact that I would need it for video too, the 14-24 concerns me with the lack of VND at the front. An ND in the rear would be needed, but that seems annoying to use when shooting all day with it. And I can see it being prone to scratching the front element. But that 16-35 isn't as wide as I want. Plus, its way more $$ Ugh.
You can actually drop in ND filters in the back of the lens. Adorama sells this lens in a kit with four ND filters for the MSRP. Granted, it's not as convenient as having a screw on variable ND, but a workaround nonetheless that video shooters might want
The problem I have with this is that I already own a whole bunch of expensive filters. Also, I’m not sure I can use 2 filters at the same time, to have both an ND filter and a mist filter.
I think I still plan on getting the sony, I am using the canon on my sony & there is a bit of distortion in the corners, I like the idea of putting a filter on my lens for protection
I am in a similar situation to yours. Even I had a 16-35 G Master lens but after seeing this Sigma 14-24 man even I am tempted to sell my Sony 16-35 and buy Sigma 14-35. :)
Totally agree: Over the years I sold my Sony lenses and changed to Sigma. The only Sony I still have is a 16-35 f4 which I'm planning to sell and purchase this one. Question: Filters and astrophotography. Any thoughts? :)
I ordered this and the 24 - 70 mm f2.8 to go with my new sony a7s iii . It's gonna be great. I currently own a GH5 but I'm ready to use another system as well.
Just bought the Sony 12-24mm GM. And I have the Sony 16-35mm GM. For now, I'm keeping both. I considered buying the Sigma 14-24mm Art. But, decided that if I was going to go ultra wide, I might as well go ahead and get the Sony 12-24mm GM. I love the lens, but it is very specialized and it's definitely a chunk of change.
I am wanting to buy one of these for filming vlogs - right now, the I price difference is not much at all. Which one (regardless of price) would be the best to go for?
It’s very tempting. I’d love to sell my 16-35 f/4 for it. Slightly worried because it doesn’t have oss (but I don’t think it would matter that much on the a7iii).
I have the 16-35GM for my Sony, and just got the 14-24Art for my Leica. Trust me, after you get a Leica, a grand in savings is totally worth it. Plus, it's, as you say, very good.
at this stage i generally look for sigma above native lenses. so so good and cheaper. Would be good to see the Tamron in this fight as well as its cheaper again
Great Video's as usual. BTW: I saw you at CES last Thursday 1/5/23 walking between North and Central Halls. Wish we could've taken a selfie. Anyway, keep up the great work!
Considering the price difference of about $800 and the minimal noticeable difference between the Sigma and the Sony lens, I would definitely pick up the Sigma.🍹👍
me too... its the biggest reason i am considering shifting to sony. Tamron and Sigma have been making lenses and competing with canon and nikon for 20 years. they have way more experience than sony, and they now have a mount that is fully accessible, rather than having to reverse engineer camera signals. up until now, i have always heard "the sigma/tamron/tokina are great, but if you can afford it, i would go with sony". the tamron 15 - 30 was the first lens i have heard many youtubers recommend over the nikon. now, on sony, so many lenses are getting recommended over the g master.
its because people confuse distortion with projection. stretched corners is a result of projection that makes corners look stretched, but that is actually what a spherical projection looks like on a flat plane. wide angles also suffer more from distortion, where straight lines are curved (like pincushion or barrel distortion), and this is undesirable as it causes a loss of a resolution. also, faces. once you leave the center 20% of the image, your face will start to do funny things. its all fun and games until the bride's face ends up in the corner of a wide angle.
... if you adjust the sigma, you also have to rebalance your gimbal. in fact, even if nothing moves visibly, moving internals means you need to rebalance. only very high end lenses like 70 200 f2.8s use a dual focus where both the rear and front elements move, keeping cg.
Can you not add a square filter system to the sigma?? Sorry if it’s a stupid question. Still new n this art is extremely overwhelming to learn all at once.
Good video, buddy. It’s not often to sit through entire videos because the presenter is trying to hard, being ‘funny’ or rambling. But you are coherent, relaxed and get on with it. Well done.
