INDIANA JONES AND THE DIAL OF DESTINY (2023) Behind-the-Scenes Crafting Indy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny "Crafting Indy" Featurette
Directed by James Mangold and starring Harrison Ford, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Mads Mikkelsen, Boyd Holbrook, Antonio Banderas, John Rhys-Davies, Toby Jones...
Archaeologist Indiana Jones races against time to retrieve a legendary artifact that can change the course of history.
#IndianaJones #HarrisonFord.
SUBSCRIBE and CLICK the notification 🔔 HERE: bit.ly/SUBExtra
🛒 CHECK OUT OUR NEW MERCH STORE! : bit.ly/EXSHOP
Some of the best and most funniest movie moments happen behind the scenes. #FilmIsNowExtra & Movie Bloopers channel gives you the latest and best behind the scenes footage, gag reel, vfx breakdown, interviews, featurettes and deleted/alternate scenes. We give you the before, during and after that goes into making movies.
![[Limbus Company - Teaser] Season5 - Oblivion](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8anKuEeZLeI/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't care what anyone says. I loved this movie!!
Stupid people, who haven't seen the film, had been just repeating what influencers say.
So did I. It's a thrilling ride from start to finish.
Yeah, so did I. So did a lot of people. The haters are a very loud minority online that are repeating a lot of copypasta over and over. I actually went into the film quite apprehensive because of all the crap that those people were saying, and came away very surprised. It's actually a hell of a lot of fun.
Most people hating on the movie haven't seen it and are just going off RUclipsrs opinions.
Me too
The character is born in 1899 and the Prologue takes place in 1944 so he'd be 45 years old.
I'm glad someone said it! Depending on the month of course, since he was born in July - but yes we can agree he wouldn't have been 37.
That just shows how much the people behind this movie actually knows about Indy.
Born when Arthur Morgan died.
@@thebufoon don't even start 🥺
I guess they were talking about Harrison not Indy.
There were parts with young Indy where his mannerisms seemed pretty obviously older Harrison Ford -- the way he moves and acts has changed. That said, there were many moments that felt completely real, and overall that intro felt like a great Indy short-film all in itself. I'm glad the sequence was so long.
Any of the farther away shots were really great the upclose like pouring out the coffee was dead give away older Harrison
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
I’m not surprised at all at Harrison doing many of his physical acting, but God damn is it amazing to see him in action! Especially meant to be his 40 year old self! Still got that energy and you can tell, not only physical alone, but mental like when he talks about his voice
The first 20 minutes of this film clearly shows James Mangold, Harrison, and everyone got what it takes to make a classic Indy adventure in modern cinema. The rest of the film then shows that they could also do a new Indy adventure, and like what Harrison been saying “Tell a story about Indy that we think we’d never see.” I enjoyed this film. Showing the old Indy we know and love to an Indy we never expected. Life won’t always be in your favor, but you gotta keep going. GIVE EM HELL INDIANA JONES!
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
@@ncard00 Well, if you could read properly my presentations of the word “adventures” is not paired with “a” and “adventure” alone, but with a description. As shown, “a classic Indy adventure” “a new adventure” not just “a adventure”
Plus how could you know I’m American? Besides straight accusation. I will agree though, in my memory of education I don’t think they taught us that. Or at least properly or long enough. My friend taught me that when we were young. Thank you for giving peeps an education lesson, though
that first 10 to 15 minutes was easily the best part of the movie
20
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
22@@clinicalpsychologist
Yep. Agreed. It dragged on and on as if nothing was edited out.
This was done perfectly. Probably the first time I've seen it working so well.
This film just feels authentically as classic as the other 3 indiana jones films.
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
@@ncard00 Please stop spamming.
Mr Ford is the best adventure actor ever ,every film he made was GOLD
the movie was excellent, and the VFX and CGI was amazing!
Indeed!
This movie blew me away on so many levels. I am old enough to have seen the episodes before this one when they came out.
This is how it's done.
I'm glad the ideas that used to give people like River Phoenix work are finally done by computers
While a few of the plot points, and especially the climax/ending still rubs me the wrong way for Harrison Ford’s *final* hurrah as the beloved character, I still enjoyed the film!
Not going to lie, Helena and Teddy were kind of the movie’s biggest killjoy imo, but Harrison and the rest did an absolutely stellar performance!
The beginning segment was awesome and I would buy a dvd just of that alone , but after that it became disappointing, I won’t be adding this one to my collection, what a shame, it had so much potential.
Finally a good Indiana Jones movie again.
