Don't you mean Magnus can't be paying Peter enough? Anyway, I agree with the sentiment. What a privilege to get 30 minutes of in depth analysis of the Grunfeld by probably the worlds leading Grunfeld expert, of a game played by a WC seemingly at the height of his powers. Honestly, I still don't really see what Grischuk did that was so bad - seems like sorcery to me.
@@thisnicklldo It's a tempo loss; he moves the rook on f8 in to protecc the knight on d7, when the further progression will definitely force the other rook on a8 to move anyway, it would have been far more efficient to use that forced move to protect the knight
@ zorrderschnitter2 Yes, that's what Svidler said. I still don't see how it became the losing move really. That is, I see what Carlsen played, and Grischuk played, and Svidlers explanation. But there are tens of thousands of following variations and it's just not obvious to me that they are all winning for white. But then I make no claims to any great expertise.
These videos are really a treasure. Can you imagine getting such amazing, extended analysis from such a strong player for free online? It's just unbelievable! Thank you Jan and Peter!
@@zebra3stripes wow, another lame comment to question credibility of AI teams.. what will chess players say on some stupid comment like this. this will probably puzzled them and they will respond. we need responds. we need a LOT of human responds. to teach our lame AI bots.. but don't worry if they will get it that our lame AI commenting, out boss will take care of it and respond like a real human authority should do. ok, let's see what will happen next with this semi AI bizarreness..:P
We live in the Golden Age of chess. The 80s/90s with the 2 Ks was pretty good from a chess sense, but to have so much MEGA high level content on a daily basis... I used to look forward to one Timman analysis in the next NiC, now you can just binge-watch Svidler, Grishuk and Carlsen. I love it! Thanks Peter and chess24!
Always love the depth of analysis that Peter provides. He keeps it simple enough that mortals understand and can keep up but with enough depth that more advanced players don't get bored.
I would love to speak English like he does. Only improvement could be silent pauses instead of "r". And I think that phrase "making argument for" is a witty idea, but inappropriate to use on constant bases.
Peter, thank you so much for the extensive analysis of this Gruenfeld line! I play it myself with white and often get into trouble against really strong players. I knew you can't pass by the game where you favourite opening is somehow beaten :)
They might as well give Magnus the trophy at the opening ceremony. He just doesn't lose this year and even when he can't quite find the win he can still boost his confidence with a swift blitz annihilation and get almost all the points anyway.
4:03 I don't quite get the implication. "And here Alexander surprised his opponent by playing b7-b5. A move that is extremely rare... recently played online by Christian Chirila, who is Fabiano Caruana's second. So you could make some inferences from that." I'm totally in the dark here. Is he implying that Caruana's team would pass on some prep lines to other players facing Carlsen? Or what would be the inference to be made?
Thanks for the great analysis. I would recommend keeping these reviews shorter. The many sidelines that according to engine looses more slowly are not really necessary. I think 10-15 min is optimal for a recap, max 20 minutes.
Well, if it is obligatory it is obligatory. So thus you gotta cover it. I think most people, and you too, know you like to throw out completely unnecessary words but they gotta make sense Peter. Common now.
@@25nisserIgnoring is amazing historical standard of play, Grischuk is extremely high rated still. It's a bit shocking that am elite player of this calibre and legacy is so far from Magnus currently. I may as well say how far Magnus is from everyone but this game was Grischuk's and he has accomplished quite a lot.
I couldn't stand the terrible accent. Why doesn't he do it in Spanish? I hope someone else will cover this game. It's really annoying to listen to. Without sound it is kind of meaningless, but much more pleasant.
No, Gabriel is Spanish. Look it up. I believe Peter is Russian, but his English is much better. Why would you bring Peter up? It's like saying the sun is round... Keep to the subject, please
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Jan can't possibly be paying Peter enough for this. Peter you're a legend and a gentleman.👍
Yes Peter is a legend and a gentleman :)
Don't you mean Magnus can't be paying Peter enough? Anyway, I agree with the sentiment. What a privilege to get 30 minutes of in depth analysis of the Grunfeld by probably the worlds leading Grunfeld expert, of a game played by a WC seemingly at the height of his powers. Honestly, I still don't really see what Grischuk did that was so bad - seems like sorcery to me.
@@thisnicklldo It's a tempo loss; he moves the rook on f8 in to protecc the knight on d7, when the further progression will definitely force the other rook on a8 to move anyway, it would have been far more efficient to use that forced move to protect the knight
@ zorrderschnitter2 Yes, that's what Svidler said. I still don't see how it became the losing move really. That is, I see what Carlsen played, and Grischuk played, and Svidlers explanation. But there are tens of thousands of following variations and it's just not obvious to me that they are all winning for white. But then I make no claims to any great expertise.
These videos are really a treasure. Can you imagine getting such amazing, extended analysis from such a strong player for free online? It's just unbelievable! Thank you Jan and Peter!
@@drnike591 Idiotic comment. I wonder who make this kind of AI bots with such a pathetic comment results?!
Btw, great chess analysis by Peter!
Jan and Peter are fantastic, so much better than Cindy and Bobby but not quite as good as Marcia and Greg.