I didn’t say you can’t attach a filter. I said the fact that you can’t attach it at the front is a deal breaker. Attaching filters at the back is cumbersome and leaves more risk of a dirty sensor
@@RileySerola You risk a dirty sensor with every lens change anyway. And it's easy enough to clean a sensor when inspecting your equipment before a shoot or after. Yeah, it's inconvenient, but not "I'll pay $800 more" inconvenient. For me, I need better reasons to toss $2200 at a lens than that. Consider everything else. If you get a lot of work using those focal lengths, make the investment.
@@lynneftw it’s interesting when ppl say that because I’m the 3 years I’ve owned a mirror less I’ve not had to clean the sensor once. It’s spotless, I’m just extremely careful.
@@SidneyDiongzon thanks Sid, since I bought the sony A6500 you're one of my mentor! I'd like to get my first full frame, what do you advice amongst A7Sii and A7iii or any other?
From another more technical review, the Tamron loses to the Sony and Sigma in contrast and sharpness, and only 9 elements means bokeh balls are oval shaped and not round. That's the only thing that changed my mind against the Tamron, besides that it's too close to the Sony 20mm that I already have.
Awesome video as always. I would really enjoy that Lynn’s I believe it’s a shame they couldn’t have figured out a way to have a screw on filter. That Lens tempted me but I ended up going with the Tamron 17 to 28 and I’ve been very happy in my wallet was a little bit more happy to. Still very tempted by the 14 mm for real estate.
Sidney Diongzon I probably would do that. If that 24-70mm was out I would have spent $200 more for that lens vs the 28-75.......I probably would have done the same for the 14-24mm. Hmmm 🤔 I would like to see a Sigma 24mm 1.4 prime. Would be epic
If got the 16-35 GM plus the Laowa 12/2.8. I can even use 100mm Filters on the latter (a bit of vignette tho). Tempted to sell both for the Sigma tho, BUT then id need to buy all filters new in 150 mm plus crazy expensive holder....
Hey thanks so much for the video, questions do you know of this lense sigma 14-24 mm would work good with the Sony A7iv? And do you think is good for real estate vide/photo? Thanks in advance
Nice. I am looking for a lens for YT videos (mainly just talking to da camera) ... i hv the 24-70gm n looking at either a 24mm 1.4 to blur out da background or a more flexible wide angle like the sigma 16-24. Which would you recommend?
@@SidneyDiongzon One of my first fave lenses was the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L. Impressed to see that you can now get a zoom with negligible chromatic aberrations.
how would this compare on an apsc a6400 to tamron 11-20 f/2.8? Cropped down on the apsc body the focal length comes to 21-36mm. But would this be a good investment on an apsc sensor if i plan on stepping up to a Full Frame sensor later? Or should I invest apsc lens with apsc body?
1:34 this is NO for me! No matter what manufacturers say that they have good weather sealing, when you go to desert sand will find the way to get in. Another disappointment you can't use regular filters :( Looks like the only choice for me is 16-35GM.
Man that sigma lens looks good...those wide perspectives are 🔥 I've heard about people having focus issues with the sigma lenses, but in the video the focus seems pretty good.
@@SidneyDiongzon AND they have such a clean design! I am sigma all the way...just need them to release a clean looking telephoto. They did a 150-400 (I think) but doesn't look as nice
Its obvious than 14mm is wider to 16mm but I don't think anybody want that lens for vlogging imo. It would be great if you compare some pictures side by side at 2.8. Thanks anyway, and keep trying.
Thanks a lot Sidney , will check out those lenses. I got my A6500+18-105 combo after watching your vlog years back!👍🏻 Watching your recent A6300 vlog inspires me to work around my 6500 limitations rather than buying a new one!👍🏻👏🏻
Only ask if this lens is black outside and has glass inside, in this "review" please. (Dustin Abbott in his web-pages, (perhaps on his YT also) says, I believe to remember - that it works very well for Astro work. (Coma etc) )
I wouldn't sell my 16-35mm GM for this lens. The 16-35mm is an excellent lens and it allows me to use filters. But, at this price, I might add the Sigma 14-24mm to my kit. I tried the Sony 12-24mm f4 and the flare was a deal breaker for me. And the Sony 12-24mm 2.8 GM is just too expensive.