I love this movie , love videos
1:41 If Indy was supposed to be 37 yrs old in 1944 that means the River Phoenix version of him in Last Crusade (in 1912) was supposed to 5 years old???
Man, sounds like they shouldve just made a young indiana jones adventure
Whew go there Harrison(Indy)like two movies in one CGI Indy to old Indy in one sitting .And that great scifi time travel end plot took a while to figure out how it affects end of movie.Great film.
I liked the movie it was good as a whole but was expecting more from this franchise, Indiana jones 1 and 3 are best
yes i love this movie too lol
it was great I found the biggest giveaway when Young Indiana was on screen was the old man voice
The backgrounds of movies are really really easy to tell they're blue screens. Why can't we get anything practical anymore?
Amen, amen.
I would love 4:18 to see all movie like that.
I wish I would have walked out after the first sequence, since it had the old Indy feel, unfortunately I watched the rest of this film.
I enjoyed it!
I love this film
*37? You mean 45 years old…
Suggestion: change the name of the movie to a more appropriate one: Indiana Jokes and the Death of the Legacy. Are there any more stories and heroes that Disney hasn't killed yet? I can't think of one.
So moving and exciting movie !
2:54 lol
The beginning was the best part for me. I loved the nods and hints of Spielberg influence thrown in. I liked the antagonist, I think he had a good arc and motive and I am a big fan of the actor.
Totally! Seeing "young" Indy again was magical.
@@gtuxgtuxHow do you feel about the worn out, old, beat to death Indy portrayed in the rest of the film?
Kind of sad. Mostly because it reminds you it's the end of an era.@@razorpit
@@razorpit I didn’t like the rest of the movie. I think it was ruined by introducing a new character because it’s a closing of a franchise, it should have returning characters and a new villain. The whole Helena character was pointless, and she was not only an unlikeable character but she had no meaning.
I think they made her unlikeable on purpose. She heavily reminds Indy of how his son became rebelious and how it got him killed which Indy blames himself for that, meanwhile Helena who's his goddaughter which he basically neglected went down a bad path after losing her father to his own madness, she tried to keep people away and just get money in order to "survive" as crooks tend to do. But in the end when Indy just wanted to give up completly and die in the past she couldn't let it happen again. I think that in the end she saved him from his past while he saved her too. I like it because it was intentional and also unlike other characters she wasn't a cliche of a smart researcher or anything.@@I_O246
I was so so SO impressed with the de-aging in this film. If I didn’t know how old Harrison Ford actually is, I wouldn’t have known the difference. How far the technology has come in so short a time! The only time I truly noticed any difference was when Indy was hanging from the rope - the rope looked weird, but not his face. Incredible work by the artists.
but the voice sounded like an 80 year old Harrison ford.
No it didnt! and it was a good movie!@@davinalopez-oz1ez
@@davinalopez-oz1ez I noticed that too, although cgi enhanced is look, his voice was not on point, and I get it, age never fails but they could have used some program or something else to improved it!
@@FabioMateus they did use voice de-aging. I saw a whole clip on it. But i guess it wasn't enough
Young indiana jones
Dear Kathleen Kennedy. Please go away. You have ruined everything.
Concordo!😅
Cry
@@nathanb3995 ???
Kathleen Kennedy has literally been a producer with Lucasfilm since 1982, and has worked on nearly every classic film they did. I don't know why she is singled out and blamed for the poor performng ones.
@@ryanvera4957 She is now president of Lucas film. The buck stops with her.
Oh man--should've done the whole movie with Harrison de-aged in the '40s!
I'm normally very picky about deaging, but this one looks really really good. I doubt they used AI alone, there's a lot of touch up by the artists for sure. If shown to anyone who doesnt know it's a new movie and all the AI stuff, no one would notice.
Yeah but the only flawed there is some scene where indy voice sounds really old in the deaging. I know it’s hard for Harrison to make his voice sounds like his younger self but overall a great effort he did
Its never just AI, also remember Mangold did the perfect deaging in Logan, years before, of course with a way less expressive character
@@AustinGMRS Tbh I didn't notice. And I was looking for deaging problems that people said were there, but I couldn't see any, and as for his voice, I didn't know Harrison was using his own voice digitally unaltered so I wasn't listening for anything off there, but I didn't notice anyway. It was all really well done.
@@AustinGMRS Couldn't they use technology to deage his voice as well? I mean, we now have AI that can imitate the voices of real-life people.