@@zebra3stripes wow, another lame comment to question credibility of AI teams..
what will chess players say on some stupid comment like this. this will probably puzzled them and they will respond. we need responds. we need a LOT of human responds. to teach our lame AI bots..
but don't worry if they will get it that our lame AI commenting, out boss will take care of it and respond like a real human authority should do.
ok, let's see what will happen next with this semi AI bizarreness..:P
@@oxiigen Duuuuuuude, my comment was a compliment followed by a silly reference to the Brady Bunch. Wrong number.
Welcome to 2019 :)
I feel like theres some quote waiting to be said about magnus along the lines of:
"The sooner Magnus is out book, the worse you're off."
Which only shows he plays chess and not only repeating computer lines!
We live in the Golden Age of chess. The 80s/90s with the 2 Ks was pretty good from a chess sense, but to have so much MEGA high level content on a daily basis... I used to look forward to one Timman analysis in the next NiC, now you can just binge-watch Svidler, Grishuk and Carlsen.
I love it! Thanks Peter and chess24!
Guilty
Always love the depth of analysis that Peter provides. He keeps it simple enough that mortals understand and can keep up but with enough depth that more advanced players don't get bored.
Many thanks Peter & Chess24, last videos were excellent as always, looking forward to watching this one.
He has such a clean english. As a non native english speaker i can understand him much easier than many native speakers.
I would love to speak English like he does. Only improvement could be silent pauses instead of "r". And I think that phrase "making argument for" is a witty idea, but inappropriate to use on constant bases.
@@strong8705 The phrase is perfectly logical and appropriate in most scenarios, but yes, it does sound rather odd when used constantly :P
When I saw starting this Grünfeld I thought _Tonight with Peter!_
Always looking forward to your analysis
Holy shit what a game. The position around 22:00 to 23:00 is just insane, love Grunfeld, love Mr. Svidler
These videos by Peter are always a treat
Peter, thank you so much for the extensive analysis of this Gruenfeld line! I play it myself with white and often get into trouble against really strong players. I knew you can't pass by the game where you favourite opening is somehow beaten :)
This analysis was really good, I just Love Peter
Fantastic Analysis.
Always a pleasure to review a game with Peter Svidler. Love this guy.
They might as well give Magnus the trophy at the opening ceremony. He just doesn't lose this year and even when he can't quite find the win he can still boost his confidence with a swift blitz annihilation and get almost all the points anyway.
Thank you Peter for another insightful analysis of a complicated game.
Very instructive!
Good game vs Grichuk and propelled Magnus to the top! Nice for the champ. Good coverage too. Thx.
peter you are just amazing 😍
Great analysis
Impressive game and impressive analysis
Audio for this video and earlier is low I think. Anyway always a good analysis by PS
28:39 Bc7 it will good or not?
Svidler keep at it my friend.
hello again, kind Peter
4:03 I don't quite get the implication. "And here Alexander surprised his opponent by playing b7-b5. A move that is extremely rare... recently played online by Christian Chirila, who is Fabiano Caruana's second. So you could make some inferences from that."
I'm totally in the dark here. Is he implying that Caruana's team would pass on some prep lines to other players facing Carlsen? Or what would be the inference to be made?
He is saying that the lne is extremely rare, despiite its recent use by Caruana's second. My question is: Could they be lovers?
@@25nisser My question would be: Could your trolling be at least funny? The answer is yes. Try harder, boring troll. You can do it!
@@Pacalolo04 Don't feed the troll, dude!
@@25nisser First, too basic, then too cliché.
After watching this whole video I've come to the conclusion that Grischuk should have played a king's Indian .
Maybe 3/4 each for a classical draw and only 1/2 for the armagedon
Thanks for the great analysis. I would recommend keeping these reviews shorter. The many sidelines that according to engine looses more slowly are not really necessary. I think 10-15 min is optimal for a recap, max 20 minutes.
Peter is unsurpassed as a chess commentator.
Well, if it is obligatory it is obligatory.
So thus you gotta cover it.
I think most people, and you too, know you like to throw out completely unnecessary words but they gotta make sense Peter. Common now.
This is extremely disconcerting seeing Magnus be 100 points above Grischuk, Grischuk!!
Better take your pills.
In your case the disconcern has nothing to do with chess. Grischuk is very very old.
@@25nisserIgnoring is amazing historical standard of play, Grischuk is extremely high rated still. It's a bit shocking that am elite player of this calibre and legacy is so far from Magnus currently. I may as well say how far Magnus is from everyone but this game was Grischuk's and he has accomplished quite a lot.
every sentence 5 times "uh"
I couldn't stand the terrible accent. Why doesn't he do it in Spanish? I hope someone else will cover this game. It's really annoying to listen to. Without sound it is kind of meaningless, but much more pleasant.
Peter isn't a native Spanish speaker....he is one of the best players in the world and happens to speak English more than service ably.
No, Gabriel is Spanish. Look it up. I believe Peter is Russian, but his English is much better. Why would you bring Peter up? It's like saying the sun is round... Keep to the subject, please
25nisser, dude you're posting this comment under a Peter Svidler video.
Possibly a mistake?
@@jasondoe2596 Don't feed the troll any further.
@@jasondoe2596 I realize. Probably the site throwing me around.