@@PhotoTrekr The 12-24 is the only lens I'm putting up against the 16-35 before I buy a wide zoom. I've seen some edge issues and chromatic aberration with the tests at the wide end of the 12-24 that I'm not sure I can live with, especially for night sky work, however, I have an 11-16mm lens from my Canon days, and it has spoiled me with interiors. Still thinking on it...
@@lynneftw I have no issues with the 12-24mm GM except for the pulsing. It doesn't want to lock focus and stay put. This hasn't caused a problem with a shot being out of focus. But, it's kind of irritating in a $3K lens. It's a known problem so I sent it back to B&H to have it fixed. After 2 months the lens was returned to me with a note saying there was nothing wrong with the lens. I love the lens, but it still has the pulsing issue.
@@PhotoTrekr Bummer. So you use it for video work then? What I'll likely do is get the 16-35 gm for the wide zoom, and a Laowa 12mm zero D for interiors and tight work.
I noticed a big contrast difference in favor of the Sony when you showed them side by side while riding in your car. I'm not sure if it's because the sigma shot was overexposed, or if the GM is just really that much better. Look at your gf's arms at 2:07. ALso, I think you forgot to mention the ND filter holder on the back of the sigma.
Debating on getting the 14-24 vs the 16-35. I would be using it for both stills and video. If it was just photo, I would be 100% okay with the 14-24. But the fact that I would need it for video too, the 14-24 concerns me with the lack of VND at the front. An ND in the rear would be needed, but that seems annoying to use when shooting all day with it. And I can see it being prone to scratching the front element. But that 16-35 isn't as wide as I want. Plus, its way more $$ Ugh.
You can actually drop in ND filters in the back of the lens. Adorama sells this lens in a kit with four ND filters for the MSRP. Granted, it's not as convenient as having a screw on variable ND, but a workaround nonetheless that video shooters might want
And they are very expensive because I think they're the only ones that made filters for this lens.
The problem I have with this is that I already own a whole bunch of expensive filters. Also, I’m not sure I can use 2 filters at the same time, to have both an ND filter and a mist filter.
I've got the Sony 12-24mm f/4 which I'd imagine being the competition to this... I'd trade the 2mm on the wide end for that f/2.8.
2.8 is pretty magical!!!
It's only one stop. But you do get that extra 2mm if you love wide angle lens.
@@bondgabebond4907 one stop is twice the light. The difference between f4 and 2.8 is huge in terms of depth of field and low light capability.
I sold the Sony 12-24 F4 yesterday and got the Sigma 14-24 2.8
@@HimanshuBhusanSahuhow are you liking the sigma 14-24 compared to your Sony?
Which lens would you get??? Sigma or Sony???
I think I still plan on getting the sony, I am using the canon on my sony & there is a bit of distortion in the corners, I like the idea of putting a filter on my lens for protection
Sigma for sure! Already own the 16mm and the 30mm! They are great!
I am in a similar situation to yours. Even I had a 16-35 G Master lens but after seeing this Sigma 14-24 man even I am tempted to sell my Sony 16-35 and buy Sigma 14-35. :)
Totally agree: Over the years I sold my Sony lenses and changed to Sigma. The only Sony I still have is a 16-35 f4 which I'm planning to sell and purchase this one. Question: Filters and astrophotography. Any thoughts? :)
Imagine having just three lenses: 14 - 24mm, 24 - 70mm and 70 - 200mm. Crazy 😍😍
That’s the dream!!!
Make them 1.8 doe😭😭🖤
well sigma does have a 70-200mm lens too, but they haven't adapted that for sony's e-mount systems
The holy trinity for Canon is what I want... except it would be 11-24mm, 24-70mm and 70-200mm.
@@hellohogo please make 1.0 hahaha
I ordered this and the 24 - 70 mm f2.8 to go with my new sony a7s iii . It's gonna be great. I currently own a GH5 but I'm ready to use another system as well.
Cool video, cool lens, but seriously, ive had to play the intro about ten times because my son loves the intro music haha.
Keep up the good work dude.
SAME!