Except people know that Harrison ford is in his 70
Honestly, some of the best de-aging I have ever seen. I really liked this movie, it bums me out that people tore it apart. It’s like my dad said when we went to see it. “what more could they have wanted, why isn’t that good enough?” (he put it in his top three of the series)
congratulation at all, this movie is pure garbage
What makes it "pure garbage?"
can you coherently explain why?@
For real i don't get the hate. Yea, it wasn't a perfect movie for sure, i surely could critize a lot, but i left the cinema with a smile on my face and a good memory, what more could i demand for the price of a movie ticket?
@@causti9744 Barbie RULES, i living in strange times
Harrison Ford did a wonderful job, i knew it was the technology, but he really sold young Indy to me.
So he actually did those backflash scene ! I was almost convinced it was a body double with his face digitally glued on.
I'm fairly sure they used a body double for the most dynamic scenes. Ford really is in peak shape for an 80 year old - hell, for even a 60 year old - but he no longer moves like he did in his 40s...
Flashback lol
This movie is absolutely fantastic! I cannot believe the amount of negative reviews from sooo many toxic butt hurt SW fans out there... unreal. Dial of Destiny is a winner... too bad it didn't make back its near 500 million dollar budget. Disney is insane to have spent that much on this film buuuut the money shows. It is a gorgeous film.
I'm very okay if we move away from superheroes for a little bit to make more high-paced adventure films.
Indiana Jones will live forever: "The Fate of Atlantis", "The Infernal Machine", "The Emperor's Tomb" and "The Staff of Kings".
@@hector_st coming "the great circle".
I think in time this film would be appreciated for what it is, fun, entertaining and endearing. I hope it gathers money in time with home cinema rentals and good old DVD sales! Yes I still buy them!!! 😂
I know for sure I am buying it in 4K when it comes out, I loved it
The movie was non of those things. It was complete garbage and anyone who’s an actual fan of the Indian Jones franchise would agree with this fact.
@@mrbear143 can you even spell it right? If you were a real fan you would appreciate this movie more than the last one. That's what I wanted, a better Indy film then crystal skull, and I got it
He brought way more life to the character in this one
This film has a lot of problems after the 20 min mark. Should’ve shot everything for real instead of cg backgrounds in the first 20 mins though. Also they should’ve used Shamook instead of the method they went with
they nailed it i was 15 again watching the opening scenes
I dont care what anyone says, the movie is crapp
This movie was delicious 😋.
It satisfied my hunger 😊.
While it was a neat effect to de-age Ford, I think something still didn't seem right. It was very good, but... something still odd about it. Come on, just cast Anthony Ingruber as a younger Indy already lol Think of all the cool actual action packed adventures they could make, none of this end of the line old man struggling to make sense of the world stuff. Let's go find Atlantis, let's go find the inner earth or Shangri-La.
Too bad it didn't work.
I was sure they only used his CGI face attached to a younger body double but it seems he really did a lot of the acting with his own body. He's got great posture and movement for an 80 year old guy. Much better than DeNiro and Pesci in The Irishmen.
I love this series huge fan.
The first 10 minutes of the movie were awesome. The rest was a dumpster fire.
Thanks. You saved me of watch this crap 😂
According to most people, that was the case. What LucasFilm's execs have misunderstood is that you don't make money when 51% of the audience walks out disappointed. You need 90% if you want repeat business and good word-of-mouth. But these days, they declare victory and say that "a majority of people loved it!"
CGI mess 🤷🏻♂️. They couldn't have actually cared
You never hear people mention James Mangold when listing the best directors but he should be right up there alongside the other greats. I can't think of another director other than Spielberg that has managed to have such a diverse filmography without sacrificing quality.
He is really good, don't know if I would put him quite at that level yet. However, that is an extreme amount of pressure to fill Spielberg's shoes, and he did an amazing job. It really was a fun Indy movie and Harrison Ford was fantastic.
delusional
He’s a decent Director, but this last one deserves Spielberg to direct it
1:38? 37 years old in 1944/45? Really?
He would canonically be 45/46
So what you did were unfinished deepfakes. Alright
the movie is fine. the score is amazing, one can only wonder how Williams pulls it off at his age... Harrison is also highly professional. but theres such huge mistrust and disappointment in Disney that no one wants to risk it and watch again another character ruined by the studio that only cares about money. also the 4th part was indicative that there nothing else to add to Indy’s jorney. so why bother at all going and paying to watch this movie?
All that budget spent on effects and almost none on script smh
It was great to see prime Indiana Jones again, of course once more in an impossible situation, about to be hanged in the first minute of a movie while things explode around him. LOL!!!
If you listen to the music played in the opening with younger indy, you can hear old sountracks for example from last crusade the theme of the tank fight. I was in tears when i heard it for the first time
Yep I noticed but I was not impressed by this movie at all, it’s the worst one out of the series
The best thing about earlier Indy moves was real stunts not unbelievable CGI overkill and green screens. The movie demanded viewers to suspend belief beyond reason. CGI and a boring script buried this flick.