Just bought the Sony 12-24mm GM. And I have the Sony 16-35mm GM. For now, I'm keeping both. I considered buying the Sigma 14-24mm Art. But, decided that if I was going to go ultra wide, I might as well go ahead and get the Sony 12-24mm GM. I love the lens, but it is very specialized and it's definitely a chunk of change.
Between the Sony and 12-24 and Sigma 14-24, did you keep one or the other? Are you still happy with the Sony? Thanks!
I am wanting to buy one of these for filming vlogs - right now, the I price difference is not much at all. Which one (regardless of price) would be the best to go for?
Wedding in Sony A7C + Sigma 35mm f1.2 + YN360ll led night wedding shot. + Vlog Night.
It’s very tempting. I’d love to sell my 16-35 f/4 for it. Slightly worried because it doesn’t have oss (but I don’t think it would matter that much on the a7iii).
Did you end up trying this lense, the 14-24 sigma?
i just bought the SIGMA MOUNTED ON MY A7R4 waouh stunningthanks so much for your advice
I have the 16-35GM for my Sony, and just got the 14-24Art for my Leica. Trust me, after you get a Leica, a grand in savings is totally worth it. Plus, it's, as you say, very good.
might i ask what leica camera?
@@chennachen2796 - SL2
Nice to see very little focusing noise. I the sigma 18-35 1.8 on a 80d and I tend to pick up a bit of focus motor noise
Like the 14-24 only reason why I wouldn't get it is filter system. Other than that Sigma knocked it out of the park.
at this stage i generally look for sigma above native lenses. so so good and cheaper. Would be good to see the Tamron in this fight as well as its cheaper again
Great Video's as usual. BTW: I saw you at CES last Thursday 1/5/23 walking between North and Central Halls. Wish we could've taken a selfie. Anyway, keep up the great work!
Oh cool! Hope u enjoyed CES!!
No you dont have to adjust the gimbal when you zoom with the sony especially the zhiyun weebel s
What are you talking about??? Of course you do or you'll wreck your gimbal
Love this video ... Please suggest me which is better lens Sigma 14-24 f /2.8 or Tamron 17-28 f/2.8 or Sony 16-35 f/4 ... Please please please ..
save your money and watch more youtube videos on camera lens reviews, it's free
Thanks for sharing, I would love to see more photo comparisons
Have you ever tried the sigma 14-24 on the crane plus? I'm wondering how well it would handle it
The image quality was “pretty close”!?, you just glossed right over that one didn’t you? Isn’t image quality the most important part of your review?
Considering the price difference of about $800 and the minimal noticeable difference between the Sigma and the Sony lens, I would definitely pick up the Sigma.🍹👍
To such a bean such and so and so on and so forth
I think NISI makes a filter box now to put filters in front even with the bulb
Lenses like this make me miss my Sony. I love my X-T4 but I wish Fujifilm would play nice with Sigma
me too... its the biggest reason i am considering shifting to sony. Tamron and Sigma have been making lenses and competing with canon and nikon for 20 years. they have way more experience than sony, and they now have a mount that is fully accessible, rather than having to reverse engineer camera signals.
up until now, i have always heard "the sigma/tamron/tokina are great, but if you can afford it, i would go with sony". the tamron 15 - 30 was the first lens i have heard many youtubers recommend over the nikon. now, on sony, so many lenses are getting recommended over the g master.
Fuji opened X mount to Sigma few months ago. New lenses coming this year.
Definitely gonna pick up this and the Sigma 24-70 soon. Waiting for their 70-200 to come out. Then I'll be set for all video situations.
the more review videos I watch, the more complicated my feeling is... might end up buying all of themXD
how is sharpness compared to gm? i am thinking about selling my 16-35 2.8 and getting the sigma 14-24 and 24-70? good idea? i have the 70-200 gm
How did you film on Sony a7R V in 2020 if the A7R V was announced in October 2022?
awesome review Sidney!
Should I get this lens for my a6400?
Wide angle distortion is fun. I’m not sure why anyone cares about it. Seems like it’s half the point.
its because people confuse distortion with projection. stretched corners is a result of projection that makes corners look stretched, but that is actually what a spherical projection looks like on a flat plane. wide angles also suffer more from distortion, where straight lines are curved (like pincushion or barrel distortion), and this is undesirable as it causes a loss of a resolution.
also, faces. once you leave the center 20% of the image, your face will start to do funny things. its all fun and games until the bride's face ends up in the corner of a wide angle.
... if you adjust the sigma, you also have to rebalance your gimbal. in fact, even if nothing moves visibly, moving internals means you need to rebalance. only very high end lenses like 70 200 f2.8s use a dual focus where both the rear and front elements move, keeping cg.
you also totally blew over the fact sigma has rear filter mounts.
wish there was aps-c version with 2.0 toneh
What u think this lens with canon200d
Any cons to this lens compared to the 12-24gm 2.8?
Liked and subscribed!
Can you not add a square filter system to the sigma?? Sorry if it’s a stupid question. Still new n this art is extremely overwhelming to learn all at once.
You can if you have a matte box with the filter slots!
MAN I WANT THIS LENS SOOO BAD but its so expensive!!!
Can wait for the Sony 12-24GM 2.8 review in this channel :-)
That'd be amazing!!!
Good video, buddy. It’s not often to sit through entire videos because the presenter is trying to hard, being ‘funny’ or rambling.
But you are coherent, relaxed and get on with it.
Well done.
Absolutely agreed! I didn’t skip anything.
The fact that you can’t attach a filter at the front is a deal breaker for me
you can! They go on the back!
I didn’t say you can’t attach a filter. I said the fact that you can’t attach it at the front is a deal breaker. Attaching filters at the back is cumbersome and leaves more risk of a dirty sensor
@@RileySerola You risk a dirty sensor with every lens change anyway. And it's easy enough to clean a sensor when inspecting your equipment before a shoot or after. Yeah, it's inconvenient, but not "I'll pay $800 more" inconvenient. For me, I need better reasons to toss $2200 at a lens than that. Consider everything else. If you get a lot of work using those focal lengths, make the investment.
@@lynneftw it’s interesting when ppl say that because I’m the 3 years I’ve owned a mirror less I’ve not had to clean the sensor once. It’s spotless, I’m just extremely careful.
@@RileySerola I've only had to clean mine once (used a7iii, so it could have come to me that way), so it's not a big deal.
Ohh that's interesting especially in this period I'm pondering what's my next focal lenght to buy😍
It's a pretty awesome lens!
@@SidneyDiongzon thanks Sid, since I bought the sony A6500 you're one of my mentor! I'd like to get my first full frame, what do you advice amongst A7Sii and A7iii or any other?
It’s so bad that I noticed you were in downtown McKinney just by the street hahaha.
the colour grading is 👌
Thanks so much!
@@SidneyDiongzon please make a tutorial on how to colourgrade like this...
Thank you for the honest review.
Would you recommend the tamron 17-28 or the sigma !? Maybe do a comparison in image quality !
Image quality might be similar, but I rather have the 14mm instead of 17mm, 3mm makes a big difference
From another more technical review, the Tamron loses to the Sony and Sigma in contrast and sharpness, and only 9 elements means bokeh balls are oval shaped and not round. That's the only thing that changed my mind against the Tamron, besides that it's too close to the Sony 20mm that I already have.
Awesome video as always. I would really enjoy that Lynn’s I believe it’s a shame they couldn’t have figured out a way to have a screw on filter. That Lens tempted me but I ended up going with the Tamron 17 to 28 and I’ve been very happy in my wallet was a little bit more happy to. Still very tempted by the 14 mm for real estate.
Thanks my dude!!! I’m honestly considering going back to Sigma lenses!!
Sidney Diongzon I probably would do that. If that 24-70mm was out I would have spent $200 more for that lens vs the 28-75.......I probably would have done the same for the 14-24mm. Hmmm 🤔 I would like to see a Sigma 24mm 1.4 prime. Would be epic
@@PaulFeinberg Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there IS a 24mm f1.4 art for Sony E-mount!
If got the 16-35 GM plus the Laowa 12/2.8. I can even use 100mm Filters on the latter (a bit of vignette tho). Tempted to sell both for the Sigma tho, BUT then id need to buy all filters new in 150 mm plus crazy expensive holder....