I wish for a complete movie with the younger Indy. The feeling in the movie was amazing. Just like the old times ❤
"presenting A adventure", what's up the Americans and not knowing when to use "A" and "An", come on, it's called AN adventure, cause the following word after AN starts with a vocal letter, in this cause Adventure, A, so embarrassing and annoying.
Yes, but stop using the word amazing every Tom Dick and Harry out there uses the word amazing it needs to be put on the shelf for good, use another word
@@ncard00 stop with your spam
This is the best movie he made,I love all his movies people say it was no good,but it was amazing ,in his movies he had different whips and hats,so I brought a hat whip and coat ,cost a lot but worth it
Are you kidding me? It’s the worst one he made!
For Ford, only his reflection has changed..apart for this, he still has that middle aged energy in full.
The movie was great. Thank's for that and Seeing young Harisson Ford again was magical. We want more Indian Jones
I’ve become mixed on de-aging as this film and The Irishman made me realize that there are more things to consider when it comes to de-aging as you not only need to make your actor look young, but make them also sound, move and feel as young as they look. Now I’m split on casting younger actors or de-aging them, or a third one where you cast young actors and deepfake them with the original actors face
I liked the sequence but his face got so blurred out for me it was hard to look at sometimes. I actually like most of the movie more after the opening scene.
@@mearndt1The CG for me either looked perfect, like a PS3 cutscene, or like a cutout
I didn't think DoD had any issues with Indy's movement in the same way Irishman had with De Niro tbh
@@marthastubbs8321 That is true
@@marthastubbs8321 Indy's movements were way better yes than in the Irishman but Indy's face to me was very badly done during some of the action scenes in the beginning.
This may have not been the greatest way to close the franchise, or the best movie... but it was really good, enjoyable and ofc, that first scene was AMAZING!, better that the Star Wars or Jurassic World ending, i really liked this movie.
i loved the movie
im sad it didnt make enough money
The audacity to say this looks like the original films after shooting it on digital. 🤮
kathleen kennedy , no thanks
Nothing wrong with this movie
Im 26, i grew up with the original 3 due to my father been in his teens when the films came out, honestly my favourite adventure films truly in love with these films
i m sad for the bad box office result !! :-( i love this movie but , work only for "boomers and 70-80's teenager ?!? new generation is blazed, too more choice kill the choice !!!! and make a real ARTISTIC MASTERPIECE WORK just a fastfood kleenex for a POOE consumable people .... barbie exemple :(
i don't care what anybody says, i loved every indiana jones movie
The movie as a whole I thought was fairly good, not that great but fairly good. But the beginning sequence was amazing, I absolutely loved that part!
To improve this franchise, 1) remove Kathleen Kennedy. 2) recast someone talented and in like with Ford. 3) Dive into Jones’ history for new stories. 4) Have someone passionate about the franchise work this. Spielberg wanted to do a James Bond style movie and Lucas wanted to model it after serials from the 30s & 40s. The documentaries for filming these movies were so great!
why this movie was flop? IDC any critics said but I love this indy movie
That's the question isn't it? The people that have seen it for the most part love it. Many reasons, I think... A large portion of people were dissuaded from seeing it because of certain Internet personalities like DVD Overlord that spread false information about movies. None of the things that person said turned out to be true. But he wasn't the only one that said anything untrue that hurt the box office. There is also the fact that ticket prices have gone up and people are hesitant to spend money on movie theaters UNLESS they are assured it will be a fun time. They decide to see fewer films in theaters. Then there are the people that still feel getting sick from the virus by being in public. I still seeing people wearing masks.
This Indiana Jones movie was ok, but it could've been better. I did like the opening but there was way too much CG going on, especially the train sequence. His younger self did look really good at times, and some looked off at times.
But throughout the movie the CG almost ruined it. There needed to be more practical effects. The first three Indiana Jones had little CG and was mostly practical which made them badass.
But this new IJ movie was more like a 6.5 out of 10
I think less CGI is more. I thought the movie was good maybe slightly better than the crystal skull. The budget 's these movies have now they have to make a billion dollars to be profitable.
Cgi was good but i think the hair was too dark. Should have been light brown with speckles of grey in it at 45
The film is decent and it serves quite excellent as a reference to all the previous ones! I've seen it twice in the cinema! We should be grateful to Harrison Ford for returning back as Indiana Jones for the very final time...!! In many aspects it is quite better than the "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". An obvious downside: his age! Ford he is visibly older, because.... well, he is!! There's a gap of 15 years between the two films!! Nevertheless, he doesn't seem as an ordinary 80 years old person. He's quite fit and in shape, thus he's portraying the character with success, humor and decency!!!