The music really kicks in 😍😍😍
Have you sold the gm for the sigma? The no filter is a problem for me
Hey Sidney. Which LUT from your packs was this graded with? love the look.
Thanks
Hey thanks so much for the video, questions do you know of this lense sigma 14-24 mm would work good with the Sony A7iv? And do you think is good for real estate vide/photo?
Thanks in advance
I wonder how this looks on the APS-C lineup
I bet it’s be FANTASTIC!!
Nice comparaison would be nice to see the same with the Sony 12-24mm F4G but we all know that the Sony 12-24mm would destroy that Sigma
Nice. I am looking for a lens for YT videos (mainly just talking to da camera) ... i hv the 24-70gm n looking at either a 24mm 1.4 to blur out da background or a more flexible wide angle like the sigma 16-24. Which would you recommend?
Or am toying with the idea of getting the a6400 + sigma 16mm as a dedicated RUclipsr cam only. Hmm would greatly appreciate ur input.
And you can even put it on a Nikon z camera with an adapter.
Gotta love those aspherical elements giving you wide angles without aberrations!
Isn’t it crazy good!!!
@@SidneyDiongzon One of my first fave lenses was the Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L. Impressed to see that you can now get a zoom with negligible chromatic aberrations.
For 1/2 the price even…
Sidney I don't think the sigma lens is lighter than the gmaster.. Might wanna do a rain check on their weight
Doesn't it have a rear mount filter system? Love your videos!
Yes it does
Hello, so which one better with the sony a7siii?
Would like to see a comparison between the Sony A7III + this lens at 14mm VS an Iphone 11 Superwide lens
why there is no 16-35 sigma ?
Hello, which monitor are you using for photo and video? Thanks a lot.
However the range for 16-35 is 19 mm vs 14-24 which is 10mm
So 16-35 is more versatile.
Great video! Thanks for helping me with my decision.
how would this compare on an apsc a6400 to tamron 11-20 f/2.8? Cropped down on the apsc body the focal length comes to 21-36mm. But would this be a good investment on an apsc sensor if i plan on stepping up to a Full Frame sensor later? Or should I invest apsc lens with apsc body?
Any planing sigma 16-35 2.8 lens realese?
The motor noise on the canon 35mm f2 is so horrible 😩
Not being able to use a filter on the lens is a big issue for me
late to the vid, but at 6:10 - the Sony is actually significantly lighter (680g) than the Sigma (795g)
The sigma looks very tempting. But having to buy different nd filters for the back of it. Hmm...
1:34 this is NO for me! No matter what manufacturers say that they have good weather sealing, when you go to desert sand will find the way to get in. Another disappointment you can't use regular filters :( Looks like the only choice for me is 16-35GM.
No lens is perfect
Man that sigma lens looks good...those wide perspectives are 🔥 I've heard about people having focus issues with the sigma lenses, but in the video the focus seems pretty good.
Yeah, it worked perfect for me!
1:45 -- The internal shifting elements will still throw off the weight distribution. :P
Yes….
Sigma 14 - 24mm AND 24 - 70mm are the same price as one G Master....plus I am a Sigma fanboy so, NO BRAINER!
Isn’t that crazy!??? Honestly, I’m tempted to sell both my sony lenses for the sigma
@@SidneyDiongzon AND they have such a clean design! I am sigma all the way...just need them to release a clean looking telephoto.
They did a 150-400 (I think) but doesn't look as nice
but how is the AF, especially with the 24-70? I'm trying to decide between the Sigma and the Sony
@@jaikavi5464 I just picked up the Sigma 24-70 and the AF has been great
Benjamin Parker great for video? That’s what I’ll mainly use it for
How comes you didn’t mention the rear filter option?! Is that not on this lens?! Thought it was.
Nope you’re not mistaken. This lens has the rear filter slot.
Nice review
Its obvious than 14mm is wider to 16mm but I don't think anybody want that lens for vlogging imo. It would be great if you compare some pictures side by side at 2.8. Thanks anyway, and keep trying.
That intro , music )))
I love my 18-35 f1.8...damn sweet lens. :)
Sidney, this lens does create some great video. I thought you could put the ND filter on the back end of the lens. Is that not the case?
I guess you could on the rear mount!
Hi Sidney, yes you can. Aurora Aperture has rear mount filters for E, L, and EF mounts lenses. The list includes this Sigma 14-24/2.8 E mount.
Hi Sidney, can you kindly advise if I should get the sigma art lens or sony G master wide angle zoom lens for my A6500 mainly for shooting photos?
Have you looked into the Sigma 16mm or Sigma 56mm? It's perfect for the a6500!
Thanks a lot Sidney , will check out those lenses. I got my A6500+18-105 combo after watching your vlog years back!👍🏻 Watching your recent A6300 vlog inspires me to work around my 6500 limitations rather than buying a new one!👍🏻👏🏻
I'm confused, I thought the sigma 14-24 was heavier than the sony 16-35 gm?
It is. Sigma 795 gram vs Sony 680 gram.
How is this lens for an APS-C?
Is there way to put ND filter on this lens??
Nope
@@SidneyDiongzon that's unfortunate but your test footage looks so good!!! Thank you for geeat review!!
takabjc Haida has filter for... or not?
there are a couple of rear nd filters for the sigma 14-24 2.8
You can buy ND filters for this lens that go on the back of the lens!
is the 14-24 good for some astro?
Only ask if this lens is black outside and has glass inside, in this "review" please.
(Dustin Abbott in his web-pages, (perhaps on his YT also) says, I believe to remember - that it works very well for Astro work. (Coma etc) )
I wouldn't sell my 16-35mm GM for this lens. The 16-35mm is an excellent lens and it allows me to use filters. But, at this price, I might add the Sigma 14-24mm to my kit. I tried the Sony 12-24mm f4 and the flare was a deal breaker for me. And the Sony 12-24mm 2.8 GM is just too expensive.
If you already have a 16-35, I wouldn't bother with the 14-24. Almost redundant.
@@lynneftw I ended up buying the 12-24mm GM. Now I'm thinking about buying the 35mm GM. :)
@@PhotoTrekr The 12-24 is the only lens I'm putting up against the 16-35 before I buy a wide zoom. I've seen some edge issues and chromatic aberration with the tests at the wide end of the 12-24 that I'm not sure I can live with, especially for night sky work, however, I have an 11-16mm lens from my Canon days, and it has spoiled me with interiors. Still thinking on it...
@@lynneftw I have no issues with the 12-24mm GM except for the pulsing. It doesn't want to lock focus and stay put. This hasn't caused a problem with a shot being out of focus. But, it's kind of irritating in a $3K lens. It's a known problem so I sent it back to B&H to have it fixed. After 2 months the lens was returned to me with a note saying there was nothing wrong with the lens. I love the lens, but it still has the pulsing issue.
@@PhotoTrekr Bummer. So you use it for video work then? What I'll likely do is get the 16-35 gm for the wide zoom, and a Laowa 12mm zero D for interiors and tight work.
I noticed a big contrast difference in favor of the Sony when you showed them side by side while riding in your car. I'm not sure if it's because the sigma shot was overexposed, or if the GM is just really that much better. Look at your gf's arms at 2:07. ALso, I think you forgot to mention the ND filter holder on the back of the sigma.
Jason Elmore 2mm difference in focal length
is it Image-Stabilized?
No
I love this channel
Your reviews are awesome. I laugh and learn. Great stuff.
I appreciate that!
Is 16-35 gm worth it if you are planning on vloggign in the future.
no, its total garbage (your question :D )
I love sigma glass over all!
Hi, is the Sigma sharper as the GM?
Greetz from germany ✌️
From another more technical review, the Sigma barely beats out the Sony in sharpness and contrast.
Does it work on sony a6400
Yep of course! It has a full frame equivalent of 21-36mm!
@@SidneyDiongzon thank you
Thanks! I’m gonna get some tacos now
I am not a professional landscape photographer, so I won't sell the 16-35GM which is more convenient for ordinary people like me.
I click... I like!
Thanks for watching!