I really enjoyed it, and he was so good at his age as Indy again. I can't wait to own it.
Ok, so I saw this two days before you guys in the states saw it. (28th day, here in Finland) and I have to say that the movie started fuckin awesome! But then... omfg.. They ruined it..
I freaking knew that was the Wilhelm scream!
The 10 minute opening scene with a young Indy was the best part of the movie, the de-aging is the best i've seen so far in movies. The rest of the movie was crap...big disappointment..box office takings reflects that
How about crafting the voice of someone who sounds more like a younger indie and not the totally mismatched 80 yr old voice that took me out of the movie immediately.
Also get a body match much closer than what they chose.
Yikes.
Indiana Jones was born on July 1st, 1899; so he was 45 years old in Dial of Destiny.
The beginning sequence was definitely the best part of the film. The cgi on Harrison to make him younger looked good, I just wish they would have tweaked his voice to give him a younger Harrison voice too.
I like to give all the credit to George lucas and the rest of the crew for working very hard on Indy . The effects were absolutely incredible. The cgi of seeing young Indy was so breathtaking. George lucas deserves the credit for that
George Lucas wasn’t involved in this film at all lol, what are you talking about? He was executive producer, which is another way of saying he made money on it, but had nothing to do with the creation process at all.
This isn’t me trying to be a dick mind you, I’m literally just saying Lucas and Spielberg both had nothing to do with the film at all.
Bruah, if you’re going to post total garbage to earn you $, at least learn who the real producers are. GL and SS had NOTHING to do with this abomination.
The beginning was the only good part. You could just turn it off after that and not see the destruction of his character the rest of the movie
I love it when people say 'i don't care what people think' but then give their opinion like it matters to others! 😂
I enjoyed the movie. I love the beginning sequence. Amazing. A lot better then Crystal Skull. Should of been the box office hit it never was.
Unfortunately, this is about as much of this movie I'm likely to watch. Sorry Indy.
Looks great, but this movie destroyed his character a few story. Movie wasn't bad, but it was FAR from good. KOTCS was way better, and that's saying something
I agree that the first half of Skull was far better. But still significantly lower than the trilogy
This film more than made up for Crystal Skulls, and had a great villain played by a terrific actor, and the de-aging was amazing. I loved this movie! It was a proper send off to the character and franchise. Not to mention, the adventure, which is the most important part, was great! They nailed it!
if you leave 3/4 of the way to the end, silly ending somewhat ruined the film. first act the best.
Nah Crystal Skull was better and had a WAY better ending.
@@manuelk1853agreed!
Out of all the Indiana Jones movies this is the worst one. And it dragged on for too long even kingdom of the crystal skull was better than this.
And please, stop using the word amazing, it’s been overused
It was a great film despite the amount of crap it gets. I thoroughly enjoyed it and appreciate the effort put into it
The audience score on RT is 88 percent. IF I were to take that face value more people loved it than not. The criticial score is 69 arrogate which is a fresh film on the site, again not a mark that shows it's terrible. So, I honestly don't get where these haters actually are. Everyone I know liked it and they did not like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull much. It seems the haters mostly exist on the internet. Myself, I am not saying it was a perfect movie, but I found it enjoyable, and it felt like Indy to me. It was a good way to end it.
I want to see more behind the scenes of Ford plying young Indy.
Seeing this makes me want to see Dial of Destiny even more- fuck the naysayers, they are not really Indy fans.
Sad that with all this talent, they couldn't make a good movie. 😥
See yourself out.
Apart of me wishes the flashback scenes were done with a different actor. Same build, maybe someone who's good at doing a Harrison Ford impression, dress him up and just film him in shadows and use the night time setting to mask the actor underneath maybe digital enhancing points where you can maybe see the actors face and use the de-aging tech as a tool rather than the main thing
I understand that'll take some people out of the movie, but I'd prefer it over the uncanny Valley that was a de-aged Harrison. I just don't think the tech is there yet for scenes that last more than 2-3 minutes
Anthony Ingruber looks a lot like a younger Harrison Ford and could have pulled it off assuming his acting has improved. He played a younger version of Harrison Ford's character in Age of Adeline already.
If only the story did not suck. Should have deaged him and just do Fate of Atlantis.
Young indy looked amazingly realistic..... Scorssese should have used the same team
Ke Huy Quan should've been in this movie.